>Wow you Hicks really have no basic sense of comprehension, do ya?
I could use that very argument against you as well.
Being Indian American doesn't make you any less Indian Pajeet, way to miss the mark. For a smart guy you really aren't that smart are you. FFS why do shitskins assume that just because they are an "American" anchor baby that Americans see them as American? Never in a million years poo.
Automation
Blue collars are respected far more than indians in white countries, Singh. Time to go back to the beach for a poo poo sweetie.
Small businesses will be able to create jobs. Factories and manufacturers most likely not as much.
>Indian anchor baby
>literally what?
You're mistaking us for the Pacos and assorted Spics, Cletus.
>I implied the West will be worse affected
No I didn't. It was simply a question directed at Drumpf voters, who ostensibly constitute the majority on this board. You read, whatever you wanted to believe, into my post
>but muh Africa will be worse hit
>whataboutism
economist.com
techrepublic.com
It's not about Africa
It's about comparing production models between Industrial and developing economies
And so you dance around the issue, and my argument, pretending that circumstantial evidence in the latter will prove your point in the former
Here, have a profoundly insightful Redpill to read at your leisure. I am sure you wouldn't consider McKinsey a libtard, communist organisation
I'm not sure what you're on about
That goes on to repeatedly confirm what i've been telling you