What happened to feminism?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=nkcKaNqfykg
nkilsdonkgervais.wordpress.com/2016/08/10/research-finds-that-the-state-is-entirely-funded-by-male-taxpayers/
youtube.com/watch?v=Do5zrdTb-yI
dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2285378/Women-DO-work-harder-men-How-female-employees-prone-distraction-likely-job-done.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

People that grew up with fandoms and fanatical brand loyalty think they can apply the same pattern to social and political issues.

Nothing. It was oppression of men from the beggining and always will be.

Your daily reminder that Sup Forums is full of shit

t. roastie
Now get out

Their movement allowed the worse specimen of women to redefine what it means to be female. The weakest qualities are now pushed as the strongest to pander those who would of been outcast prior.

Reoccurring theme in leftism.

It's useless in western society nowadays user, but there's still problems that need to be tackled all around the world about women.

That would be the case if you could grant them personhood, which I'd like to see proven.

It's their own methods: guilty until proven innocent.

>feminism used to be good!
No, it's always been socialist garbage.

>problems that need to be tackled all around the world about women
That's true. In some places cunts are considered people instead property as they truly are and are allowed to go about wrecking everything.

Pretty much what happens when you employ a gigantic axe wielded by a retarded gorilla to do the job of minor surgery

>tfw youtube.com/watch?v=nkcKaNqfykg will be a reality in our lifetimes
feels bretty gud mang

I know women that contribute way more than men to society, your pic is just for frustrated MGTOW.

>It's their own methods: guilty until proven innocent.
No need to get down to their level. Be the better person.

...

>Be the better person, goy, keep on worshipping (((the ovarian jew)))

Into the oven it goes

...

...

Hence why they don't desserve personhood on that basis, but on an individual one (i.e Joan of arc, Ada lovelace, and Marie Curie perfectly could reach it but not your average roastie)

It's not like you had arguments on your side pal

>implying I said anything about worshipping women

Anyway, other than things that would be replaceable by AI/robotics, why should I give anything to the (((Ovarian jew))), and by extension, it's puppet, the (((gubmint))) ?

Became a parody of itself when they realised they had nothing to fight

...

Anecdotal evidence does not disprove 2000 years of modern history that goes against your point.

>French men surrender to women
No surprise there.

>Implyin these things had anything to fight for to begin with

Are you really asking me what a relationship to another human could bring you, you fucking autist?

The only thing women contribute is gestation, and soon technology will render woman unnecessary in that as well. Women were allowed to leech purely because she was necessary for the survival of our species: what happens when that's no longer the case?

>falling for the 2d jew

>Another human
No, what can a female bring me else than a kid or a meal

>falling for the (((ovarian jew)))

>Marie Curie perfectly could reach it

...

>Joan of arc

>what happened to feminism?

Nothing.

Yes goy, stay away from the women, 2d is better

>No, what can a female bring me else than a kid or a meal

Get a load of this try hard edgeking. You tell 'em, savage.

...

...

>Implying the (((ovarian jew))) will be able to compete with bots once their biological monopoly on reproduction ends

...

>Tfw there will be people who will hack the software of fembots for getting themselves cuckolded from perfect female prototype.

But men earn them first and then money are redistributed.

This way she can live with no responsibility when riding every dick she can tackle.
Also abortions paid by the government. Child support from government. Sex change for my child from government.
And she unleashes another marxists monster upon this world funded by the government. Lovely.

also
>females
>human
ishyddt

>Child support from government

They force men to pay for her children.

You mean men force men. Something went terribly wrong. :^)

>You mean men force men

Government isn't men. Stop blaming men, femishit.

>(((Manginas)))
>people
pick one and only one.

I'll keep this

Then women force men? How? Are they somehow superior? Have more power? There is literally no other way.

And no blame was implied. That's some serious complexes punching trough.

Aristophanes - Lysistrata
Some get pussy-whipped, some resist and get it from somewhere else

...

>tl;dr
So I will repeat myself again. At end of every argument lays a barrel of the gun. When it comes to bigger guns it's men who are going to drag you to the court.

And next time at least bother to make a point instead of posting images. There is no discussion here. You don't understand anything you are reposting.

Can't bother to check it.

You should. Aristophanes is based af

>Anecdotes
Woman in fact take more money from society then they pay tax. Men are the only ones contributing to tax.
nkilsdonkgervais.wordpress.com/2016/08/10/research-finds-that-the-state-is-entirely-funded-by-male-taxpayers/

>Woman in fact take more money from society then they pay tax.

NO!
How can this be?!??

I know right? That's the (((Ovarian jew))) for you

B-But Muh pussy!

Feminism was cancer from the beginning. It just got worse and worse as time progressed.

>what happened to feminism?
It reached its natural conclusion. It has always been a scam.

Oh god, I hope that's true.

no women conspire with the wicked and trick men into destroying themselves.

genesis 3 eve conspires with the snake and tricks adam into eating the apple

Jews took it over and used it as a weapon

You really are in every thread about feminism

and? got a problem with that?

Yes. Get a life

>Work yourself to death or the (((ovarian jew))) and the (((rapefugees))), fuck your happiness and fuck your hopes and reams

No thank you

Men are more like Jews than women. Stealing our inventions and progress and claiming it's theirs.

>the (((ovarian jew)))
>doing anything else than stealing from men with little to nothing in return, without even a word of thanks or any sign of respect
my sides

also

WE WUZ INVENTORS & SHEEIT

WE

WUZ

It died. I mean, in the very beginning, while still socio-politically motivated, it was created and supported to achieve certain sensible results, like some laws and rights for women to be able to participate in the course of society. That was achieved in most places in the world and thus, none of those places requires feminism anymore. So it did its job and died.

Now, it's a different movement which only uses feminism as a name due to its historical good reputation, but the agenda is quite different and most of the movement is either hateful, selfish, bigoted and sexist women who feel the society owes them anything just because of them being alive and women or clueless, unintelligent girls whom those women lure by playing on their insecurities, regrets and need to belong.

Cue members of the movement physically resembling the corruption and disgusting tendencies that are now its ideology of fat dyke supremacy and revenge on all men for their personal slights and experiences.

>Now, it's a different movement which only uses feminism as a name due to its historical good reputation, but the agenda is quite different and most of the movement is either hateful, selfish, bigoted and sexist women who feel the society owes them anything just because of them being alive and women or clueless, unintelligent girls whom those women lure by playing on their insecurities, regrets and need to belong.
>Implying it wasn't the goal from the very begining

Women do work harder than men. It's a fact.

>feminism used to be sensible

No. Never.
The entire point of feminism was to make men pretend that fugly broads were as desirable as cute chicks.

They're not.
Never have been, never will be.

Feminists got what they wanted, the right to own land, so they moved the goal posts.
Then they got what they wanted again, prohibition, so they shifted the goal posts again.

Then they got what they wanted again, sufferage, so they shifted the goal posts again.

Then they got what they wanted again, going to college, so they shifted again. Then they got the right to work anywhere they wanted, so they shifted again. Then they got sexual liberation, and shifted the goal posts again.

Then they got complete equality and started demanding free shit and special privileges, and they got that. Now they want more.

Feminists have to keep begging for shit, because as soon as they don't they become irrelevant. They "won" but they're still not happy, so they think they're still oppressed somehow.

[Citation needed]

Also
>what are maternity leaves?

That's still actually depressing and shitty. I can understand fembots for actual sex as that's the biggest lure and worth of pretentious women but the box thing is not even that.

It's mostly prerecorded animation mimicking someone who cares while in reality no one does, no one will. It's not a sentient, feeling, caring being and never will be. The man just gives up and entertains his delusion. Sure, it may be enough for someone but that's SJw like giving into emotions and ideas cause they feel nice over facts and actual reality.

The guy basically spends the time exchanging text messages with a chatbot. And then, at the end says someone wait for him at home.

That's depressing. It's like if people would say the same and then whip out their smartphone, activating Siri.

>feminism was about women wanting to be seen as attractive
Lmao
None of you should ever reproduce

youtube.com/watch?v=Do5zrdTb-yI

>feminism was about women wanting to be seen as attractive

No, toothpaste.
Feminism was always ugly chicks demanding to be treated like hot chicks.

Women thought men were too smart to give them real rights.
They were wrong. Oh so wrong.

Says the guy knowing that he is in every thread about feminism and is writing on Sup Forums

dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2285378/Women-DO-work-harder-men-How-female-employees-prone-distraction-likely-job-done.html
>maternity leave
>not hard work
You think that taking care of a baby is easy?

I'm a feminist so it makes sense for me to be in these threads.

>Women-DO-work-harder-men

Tits or GTFO.

No. It was about women wanting to be treated as human beings for once

>The entire point of feminism was to make men pretend that fugly broads were as desirable as cute chicks.
Holy fuck, you don't know much history, do you? Fucking american education.
I am talking about first initial wave of feminism. It wasn't about standards of beauty, it wasn't even about women ignoring their traditional role. It was literally about women land-owners and other relatively well-off females demanding right to have an effect on policies and law through being given a right to vote and so on as the government directly affected their shit while they couldn't manage it their own way at all.

those are just individual cases, not studies

Yes. I've done it before, you lazy hambeast.

>women wanting to be treated as human beings

Now we treat women like men.

The fight for women’s “equality” has always been absurd: why would any woman want to step down to the lower status of being equal with men?

Be careful what you bitch for, you just might get it.

I wasn't talking to you

>It's mostly prerecorded animation mimicking someone who cares while in reality no one does, no one will. It's not a sentient, feeling, caring being and never will be. The man just gives up and entertains his delusion. Sure, it may be enough for someone but that's SJw like giving into emotions and ideas cause they feel nice over facts and actual reality.

I beg to differ. This will care to it's owner more than a (((female))) ever will

Well as long as I have to deal with (((females))) for that matter, I won't.
But when the artificial womb arrives, things will change. There's nothing that a woman can't do than a man can't (except accusing people of things that didn't happen and getting away with it)

>(((Daily Mail)))
pic related says otherwise

So you're that much of a cuck? Or you already passed the wall and you're that much damaged goods that not even your cats want you?

How about sacrificing yourselves for once? Or thanking men for their sacrifices for that matter?

>pic related says otherwise
This one does, my badn wrong pic (although related)

What sacrifices? And also, I'm neither of those

>ITT: what is bagina

>Now we treat women like men.
It'd be great if that'd be the effect but it's not.
If you do not want to be labeled a sexist or a bigot, you cannot treat them just like men. You have to treat them like your superiors - like men only when it comes to basic, professional attitude and with praise, appreciation demanded of you on top of that, while also being more understanding, forgiving and gentle with them when they face failures or hard times just like if they'd be your wonderful princesses.

Feminists don't want equality. They want access to the claims of reliability and independence men may make among themselves while not being willing to relinquish their rights on special treatment and appreciation for their femininity.

>Combat deaths
>Worplace deaths
>Men being at the paying end of taxation and (((females))) at the recieveing end
And I could o on and on. Yet, the only time where men are thanked for their sacrifices is when there is a shortage of them (early fifties, end of ww2 where a crapton of males and exlusively males died)

And this is why, once we can reproduce without them, a genocide will be lon overdue

>to prove my point

>I beg to differ. This will care to it's owner more than a (((female))) ever will
No, it won't. Because it cannot care. It isn't sentient to any degree. Just a program using complex combination of speech recognition and creation per simple hardcoded flags and cause-and-effect. Nothing it ever says is said because it feels that way, everything it ever says, does is because it's a program made to do it in that particular way upon registering particular stimuli/command.

It's like lightbulb. Lightbulb never turns on because it loves you, it does because you flipped a particular switch to make an electric circuit work and the lightbulb is functioning as per its role. In case of that Gearbox is the same, the switches are just slightly more less subtle and so are the effects.

Zero is greater than negatives, thanks for proving my point

>Combat deaths
While fighting other men

>Worplace deaths
Their own choice to work somewhere or not

>Men being at the paying end of taxation and (((females))) at the recieveing end
Not true. And stop using (((this))), it's stupid