Is there an ideology more laughable than communism?

Is there an ideology more laughable than communism?

Other urls found in this thread:

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/170931
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Radical centrism, ancap, ancom, tribalism, minarchism, and bogdanite ascension.

Modern Day Feminism

Can you give me a quick rundown on ascension?

It's like being a borg in a hivemind. You're connected up wirelessly to the bogmind.

Yes, your country's and mine

Atheism+

Anarchism

Nazism...

Trickle down economics

Alt-right neofascism.

/thread

Zionism

>one-line
>writing prompt

>Liberalism
>Anarchism

Anarcho capitalism (as they call it, but reality is it's called Plutocracy), Theocracy.

Anarcho communism.

Anarcho communism is redudant. Communism IS anarchy with communal ownership of production. It's just every time they try to implement it they never get past the pure Socialist State (and state owned production) phase that's meant to be a transition period.

Communism doesn't work even though it's never been tried because once a state gets full socialist power it never wants to let go and disband as its supposed to.

>A group of men who genocided their own people, violated an innumerable amount of human rights, gulaged and imprisoned any and all dissenters in their countries, and did not allow for free speech or expression that challenged them or their "perfect" ideology

>See an "kooky guys with different ideas" to edgy teens

Seriously, 2 of these fuckers are worse than hitler in innocent kill counts, and the other two are just as bad.

Marx only gets a pass as being just the idealist fucker who came up with the idea, but the thought that anyone would wear this stuff (seen mutiple times through high school and university) just baffles me.

What is someone made a shirt with Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, and Pinochet in slick tailored suits that read "Its good to be Fachionable"

I know, and it always has and always will remain state capitalist at the top. They don't even believe in their own shit at the top, it's just about becoming the new elite and profiting like a king.

>It's good to be Facionable
It is a pretty cute phrase.

Honest question Sup Forums, would you buy this shirt and wear it if you wouldn't get socially ostracize you?

I need a drawfag or Photoshop wizard to make this a reality yesterday

Anarcho-capitalism or anarcho-communism, but thats about it

Civic nationalism

lol

Anarcho-primitivism, Nazi satanism, anarcho-egoism, National Bolshevism, Communo-Capitalism and anarcho-authoritarianism are the most retarded ones I can think of

Mutualism and syndicalism.

right there that is an 'animal' problem. You will never have a society like that because we flourished through competition and cooperation.

Communism will happen again as it's our only logical conclusion.

Good luck fighting the inevitable

Anarcho-anything. Like how the fuck are you even meant to enforce your ideology without any power structure.
I can kinda see an ancap society working but it would be like living in the middle of some shithole in Africa

Yeah, capitalistic democracy, an ideology where you have a very small government that doesn't even collects enough tax to build borders or to sort people by towns, so it just stops caring and throws everybody together until they extinct each other into brown melting pot.

The only socialist countries left on Earth are either poor as dirt, transitioning to capitalism, or about to collapse.

>Yeah, capitalistic democracy, an ideology where you have a very small government that doesn't even collects enough tax to build borders or to sort people by towns, so it just stops caring and throws everybody together until they extinct each other into brown melting pot.
That sounds more like the "social democracies" of today than any libertarian/minarchist idea of a small government.

You shitlibs realize that's just a strawman created by your predecessors, right? Classic example of fake news.

Social democracy can't have extra rich people who import workers just to benefit themselves, that goes against everything social, community or democracy. If you don't decide if migrants get imported, don't decide how much salary somebody has, then it's hardly social or democracy. But we have people who call themselves that, like we have niggers with swastika.

anarco-communism is even stupider than normal communism.

.. see it's not "Anarcho-communism" it's just Communism. The Anarchy is a part of it. What you call "Communism" that involves state ownership is Socialism, not Communism.

In a way, you could consider Communism "Anarcho-Socialism"

Anarcho-primitivism

Generally every Anarchistic theory, which Communism is too.

Anarchism has no government. Communism has big government. How did you finish kindergarten?

>Social democracy can't have extra rich people who import workers just to benefit themselves
Well then WTF is going on in Sweden?

>If you don't decide if migrants get imported
Guarding borders and handling immigration is generally regarded as one of the few legitimate functions of government in libertarian and minarchist ideologies.

>don't decide how much salary somebody has
Why would you have the government decide how much salary someone gets? That just seems like a recipe for typical socialistic failure.

Anarchism

I'll tell you what's laughable. Having a TV license.

Brits, sign this petition to abolish the requirement of a TV license:

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/170931

Look American, there's a difference between freedom and freedom of expression. You know freedom of expression you have in USA, where you can be as stupid as you want in public, but you don't have freedom. Like there is a very big difference between Social Democratic party and Social Democratic system. How do you retards of USA manage to pee in toilet if you think that electing a political party called Social Democrats will instantly rewrite 100000 laws into Social Democracy and then electing Green party will instantly make all forests exist again that were cut down in 200 years. Really take your pills retard.

Communism has no government, Socialism has a big government.

The socialist phase of a "Communist" country is meant to get people used to the idea of no private property or private ownership. During this Socialist phase the government owns everything, and utilizes a command economy.

Ultimately no nation will ever get past that part, even if they try again. Communism is unachievable BECAUSE it is a form of anarchy, and ESPECIALLY because it involves creating an EXTREMELY powerful state to run things in transition that doesn't want to let go of power.

Supporting jewish sodomite pedophiles is at least equally as bad

Capitalism

Well there's not really a truly free country left on earth, but America probably gets the closest to that goal. We still have a long way to go though, and as long as we can avoid going the way of Europe we should be fine.

The ancaps are pretty stupid with their redundant ideology.

Ethnic Nationalism

Primitivism is hilarious, though.

Communism is just kind of sad.

Also
>be Sup Forums
>hate globalism
>be pro capitalism

oooh sweet irony

Private company doesn't means native company, it just means anybody can buy it, especially foreigners if you have an open free trade system.

>believes in natural human rights
>fash
wew lad

Actually falling for this Jewish meme is worse than creating it to destroy the goyim.

IF HITLER WON WW2

No USSR (the Soviet government murdered millions of its own people during its 70 year reign)

No cold war (without the USSR)

No Communist Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain (when WW2 ended, Eastern Europe fell to Communism)

No Red China and Mao's subsequent killing of 40-60 million Chinese (the USSR created favorable conditions for Mao's Communists)

No Communist North Vietnam (both the Soviet Union and Red China aided Ho Chi Minh)

No Communist Cambodia and Pol Pot's slaughter of 2,000,000 Cambodians (Red China aided Pol Pot)

No dividing Korea into North Korea and South Korea (the Allies split Korea after WW2 ended with North Korea becoming Communist)

No Communist Cuba and no Communism anywhere (Hitler was the world's most fervent anti-Communist)

Liberalism and multiculturalism wouldn't dominate Western ethos (both are Jewish creations and both have always been heavily promoted by Jews)

No Cultural Marxism and no political correctness (these are social engineering tools which came out of the Jewish think tank known as the Frankfurt School)

No third world immigration into Western nations (Jews wouldn't be in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws)

No depraved filth on TV, in movies, etc. (because Jews wouldn't run Hollywood)

No widespread pornography (Jewish lawyers and Jewish activists were the main challengers of anti-obscenity laws, under the guise of "freedom of speech")

There would still be prayer in public schools (Jewish lawyers were instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of so-called "separation of church and state")

No radical feminist movement (Jews such as Betty Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem were the key drivers of radical feminism)

No Israel and the problems it has brought the US, and the immeasurable misery it has wrought on Palestinians

*Full Must-Read Article: immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/2011/10/if-hitler-won-world-war-ii-we-would.html

Freedom can't be achieved, since other man's freedom is your pet body in cage.

Doesn't get much more globalist than wanting to destroy all nation-states and form a global government/society.

Yes. Canadianism.

>since other man's freedom is your pet body in cage
Only with "positive liberty", as it's called. "Negative liberty" just gives you the freedom to do stuff, but not freedom "from" stuff like positive liberty espouses.

I'm an anarcho-monarchist. Ask me anything

You clearly don't understand capitalism, Giuseppe.

actual Marxism involves dissolution of the state and collective ownership in anarchy.

I suppose you'd actually have to read Marx to understand.

is that a real thing or are you meming

It's all well and good to say that certain bad things wouldn't have happened, but the problem with chaos theory is that you can't exactly know what other bad things might have happened either.

Tell us more about your specific, infallible brand of Communism

Marxism and fascism isn't a system, it's description of human behavior/environment.

I'm meming but it's a real ideology that exists, look it up on google

I think we have different ideas about what a "state" is.

Huh, I'm a finance student, but anyway
>low cost labour to save on production
>more profit for companies

>the whole world is a potential consumer
>this means selling more, so more profit

>no border taxes
>meaning a more free market

>resources to take from underdeveloped countries where they are cheaper
>basically what Americans do when they "export democracy"

Yeah, literally what America has tried to do since the last century.

I never said I was fascist, I'm just saying that those commie fucks are no better than hitler in terms of voiding natural and human rights, but yet for some fucking reason our society deal with them so daintily while hitler is so taboo you'd be crucified for having him on you no matter how ironic or sarcastic the image is.

If you have any kind of rules everybody follows, then you gotta have a centralized system that everybody follows aka government aka state. Total freedom isn't peace and love and you doing whatever you want, only you doing whatever you can.

>but yet for some fucking reason our society deal with them so daintily while hitler is so taboo you'd be crucified for having him on you
Oh jee, I wonder (((who))) could be responsible for that?

It's the one Marx actually wrote about, what is actual communism. Soviets altered the philosophy. Note that the USSR was always called the Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.

Not Union of Soviet COMMUNIST Republics.

EITHER WAY. Communism does not work, I'm just correcting on the definition.

you have to join The Bogdanoff Commission
you also have to study Post-Anabelian Froeboid Geometrics for 2 years to even begin ascension

>Yeah, literally what America has tried to do since the last century.
Eh, it's been on and off between the presidents. Woodrow Wilson and FDR were the two biggest supporters of globalism, but we've also had men like Calvin Coolidge and now Donald Trump here to oppose it.

A finance student that doesn't like capitalism? I'm an accounting graduate, I find that hard to buy. All good points though, but obviously capitalism is not inherently globalist.

I'm not advocating for anarchy, nor am I saying absolute freedom is possible or desired. But I do think that most freedoms are a good thing to have, and that the United States is one of the most free countries on Earth, although we could certainly be doing better right now.

fascionable

anarcho-fascism

Capitalism = i sell to the highest bidder. It's not inherently globalist, but it can't be anything else on long term. You will sooner or later sell it to globalist, if not sooner than when you are old or dead.

You can't be free, since if not government, then individuals will try to impose their rules on you. Every person you come in contact with, even if it's your wife will force you to follow some rules, therefore you can't be free around people. The closest to freedom you can get is to move in middle of jungle and live away from people, but even there the animals will force you to not be free, the stumbling rock under your feet preventing you freedom, your hunger forcing you to do something you don't want. Freedom is an silly concept.

democracy

>Every person you come in contact with, even if it's your wife will force you to follow some rules, therefore you can't be free around people.
But as long as I have the freedom to choose not to follow their rules or associate with them then I'm still free.

Capitalism and Globalism

God damned jews and their agendas

You know how successful relationship between man/woman or friends is made? You needing to follow some of their rules. If you just don't follow any rules they will leave. Relationship is really nothing else than getting attention from other person and that attention is rules based. You do something, you know you have to do, that feeds the ego of another person and makes them happy. If you don't follow their rules and they don't feel you give them attention enough, you have no relationship.

Fuck off roach

Liberals that think socialism doesn't lead to communism.

You can't be right. He already gave a one liner and the other guy said /thread. That means he wins.

Anything starting with "Anarcho-"

Centrism is pretty faggy.
They act like women.
No strong stances, thinks everything can be settled with a little sympathy.
They're straight up homosexuals, even if they think they're not, they are.

here is the bogdanoff commission:
fb dot com slash groups slash 1031250890352461

Fascism

Fascism is equally funny.

Civic Nationalism

I can always choose not to have those relationships. The whole idea about the libertarian ideals of freedom isn't that you can do literally anything, but that you have the freedom to do what you want with what you own, so long as that doesn't infringe upon others right to their property. I don't have the right to a relationship with a woman, but I do have the right of freedom of association.

communism isn't really laughable

Ancaps. At least communists have a track record with some achievements, though it has a lot of atrocities as well.

>radical centrism


Eh, it's hard to say who's right or wrong.