ITT: Great leaders that the people of your country loves but the Jews hate

ITT: Great leaders that the people of your country loves but the Jews hate
>Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, the Captain of the Iron Guard

Other urls found in this thread:

semiticcontroversies.blogspot.ro/2015/10/vlad-impaler-opponent-of-muslims-and.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

oy vey

very based. Can't believe he was Romanian

Me neither. We were blessed when he came to power. What about you Aussie user?

We weren't blessed because he came into power in Romania not Australia.

What do you guys think of that commie dictator you shot in the back of the head, I heard he have the soviets a middle finger several times

...

So you had no leader like him in your own country?

Who? Ceausescu? He was lucky that he had the commies back him to get to power. Pretty much a shill.

The closest we got to a Fascist coup was in the Great Depression, and even then it's unlikely it would of succeeded.

We had a movement known as the New Guard and it's political wing known as the Centre Party.

They started out as libertarians before becoming Fascist, and their brand in Fascism has been described as an 'individualistic form' of Fascism.

They are unfortunately a dead meme hardly remembered

Well, I've seen online many Aussies backing the greek party "Golden Dawn", don't know why. Are some of the members close to your region?

Australia has a sizeable Greek minority within the White majority, Anglo-Celts such as me forming the majority.

The Greek descended minority may have something to do with the Aussies you've seen backing the golden dawn

Interesting. I wonder how they will react when a muslim came close to their places and threatening them?

Based Teleki. One of the most intelligent people ever to rule Hungary.

I don't really have to post ITT, right?

...

>gypsieland
>country
Great joke m8 well memed indeed

Hated by Jews and Mudslime

Hated by Jews and scots

They react with nothing, they're busying on cooking Souvlaki in their "tavern".

And by English, Richard I spent all the money he could get from tax in England.

Thanks for taking in our gyppos mehmet

TRIPS FUCKING GET!!!!!!!

The only correct choice.

no because you always pandered to muslims

>Britan
>British

>Britan
>Christian

>Britan
>White

>Britan
>United

I wouldn't say anything If I were you
Just leave with your tail between your legs.

Why would the joos hate him

To wage more war, he never cared much about England other than for tax, yet English people still like him

Disregard this faggot. He was anti-moscow and probably russia organized the coup... I mean revolution against him.

Ceausescu did nothing wrong.

...

>Indeed it is worth mentioning that, in the case of Vlad at least, he fought both Muslims and jews with the same savage ferocity as he dealt with domestic traitors. The Armas didn't just deal with Vlad's noble enemies (the boyars) and Muslims, but also eliminated numerous jews as well.

>This would have been for two reasons: in the first instance jews had a well-known history of working with the forces of Islam to facilitate an Islamic takeover (as Islam was seem to be more tolerant of their socio-economic behaviour and supremacist religious ideas). In the second because jews tended to be money-lenders/tax farmers and made the common people suffer with usurious rates of interests and use of force to extract money.

>Further evidence of this can be found in the fact that the jews of Wallachia fled to the Ottoman Empire and were taken in by the forces of Islam without any quibbling whatsoever.

>Essentially what Vlad had created was a nationalistic economic policy that favoured his own subjects not foreign merchants and jewish moneylenders, while also creating a classic professional popular army based on national feeling.

semiticcontroversies.blogspot.ro/2015/10/vlad-impaler-opponent-of-muslims-and.html

He was never a leader

Thanks f a m,it's said that our capital fell to the turks not only because we were in a state of disarray but also probably because we had (((merchant)) quarters who probably aided them to get in.

"Charismatic leader of the iron guard"

>Ceausescu did nothing wrong.

Too right.

And he was friend with most of Sup Forums heroes

>assad senior
>qaddafi
>saddam
>carlos the jackal

umm... he never came to power. How are you unaware of your own history>

>Gorbachev
>organizing anything
top kek

Don't tell me that any of you unironically miss Ceausescu...

Ceausescu bumping

Kek. fair enough.

maybe it was Vladimir Zhirinovsky

I was too young to actually miss him but he was definitely better than our current leaders.

Besides, I keep hearing nice stories from old people who lived in those times, you know, like we here about germany being pretty nice to live in during national-socialism.

> t. abdullah mehmet of londonistan

He was a nobody before later turning into a clown that he's today.

But weren't you literally starving during his rule? From what I heard even matches were constantly in short supply. Nostalgia is a powerful thing, but I could not see myself being nostalgic about someone like him. As for your current leaders, can they be THAT bad?

he'll be the next president Ivan. People enjoy his jokes

Also, he boosted national economy, education, healthcare. He sent degenerates to die... build massive infrastructure projects.

He eliminated unemployment and the country external debt. He built the Transfagarasan and the People's Palace (second largest building after the pentagon).

And that's just at the top of my head. He basically did normal dictator stuff.


Not really. Those were just a couple of years, compared to the 71 years he ruled, and we had to make sacrifices to reduce the foreign debt to 0 (which is an achievement unto itself). Besides, I clearly remember even as a boy, that even if everything was official rationalized during those years you could still manage to get everything you wanted.

Anyway, like I said, it wasn't utopic and he was no saint but it was better in many aspects that this corrupt cabal that rules over us today.

How would Romania be if they returned to monarchy?

much better off.

Ceausescu's regime was pretty shitty tbfh, the bread lines were shit, the stores only had canned shit, tv and radio was all just state approved shit, Romania was slowly turning into North Korea.

The gov that came after was even shittier but at least we could watch some DBZ and buy a pepsi bottle

Young man joins a political party, betrays his generation and his race. I show up and shoot him. Many such cases!

Even if the King were to be the messiah the monarchists make him to be he is old as fuck and he will soon die and we will end up being lead by his retarded and corrupt descendants. So, not a good idea.


Besides, we're supposed to move forward and develop new ways of government not return to more primitive/old ones. But that's just like my opinion, man.

>In 1967, Ceaușescu, in an attempt to boost the country's population, made abortion illegal and introduced Decree 770 to reverse the very low birth rate and fertility rate. Mothers of at least five children would be entitled to significant benefits, while mothers of at least ten children were declared heroine mothers by the Romanian state. Few women ever sought this status; instead, the average Romanian family during the time had two to three children

Read "For My Legionaries". Very good book.

>Initially, Ceaușescu became a popular figure in Romania and also in the West, because of his independent foreign policy, challenging the authority of the Soviet Union. In the 1960s, he eased press censorship and ended Romania's active participation in the Warsaw Pact (though Romania formally remained a member). He not only refused to take part in the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia by Warsaw Pact forces, but actively and openly condemned that action in his 21 August 1968 speech. He even traveled to Prague a week before the invasion to offer moral support to his Czechoslovak counterpart, Alexander Dubček. Although the Soviet Union largely tolerated Ceaușescu's recalcitrance, his seeming independence from Moscow earned Romania a maverick status within the Eastern Bloc.[14] Ceaușescu's main aim as leader was to make Romania a world power, and all of his economic, foreign and demographic policies were meant to achieve Ceaușescu's ultimate goal of turning Romania into one of the world's great powers.[16] For the Conducător (the "Leader"), as Ceaușescu liked to call himself, "demography was destiny" and countries with rising populations were rising powers.[16] In October 1966, Ceaușescu banned abortion and brought in one of the world's harshest anti-abortion laws.[17]

>In an attempt to correct this, Ceaușescu decided to repay Romania's foreign debts. He organised a referendum and managed to change the constitution, adding a clause that barred Romania from taking foreign loans in the future. According to official results, the referendum yielded a nearly unanimous "yes" vote.

He just wanted to Make Romania Great Again.