What was he wrong about?

What was he wrong about?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ccASsjhhgP8&list=PLwt9OUJ1gdC8wPFUW4qcYdKv4q3G6CEmk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Everything

he overestimates people

He predicted the rise of automation and figured democratic ownership of companies would be a good idea. I think that's fairly accurate.

Fat NEET piece of shit, that never had a job; and had nothing of value to say about the morality of labor.

He thought his socialist paradise would be full of huwhites

because democracy is so tidy and people only work for the greater good

...

The global revolution never happened.

Look at what's happening to Scandanavia. Maybe he was right.

People in general do. Society always has leaches. Do you want that crazy homeless guy screaming at people to have a job, or be locked away and taken care of?

fpbp

Industrialization is necessary first. Places like Canada and Finland are experimenting with UBI after tech jobs and manufacturing jobs went to the developing world.

Mooched off his friend to couch surf all his life, sat at cafes all day day dreaming his ideal world where people are more automation than man.

Equivalent:
>fat neet on the dole sat at starbucks all day writes down web blog on how a society should be run without having any real world knowledge or experience to apply said theory

>dude just wait a few years capitalism will inevitably implode and then people will naturally realize they should rebuild with communism lmao

Nothing.

He was right about everything except for the part about the masses eventually seizing the means of production and ending class conflict.

>Dude just wait a few years and Liberalism will collapse. Everyone knows Monarchism is the natural order of things.

He predicted wrongly where communist revolutions would rise up.

The idea capitalism would collapse.
Ironically because he underestimated the sheer insanity it would resort to in order to prop itself up.

Marx thought we were too smart to let 2008 happen, and we let him down.

The road to Communist paradise being good for workers.

I'd like to let you down from a helicopter.

The conclusion from what I said isn't that I'm a communist. Communism is clearly retarded shit from the fact it underestimated what capitalism can do when you don't guide it with conservative values.

Modern capitalism is a fucking abomination, closely interlinked with degeneracy. (Basically another route to profitability.)
Productive capitalism is great.

we aren't experiencing capitalism, we are experiencing corporatism or crony capitalism. Pure capitalism (which ironically sounds like this isn't real communism) is the closet system that mimics the biological drive of humans, competition and rewarding yourself.

Proper corporatism with appropriate national control on industry is great too.
The problem since the late 70s has been that companies outpower governments.

1950-1970 best period ever. Then the sandniggers fucked it up

fpbp

capitalism has never been less stable and is getting worse by the day

Nothing. The workers WILL seize the means of production eventually, just not the type of worker he thought of

I agree and disagree, while large corporations under national control seem nice at first. They are very anti-capitalistic, they kill competition by various economic factors then try to influence governments by implementing regulations or abuse welfare systems. Eventually they will always become more powerful than the government as businesses are way more efficient with cash then governments and politicians are the type of scum that will allow them to get away with lobbying (aka bribing).

Absolutely right about the failings of capitalism; read the book Ayn Rand tittie suckers.

If you retards can't distinguish that critique from the many problems of the proposed solutions put forward to address these failings, then I feel sorry for you.

>But Muh Stalin But Muh Mao and Muh Communism
>Ignores Capitalism and Americas hand in over 70 years of war and oppression.

Also

>1) If i tell you your obesity will kill you = True
>2) I propose you cut out your gut = Bad

If number 2 is wrong, it doesn't mean number 1 stops being right.

Fair; we are scum.

One day we will evolve to stop being scum. Maybe /pol is a step in that it allows free speech so we can be sane in the real world?

To some degree this seems counterable with full employment as policy (as from 1950-1970) since you get much more militant workers.
If you could get the balance about right, between militant labour, government and business things could fall into a half-comfortable nationalist equilibrium.

But as we saw in the 1970s, instead you'll probably just get corporate lobbying nightmares, as we did.

Well those are some retarded and wild assumptions you're jumping to. Capitalism will always become corrupted because money and power are intrinsically tied.

> says increasingly nervous man

/thread gg

WEW

Nothing like a good ol military dictatorship to bring some stability. Theocracies work well, too.

Except they aren't assumptions, it is true. Corporatism is not capitalism. Creating monopolies and regulating the free market is anti competition, hence anti-capitalistic. Is it a failure that capitalism can lead to this probably. It would be equivalent to the same flaws that communist system would lead too, inefficiency requiring someone to lead and then that leader is the most powerful man of the state. Instead of money that corrupts him it would be his ego and ambition.

The difference is capitalism rewards the human biological drive, while communism would be better for a hive species.

>He predicted the rise of automation
except he thought it would destroy the middle class

>BASED

Balance is key; fuck in the 1970's a convenient "Accounting Error" meant we overestimated how much we would need and only then were we "forced," to go the IMF.

All liberalisation has done for us is use the problems of the 70's to create a neo-feudal model in technological dystopia caught between Orwell and Huxley.

Also; Trump and his team will create the greatest BOOM and BUST you've ever seen since that slag you love had a tit job that later exploded.

>I am also a pretentious knob.

It will.

not for economic reasons
It is because the welfare state and degeneracy

Still waiting

this

>KEK

Trickle down economics eh? How does that taste?

I am enjoying making 150k a year and living in a 3k sqft house

...

the faggots of our age aren't following him exactly, he never talked about the need to put gays, ethnic minorities and trannies first

It's the damn critical theory folk, the cultural marxists one from the Frankfurt school.

That is good.

Do you enjoy the ignorance of knowing that much of what you consume is made by people who have less workers rights than you?

>muh I'm ok so it's fine. Fuck everyone else. They are all brown and poor and I can exploit them.

the fact the communist party wouldn't become and interest group in its own right and would abuse the centralization of the economy. he thought the state would eventually dissapear, which is austistic as for his economic model to work u need the state, as no free market mechanisms exist. if anything u need more of a state

You are not allowed to have a debate about marxism, socialism, or communism until you read the Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsy and know the evil it does and the vile notion of trying to voice an overtly egalitarian perfectionist ideology that forgoes freedom and competition for the sake of "equality" and "virtue"

I have here for you, the entire thing on audiobook. Feel free to learn and then come back when you understand the truth.

youtube.com/watch?v=ccASsjhhgP8&list=PLwt9OUJ1gdC8wPFUW4qcYdKv4q3G6CEmk

The failure of cultural marxism in this 21st century

Can you extrapolate on what markets he will boom and then later bust. Will it be his doing, or the socialism bubble that is slowly inflating everything due too guaranteed government/ insurance money finally popping?

I am a nationalist
I look forward to automation bringing those jobs back

I was JUST looking at buying this book. I might use both. Thanks user.

>democratic ownership of companies is good
kek

he was wrong about consciousness being the brain. he was also wrong about lol atoms. like seriously atoms. even back in the 1800s the elite knew atoms were bullshit. then this dunce is like "Hey guys you know what? More atoms."

like no wonder that shit only found purchase among idiots and backass countries that were full of serfs.

rofl atoms. ya guys atoms everywhere. holy shit i mean this was even shot down a bazillion years ago by the greeks. fucking noob.

Labour theory of value.

The worst one's probably
>XDD the state will totally relinquish it's power
There's so many faults, but that one takes the cakd

>I can't die because I'm not dead yet

>The idea capitalism would collapse.
Even some capitalists have admitted this. Joseph Schumpeter for instance posited that Capitalism would slowly decay as the entrepreneurial function was rendered obsolete by the mechanization of the innovation process and improvements in the means of production. He predicted that the collapse of capitalism would be preceded by a long period of relative stagnation as human desires became increasingly satisfied and as innovation sputtered out due to the theoretical and physical limits of technological progress. I think many of his predictions are turning out to be quite prescient.