It has been 9 months. It is getting ridiculous now. What is your unelected House of Lords doing? What is next, will the unelected Queen say the Article 50 bill was eating by her dogs, so it just cannot be effective?
The democratically elected EU commission is waiting for the notice!
Other urls found in this thread:
openeurope.org.uk
archive.4plebs.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>It has been 9 months. It is getting ridiculous now
2 weeks m80
>What is your unelected House of Lords doing?
sending it back to parliment.
>democratically elected EU
Thats a good one ;p
We told you 6 months ago that we would trigger Article 50 at the end of March.
Nothing has changed.
article 50 was always supposed to be triggered in late March 2017, you haven't been paying attention.
The left fucked the house of lords with "reforms" in the Blair period. Most of the lords are radical socialist cronies of Blair now.
>trigger Article 50 at the end of March
This has always been the plan
Lords can't stop us
/thread
David Cameron said he would trigger it on June 24, 2016.
Theresa May said she would send the A50 notice at the very, very latest in March.
Guess what, it is March. Why are your unelected Lords even discussing this? Don't you have a democracy?
Can any brit bong in here give me a quick run down? You guys left the EU right?
>House of lords sends it back
They should be boiled in piss
I've lost a lot of respect for Germany. Shit seems fucked. Don't respect a country of people trying to be independent, instead up cuck EU slaves.
No.
The process for leaving the EU takes 2 years from the moment we trigger Article 50 of the EU Treaty.
We will trigger Article 50 at the end of March. We will no longer be members of the EU by March 2019.
David Cameron is a lying cunt.
The plan has ALWAYS been to trigger A50 at the end of March. Cool your autism Hans.We're just as eager to leave as you are believe me. We just want to make sure we do it on OUR terms.
WE decide when we want to trigger A50 not you.
>The plan has ALWAYS been to trigger A50 at the end of March.
Why did Cameron then say he will trigger it on June 24, 2016... 1 month BEFORE the referendum? And all the conservatives in parliament agreed.
Because he's a lying cunt. You'd have to be an idiot to believe anything that DC says.
Since he resigned like a coward and Theresa May stepped up, we have been very clear on the fact that we will trigger article 50 at the end of March.
I don't know why this is so confusing for so many people.
>will the unelected Queen say the Article 50 bill was eating by her dogs, so it just cannot be effective?
The Queen supports Brexit, she needs to step in and take over again after assassinating Charles.
>This has always been the plan
It was the end of January six months ago when Leadsom was still in the picture.
Law is just a game and people are animals who can stop playing it at any time, especially when theyre mistreated, which is why EU parasites are living on borrowed time.
fUck JoOs, PraisE HITleR!
>David Cameron said he would trigger it on June 24, 2016.
Wtf? No he didn't, you fucking kraut. Get your facts together.
You have no idea what you're talking about but seeing you're an anarchist from the US that doesn't surprise me at all.
Sorry, idiot, but I have been following this shit for a while and I watched Cameron say he will trigger Article 50 the day after the referendum live in parliament.
As we know, he chickened out and stepped down. What a coward pussy.
Keep being wrong, dumbass. Cameron said "promptly," but he sure as hell didn't say the day after the referendum.
Following it where? Read the Spectator or OrderOrder to get into the low down if you're really interested. To non-Germans it'll be boring af but after following German politics for awhile, nothing is more boring than german politics, nothing.
No you complete fucktard. He said it in a PMQ, when pressed by one of his own MPs what "promptly" means. That was in April or May 2016. You probably do not know what a PMQ is, because you are an idiot, but still.
So what? That pigfucking queerlover is out of the picture now.
Nope, never happened. There's no chance Cameron would have promised triggering Article 50 the day afterwards, and if that were the case, there would be articles about it everywhere.
But if you're so certain, give me evidence, beyond referring to some unspecified PMQ. Go on, I'm waiting.
The closest thing I could find to this is Cameron saying in a rather ambiguous way that "That's what we would have to do," when asked if he would trigger it on June 28, which doesn't make sense, as he knew there was no chance he would trigger it in that time, not even being certain the government had that authority.
But I'm not seeing anything about a trigger on the day after, maybe just hours after the results came in.
>there would be articles about it everywhere.
You are stupid or something? Of course there is an article somewhere. But as he was just saying "promptly" means "as early as June 24, 2016" on an MP question, it just wasn't big news. "promptly" generally means within days, which was the point I was making.
It was NEVER March 2017 until around September 2016 when May started with the "end of March" bs.
He specifically said "June 24" on a question. The reason I remember this so specifically is because I made a thread about it on Sup Forums a year ago.
And that's that. Believe me or not.
Because the pig fucked never anticipated that Leave would win and had absolutely no contingency plan in place so he rage quit
>Of course there is an article somewhere.
You mean the one you haven't posted? You made the claim, let's see the evidence.
>"as early as June 24, 2016"
That's isn't the same thing, is it? Obviously, they couldn't do it earlier than that because it then would have been before the referendum. April 1st, 2017 would also have been as "early as June 24, 2016. Still, that doesn't mean he said it would be on a day he knew would be impossible.
...
I assume this was you archive.4plebs.org
This probably didn't happen and you either misunderstood or imagined him saying this. Secondly, there was absolutely no chance of this actually happening, so if you believed it, you were incredibly delusional, considering the British public wouldn't have believed it. If Cameron had said it, it only would have been to fear mongered even more about the uncertainty that Leave winning would cause, adding to this fear that he would have triggered Article 50 the day afterwards.
>That's isn't the same thing, is it?
Yes, it is. He was asked "What does promptly mean" and he said "The day after the referendum, June 24, 2016, as early as that".
Again, I heard it, I made a thread about it, I discussed it here. Just because I cannot yet find an article covering the PMQ or the link to the specific PMQ youtube vid around here, doesn't mean it did not happen.
P.S. here is a clip where he said he will active on June 28: youtube.com
In parliament he said June 24 (not sure where the 28 comes from...)
That is from January 2017... I am talking about April or May 2016.
well then do it already dad! jeez!
English are so fucked, why do they want to kick out white people and not pakis and nogs?
>Because he's a lying cunt. You'd have to be an idiot to believe anything that DC says.
/thread
No, that's not the same thing.
If I say something happens as early as a specific date, that means it will happen, but won't happen earlier than that. Trust me, this is the meaning of those words. You might object that it makes it meaningless, Cameron merely confirming that he wasn't going to trigger Article 50 before the referendum. While it literally does make it meaningless, it's a sly attempt at fear mongering to even suggest the complete implausible option of triggering Article 50 before any negotiations actually happened.
>P.S. here is a clip
I was referring to that in . Again, his answer is ambiguous because, he meant to say that the Article had to be triggered. It would have been absurd for him to say that it had to be triggered on that date because there was no foundation to that.
We can't deal with that particular problem while in the EU.
Don't worry user, they are next.
>democratically elected EU commission
>democratically
I was aware of that, I was just wondering if you or some other kraut was obsessing over a date that Cameron probably didn't say, but if he did, anyone with common sense would have known was bullshit.
>Again, his answer is ambiguous
What in the following conversation is ambiguous?
Cameron: You active Article 50... [mumbling]
Islamic reporter: You activate that immediately?
Cameron: That is what... if British people vote to leave that is what we should do, yes.
Islamic reporter: On the 28th of June you will activate the notice to the European Council?
Cameron: Yes, this is what we got to do. What would happen next is you have two years to negotiate.
youtube.com
>he meant to say that the Article had to be triggered.
He was asked whether he would activate it immediately and he said "yes".
>It would have been absurd for him to say that it had to be triggered on that date because there was no foundation to that.
In another article he said that a promptly triggering of A50 is what the British people expect and that there was no way around it, politically, to promptly trigger it.
And AGAIN, in parliament when pressed by a Tory MP what "promptly" means, he said "June 24, as early as that".
Again, it's ambiguous what he meant, because he's perfectly aware that, while there isn't a need for it to be four days after the referendum, there is a need for it to be done at all. So his answer saying that it had to be then, doesn't make sense.
Also, he said the 28th, not the 24th, so get fucked.
>He was asked whether he would activate it immediately and he said "yes".
"Immediately" is ambiguous, and to anyone with half a brain knew to be false. I'm sorry if you German krauts are too stupid to realize when politicians make white lies that are flagrantly false, but everyone else just accepts it. Really, only idiots would have taken that as a promise, especially when he was so ambivalent in expressing it.
>June 24, as early as that".
I've already explained to you that that does not literally mean that it would happen on that day, but it would happen not earlier than that. Again, nobody watching that would have thought that Cameron was actually going to trigger Article 50 on that day, otherwise there would have been far greater reaction to him saying that.
You might not like the response, but that's it. Nobody gave a shit when Cameron said that date because there was no meaning in it. If you fell for it when nobody else did, you only have yourself to blame.
Yes we could have done.
Theresa May did almost nothing about the immigration numbers during her time as Home Secretary.
Poor foolish europhile plebs think the commission is elected.
He never expected his party to be elected into government. At most he expected a coalition, and the Lib Dems or whoever it was would have blocked it.
No, pretty sure this was well after the 2015 election.
>democratically elected EU commission
wait a sec..