>When you accidentally stumble upon a real red pill

what the fuck

Other urls found in this thread:

dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2015/table6
oecd.org/publications/indicators-of-immigrant-integration-2015-settling-in-9789264234024-en.htm
oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/8115051ec012.pdf?expires=1488441548&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=54772B952685D98D35146D5286474ECB
abc.net.au/news/2015-02-17/berg-you-cant-blame-foreigners-for-high-house-prices/6125500
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Legal immigrants are usually very smart people, who already have completed university or are students cursing it. Most countries basically only take the best of the best.

is it that that graph is the most unscientific garbage ever printed?

Better to be a serf than not have enough engineers?

Would any renter actually vote for immigration if they knew that immigrants outnumbered them in home ownership?

Nice get

nigger

Exactly this

why

GET

Also, smelt man.

FPBP and quints together?
wtf i love brasil now

You people are fucking cucks

You think the capital outflow from China into London, New York, San Fransisco, Vancouver and Sydney is because of rich Chinese doctors?

Not dirty money being cleaned that displaces a native who has lived and paid their taxes there from birth?

I really dont get it. Native-born immigrant????

In a number of countries (left) immigrants own their home in their new country more than people born there.

2/3 of immigration into the US is and was based on "family preference" visas.

dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2015/table6

I don't know about other countries.

I am really sorry but I dont get it. I look at polish bar and I see that immigrant own 90% of homes and natives like a 10%. I am I missing?

Also this is the biggest waste of a get I've ever seen on this site.

Checked, nonetheless, you faggot.

So immigrants rent more? And in Austria and Switzerland everyone rents?

Wuhu, who would have known?

...

>No source given as the bottom is conveniently cropped off.
>By "responsible person", do they mean head of household or similar?
>Is it based on New Zealand or Australia. Or somewhere else?

And if I'm reading it as intended, it's just saying that eastern Europeans are more likely to value home ownership? And I guess the Swiss like renting?

oecd.org/publications/indicators-of-immigrant-integration-2015-settling-in-9789264234024-en.htm

oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/8115051ec012.pdf?expires=1488441548&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=54772B952685D98D35146D5286474ECB

page 5

Even those immigrants are poorer than natives

fucking pardos. the biggest waste of a get ever

checked you fucking asshole

Doesn't make any sense

hey aussies wanna own your own home?

All of you retards are reading the graph wrong. The full bar is native born, the blue section is immigrants. The blue immigrant section doesn't reach the same percentage as the native born. And when you adjust for income the immigrant percentage gets closer to the native born percentage.

Jesus christ, it isn't difficult.

People didn't understand that???

Daily reminder that refugee laws were signed in Switzerland, where Nazi gold is, where fake medicine is. Keep believing the magic moving Jew of high salary and no permanent home. It won't turn out for your lower-salary countries as well as for them with 4 homes around globe.

how is this a waste? Trump has nothing against legal immigrants, only illegal immigrants.

This graph shows legal immigrants, not illegals. They don't have data on illegals because they're UNDOCUMENTED

Apparently. Look at some of the replies, lol. I think OP read it wrong too, otherwise there is nothing shocking about the graph.

Just remember

abc.net.au/news/2015-02-17/berg-you-cant-blame-foreigners-for-high-house-prices/6125500

Even though 7 million immigrants live in Australia, and most of them own their own home, and some own multiple properties

It's probably nothing to do with that

What is the redpill here?

Indeed. Btw Estonia's graph is mainly Finnish buying vacation homes.

7 million might not be much friends, that's 30% of the population

If 1 in 3 Americans were Chinese and your government told you that the Chinese were not causing you to be locked out of home ownership, you'd go troppo too

America's looking the goods too

Oh yeah, just noticed that. That is pretty crazy.

That's OK we'll just spend all our income on mortgages and rent, no worries

You yanks are spending less and still can't buy your own homes, that a great time for you

Debt is good if people can handle it. It adds to the GDP

Goy shall not rest, drive trucks in old ages, overfish all waters until there's nothing left, then comes company owned GMO fish, that costs extra too goy, might cause cancer, but no worries we got those extra hip cancer cures, which costs extra. Are you tired of the fucking in your ass? Well we present to you: Matrix, just plug in, we'll handle the rest.

Yes goyim discretionary income trending downwards reducing the velocity of money; causing consumption to decrease in everything is great!

The banks and landlords syphon up GDP while everything else dries up! That's great for everyone if you love unemployment!

Either I'm retarded, or everyone else in this thread is.

The graph shows that in every country except for Estonia Native Born people have a higher rate of home ownership. This is most pronounced in Switzerland and least pronounced in Lithuania.

Why is that a red pill? Isn't this about what you'd expect? Eastern European countries are relatively poor. People immigrate to them for reasons like "Retire to live somewhere with a low cost of living." Poor country, so most immigrants are more wealthy than average, so home ownership among immigrants is relatively high. Conversely, Switzerland is a rich country, and relatively few immigrants can afford to buy homes there.

Where I think some of you may be getting confused is the countries where the blue bar appears larger than the clear bar with the black border. Every country, or group of countries (highlighted), has two bars in the same X position. Only in Estonia is home ownership greater among migrants.

It's not you, OP and most everyone else here is reading it wrong.

I tried to explain
>114904284

Lithuania has a 5% immigration and they owned means of production since Socialism, but nowadays they still own houses. Croatia is just fresh into EU, the situation there might change, since their parents still owned homes since Socialism. Also their divorce rates aren't as high, so it might suggest they have 2 people paying for apartment. If those poor countries do sell apartments, they are 2/3 times as screwed as richer countries.

>apartment

Holy fuck you commies are miserable. All the room in the world but everyone lives in shitty apartments

Apartments were relatively for free in Soviet Russia, you only had to buy a house, which wasn't that expensive also. Nowadays the backed back into apartments, since that's what is left.

IE people not born in Poland.

Most likely due to them being born in whatever Poland was called before the USSR collapsed.

For us and Australia it'll be about half being elderly British couples and the rest being chink money launders.

What's with the big dip in '76?

What's with the dip in 76?

Starting with late 80ies the free trade market moved jobs into main cities and apartments will still cheap, so to force people to sell their homes elsewhere. When they sold their houses they raised the prices and eventually also Commie block prices got higher. So what do you see in EU or modern Russia? Centralized work into main cities. While in the meanwhile foreigners happily buy houses and not even living in them. Somebody from richer country can easily buy a house, but he not going to work there, since first of all there is no work, secondly too low salary.

dont worry goys itll all be over for you soon

Why not? If I had a job in London and a sponsored visa from an employer, I'd buy an apartment in London and would get the British citizenship after 5 years of living there.

Thank you based Slov, sounds like a larger scale of what's happening here.

Unless we get inflation and higher prices of food and everything else. Just a matter what switch they pull, but the core is the same: more enslavement.

Germans are the biggest rent slaves. Winning!

Ever wonder why discretionary income data is impossible to locate?

You wouldn't get citizenship after five years.

Sick system if you ask me. Roskie towns look so stupid, apartment buildings in the middle of nowhere

>austropoors
>switzerpoverty

I will tell you this: they sold our native supermarkets(Mercator) to Croatians(Agrokor), who aren't Croatians, but Americans/British in the background. Now the price of ice cream in Mercator is 5 euro, compare to very similar or even better ice cream in supermarket Lidl, which is 2.5 euro. So what is their goal? Same goal as with banks, to buy it, to ruin it, to allow foreign companies to win. Similar thing they done with most every company. This is how big league competition looks like, they have money to build 5 failure supermarkets in towns, just to compete and fuck the market up. If they bankrupt anybody, that's success for them.

I was scrolling down this thread losing my fucking mind.

The people ITT are fucking retarded and can't read a fucking graph. Immigrants own less homes than natives in most countries, no shit, they're poorer than the natives on average.

Am I having a total brainfart here? Does this graph sow that the VAST majority of owned homes in Lithuania are owned by immigrants?

Oh wait, nevermind. It was a brainfart. Graph is of rates, not magnitude. Derp.

What is wrong with Estonia?

>Debt to income ratio for US peaks around 2007 and decreases from 2008 to 2016.

Thanks Obama.

Why the hell would you want to pay rent 30 years instead of buying your home? At least after you pay off the mortgage the home actually becomes yours.