What's wrong with this political cartoon?

Sup Forums is not Na...

It ignores the influence of national culture and ethnicity as it influences population-level behavior, which matters more than all of the above and determines what form they ultimately take.

Hitler was a lefty.

The majority of brutal and terrible dictators have been.

IFUNNY DOT CO
THE ONLY PLACE TO GET THE HOTTEST REUSED MEMES WITH OUR WATERMARK

>Hitler was a lefty

I find it very accurate. It displays that the true communists are authoritarian while the fags and kikes belong in the libtard pile.

This is so wrong I don't know where to begin. Fascism is right wing. Don't associate us with lefties.

You know a lot of right wing socialists?

Kikes are behind both Communists and Libtards as well as behind usury.
There is literally only one option left that is not theirs and that is..

He seized the means of production.

>control the industry
>control the distribution of products
>centralize the economy to control it

m8 that's why is called NatSoc National SOCIALISM
You are the same shit than commies

Im preaty sure that 50 years ago any gay/fag/kike/SJW or anything similar would be shot and thrown into a mass grave in the Communist block.

Just kill the "SJW/fags/kikes/libtards are commies" meme please.

National Socialist.

>imprisons thousands of marxists and launches a massive war against bolshevism
>strongly nationalistic
>left wing

hitler was neither left or right the nazis considered both sides to be kikery

>ifunny
saged

Is he Left wing too?

Culture =/= Economic policies

My dear burger.

We are not left...or right...we are....erm.....hm

Stop hiding

he didnt. he cooperated with leading industrialists and aimed at preserving the traditional order and hierarchy of the economy and society. only when the country entered a total war did the state take control of businesses - and even then, the means of production were never taken away from their owners. instead, the owners were temporarily placed under military control and told what to do by the government.

MONTENEGRO

Socialism in a 100% white society is ideal though. Most people hate it because they don't want their hard earned money to go towards some lazy nigger's gibsmedat

Fascism has nothing to do with left or right you fucking hebe

But...

so you're saying that Hitler was a radical centrist?
t. enlightened rational objective Alt-Centrist

Fascism is neither left nor right but it could be either, it is the third option as Mussolini put it. It is the complete control of people's decision's by the state.

Agree, thats why it works in Scandinavia and not in the us

Right wing socialism is a thing. Spenglerism.

Exacly

Even if we achive communism these ungrateful niggers would just sit around doing nothing, while everyone else would work.

Communism whit out blacks when?

>iFunny watermark

Economically yes. Maybe not socially, but economically he is 100% on the left.

Fascism is not Nazism. Why don't the burgers see the difference between them?

>all expressing disdain toward the green queer
Sounds about right.

Blue > Red > Purple >>>>>>> Green

There's a lot more to left/right then merely economics.

>National syndicalism is socialism now.
rly makes u think.

Communism
fascism
anarchy
capitalism

...

Not back when it was conceived, but it is considered right wing now.

Common media-induced misconception about anarchy being tied with degeneracy is the reason why I stopped using terms like anarchism and anarchist.
Seriously, this is western liberal tier. Meanwhile there are people striving to be the only monarchs to govern themselves, no need for laws and government, and this rule over them is a lot stricter than the one pushed from above.

Won't even comment other parts.

>ifunny.com
Y O U
H A V E
T O
G O
B A C K

No I would still hate it TAX IS THEFT GOVERNMENT GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Nationalism isn´t rightwing.
It´s a state form not a political direction.

>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.
>Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”
- Adolf Hitler 1938

I keep fighting this bullshit.

2 slightly different types of socialist fishing in the same pool, like sunni and shia mudshits, killing each other because they are too autistic to get along even though they basically believe the same shit.

>socialism 2.0 - ever so slightly less collective and shit edition