Is this 4d chess or is he just a big fucking liar?

Is this 4d chess or is he just a big fucking liar?

We have to say whatever we have to to make sure that people fall in line vis a vis cracking down on the nonwhites

A percent graph when we have a rapid rising population.

Also same polls that put Clinton at 99%? How can anyone trust a poll or graph now?

Also that says esitmate. You don't have to estimate documented crime. It's been documented.

>Is this 4d chess or is he just a big fucking liar?
Yes.

First they say there is lots of crime reason why they need to take our guns and now they are saying there is no crime

in the case with maryland they aren't even restricting the guns that cause the most crime, handguns.

Violent crime is down nationwide, but in Chicago and a few other high profile communities it is definitely on the rise.

Chicago still has a long way to go to catch up to the murder rate they had in the 80s and 90s, but they are well on their way.

Until they invent a cure for blackness the violent crime rate cannot help but increase in urban areas.

Ask about the crime rates in Chicago and other Democratic cities. That's why Trump keeps mentioning "inner cities".

Ask about the color and race of the victims of said crimes.

is the effects of abortion finally being nullified in these places?

MSM is still relying heavily on polls, polls are still the gospel

NOBODY CARES OR REMEMBERS 1993.

Putting it on a graph is meaningless with regard to public perception or judging the present trends.

OP, this is from Pew Research. The moment you invalidate this study is the moment you'll have to question their study on Muslims.

So, drop the talk of 4D chess. There is only the True and the False, and we had better figure out which of these this article is and draw conclusions from there.

the only important poll

It just tells me how much people trust messengers, not the truth of the message.

So, just lie to people, basically? Sure, lets just dump Truth to get people to do whatever we want. Thats not bad at all man.

This is what old liberal attacks on absolute truths get you. Dangerous morons.

>the truth of the message
who decides that from your perspective?

> liberals whine about crime, especially gun crime
> activate their knee-jerk reactions
> they make themselves look dumb

Nobody. It outs itself.
Theres no point in distrusting the media if your solution is to just take what some other guy says on faith, just because he distrusts the media.
Otherwise, Its just another side of the trust and believe coin.

There are two parts to this:

1) While violent crime is down, internet usage is way up. It's objectively true that there's way less crime per capita in the US than a few decades ago. It's also objectively true that every citizen now sees a catalogue of all the crime due to the proliferation of information. So most people felt okay about it in the 90's and earlier because they didn't know it was going on. Now everyone knows everything, and seeing actual video footage of violent crime changes peoples' perspectives on the matter (which isn't necessarily a bad thing).

2) Violent crime in certain cities like Chicago are actually way up over the last few years. So people, even if they don't live in places like Chicago or Detroit or whatever, see the crime going on in cities like that and feel a deep depression over the fact that certain parts of the US are virtually interchangeable with third world countries, which makes them feel as if there's more crime everywhere (even if there's not).

...

Comparing % of what people said? Trying to understand the stupid.

>Make claim that agrees with liberal
>Include a graph
>Liberals can't read graph, but your tweet agrees with them so they use it as evidence when they need to

I guarantee you could say the same thing, but prove the opposite with a graph made in paint and liberals would use it. It's just like the cursive handwriting on the Trayvon Martin fagbook page.