>CNN, NYT, and WP have been replaced by OANN, Breitbart, and Washington Times
>Already know Washington Times, and Brietbart are full of shit , but research what OAN is
And I find this gay little propaganda music video
youtube.com
How could Sup Forums defend this shit? Is this what you call unbias and fair media?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
The line has been redrawn. CNN NYT, etc are below the line. They certainly earned it.
So you think this shit is ok?
no, I think the WH took way too long to do it.
I mean do you support unbias media or not?
I may, Pls give some examples of unbiased media.
Fake news. This isn't the first time journalists have been kept out.
Newspapers, which cant be manipulated by emotion
this is what #realnews looks like
youtube.com
Post examples of times Brietbart have posted fake news.
Seriously I want to know if they are worth following or not.
Everything is manipulated by emotions, you fag.
KGB niggers and beta newfag cucks
This is propaganda and CNN/FOX/MSNBC somehow aren't?
compared to #fakenews
youtube.com
Dont see any of those having this type of shit
maybe if CNN didn't shit on the carpet like a bad dog they wouldn't of been replaced with other dogs that are more well behaved.
Post your OANewsfu
why do they get to be the only ones what makes them so special?
Fox has almost the exact same promo except it doesn't say MAGA
Liz Wheeler is bae.
You could add internet organizations to the same list as papers as well. Papers don't write themselves.
Funny how rational news sources dont have this masturbatory shit only far right ones
Name one rational, unbiased news source
>believing in the left-right paradigm
OAN used to be where Tomi Lahren worked.
Kinda how she got her start I guess.
Maybe they shouldnt have lied constantly and they wouldnt have been replaced? They avsolutely deserve to crash. If it was up to me, they would be arrested for spreading false informatiob too
Reuters, Associated Press, BBC, RT (lol), NPR
If I was a mod.
I'd nuke every one of you lefty faggots indefinitely
This is a CTR shill thread paid for by the Democratic party.
>How could Sup Forums defend this shit? Is this what you call unbias and fair media?
no such thing as unbiased and fair media. last election made that clear. so you only really have two options:
>media outlets who hate trump and constantly shill against him
>media outlets who love trump and constantly shill for him
now please explain to me why trump would want to support his enemies over his friends?
They never let everyone into these events, and he did allow a bunch of journals that are against him.
What makes these old cucks so special they must be allowed into every event?
I fucking love OAN. I watch that, and then switch to fox for an hour to watch Tuck, then to Rachel Maddow to watch her cry and act all smug about what Trump did that day.
Reuters is extremely biased
AP is one big press circlejerk
Big black cock
RT is somewhat acceptable
NPR is the equivalent of state run media
OAN is based
No one?
They never let everyone into gagles. There's always a pool of people they call. Irs just that these guys who had major peivileges before spicer are now treated like everyone else, and for once a president didnt invite the same "big" (not anynore) newspapers as always
Would taking out 3 more conservative newspapers and adding 3 more leftists make the views expressed by jornalists mlre representative? No.
Even Alex Jones has more viewers than CNN, theyre not even big anynore, just living off their past glory
They always post Milo articles like "geminism makes you ugly" kek
>RT
They're not bad, but don't expect them to ever criticize anything Russia ever does even if they deserve it. RT actually is state-sponsored propaganda.
>AP
An unbiased organization made up of biased individuals but yes, the most tolerable.
>BBC
>NPR
TOP FUCKING KEK
can you stfu please already
I just read that article and Milo made some solid points.
He also concluded that feminism doesn't make you ugly, being ugly makes you a feminist.