Brits will defend this

>Brits will defend this

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DwKPFT-RioU
foxnews.com/world/2010/08/14/historians-soviet-offensive-key-japans-wwii-surrender-eclipsed-bombs.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Mussolini did most of the job actually. A fucking retard he was.

>55% of burgers think they were relevant
maybe as nigger rape squads jej

They're all fucking retarded anyway, the Soviets did at least 60% of the actual work.

You would have starved without burgers shitting trade ships all over the place

He's Italian. Probably fell asleep during something important. Absolutely glorious nigger.

What's the problem?

We're all taught the war from the perspective of our respective countries, and with the US and UK both on the winning side of course their respective populations will think their country did the most.

Almost 90% of German solider causalities were against Soviet Union. Gee, I wonder who did the most work?

Was looking for this - I'm surprised it wasn't an option.

I'm not familiar with Mussolini in WW2, but I'm intrigued what he did to fuck up. I know he tried hard to resurrect the Roman image but not much else

The US won the war
>remained "neutral"
>fed supplies and "volunteers" to Britain
>fed supplies and equipment to commies
>opened up two extra fronts to divert the Germans from the Ostfront

>Brits doing anything other than sucking Soviet cock and begging for American spare change during World War 2

USSR beat Germany

> Get btfo
> Need fisherman to save Tommy
> Hide on island
> Turtle until your higher level friend gets on

You guys just gave Germany something to waste resources on. You were a glorified money pit. Congrats.

*in Europe. America soloed the Japs

For people who are so secure in the fact that it was all down to the US, you sure do need to keep going on about it.

The problem is that that's the wrong way to teach it then because it's fucking objectively wrong to think that anybody other than the Soviets were primarily responsible for defeating Germany in WWII.
No it didn't, the Soviet Union essentially turned itself into a meat grinding machine to defeat the Germans and put forth at least 50% of the total work to beating them. They suffered more casualties than every other European combatant country combined.

The Italian and French fronts tied down 50% of the Reich's manpower and tanks at th end of the war. The Americans and British also eviscerated the Luftwaffe so that the Soviets didn't get bombed to hell. Also knocked Italy out of the war and kicked Rommel's ass in North Africa. The Soviets did most the legwork for sure, but let's not prevent the Western alllies didn't nothing

KEK

>Americans think we defeated Germany

What? US defeated Japan, USSR defeated Germany.

pretty bullshit graph every german knows the russians won this war by giving even less fucks about human lives

Triple doubles confirm my assertion.

Also, leafs did more than the UK did.

9/10th of the wehrmacht died o n the Eastern Front.

So,
>40% Russian Winter / Terrain
>50% Russian
>6% UK (the extra 1% for going it alone and successes in Africa)
>4% US (for suppling the Soviets with good trucks for move supplies)

If any one of Soviet union, USA or Britain had not entered the war, the allies would not have won.
The soviets laid down the most lives and were probably the most effective in the war, the US decided to send their men to the other side of the world to fight, and the Brits decided to fight and die for the cause instead of getting cucked in the name of security. All of which are admirable.

The average person knows absolutely fucking nothing about WW2 anyways beyond muh jews and evil hitler and DDay, myself included.

>making a bait thread at 0610 on a board full of unemployed nerds

you're an ungrateful little faggot. you and the allies couldn't even 30 v 1 germany. if it weren't for nips being stupid and attacking us, you would be speaking german right now. we had to solo the Jap empire and then clean up the mess you bongs and soviets made to end the war.

>you will never have the blood of superior american fighting spirit coursing through your veins

That image is from someone that doesn't know their history. Britain gave the US somewhere around 50 years of technology overnight just so we would produce shit for you for free, because you were getting so badly beaten. Without us, the Wolfpacks of U-boats and air raids would have utterly destroyed your ability to fight, leaving Germans with a war on 1 front.

the Italians did more to jeopardise Germany's chances of winning WW2 than the allies ever did.

The only reason the Soviet Union didn't fall in a day was because of the Lend-Lease deal

The Soviets lost a majority of their equipment in Barbarossa and relied on American equipment to keep them in the game while they moved their industry to the Urals.
America partially helped turn the rural backwater that was the Soviet Union into an industrialized nation.
The famous Katyusha was mounted on the American made Studebaker trucks.
The T-34 would never have existed without the Christie suspension, given to the commies by America.

America gave over $150 billion in lend lease aid to the commies. America kept the commies afloat.

Lend-Lease was extremely important on the western front and Britain would definitely had fallen without economic support from the US, but it only acted as a primer on the eastern front for a soviet forced migration after Hitler's invasion.

What ended up being the most important to the soviets were actually the vehicles we sent them (trains specifically). This allowed them to survive an interim period where Stalin basically relocated the manufacturing of the entire soviet union eastward. Once their factories were up and running again lend-lease was less important.

The blood the soviets spilled in WWII imo far outweighs any economic support we gave them. They took the brunt of the German war machine and our money basically prevented us from having to do it.

This is a great video that illustrates the unequal commitment of lives.

youtube.com/watch?v=DwKPFT-RioU

Well I don't remember exactly but I read that he basically delayed Hitler's invasion of Russia by a good 3 or 4 months because of his fuck ups, Hitler had to send German troops to help him.

By the time Hitler could invade Russia it was already close to winter, which resulted in his defeat there. If he invaded Russia a few months earlier they would've steamrolled the soviets.

Britain did more than people give it credit for.

It was a team effort but Everyone who isn't an idiot knows that it was the Eastern Front that decided the war.

Wait France?
WTF did France do?
We backed them they had the weapons and the man power but they surrendered. At most they fixed their fuck up
Poland had none of that and they did better and fought

You're too retarded to read the graph. That bar is who French people think won the war, not who things French people won the war.

>this is your brain on japcuckery

>american education

>sucks our dicks to bring us into the war
>"we did more lol"
Nah

I actually don't know much about Italy's involvement, care to share some knowledge?

>55% of US believes they did the most
>Moans that 50% of Brits believe they did the most


Fuck off Uncle Sam.

>blood of superior american
Surely you mean European? There's no such thing as American blood honey.

Soviets are the green one. You drunk m8?

I once saw a similar poll that just focused on France, but it was taken once a long time ago and then taken recently. People in France used to think the Soviets contributed the most but now they think the Americans did.

It's all those WWII movies and video games.

>UK early war years
>90% of the world shipping was British
>Atlantic convoys shipping American/Canadian supplies supporting African and European campaigns
>Pacific convoys supplying Asian Campaigns
>Arctic convoys supplying Russian Campaign
>Arabian convoys supporting India and other colonies
>Mediterranean convoys
>etc etc

And that was just the British Merchant navy, without it there would have been no victory, American lend-lease or not

the uk, australia and new zealand did more in ww2 than the US.

>stronk, adventurous, virtuous europeans set off to uncharted territory and leave all the scared cucks and aristocracy behind
>create a migratory bottleneck, only the strong can survive in this new world
>americans are basically europeans on steroids

what dont you get about that?

I am not going into a long discussion on the BoB but experts know the UK was producing and would always produce enough fighters-to-German-fighter losses to win out and the RN was already transitioning to mass mercantile escorting. But you are right, we wouldn't of won the war without you.

>Soviet manpowr
>US money
>UK/Pollack brains

Won it. You have to remember we were 45 million+plus colonies half a world away vs 80+15+Italy million. Also we had deal with the likes of Sweden suppling Germany with iron while selling out German naval positions to the RN. It was a clusterfuck.

Thank you to Britain and their army of Australians.

The Commonwealth members are never forgotten for their contribution in this country and committed themselves on day 1, Australia, Newzealand, Canada, India, South Africa, Burma etc etc so many to name.

Sometimes it's easier just to post a picture

>defeat of Germany
do you even read?

fucking french niggers have no respect

we bail their useless faggot frog asses out and they dont even have the decency to give some gratitude in return

i hope germany fucks your refugee ridden corpse to death

>UK talking about other places being refugee ridden

good 1 m8

Mfw it would be 99.9℅ in Russia. We fucking managed to reck the most advanced militiry-industrial complex on our own with just 3 mosin rifles and 2 t34's, while you British pussies ran to Narnia from burning London.

more like
>0% UK
>55% USSR
>45% USA
for european theater
and

>0%UK
>95% US
>1% ANZ
>4% E = MC^2

That include the Japs in Manchuria, Singapore and Burma?

and 99.9% British for Naval theatre

and Canada minus 1% for spelling theatre differently

Question: Did Canada help the USA in fighting the Japanese?

Of course, though not as heavily as they did with other land/sea campaigns

Wherever the British Commonwealth went, Canada went and the British Commonwealth went everywhere

>0%UK
>95% US
>1% ANZ
>4% E = MC^2

what did he mean by this?

it all goes back to pic related

Naval Theater?
oh youll clutch to anything you filthy ango kike
your contribution to ww2 was pathetic and you were no longer relevant to the world in 1940

>spot the gook

>you were no longer relevant to the world in 1940

Largest navy in the world
Largest merchant navy in the world

>irrelevant


tl;dr (You)

You don't really think you did as much as the Russians and the Americans, do you?

>tfw you will never be in the Grand Fleet.

>burgers thinking they did anything to effect the outcome of the war

tippytoptipkek lads

> Ah oh French and British fight.
How utterly normal.

>coutnry

>trips wasted on chav retardation

Godfuckingdammit

8 out of 10 Germans were dropped by soviets, they didn't do much against the nips

You fuck with the British in WW2 you fuck with the Commonwealth and it's Royal and Merchant navies

you fucking idiot. burger genocide when?

Read the fucking OP image
> In your opinion, which country would you say contributed most to the defeat of Germany in World War Two (%)

Id go with russia

>Also we had deal with the likes of Sweden suppling Germany with iron while selling out German naval positions to the RN.
The eternal cuck. Has there ever been a more wretched breed of European?

K, but add the fact that they did basically didlysquat against the Italians, and the Japanese, and the support we gave them throughout the war, and it's clear that the US contributed the most to winning the war, if not defeating Germany.

What did Finland supply the Germans?

and us & uk defeated italy
or Italy defeated itself

You have to admit, it's a little confusing, as the title is about winning the war, while the question apparently was about defeating the Germans.

>US contributed the most to winning the war
>arrives over 2 years late

bobms

Time for Round 2?

...

>American education

Using the same logic Russia couldn't have contributed the most considering they didn't join until nearly 2 years in.

And? This discounts the Lend-Lease program and the immensely larger production capacity of the US than the Soviet Union.

If it wasn't that important, Stalin probably shouldn't have begged the US to open up a second front. Maybe that wasn't actually necessary and he thought it wouldn't be sportsman like to take over all of Western Europe and wanted to do it after the war was over. I guess that didn't work out well for him in the end.

Nobody seems to be paying attention to OP's question. Regardless of which country, Russia or the US, contributed more to defeating Germany, more than half of Brits actually believe it was the UK, which is indefensible.

>it's clear that the US contributed the most to winning the war, if not defeating Germany.

Again, not really m8.

Only thing france did was giving germans slightly lesser quality goods and desease ridden prostitutes
>french """resistance"""
germans didnt even notice

Are you really suggesting the Soviets did equally as much, if not more, in defeating Japan as the US did?

My point is it's scummy to say one country contributed the most especially a country that arrives over 2 years late before committing and only because they were attacked.

How long would it have been if Japan had never attacked, 1943, 1944?

The United States are objectively fuckheads if that is true, just look at British casualties alone.

No, it's not scummy if that's what happened. Britain joined the war even earlier than the Soviet and nobody says the former contributed more than the latter. Oh wait, they do, specifically your indefensibly stupid countryman. Are you literally going to defend that, like OP said you would?

> Scummy to claim contribution in a war unless you were attacked
That's literally the most legitimate reason to go and contribute to war, even if the Soviets entered later than the French or Brits they were at least an order of magnitude more important and contributive.
> How long would it have been if Japan had never attacked, 1943, 1944?
The US very possibly just never would have went to war.

Does that mean China contributed more than the UK? Huh, you learn something new every day.

You literally have no idea what you're going on about. Stop learning your history from Pearl Harbour films. Also kindly note, your culture and genetics are European, mostly British, you're welcome.

The thread is specifically talking about defeating Germany. Jesus fucking goddamn Christ how many people can fucking read an image in the OP?

Against the Japanese, yes.

The Manchuria campaign and August storm is often overlooked. I would say it's half and half. Can't remember the cable the Nips sent.

foxnews.com/world/2010/08/14/historians-soviet-offensive-key-japans-wwii-surrender-eclipsed-bombs.html

>"The Soviet entry into the war played a much greater role than the atomic bombs in inducing Japan to surrender because it dashed any hope that Japan could terminate the war through Moscow's mediation," said Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, whose recently published "Racing the Enemy" examines the conclusion of the Pacific war and is based on recently declassified Soviet archives as well as U.S. and Japanese documents..

>"The emperor and the peace party (within the government) hastened to end the war expecting that the Americans would deal with Japan more generously than the Soviets," Hasegawa, a Russian-speaking American scholar, said in an interview.

>"If we miss (the chance) today, the Soviet Union will take not only Manchuria, Korea and Sakhalin, but also Hokkaido. We must end the war while we can deal with the United States."

>"very few Anglo-Americans saw the Soviet offensive in the Far East with their own eyes, and Soviet archives were not open to Western historians subsequently,"

>Are you literally going to defend that

Yes because Britain is a collection of countries not one, Britain was the Commonwealth, a commonwealth that committed in 1939.

You won't hear anyone say England committed the most, it's Britain, it's the British Commonwealth and like I said were in it from the start.

See all these countries, they all committed over 2 years before America, all of them.

I was making the point that merely determining the number of casualties isn't a valid of way of determining the war effort of a country.

Nonsense.