If man has had multiple sex partners he's alpha, but if woman has she's a slut and used goods, why is this...

If man has had multiple sex partners he's alpha, but if woman has she's a slut and used goods, why is this? Why isn't woman who has had sex with many guys an alpha female?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0uLI6BnVh6w
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's difficult for a man to get a woman to agree to have sex with him. It's easy for a woman to get a man to agree to have sex with her. Personally, I hate whoremongers and whores equally, but I'm not going to pretend there's not a good reason why whores get more flak.

No, multiple sexpartners no matter gender isn't alpha. Its degenerate. Stop spreading degeneracy

>If man has had multiple sex partners he's alpha, but if woman has she's a slut and used goods

Right.

A key that opens any lock is a skeleton key. A lock that opens for any key is a useless lock.

what if the whore is ugly? is she better then?

Source says on any of your claims you virgin.

Give evidence to back up any of your shit

Wanting to fuck women who cant keeo legs closed

Guy finds out a 20-something lady is a virgin:
"Hmm, that's kinda sweet."

Girl finds out a 20-something guy is a virgin:
"Ahaha fucking loser no way I'd date him!"

It's woman's fault.

fpbp

It's almost like men and women have different roles and are not identical in every way???? I'm confused.

A good key opens any lock; a good lock is only opened by one key.

>wanting to eat cereal that has had a dozen dicks dipped in it

if anyone has sex before marriage, they're degenerate and have comitted a sin you pervert

>girl fucks a hundred dudes
>can't imply she might be diseased because slut shaming

>guy fucks one hooker who has fucked a hundred dudes
>omg that guy probably has aids sick fuck

Why would any self respecting man want to stick his dick in something dozens of different men were already in?

>Sup Forums never fucks

find something new to talk about

This. But it's master key, not skeleton key

Would you like a new bottle of Coke or one that has had 48 dicks in it?

>guy fucks one hooker
fucking a diseased hooker with pancake makeup because you can't talk to women is a total alpha move

It's an instinctual survival strategy to prevent the spread of STD's. Sex between men is the same.

Men don't want to raise another mans child.

Because a woman doesn't fuck, she gets fucked.

A key that opens many locks is a master key.
A lock that gets opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

Female have one womb, men have two nuts and lots of sperm. enjoy your whoring now, slut, 100 years from now you will be beat the fuck down for infidelity. mark my words,

you're an idiot and completely missed the point

Men are overly-concerned with the 'purity' and 'virginity' of women because they fear a woman with sexual knowledge.

A virgin has no frame of reference for good and bad sex - so if a man beds a virgin, he is the measuring stick. He can be good at sex or terrible at sex, but it doesn't matter because she doesn't know any better.

A woman who knows the difference between good and bad sex frightens them because they know they're terrible at it. They'd rather make women feel bad for liking sex than try to be better at it.

>one-post
>not politics
If you have serious questions about sex read Chateau Heartiste, it's a top game blog that correlates game lore with legitimate scientific findings. Five minutes of evolutionary biology males the craziest female behaviors perfectly logical.
If you have nonserious girlfriend advice babble, it goes on /adv/.

Dumbest, most feminist shitpost of the day. Congratulations

so what's the point they're both fucking disgusting situations?

Basic biology.
An alpha male can have hundreds of children.
A "alpha female" ends up being a single mom.

Females are the selective sex, males the ones who compete. Just look at peacocks.

in the words of some comedian.
>if a key opens a hundred locks, its a master key
>if a lock is opened by a hundred keys, its a shitty lock.

Aww shucks.

And this

this but mostly it's biology's fault

men are meant to impregnate as many women as possible in order to increase the amount of offspring
women can only be impregnated one at a time so they get pregnant and it's in their best interest to have their impregnator take care of them while they're otherwise useless

plus men, being the stronger sex, are relied on to take more dangerous jobs thus cutting their numbers meaning the remaining males who survived have more women to impregnate and pass down their superior survivalist seed

wrong

>alpha female
women can get pregnant once per year in any healthy way.
women cannot impregnate anyone.

a man can impregnate 20 women a day.

women and men are not the same, no matter how much brainwashing you receive.

She can be considered alpha if it makes you feel better. Sluts are alpha, doesn't mean alpha females are attractive.

Also dudes who do nothing but fuck women have issues, if you're scared of commitment you are emotionally immature.

When you a relationship with a well adjusted person it's pretty fun as long as you are well adjusted too. I don't judge sluts though, do you girl. I just don't think they are ideal. They are like used cars, they are great when you have no other option but everyone would prefer to have a new car if they have the means of getting one.

How do you do, ma'am?

>picking up the tab on a woman who gave it away for free to 25 guys before you

lol is all I can say. we are truly living in the era of the beta male.

>fear a woman with sexual knowledge
So being a loose slut?

wow you guys really are redditors

I'm sorry you're terrible at sex. Maybe you can practice with a prostitute if you're lucky enough to live in a country with legal prostitution.

Better than being Ausfailian.

leave your egalitarianism, everything will make sens
Apples are not oranges!

Even an ugly whore can still get a man to fuck her. He won't be a looker himself, but he won't mind her looks.

This, too.

A key that open multiple doors is considered great.
A keyhole that is unlocked by multiple keys is shit.

Use this in every argument and you win.

dumb newfag shill

Because a key that can open many locks is a master key, whereas a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

this dude is such a retarded cuck. it's embarrassing.

...

Because that's not the purpose of females

men aren't falling for your gobbledygook dumbshit "rationalizations" no matter how hard you try.

>fpbp

go fuck yourself

pol is misogynist. what else is new?

they want to apply old caveman rules when it's convenient and new civilized rules when it suits them.

they don't want women to enjoy modern freedoms but be traditionally bound to one male.

In reality if we went full traditional 80% of the betas on this board would not be allowed to reproduce and pass on their inferior genes

The point is that suggesting a woman who fucks a hundred dudes for free might be diseased is somehow inappropriate while suggesting some guy that pays to fuck that same broad is commonly accepted as likely diseased, but if she fucks him for free then the disease issue doesn't exist somehow.

I agree with you that fucking a hundred people is disgusting and degenerate. I think the idea that adding a money transfer to fucking somehow increases the transmission of disease is retarded. Fucking somebody who has had a hundred partners will greatly increase your chance of getting a disease, no matter if they get paid or do it for free. However, there is this notion among men and women that fucking one whore will inevitably lead to disease while fucking a common slut is somehow less likely to lead to disease.

If a key can open many locks it is a master key, but if you have a lock that can be opened by many keys you've got a shit lock

Holy shit

...

This.

These insecure little boys are afraid that the woman has been with a man with a bigger dick than them.

You guys are insecure as fuck.

People that shame whores are probably just dudes with small penises. LOL

>respectfully head twitches toward you

>0.1 U.S. Denari have been deposited into your account

S A L T Y
A
L
T
Y

being Australian is definitely better than being a woman

>trusting a whore
>raising what could be another man's kid
>picking up the tab when she's 33 and done banging around

lol.

I have no problem with a women being good as sex as you phrase it(who would?). Its just that your theory was dumb, and feminist and has nothing to do with reality. It sounds like something you might learn at the fairytale called "Gender Studies"

There never was and never will be any symmetry in gender relations. It's not nearly as hard for a mediocre female to get sex as for a mediocre male.

Men and women are different. Dick is abundant and low value. Any woman can get dick with minimal effort.

what?

based Moshu, VETO on your death.

enjoy your cats, landwhale.

It's called biology.
Men are meant to reproduce with tons of women in a short space time, that is why we got millions of sperms while you ovulate only once a month.

You don't even have such sexual desire to become an "alpha female". The only reason you'd want to have sex constantly is to confirm your rebel feminist behavior or satisfy your emotional deficits, caused pretty much probably by the lack of your dad.

It's harder to convince a woman to have sex with you than a man. Harder tasks are rewarded with more praise.

I will tell you a truth you might not like. I guess you might be a girl, and if you are. Enjoy being alone for the rest of your life. No man likes a slut, not even a betamale cuck likes a slut. We are biology programmed not to like sluts, and ideology can never change nature. So good luck with that

And another (you), Heartiste is a genius.

alpha males are not abundant, but whores are.

The purpose of having sexual intercourse varies, but in most cases, we were given the ability to reproduce through sexual reproduction. So when you have a male spreading his seed, compared to a female who is taking whatever comes across her way, and not picking her best partner, it causes a situation where you get a bunch of mongrols and shitskins all over the place, and a prime example of this is the great natior of 'Murica.

Men don't get gaping loose holes when they fuck a lot of women.

Men don't want to settle down with a woman who has had 100 dicks inside her.

Sluts don't realize this truth and break down around 30 when no-one will settle down with them.

Det er faktisk en Lapp du snakker med. Ikke forvent for mye.

You mean like this girl?

youtube.com/watch?v=0uLI6BnVh6w

I've heard people refer to her as a "player." I guess if you're ugly it makes a difference.

Anyways, this post is shit and I will report it. Nothing to do with politics, find another board to post

Oh boy look at this loaded question.

I've only seen it 100,000 times and any time I see a real person ask it I automatically know they're easily brainwashed human garbage for repeating it.

You are appealing to imaginary standards you made up. Promptly kill yourself.

Well maybe if men weren't shamed for wanting to wait until marriage, or at least until they know they love the person, it wouldn't be this way.

ouch

Sup Forums's neuroticism about being adult virgin's is 100% connected to their politics

please, "player" is a term reserved for skilled men, not loose skanks.

Because men and women have opposing sexual strategies. The same reason it's good for a sports car to go fast but not a house.

Not any woman. There is a sexual hierarchy among females too. Also their value declines much faster than males.

All of these social theories and how difficult it is for either sex to get sex may or may not be true, and I don't necessarily disagree with it. But here is the real reason for the double standard:

Women want a man that has fucked lots of other women.

Men want a woman who is still a virgin.

It is what people like you would like to think at least. Have some shekels kike

CHOOSINESS

MALE-MALE COMPETITION

LITERALLY BIOLOGY 101

This. A man who sleeps with many women is doing something difficult, because men are the sex which competes for mates. A woman who sleeps with many men is doing something easy, because women are the sex which selects for mates.

A man, from a biological perspective, who has many children [from one or more women] is genetically successful. His concern was spreading his seed.

A woman, who from a biological perspective cannot have many offspring often, and for whom until recently pregnancy could be fatal, had to be selective in her mate, to get the best quality.

TLDR: Key, lock, etc etc

It's the same across all human cultures. Female fidelity and purity is valued. At this point it really does not even matter why that happens to be the case, since it's as universal a standard as hip to waist ratio, height, facial symmetry etc.

Anyway, the reason it originally evolved to be important is that men can never be certain if the child is theirs, but they can make sure the woman stays faithful. Therefore the genes that have allowed for women to be promiscuous have been likely to be cuckolded, i.e. not propagate. The jealous genes have kept the women in control, and they've fathered their own children.

You might think it's stupid nowadays to consider virginity to be valuable, but you are a result of 4 billion years of evolution, and every cell in your body disagrees with you. Valuing female faithfulness is an intrinsic part of being a part of a dimorphic species, i.e. your cultural standards and feelings don't matter at all. We will always find young and thin virgin girls more beautiful than any other kinds. Nature says your feelings can go fuck themselves.

Well if you're a fatty like her, but you get all the dick you want because you're a rock star, doesn't that require skill?

How's this a loaded question? I'm genuinely curious, call me a retard, but I wanna know.

Nah mate, having many partners is degenerate for all.

The good old Key and the Lock comparison.

"'A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.'”

aint difficult for me bruh..

gold medal for mental redardation

christ you people are pathetic.

>How's this a loaded question?

Because it's constructed out of imaginary assertions nobody made and appeals to a double standard that does not exist. It literally constructs its own answer before the discussion even starts.