OBJECTIVELY

OBJECTIVELY
Who would win?

The Nazis or ISIS

I know most would want Nazis because they are more civilized and less barbaric but objectively in a war who would defeat who?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LZDJUTYDiq8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_intervention_against_ISIL
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

nazi

Depends on who arms ISIS.
The nazis were perfectly capable of developing their own weapons to arm their forces with.

>Who would win?
ISIS

who defeated the Nazi, the Jewish controlled countries,

Now who controls ISIS, the jews

ISIS

>talks about Nazis
>posts current flag of (((Germany)))

It's still a nice colour combo, Hans. I mean, take a look at my shitty flag.

youtube.com/watch?v=LZDJUTYDiq8

You should know how this ends.

What are you fucking serious. Even if you had 1938-1945 Nazi's verses ISIS with modern weapons the Nazi's would still win.

Nazis would win.

Nazis.
Zero objections to collective punishment in those days. One acts up, all of them get put in a bag and hit with a big stick until it stops squirming.

ISIS want you to fight Muslims!
Let ISIS win or they will become stronger!

t. GROKO shill

Nazis had the manpower to win. It took most of the world to defeat the Germans. Isis only exists because other countries don't commit to destroying it. And America has been supporting them. Terrorists can attack the west because the west doesn't arrest all shit skins.

What do you seriously think?
Why even ask?

A bunch of inbred shitskins with no discipline what so ever, going only on civilians and by that I mean children and women.

When Hanz snaps you all know what happens into..... Same with Sven.... instead of adopting to the moment, they stand there, waits, waits, waits

BOOOM Gassed, expelled, Africa and the middle east is now a colony again.

Goes for both of them, the empire makres

>Look all through the Syria etc shit we've seen this
Give them the best eq in the world, they outnumber the enemy by 6 million times
>hear a gun shot
HELP MUM! EVERYONE RUN
>leaving all eq behind

It's like when our special ops a couple of hundred men went down to Syria to do shit, in one fucking day the cleared the whole southern part of the country, jumped over to Iraq did some shit there, back again in Syria fucked a powerplan
>Pooof
gone

I know what they are doing

this was 2-300men at tops...

Also you had 1 single dane that fought either for Assad or the Kurds. He was a former sailor and got combat experience so he knew many Syrians, and idn't like what he saw.

He went down there, bunkered him self in as you should, these inbreds kept running for him
>so he went, reallly, ok... 100..200..300...
he lost count
He don't know how many inbreds he gassed

They can't into warings for shit, and the pols are using them as a tool to regain the coloniez.... Before any war you must dehumanize the enemy, they do it them self, so you don't even need 5 years of propaganda.

WAR IS COMING

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_intervention_against_ISIL

More than 54 countries are fighting ISIS and that is excluding terrorists like Hezbollah, Taliban. Idiot.

AHAHAHAHAHA

Nigger, even if they kept they respective era's weapons and tech, the Nazis would steamroll ISIS even with EQUAL NUMBERS.

50k Nazi soldiers with respective WW2 vehicles and support vs. 50k ISIS rats with AKs and technicals.

It's still fucking sand people who believe allah (piss be upon him) will guide their bullets, so there's no need for aiming vs. the best war machine the world has ever seen (including the US).

Depends which way the war is going. If Nazis are invading they'll lose like the Americans lost Vietnam and are currently bogged down in middle East. If ISIS invades they'll try to do it culturally first and fail because Fascism doesn't allow for outside cultural influences to dominate. They would not be able to establish an effective guerilla force in Germany without the complicity of the population. Today they can and are succeeding at this tactic, but not back then. If Germany rolled into the ME with proper objectives they could run down ISIS eventually, but the ovens would have to be much more efficient

>a professional army that was dreaming up all kinds of crazy weaponry vs stone age-minded sand dwellers with pickup trucks and donated weapons from obama arming "moderate rebels"
>the nazis don't have to march into Russia in the middle of winter this time
No contest.

>Nazis trying to invade middle east
>learn that bronze age cultist with ak' are actually really hard to kill off from thier homeland
>terrible terrane
>get shot from the mountains all day long
>lose tanks to IEDs like nobodies business
>long way from home
>suicide bombings


Probably the Nazis but it be a long,tiresome,costly war
Just ask the burgers

>The Nazis or ISIS

well ISIS is a deep state sponsored terrorist program so they're both basically the same people anyway

certainly funded by the same people

Nazis. Hands down
Albeit both are straight out of the pit of hell

isis. the nazi women would want to breed with them on their own will, ensuring the nazis would not reproduce, securing victory for them.

1. Weaponry/Technology - ISIS
2. Airpower - Nazis
3. Manpower - Nazis
4. Mobility and Logistics - ISIS
5. Discipline/Organization - Nazis
6. Willpower/Brainwashing - ISIS
7. Intelligence - Nazis

Looking at this, Nazis obviously but practically, ISIS would conduct guerrilla warfare acting like Russian partisans/Vietnam and prolong the war/allow them to bogged down (IED, Suicide Bombing, Hiding etc) to defeat the Nazis so it would be difficult to say.

>The Nazis or ISIS

>technology
That's just a matter of isis existing after the nazis collapsed. They got their weapons and tech from other people. Nazis were technology creators

Doesn't matter.

Third Reich military
>Stockpiled natural resources
>Effective assault doctrines
>Powerful war economy
>Well oiled combined arms
>Powerful most advanced planes and tanks of their time

ISIS military
>Oil and sand
>"Throw men at it" doctrine
>No manufacturing capabilities at all
>Disorganized
>Makeshift armored cars, no planes

Nazi's could win using world war two technology and rule with an iron fist. Isis has nothing for blitzkrieg.

At the time, the Nazis were the greatest army in human history.
ISIS is a failing group for pudgy 30-something drug dealers.

The nazis, definitely. They would genocide entire Levant in order to defeat ISIS if they'd revert to gorilla tactics.

>the rainbow nation
:)

>industrialized and militarized modern regime that conquered Europe in the span of 1 year vs. a bunch of goatfuckers that can't conquer Syria in 5 years

really motivates my prefrontal cortex

The german flags reminds me of overdone chicken meat. Probably why i don't like it's look. It awakens hunger.

>More than 54 countries are fighting ISIS

>sucking up the propaganda like the goy you are.

ISIS

Nazis would get blamed with bullshit again after which the US and most of europe join up with ISIS to defeat them

There's no major infantry fighting on the ground against ISIS, more people faught at Kursk than ISIS has in their entire arsenal.

Kek'd. Very good, Volksgenosse.

Don't forget Isis knows they suck,that's why they use a whole book of dirty militia fighting tactics
That's got to count towards the war effort

Depends on two factors:
Who will U.S. back up and who will Russia fight against.

I think South Africa's flag is interesting. English, Dutch and African colors.

Nazi's faught guerrilla warfare all over Europe, they'd wipe out entire villages then hold public executions and anyone who didn't attend would be shot on site.

Nazis had more advanced weaponry and better military training. It's no contest imo.

> the white man be holding me down
That's what happens when you crossbreed with niggers.

Nazis would fuck their shit

but Hitler wouldn't want that war

Looks like the Nazis dont have to rely on Russia for their oil anymore lol

The nat soc army wouldn't spare civilians, so it would be nothing like Vietnam. Germans would have it sorted in 2 weeks max

...

Also, winter is coming russboos

ISIS don't have first strike capabilities.

Any technological advantage they may have will be figured out in a few months by the far superior nazi intelligence machine.

>Nazi germany
>Conquered Europe in a few months
Fucking obvious who would win retard. IS would get annihilated

Kurds?
Turkey?
Iraqi soldiers?
SAA?
Hezbollah?
Russian spetznaz?

What the fuck are you talking about?
Also, I still think the Nazis would win.

So another yolocaust?

Nazi's would have fucked their shit in even with inferior ww2 tech.

ISIS are superior in only one respect.
THEY ARE BETTER AT DYING.

Surly old skool superior German ingenuity and precision engineering would prevail
Isis just copy shit off jubetube

>OBJECTIVELY

duh depends on size of forces, how well they are equpped & supported, how good their commanders are, and of course, LUCK

but generally i'd say the nazis would win because of their better training & indoctrination

people that got nothing to lose or believing in a holy cause(even it's right or wrong) always outperform the opposing side.

if they had same numbers, IS could win, else nazis would steamroll

Imagine the Nazis reaction when they saw Russians in Russia wearing Nazi uniforms but still fighting against them.

black white and red are the true colors of Germany, same way that orange white and blue are your true colors

Nazis would win at first, then ((USA and EU)) would join the poor muslims getting genocided

>Who would win?
>The guys who have an army of 18 million people
>vast natural and industrial resources
>and access to rapid technological r&d
>or isis

Isis has captured some modern equipment, but by far not enough to stop the nazis.

When it comes to the resistance, the nazis also have the upper hand, as they have literally no moral boundaries. They would just poison water sources and salt the fields and watch the entire population of the area starve to death, then go door to door killing survivors. Isis terrorists can only execute attacks when they hide in the population. They can't do that when there is no population to hide in.
With the nazis as their enemy they'd be reduced to cave dwellers struggling to find enough food to go last another day.

That being said, there's good reason why we wouldn't do that nowadays. Besides it being obviously horrible and inhumane, we would also make many enemies and isis would probably even get supporters.

Are you guys still butthurt because we cucked you at your own home WM?

Not necessarily...Nazis believed in a holy cause in WW2 but still got defeated by Atheistic Soviet Union.

Isis has what, 40-50k fighter total? The Wehrmacht invaded the USSR with 3.5 million soldiers while also defending the western front and fighting in africa and they also used 750k horses for that... that are more horses than there are camels in ISIS territory. German horses alone would be enough to trample ISIS. European animals > middle eastern "humans".

Operation Barbarossa style invasion to the middle east would conquer everything in a month except Pakistan because they have nukes.

Isis would win. Nazis were GERMANS. Germans never won a war ever

What if ISIS uses jihad and nazi brutality to galvanize arab nations to their cause?

Let's say Turkey enters the war to defend muslims from nazi aggression, then what?

If you give ISIS the USA's air force, ISIS wins.

well nazis outperformed them, but lacked manpower.

Key word here is "major".

When I say major, I mean a million man blitzkrieg with thousands of tanks and air support, something that hasn't been seen since WWII

Fake news
You are Banned, gtfo

No. We think you're a silly people, 90% turks and bad loosers.

>1. Weaponry/Technology - ISIS
They use what's left in the armory
Nazis invent and change warfare forever (literally invented jets, assault rifles and stratosphere rockets)

>4. Mobility and Logistics - ISIS
What is supplying troops on several theaters in 3 continents (Europe, Africa and Asia)?

>6. Willpower/Brainwashing - ISIS

Maybe here, but because of the "brainwashing" thing.

The nazis would obliterate ISIS in days.

>implying turkey wouldnt be an ally of reich.

the only reason we couldn't enter WW2 alongside of nazis is we were literally starving. WW1 was simply mission: destroy ottoman empire and install israel

nationalistic whites and supremecists would fight for nazi germany with the promise of becoming citizens. hell some might do it for free

They all together are 10-100 times the number of ISIS soldiers supplied by both the West and East (USA and Russia), so your point is null and void

Technically, their invasion of every country was it's own war, france was humiliated.

Nazis, Army which had a war effort against France, Britain and ist empire, Soviet Russia and the US, outmatched them for years in the Technology department and had all of Europe for a few years
ISIS, Has Problems with wartorn Syrian Government, Needs weapons from Other factions, cant even mill Barrels for Basic rifles, has a few desert territories around rivers under controll and has Problems Holding them

You tell me

Although he won win.
Hitler would beg them to join his forces, kiss their nasty feet with a few tears in his eyes while saying : "please don't, I love you, love me too."

They use modern weaponry and Nazis weapons are outdated (Stg LOL). The air power thing is listed in a different point.

ISIS have more oil and logistics as in they are not the ones invading.

Nazis would win.

Nazis didn't invent jets lmao. And everyone was aware of their rocket program already. The only reason they were the only side to try pump them out during the war was because USA, ussr, and British understood their practical limitations at the time and felt that manufacturing 1000 conventional planes would be more useful than a handful of jets etc. the nazis thought super weapons would win the war.

And it was ideologically secular scientists inventing this shit anyway, not actual nazis. Except for Albert Speer

>outmatched them for years

They were always behind technologically including against the ussr and they were pretty much defeated after the first winter. Certainly after Stalingrad in the second winter

...

You're comparing a full scale army to a bunch people with pickup trucks that make bombs out of water heaters.

Islamic causes people to be lazy in the brain and their fighters are no different. War in yugoslavia all they can did was chant allah akbar while Serbian soldiers had far superior weapon and tactic training systematically exterminated them that big daddy NATO had to come in. You watch clips online you can see Mujaheddin killing themselves with weapons and charging into death. The Nazis would utterly decimate ISIS.

Ok so debate has finished and it looks like nazis would have lost. Thanks for coming guys see you next thread

just he nazis or the german army too ?

nazis no matter what

The point is that altogether they would probably constitute a 'major' one.

Hmmm interesting so why did crusaders get btfo. Why did Umayyads take Spain for 1000 years. Why did ottomans remain the most powerful nation within Europe for so long.

The ottoman empire's destruction benefited way more people than just us Zionists. It simply had too much ethnically European clay, Palestine was just a small part of it.

Both of your flags look like they were made out of those horribly colored carpets from the late 70's early 80's

Australia trying to Sound smart. No big shocker
The Stug III was THE best tank killer in the war and didnt even have a fucking turret, it was a self propelled gun at best
The ME 262 was able to fly at 800 MPH while all other Planes only got 400 MPH at best. It basically didnt have to outmaneuver the other planes it just had to fly straight away
the STG 44 Was the first assault rifle and to this day is a viable Option as a Standard infantry rifle through ist high controllability and high caliber (7.92 Kurtz which is to this day one of the best cartridges)
dont brag if you dont have a clue

Like the Wehrmacht? Are you retarded?

i know. anyway at least we saved anatolia, could be worse.

it's sad that abdulhamid refused herzl's offer to buy palestine. i think if we accepted that there would be no ww1.

Nah you. Cunt.

Stg44 is the only notable invention everything else the nazis achieve at best second place. The nazis were behind the allies in tank tech from beginning to end. Read a book and stop playing world of tanks you fag

Crusaders heavily outmatched in the numbers department bc reinforcments had to come from europe
Umayyads getting btfod in south France time and time again and only Holding out as Long as western europe fucked itself
Ottomans........INSIDE EUROPE ? you trolling or what ?

Naah bullshit we were fighting in NA and did pretty well against the allies and there is no real difference between NA and ME
We would kill them in a week

Numbers. They cant even drive properly in the Muslim world. You very naive if you think the Europeans man brain is similar to the Muslim. Muslims are too fucking stupid and lazy for even slave wage jobs. What 0.2 muslims in Sweden work out of 200k?

You're wrong. They lost badly because European men are effiminate and craven just like today

This fucking stump of a tank killing most of all allied tanks in ww 2 while only 10.000 were produced
Lol STFU
Battle of Wegscheid last battle of WW 2 where 134 Allie soldiers were killed and had to bombard the town with only 35 German Volksturm and Wehrmacht troops killed
Lol yeah