Housewife

Would you agree that having women only do housework would be extremely inefficient and a waste of economic potential?

It takes so little time to cook a meal and to clean the house. It doesn't require 8 hours a day. What would they be doing after the housework? It'd be such a waste of time! Even if you include babysitting for a few years, women would still have so much dead time.

bump

>Would you agree that having women only do housework would be extremely inefficient and a waste of economic potential?

No. If they're intelligent enough, then they can be trained to trade stocks and given an allowance to do so from the house.

You forgot about doing the laundry.

>What would they be doing after the housework?
raising children with the help of the biological father (who lives with his family in the same household)

so what you retard, let them have free time, they deserve it

volenteer

That's going to be less than 20 min averaged per day

>making children and raising them properly is a waste of economic potential
>Europe is importing immigrants because Europeans don't make enough children to support the welfare system

You are wrong, buddy. The fact that they started working is a disaster on the long term.

>This is Glorious Bad low quality B8
I cannot even post a witty Post Plz take meds an tendies from mommy ok lad

this is winrar

How much time a day do you think it takes to raise a 5 year old?

Raising children. If you want them to come out as decent human beings, they need their mom at home with them.

I agree it's silly to base our gender roles around the way our homes are designed

I want a housetrap

Their job is to raise the children, not only cook and clean.

Off Yourself!

A+ degeneracy

as a civil libertarian I support this

...

This picture is so Jewish

It's only innefficent because our workforce was flooded with women.
>cooking ACTUAL MEALS would take a lot of time, not that shit men cook themselves while their wives play on their iphones
>cleaning the house, laundry, etc, to make something for a man to come home to
>raising children, and not shoving them in a daycare with Jamal Jr amd Ms. Shaquana, giving children a steady home enviornment and dropping them off/picking them up from school so they don't have to get on the yellow nigger tube and listen to nogs screaming fighting and playing rap music
>Running errands, going to the bank, buying groceries, etc.

Yes, it would not be very hard, but women are not meant for jobs. They age that way. I work in a factory and the women all look 60 by the time they're 25, and they're all obese amd disgusting. A simple life of holding down a home and serving the family unit may not be efficent, but we are not robots, it makes everyone happier. When I get married as soon as my wife gets pregnant for the first time she's retiring. I will not have a miserable old looking hag as a wife with fucked up kids and come home everyday to nothing. I'd rather have a comfy housewife and be a bit poor because we work to live, not live to work.

ghey

I have a stay at home mom for my wife. Works out great and all depends on how much value you place on raising you kids the way you want your kids raised

playing with my 10 white kids

clearly said by someone who has never done these things and never taken care of a child.
Cooking an actual meal can take hours if you're making real food and not just throwing some chemicals into a microwave like a conveniencefag piece of shit. keeping an actual clean house takes more time the more people are living in it. Plus it's to be expected that if a male is the breadwinner he'll feel like money is enough of a contribution and put forth little to no effort in maintaining a home and caring for a child.

Women are retarded
> Waaaaaah, raising kids is so hard I'm busy all the time!
> Waaaaaah, raising kids doesn't occupy enough time, I'm bored!
Women were a mistake

I'd kill to be a white suburbian soccer mom with fake tits in Chadville, Ohio

You talk like a modern beta-male, which isn't suprising since you're an American. You simply want to enslave the female to the bourgeois rabble, you want her to sacrifice her innermost instincts at the altar of equality.

...

...

...

>Would you agree that having women only do housework would be extremely inefficient and a waste of economic potential?
If you are driven to provide for others, you can do more specific tasks (I.e. MAKE MONEY) and your wife can do the homemaker tasks. I don't care what anyone says...IT IS A FULL TIME JOB!

I make enough that my wife does not need to work. She chooses to be a stay at home mom. She chooses (with my input) to home school our kids because of the failing public education system. I don't make enough to justify private schools, but I guarantee my kids are doing better than their peers. My wife does quite a bit of work throughout the day, and it is a job. The things she does are essential. There is always a hot meal when I get home. My laundry is always clean. The fridge is always full of food.

I am responsible to give her money to live, and to obtain the food/supplies. I have only been in a grocery store twice in the last decade. Also, I am responsible for the lawnmower and other mechanical things around the house. She has no bills at all. NONE. I bought her a vehicle, I pay the insurance.

Basically, its union work. I don't do her jobs, she does not do mine. She is an expert on the domestics, I am the expert on the repairs and upkeep.

It works out well, and triggers the fuck out of all of feminists.

Idiot basementfag. Cooking a full meal from scratch should never take over an hour unless you are a useless moron

It's not our fault sven.
If you saw the women here (not media) you would not put them on a pedestal. They are not sacred. No such thing as virgins, and at best if you make 100k and are muscular 80kg+ Chad you get to choose between having a girl with less than 20 previous sexual partners or weighing less than a 90 kg blob.
He's wrong but don't call him a beta, it's pretty fucking bleak here, thinking women belong as slaves would be a reasonable conclusion for someone without a global perspective.

I guarantee that commenter is some obese blue haired feminist. God that fucking pisses me off.

My wife is a home maker. Cooks, cleans, and home schools the kids. I also help do all these things.
Your wife is waiting for the man of the house to come home and relieve her of duty.

There's really no tangible benefit to housework

Father of one with housewife
AMA

Whose are her other children?

Yeah, it doesn't make sense.

>If you give a woman clothes
>She'll want pockets
>If you give a woman pockets
>She'll want to put things in them
>If she wants to put things in her pockets
>She'll need money to buy things
>If she needs money
>She'll want a job to earn it
>If women have jobs
>Acquire, woman, ACQUIRE

>brit
lol ok.... keep eating your disgusting puddings and boiled beans

uh all day? you cant just leave them alone to play with forks and outlets

The only child she's had is mine.

>it takes so little time to cook a meal and to clean the house

not if you are a woman *drumroll*

baking bread alone takes a couple hours
>inb4 buy grocery store bread made with soybean

Unless you have five children. Cleaning is a job all on its own

So it doesn't end up browsing pol all day, but instead, pursues decent interests?

All day. Iamma go with all day.

IQ is like 50-80% heritable, that nurture part Place a huge roll in actualizing that IQ. Wife has an 118 IQ and I have a 132, this we are hoping the kids split the difference or are at least as smart as her; Masters in STEM, artist and designer. We are also praying for left hand dominance.

t.wifemakesdinnerandpackslunchesman

t. manchild who's never done laundry let alone laundry for a whole family

t. person that never did a full meal and had to clean kitchen afterwards

Raising kids you dumb fuck

Cleaning house, gardening, doing craft projects, taking care of young children, managing finances, doing food projects besides dinner (canning, berry picking, baking) doing community service, volunteering at churches, not to mention the amount of time they should spend being pregnant to produce the requisite number of children. The reason communities no longer exist, why white birth rates are dropping, why husbands are no longer excited to go home, is because Schlomo cut our wages in half and forced us to send our women to work

>We are also praying for left hand dominance
Fucking why? The world is made for right-handed people.

Also, ambidextrous rifles a shit.

t. someone whos mother was a whore and could only cook him ramen and kraft macaroni

The whole day, retard
t. Single father to a 4 year old

>women would still have so much dead time.

they use to knit and mend clothing and do other misc tasks. A woman, or whoever your house person is, should be also gardening/yard work as well.

The idea that women should be in the work place is a terrible one, and it effectively cut the value of unskilled labor in half. Which is why big governments/corporations LOVE the idea. It has nothing to do with liberation, it has to do with eternal servitude. And we can see the effects of this fairly easily. 100 years ago, a man could work a shit job and provide for a family of 5 easily. Now, both the husband and wife work and make practically nothing, they struggle and are debt ridden. It was the perfect plan to undermine a free society.

Yep. No joke.
These are obviously kids or sodomites that oppose home making women.

>when your mom does everything for you
OP habe you ever actually done any cleaning before

Yes, because a good mother only interacts with her children an hour a day.

Low energy.
Get to work user!

They would not be distracting men for one

>Cleaning is a job all on its own.

Takes a mexican woman two hours to clean what my wife can't clean in a month.

Yes. Left bolts suck but they hold value.

It's not going to happen though: babe is already focusing right. I just thought it would be interesting

>cooking a full meal
A hot pocket and soda pop is nor a full meal.
>ITT basement fags who have only ever cooked or cleaned when they absolutely have to.
>shouldn't take more than an hour
Not in your toaster oven you have next to your mini-fridge I suppose.

Well, I have five younglings. Cleaning is an all day job, several times a day. Laundry is a daily thing, twice a day.

then your wife is a lazy cunt?

Not really. Pure lefties are less common and with age they usually become more ambidextrous.

But in order to succeed as a lefty you have to be smarter or something since most of the ways you operate tools are self taught or substantial variations.

Yes, it takes very little time. I could understand people complaining about cleaning if it was still before the vacuum cleaner, washing machine, and dishwasher were invented. But those inventions have drastically reduced the amount of time it takes to clean.

It takes me very little time to clean my whole place, since I don't keep putting it off.

THIS MANY REPLIES TO REDDIRt FAG B8

REEEEEEeeeeeeeeeee

100% this.

1household 1 income
Now 2 incomes 1 household...

Women's liberation drove down wages.

Make a fake website for western union hack or bank hack transfer and scam naive idiots ( preferably american) like I do.

Glass ceiling for a reason Kek

>Idiot basementfag. Cooking a full meal from scratch should never take over an hour unless you are a useless moron

It can take multiple days to make a good bread from scratch. Meat has to be cured, marinated, or stewed which takes days/hours depending on the recipe. Making soup stock takes multiple hours. Some recipes require food or ingredients to rest, to warm, or to cool before moving on to the next step which can also take hours.

You know shit about cooking.

Women basically get the easy life, deal with it

These, laundry to wash is 20 min for a small load. What do you do when they're done? Wear wet clothes? No you dry em via dryer or line dry.

Bread takes a while to bake. Shepherds pie takes a bit to make. A FULL meal for 3-5 people gonna take 1-2 hours because portions.

You got my respect leafbro. You know how shit is

Obviously 100% of the point of women staying home is so they can BE PREGNANT and TAKE CARE OF CHILDREN.

>cooking
>cleaning
gtfo

Do you even iron and fold?

>but, but children just raise themselves. My mommy went to work...
>I have a steady boyfriend and him an I plan to adopt to prove two men can raise a child just was well as any breeders!

Smh why did creation develop sexual dimorphism if we are all just exchangeable cogs,

>Oh no having children risen by thier mothers at home is so inefficient
>Better get women working in useless positions like HR, and then have them spend all thier money on childcare
>And the childcare is government subsidised
>And the children grow up in daycare and have mental illnesses
>And the career women have less children, so immigration is needed
>And to cap it off, dual income households today barely make more money than single income households did in the 70's
Oh wow what a fucking good idea retards.

underrated post

>The world is made for right-handed people.

Forces you to learn how to do things multiple ways/think outside the box/be ambidextrous. Basically every day tasks become critical thinking exercises if your tools are for your other hand.

>Mt whole place
A bachelor apartment or mom's basement is not a whole house. Also a house cleans for the family. Maybe when you have kids and think it's an easy day but Tommy couldn't make it to the toilet and shit on the walls and floor. Your toilet has piss all over the seat because lol why put it up. Sink full of unwashed spit and toothpaste.

Come back when you have a life of slobs and actual mess

OMG you are such a stupid omega retard. Have your dad ever beaten you?

Having an ideal stay at home wife implies you are having at least 2-3 kids as well. Have you cleaned up after multiple young children? Theyre the messiest from 2-5 as in before they even go to school. Obviously you wont be cleaning up their messes constantly from say, 13-18, but before then its a good amount of work.

The fact that you think cooking and cleaning for a household, raising children, and managing the property doesn't take a whole day, for that matter that you dont think it can be a full time job, shows me you've never had to do anything for yourself ever.
A good wife has the skill, knowledge, and the WILL to care for a household. It aint easy to be a good mother/wife. I want my wife to be stay at home. That doesnt mean shes not useful. Cleaning, cooking, managing property/finances (women used to actually be able to do that very well), rearing children, etc. A good wife makes herself useful to the whole family, a great wife goes the extra mile, making preserves, quilts, clothing, handling the basic business of the home (bills, organization of documents, dealing with utilities, etc) and so much more.

The problem with homemaking is everyone seems to have forgoten how to do it, and what it SHOULD entail, to make everyone happy. I am blessed with a mother who did all those things, so I know women can do it, they just dont know. Being a good wife/mother is a fucking full time job that you get to work from/ON your home, you get satisfaction and happiness from, and you are appreciated by the people you work for. Compare that to a corprate job where what you do is meaningless 70% of the time, you hate your environment, and your boss/co-workers give no fucks REALLY about you. And feminists have the fucking sand to tell me being a good wife and mother to a loving husband and children is opressive. Get fucked.

Why are we dividing this up?
All of these things are the job of a mother and wife. The father relieves her of dirty after work.
In my case, we go over history and theology in addition to recleaning

2 word for shitposters like him
Thanksgiving turkey

>It takes so little time to cook a meal and to clean the house.
Sure, if you fucking half-ass it all the time.

Yeah, if your woman's just heating up a can of peas and throwing a chicken breast in the oven it doesn't take much time... but making a good, delicious home-cooked meal, with fresh ingredients, from scratch - that takes time.

I know how to iron and fold but I don't do it as often as I should. I buy wrinkle proof

>Man works and woman takes care of domestic chores

I dont mind this idea in principal and myself make enough to sustain such a lifestyle. But I think its unrealistic for all but a small minority to be able to sustain this life style. Two average incomes can pay for a fucking lot, or if you're both lower middle class its necessary to pay for rent and food.

wat?

Hahaha, you obviously don't understand. As a bigoted alt-righter, my hatred towards women, minorities and the liberal media is far more important than any advancements in the fields of economy and science.

I am $100% governed by my emotions, and by my hatred. I refuse to listen to logic and reason.

Russia do not the English good

Indeed. We're "enlightened" and think werknow better than all of human history

Taking care of children is a full time job

Important shit
>making children
>raising children

Not important shit
>banal household maintenance that takes 2 hours a day at most

Not going to expect women to stay home from work so they can sweep the kitchen floor. I do expect women to stay home from work so they can have lots of children and raise them well.

from 1 to 2 years old you are basically carrying the little shit almost every waking moment of your life. from 2-5 they still need to be held and carried at least an hour total each day, but by that point they are smart enough to walk/stand around on their own. but they are still with you if you are a good parent, because those are the years you start teaching them how to be a human being. They observe you cooking, cleaning, and so forth to understand the importance of personal responsbility. When you take a break from your housework, thats when its suddenly SPECIFICALLY child time and they want you to play/read to them. And this lasts until about 6 or 7 years old. Only then can you expect them to be fairly independent. And by independent I mean capable of existing without your constant supervision. By then, most parents are more than happy to dump their kids into the arms of the state who then spend 12 years brain washing them so they will be loyal to the state rather than to you and your family.

>economic potential
hahahaha
male children have much more of that
anyway government makework does not economic potential realize

I am not opposed to women in the workplace, but the economic value of nurtured, supported and parented children is so undervalued now.

Having a generation of children who know how to learn, love and live because their mothers too 5-15 years out of the workplace should be encouraged.

Plus have you ever seen a infant daycare? It looks like a tiny playplace gulag.

Outsourcing child rearing to 9.50-15.75/hr """early childhood development """ certificated people does not yield high performing, well/adapted and strong children.

I believe our investment in our child's developmental maturation will pay countless dividends, additionally the wife is looking to start her own practice that can be part of the child's life.

How much time and wages would you pay to never see your child act this way?

>advancements in the fields of economy and science
Women are making these advances?

This simply isn't true. Women are the weak link of any organization. A male-only organization will trounce an organization with females. Women simply are not biologically designed to be members of the workforce.

Women who go into careers end up depressed, miserable, and suicidal. Conversely, men who DON'T have jobs end up depressed, miserable and suicidal. It's because men are supposed to be workers, it's in their bones. Without a job they are lost. Similarly, without children women are lost

why do you think men go and fuck the maid so much? they see a hard working woman and their instincts kick in: this ugly fat chick is actually a hard worker and therefore a good woman.