Question pol...

Question pol. I hear a lot that the main reason America cant have socialism and why countries like Sweden norway etc work is because theyre ethnically homogenous/white. Why is that a reason why it works? Why does a country need to be ethnically white for it to work?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states
macaulay.cuny.edu/eportfolios/benediktsson2013/files/2013/04/Putnam.pdf
archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/30/populations-with-big-governments-tend-to-be-happier-if-and-only-if-they-are-smart/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Nah, niggaz' racism makes that shit complicated is what it is. it can be done, doe.

No.

There are no white socialist states.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states

Sharing is fine, being forced to share is not.

It doesn't however the population is huge compared to the Nordic country's.

I need a kidney OP. You'd better be willing to share yours or I'll have the cops come.

It's not sharing if you don't have an option not to.

Socialism: The radical idea of compulsory sharing, comrade.

Why would I bust my ass working so some nigger can smoke weed all day waiting for my money to come in the mail

>> forced sharing
>> theft

Ok goy

socialism: the radical idea of sharing: at gunpoint.

Cuz lazy pieces of shit will suck the working population.

We can't have socialism because:

1) It's degenerate
2) Our expenditure and military strength makes Euro-socialism possible in the first place.

...

That would explain why you guys let your wives get fucked by other men

The radical idea of sharing someone else's property against their will*

Socialism: the radical idea of forcing people to share.

WRONG!

>le socialism meme

Sorry but scandinavia and bernie sanders are not socialist.

FREE SHIT
FREE SHIT
FREE SHIT

Socialism: The radical idea of taking from some to give to others by force

Homogeneity radically increases social trust in human communities and has been shown to drastically increase faith in governments ruling over homogeneous populations. This is especially necessary in a system in which the government provides a large number of services, since too low of social trust will quickly bloat to an unbearably large and inefficient government with massive amounts of bureacracy, needed notarization, etc. for the government to work to compensate for the decreased levels of social trust which would allow the machinery of government to work normally and intuitively without much interference in a high trust society.

Look up Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century by Robert Putnam.

macaulay.cuny.edu/eportfolios/benediktsson2013/files/2013/04/Putnam.pdf
archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/30/populations-with-big-governments-tend-to-be-happier-if-and-only-if-they-are-smart/

True. Sharing with people who have nothing to share is retarded. Theyve always been taking and now theyre giving.

>Socialism: the radical idea of stealing from others

At least a nigger with a Saturday night special has the balls to go do it himself, using the ballot box to loot from your neighbors is literally sub-nigger tier pathetic.

>muh roads
I'm all about productive labor for the good of all, but stealing from Mike to put food in JaMarques' mouth because he can't be bothered to work isn't productive, it's counterproductive and deleterious to society because it discourages labor force participants.

>Why is that a reason why it works?

because white societies generally have higher community trust, higher cohesion, lower levels of crime, better sense of duty, etc

apart from that:
norway "socialism" works because they have a tiny population sitting on giant oil reserves which make them rich beyond belief. with such an overflow of resources and capital, it's really damn hard to fuck shit up (although venezuela still manages to do so)
and if you think sweden "works" then you are insane. literally headed for third world country status.

>the radical idea of forcing farmers to sell their lands and replace farmhands with 3rd world urbanites

ftfy

Venezuela's oil is much shittier than Norway's and needs extensive refining making it worth much less and they also aren't in NATO to receive a ton of indirect support from America which opens them up to fund other stuff with the extra money they don't have to spend and they also aren't hostile to the US politically and don't try to get around the petrodollar with direct bargaining so the US and its global financial capitalist puppet organizations don't use the forces of global capitalism to work together against it and fuck it over.

If you had to share property with your family, and your closest friends, that would be pretty manageable, right?

Some families de facto function around the "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" principle.

Now imagine having to share property with some completely random people - not so manageable.