Customs Confiscates 21 Sex Dolls Made To Look Like Children

A bunch of guys in Norway ordered sex dolls that look like children. Some of these men work in jobs where they have access to children, others have been found to possess pictures of child abuse.

General overview of the legality on this
>a fine or imprisonment of 3 years will be given to those who
>manufactures child abuse or something that sexualizes children
>distributes, offers, sells, or hands over, or in any way make such products accessible
>obtains, introduces, or possesses such products, provided they have been procured knowingly
>holds a public presentation or orchestrates a public performance with such products
>misleads someone below the age of 18 to be a part of (for instance body reference for drawings or voice work) the manufacturing of such products

I think that these dolls undeniably warrants a breach of the privacy of the purchaser, and those found to have access to children or in possession of photographs of children even close to sexualized should face the law. However, I fail to see who the victim is in just possession of these products dolls/drawings/written material. Enlighten me Sup Forums.

Other urls found in this thread:

money.cnn.com/2016/12/21/news/firearms-rules-europe/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

3 years for manufacturing child abuse?

As in, they don't actually abuse real children to produce it. They draw it/write about it/create dolls that look like children.

>Making smaller dolls cost less money for the manufacturer and the customer

What makes them childlike? Just because they are small? I mean based on that picture I'd agree with the statement. However, if actually look at the difference in price on those sex doll you'd see that the ordering a doll with child like size can save you thousands.

That said, the proportions of the doll in the picture are rather suspect.

>norway

jesus you guys are the worst

More proofs please of evidence of illegal dolls. Ty user

sounds good to me, although now you cant watch japanese stuff :P

What do you expect living in a police state?

Fine! I'll get pleasure with the real thing instead! I like the warmth she puts out, the movement as she struggles and the sound effects she makes too. Jokes on you (((customs)))!

Good. Fuck pedophiles.

jews working hard to prevent the goyim from taking the cunnypill. SAD!

>As in, they don't actually abuse real children to produce it.
True. Still pretty fucked up though.

There are laws against animal cruelty. Do you think it's because we care so much about animals? They kill and eat each others alive in nature all the time. The problem with animal cruelty is that it's psychologically unhealthy. For those doing it and those watching it happen. It creates psychopaths. It can come with exposure and habits. You don't want too much of that in your society.

Similar thing with child dolls like this. Maybe.

One look at that pig faced customs officer and I'd want to fuck a loli doll too

Yeah Schlomo, those button noses are so revolting.

So there is the potential that when the dolls are not being made available, the said buyer goes out to find a....

Just saying

plastic dolls are illegal? why?
they dont harm anyone?
would they rather have them fucking real children?

>The problem with animal cruelty is that it's psychologically unhealthy.
> For those doing it and those watching it happen.
I think that is really a case by case basis. I know that I personally only started taking animal cruelty seriously after being exposed to it in the way of videos and realized how horrible it was. On the other hand, there are some cultures that boil dogs alive or cut the throat on their food to watch them bleed to death while praying.

I think it's important to have a culture surrounding it that condemns it, but like violence in movies and videogames, a product where someone does not actually get hurt should still be completely legal to possess, sell, and produce.

First they came for Freedom of Dolls, and then they came for Freedom of Porn, and then they took Freedom of Speech. Don't let your hate for pedophiles cloud your judgment. The government has no business going after sex toys and masturbation material.

What's next? Will Norway ban Loli art?

cernovich?

I bet the Norway laws regarding this were put together by some Viking Wimmens.

It already does. Manufacturing pictures that contain sexualized children is illegal, especially if you make money off of it. If it is found in your possession during an official invasion of your privacy it is considered possession of child pornography.

Pretty goofy if you ask me. I could literally draw the stuff in court, and the only victims would be the people in the room grossed out by it, and me being punished by the law.

so let me get this straight... these guys are attracted to little kids and instead of going out into the real world and fucking them, they try to relieve their impulses by fucking an inanimate object, and are sent to jail for it?

do you want your kids to be raped and murder? let the guy fuck his stupid doll so he doesn't go wandering the streets for your daughter.

OK, what about the written word. Say someone writes about having a fantasy of sex with a underage child. Would writing that be illegal?

THINK OF THOSE POOR SILICON CHILDREN YOU SICK LEAF!
[spoiler]thank god loli is legal in good ol usa. im gonna go fap to sad panda now.[/spoiler]

it's europe so my guess is yes.

I don't know guys. It could be a necessary evil to prevent pedos from raping children.

But can their fake meat keep Soros alive?

If you're found to possess it or have created it you will be viewed as a threat to children and be subject to the law up above. Any manufacture of something that sexualizes children is treated the same.

For Christ's sake! If I put down offensive words in a private journal they can lock me up. That is just FUCKING wrong.

this is the next step to 3d waifus.

why the state gotta be so mean?

This is the argument they are using for keeping these laws. They feel that possession of these products may breach barriers that can lead to these people taking sexual advantage of real children down the line.

yes. just like making a threat online to someone can be considered a crime. writing that you want to bang a loli is the same thing as really doing it irl in real life.

This.
The small ones are much more affordable and easier to put away somewhere.
Getting the big adult size ones ( though most are not really adult size they are like teen size ) are harder to put away and maintain, cost.
Ridiculous.
They might as well ban onaholes completely since most male masturbators are fairy vagina size ffs.
This is retarded

Unbelievable. Thank GOD for the 1st amendment.

THese fuckers must get the death penalty.

Its a proven fact that people who own items like this become rapists sooner or later which everyone already knows and why their illegal in the US since we protect our children.

>wasting my tax money to prosecute dollfucking autists

we need another Breivik

That does also seem valid, but suppressing your desires can result in explosive consequences. I guess more pschoanalisys is required but no one would willingly admit to being a pedo.

However if you legalize these child sexdolls it would make it easier to track down and record pedos for survellience

>proven fact

okay, so it should be no problem for you to provide said proof, then?

Citation please. And your argument sounds like the old "marijuana will always lead to heroin addiction" meme of the 1950's

>they dont harm anyone?
Just making them available for sale constitutes a danger to children everywhere who could become a victim of someone who buys one of these sick fucking dolls.

>in the US since we protect our children.


bill, your shithole is a haven for some of the biggest organized untouchable pedophile rings in the world.

and pizzagate proved this.


sick and evil yankees

I'd like to add that we have minority groups in our country that are protected by hate-speech laws. These groups include jews, blacks, muslims, etc.

>On the other hand, there are some cultures that boil dogs alive or cut the throat on their food to watch them bleed to death while praying.
>some cultures
Fuck those """"""""""cultures"""""""""" desu.
>violence in movies and videogames
That's very fake though. It doesn't come close to making you experience real violence or cruelty. I must have killed tens of thousands of people in video games kek. Doesn't matter. It's not a very good simulation of it (and that's not the goal). With VR it might start getting a bit more disturbing though if they focus on trying to make the whole thing feel as real as possible.
>a product where someone does not actually get hurt should still be completely legal to possess, sell, and produce.
That's the general tendency I guess. Almost everything will be allowed unless it *directly* affects other people. No matter the effect on overall society in the long run (and thus on everyone else eventually).
We used to have religion regulating some basic decency issues in society. It made sense to have the government out of it then.
Now what is guiding society overall? What are the values we still care about and want to perpetuate? It's easy to say there should be a shaming culture discouraging fucked up shit, but this doesn't just magically happens. Our values will falter over time. And our culture will decline as it fucks up people.
There's a certain chic to the libertarian approach, but it might not work so well when your culture is already being attacked from all sides and slowly dismantled.
Pedophilia is bad is one of our values but it might already be starting to change.

>okay, so it should be no problem for you to provide said proof, then?
Its called the LAW, we have laws against people owning anything like this and many states ban even a drawing or writing about it because its so dangerous, there is nothing more sacred than a child. Your not a parent just some basement dwelling troll so you wouldnt understand what the LAW is.

Thanks. Yes, like Germany. Ok, understand user. I won't be giving a seig heil in Oslo anytime soon.

>"lol is as dumb as those idiots in the 50s who said pot leads to heroin xD"
>meanwhile rates of heroin overdoses goes up every year as marijuana use becomes more commonplace and prevalent
Hm... Makes you think...

>constitutes a danger
how? do you think doll fuckers would ever go outside in the first place?

I bet your a kiddie diddler

I can tell you are.


you wouldnt happen to be jewish by any chance?

Yet the fucking weaboos will never see anything wrong with japan pedophillia when it comes to anime and sex dolls.

We need Norway's immigration policies.

Correlation does not imply causation user.

thats because its not real

>pedophilia is bad is one of our values

yeah, since like, the 80s. There are instances of child marriage in the US(and I mean actual prepubescent children) as late as in the 1930s. Pedophilia (both child marriage and in some cases pederasty) has been part of western culture until recently.

Naturally, we know better now than to give free-reign for grown men to hit on little kids, but the current hysteria is way overblown.

Funny thing about sieg heil specifically.
There have been a bunch of articles recently about nazis in Norway organizing. They mention the members specfically by name and with pictures. They are no longer viewed as stable enough to possess guns, and shooting ranges are bing pressured into restricting access to suspected nazis.

t. Mahmood

>until recently.


still is

(waits for the obligatory AoC laws are femanazi controls comment)

>US customs poker face

Trained professionals.

>it is a proven fact that owning a sex doll will lead to molestation because it is illegal to own sex dolls

I forgot that most of Sup Forums are actual retards

>Norway

Goddammit!

If you write an erotic pedo novel with extensive details of adults abusing children, you will face the wrath of the law, yes.

This doesn't mean it's illegal to write novels where child abuse a theme, though. As a part of sex ed in middle school we read a pretty graphic story about two 16 year olds humping (with consent).

I would think that when trying to separate legitimate (in the eyes of the law) storytelling from "written CP", they will consider things like if it is meant to cause arousal, is it trying to glorify or excuse the acts, who are the parties doing the act, who is this supposed to reach, is it explicit etc.

As much as I hate pedos and those trying to normalize it, I am skeptical of banning fictional drawings and texts, even if they are gross and despicable.

One thing I find concerning is that the advocates of this are pushing that an abused child, no matter the severity of the offense, is irreparably damaged and a broken person who will never live a truly fulfilling life as a result of it.

I can see how the narrative helps as a protective barrier that steels peoples disgust for pedophiles and fuels the engines to protect the children of the nation, but at the same time I can also see it creating a lot of tension and a lot of people who in their teens get convinced that they are broken deep down inside and should just give up on themselves and society.

drawings are just as bad as a real image, its the same thing really.

Only sick fucks like you and pedo sympathizers think that shit should be legal.

Crazy how gun control laws can be added/changed so easily. It's such a foreign idea to anyone in the USA.

I'm reading the comments under the article
Most of the ones from men are:
>I don't see a problem with people fucking small dolls even if its pretty sick.
All the women are:
>SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!

That's so fucking bullshit. We probably have something here.
How can you criminalise something that does not impact upon a single person?

HOLY SHIT THE GUY IN YOUR JPG JUST RAPED ME! IM CALLING 911

Just a (((coincidence))) then? Even though marijuana has always been a gateway drug, so regardless if the user goes on to harder drugs statistically the more its used the more people will use harder drugs like cocaine. user is right you fucking nigger.

The EU is currently working on even stricter gun laws:
money.cnn.com/2016/12/21/news/firearms-rules-europe/
Trying to ban semi autos this time. As an active pistol shooter, this pisses me off. Even though Norway isn't a part of the EU our politicians bow to them anyway.

"This ban sure will stop the influx of old AK47's from the Balkans!"

I understand this logic of your laws. In the USA a federal law could not be passed with such restrictions, BUT in many of the more Conservative (southern mainly) states, such restrictions would be the norm. California and New York would never pass such restrictions so the more lenient federal law would be applied. Bottom line Loli is OK in the Blue Democratic states, but may/may not be legal in Texas, Alabama, etc.

Thing is, we already do criminalize a lot of things for "potential for danger" one of the most common ones are speed limits on the road.

clearly there needs to be laws protecting kids from manipulation, but we should tone down the rhetoric surrounding this. I started watching porn and fapping when I was around 10, some of my friends started even earlier. Hell, I've even talked to some girls who had sex with adults when they were pre-teens, and they say they were willing and don't feel harmed by it at all.

Whether we're comfortable with it or not, some kids are sexually precocious, and reacting with "OMG, you were raped, you poor victim!" can sometimes hurt more than it helps.

The real image has an actual child, an actual victim. And anyone who makes drawings or texts based on real children or actions should of course face jail time.

But a drawing or text can be pure fantasy too, with no real victim. While a vile, disgusting, morally bankrupt fantasy that should exclude you from a lot of jobs and positions in the community, it's still a fantasy. Commercial distribution of that shit should be illegal too.

But I don't think being skeptical of a thought police is "being a sick fuck".

We're a country run by women and cucks. None (except pedos) are against the ban on child porn, but everyone I've talked to agree that the written word thing is ridiculous.

>But a drawing or text can be pure fantasy too, with no real victim.
How can you say there is no victim when the drawing is illegal because it depicts a child engaged in a sexual act fucking baby raper.

kys

$800-1000 for a doll that is small variable breast sizes.
Or
$2500-4000 for Teen size dolls
Or
$7000-8000 for the american company Real Doll

ffs Real Doll sold torsos for bargain prices because most people dont want to shell out that much for a fuck toy.

Pocket Pussies are almost all small fairy to child sized depictions of genitals. All of them.

Ridiculous. If these kinds of laws come to the USA fuck it I'm going left.

Citation needed, nigger

Telling people to "kys" Is a crime user! You are aiding in someone committing suicide if they go through with it. I hope are ready for jail time!

real like turning into "minority report" police arresting you for a future crime you could commit. Better not speak out that would lead to future treason.

As a side note, most of the "ban porn laws" are in the USA Southern Conservative states, BUT... Did you know the biggest consumers of porn in the USA are from those exact same Southern Conservative states. It's as if they say publicly "porn is evil", but behind closed doors they love their Thai midget fart porn. Kek.

>MUSLIMS IN NORWAY HAVE 9 YEAR OLD WIVES THEY FUCK DAILY
>MUSLIMS CAN FUCK YOUR 12 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER IN EUROPE AND IT'S OKAY

>WHITE GUY GETS A DOLL THAT'S YOUNG AND HE GOES TO PRISON

WAKE THE FUCK UP. they want to fucking make everything white men do criminal so they can genocide you

i had no idea Sup Forums knew so much about sex dolls... i feel less strange

Trying too hard, your b8 needs to be more subtle

>no mention of prescription drugs
>most abused drugs and lead to abuse of harder drugs.

>DOLL THAT'S TOO YOUNG
How can dolls even have ages?

Pictures or it didn't happen

Which child, specifically, is the victim when some hobo draws an underaged girl stick figure being pounded by a fatty stick figure?
The one that was drawn? Are you insane? You're advocating thought police. Shit would be full blown 1984 if the law was enforced the way you wanted it.

Triggered by weak bait

it dioesn't matter. they can make up any fucking rule or description possible. in the future they'll say it's potential rape to own one and arrest you that way.

MUSLIMS FUCKING 7 YEAR OLD BOY = OKAY
WHITE MAN OWNING A DOLL = JAIL TIME!

There certainly is a lot more nuance to the topic than a lot of people are comfortable with admitting. I personally knew how babies were made when I was 7 years old. Started masturbating at 10, and remember classmates having had intercourse as young as 11, all of which have grown up to become stable and stand-up members of society with good jobs and happy families of their own.

That being said people have legal guardians up to the age of 18, and I think any legal leverage the guardians have to protect their child is a good one.

Like I said in the OP. Possession of those dolls clearly warrants a breach of privacy on behalf of the purchaser, but possession, manufacturing, and even selling the stuff is a victimless crime at best.

wouldn't sex doll keep pedos from raping real kids?

"I don't like it, so it should be banned." - Every European ever.

It's even better since they say it's fine for mussies since "it's their culture!" but cry about the "rape culture" of the wast and how it needs to change.

>victim-less crime at best
It's no crime at all though. Just because you don't like it is not a good reason for a law. If it ends up being harmful later handle it then, not now before anyone other then the buyer is involved. It's like going the music and games will lead to murderers and rapists, it didn't and it won't. Fiction is fiction and reality is reality, this never changes and if you have problems with telling them apart you need some mental help.

Yes, the laws against the written word are insane. It's almost like censoring thoughts.

That's the irony behind all of it. These "save the children" nuts think that if they take all the sex dolls the children magically become safe somehow. As if taking the dolls away helps their urges to not rape little children.

>those found to have access to children or in possession of photographs of children even close to sexualized should face the law
And who is the victim in this case? Are you a victim too if somebody takes a photo of you and then jacks off at home? In what way it causes harm to you?
I get how distribution of said material can be considered a crime if pornography is illegal, but possession?
This is a slippery slope. First they prohibit possession, then drawing, then small dolls or robots, then any man with a child is seen as pedophile.
When the only thing that actually constitutes a crime is fucking a child below the age of consent.
Same with rape laws. The more they deteriorate due process - the easier it gets to destroy mans reputation.
Whether or not hes actual rapist is of little importance.

It's like those who say "just make more laws" as if people that are not following the current laws are going to start following the new laws. Why would they? They are already lawbreakes it's nothing for them to break a few more.

A-are you saying conservatives are a bunch of hypocrites?

This may sound sexist, but I bet these anti-sex doll laws were made up and suppted by women law makers.