Be russians

>Be russians
>Be captured by swedish vikings
>Get sold as slaves
>Cucked by THE cuck
LMFAO

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rani_(Slavic_tribe)
stormfront.org/forum/t44347/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Constantinople_(860)
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>be vikangz
>raid random villages near rivers and kidnap people
>be proud of it

They truly were the tatars of their time, kidnapping people only to sell them to Arabs/Turks later. Yeah, sad.

being an etymological origin of the word 'Slave' says it all

Cool, so now called a slave means glorious huh? Really fires up those neurons doesn't it?

>Be Peter the Great
>Cuck the cuck who cucked you

Swedecucks cant fight lmao

>georgian intellectuals
'slav' is derived from old slavic 'slovo', which means 'word'.
how possibly could an eastern-european word have its origins in english language?

>bringing a gun to a sword fight

>how possibly could an eastern-european word have its origins in english language?
he said its the other way around

dont know if true

We took some of them home as well
>What are the caroleans

What battle is that btw?

>be argie
>get cucked by bongs
>be so cucked that you still havent recovered

I have no reason to start a fight with you, I just want another season of bongs vs argies banter

Don't forget Slavs once lived all the way up the Denmark. If the anglo saxon race was so superior how'd they tell foreigners push into their supposed land so much?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rani_(Slavic_tribe)

there were no russians back then, there even was not a single nation united by single faith or language

it was a bunch of tribes who lived in forests, swamps and steppes and constantly fought every neighbour and each other

SLIDE THREAD
>SLIDE THREAD
SLIDE THREAD
>SLIDE THREAD

SLIDE THREAD
>SLIDE THREAD
SLIDE THREAD
>SLIDE THREAD

SLIDE THREAD
>SLIDE THREAD
SLIDE THREAD
>SLIDE THREAD


newfags and redditors, ignore the obvious slide threads. Shariablue shills are in full force. Ignore their slide threads and pitiful attempts to derail topics

There were Slavs living on the shores of the Baltic since antiquity.
Their role on the Baltic is not very well known in the West, in spite of that it was considerable. It is interesting to see that the famous Norman vikings who plundered so much of Western Europe failed completely to duplicate their feats against the Slavs dwelling on the shores of the Baltic. In fact it is these very Slavs who often raided and pillaged the Normans instead! These Slavic raids varied greatly in size and took place on Danish, Swedish, and even Norwegian soil. (Their devastating nature is well testified in the literary works of the notable Danish chronicler Saxo Grammaticus)

The Slavs who dwelled on the shores of the Baltic not only proved to be more than just a match for the Norsemen on the waters of the Baltic Sea, but also are known to have ventured outside of that acquen into the North Sea. Such forays took place during the Slavic raids against both Denmark and Norway. For example, on one occasion during a campaign in 1043 AD, the Polabian Slavs first defeated a Danish fleet that was send to capture Vineta, then took advantage of the victory by launching a naval expedition against Denmark. This expedition sailed south of Falster and Lolland, then between Jutland and Fionia, it fought a battle off Arhus, circumnavigated all of Jutland thus ending up on its western or North Sea side, and then crossed Schleswig by land (between the Danish strongholds of Schleswig and Haithabu) fighting much of the way in the process, and
safely returned by sea to Slavia, after successfully completing the
land crossing of Schleswig. In the end only during this one
expedition, the Polabian Slavs managed to lay waste to many of
Denmark's coastal areas...

t. Ross


>b... but sl- slavs are a slave race!

And talking of the Slavs on the North Sea one must also add that some Slavs actually lived on the North Sea's shores, as military settlements of the Polabian Slavs are know to have taken place in areas on the North Sea, in the Netherlands and England, not very far from the westernmost lands of Slavs - west from Hamburg (which was known as "Civitas Sclavorum"), where Slavonic Drevams were finally Germanized only in the 18th century.

Joms-Vikings, the best fighting force on the Baltic (as acknowledged by Vikings), were mostly Slavs.

In 965 AD the Viking Harald Gormsson (a.k.a. Bluetooth) married a
Wendish princess and built a stronghold at Jomsborg on the Baltic
Coast near the Wendish trading center of Wollin. Here a famous
brotherhood of Vikings (i.e., the Joms-Vikings) founded by Harald's
son, Svein Forkbeard, is supposed to have collected, fighting with
the Wends against foreign invaders on land and sea. The Joms-Vikings
were essentially a warrior cult (a sort of Pagan Knights Templar) who
lived in barracks under harsh discipline and trained constantly in
hopes that they would die in battle so as to join Woden in Valhalla.

According to Adam of Bremen Joms-Vikings were Slavs, as confirmed by archeology.

Didn't know slavs were such kangs, Source?

...The desire for piracy was as strong among the Wends as was
their "longing for display," and for similar reasons. As already
stated, plunder was a most important source of surplus wealth in a
society that tended to neglect agriculture. To maintain their
hospitality the Wends, especially the great families, had to resort
to raids for plunder. As with hospitality also, this form of behavior
was encouraged by the society: "He, indeed, who does not know how to
make away with plunder is stupid and inglorious." Skill in piracy,
like liberality, was a necessary attribute of a man. The very
definition of a leader was one who plundered. This is the reason for
the "sorrowful countenances" of the Wilzi when they learned of Duke
Henry the Lion's prohibition against raiding the Danes. Not only
were they being denied loot, they were being denied one more field in
which they could behave as men were supposed to behave. This
accounts, too, for the persistence of piracy even in the face of
retribution and subjugation.16 When the Obodrite Pribislav (ca.
1142), who took the German name Heinrich, took over Cruto's Obodrite
realm around 1093 he chose not to promote Christianity even though he
was himself a Christian. Realizing the importance of piracy to his
people, and desiring to live in peace with the Germans, he promoted
farming among the Obodrites and discouraged raiding, albeit with
little effect. The result of this need for plunder was that it made
the Wends wretched neighbors. Saxo complained loud and long of the
depredations wrought in Denmark by the Wendish pirates. To the Danes,
a truly effective king was one who could deal successfully with the
Wendish raids.18 It was this incessant raiding that was the main
source of tension between the Wends and their Germanic neighbors.

Some Pole who appears to be quite intelligent appears on youtube and on stormfront plus slavic websites saying this about Slavs. Don't know how true it all is.

ok, can you give me some anti-ship missiles?

pls dont give the codes to the britfags like the frogs did

stormfront.org/forum/t44347/


The Wends also waged wars of conquest. The goal of war was not the
acquisition of territory but rather of booty and tribute. The methods
used were similar to the raids of Niclot and Pribislav: the main goal
was the capturing of a stronghold. The Wends realized that castles
and other fortified points represented the most serious threat to
their own freedom.31 We possess almost nothing about the methods of
campaigning, but the fact that the Circipani and Kicini could, in
1057, sustain three defeats in a single summer and still have
sufficient reserves to call in foreign armies and eventually triumph
is evidence that Wends had as hard a time subduing other Wends with
their armies as the Germans often did, possibly because they employed
similar offensive tactics.

The keys to Wendish warfare were mobility and surprise, which were
given them by their ships and their horses. It appears that cavalry
was used only as an auxiliary force. The Carolingians forbade the
selling of horses and arms to the Slavs, but the main force was
normally on foot.42 Like their German counterparts, the Wendish
warriors may well have used horses to reach the battlefield,
dismounting in order to fight.

It was like 1500 years ago, guy.

Once mobilized, a German army could achieve only limited success. m e
western notion of victory was to drive the enemy from the field of
battle or to force a surrender. An army did not usually pursue the
vanquished, except as individuals might decide to capture a hostage
for ransom. The other basic strategy was the attacking of
strongholds. This was unreliable, since German siege techniques were
extremely primitive until the middle of the twelfth century. The Slav
oppidum of Brunabor (later Brandenburg) was captured thirteen times
between 928 and 1157, but it was taken by storm only three of those
times.77 Treachery or starvation and disease were the best siege
weapons the Germans had. This was why the oppida of the Wends were
frequent targets on these expeditions: the tribe could retreat inside
the walls and wait for the invaders to go home, which was usually not
long. The Wends could not long be cowed by these methods. Retreat was
not a disgrace but a tactic with them. Strongholds were sometimes
burned before the invaders ever reached them. A great defeat usually
made the tribes submit, but their ability and desire to resist was
not broken.

>be vikangz
>rape,kill, pillage innocent peasants
>literally nigger tier
>but at the end anihillated by real armies

PAGAN KEKS BTFO!

I swear to God i typed "KEKS"

Aparently is you type "KEKS" it becomes "KEKS"

WTF!!!!

Funny for you to have that flag
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Constantinople_(860)

OMG!!!!!!!!!

ITS HABBENING!!!!

But yeah honestly I dislike to think of myself as a nationalist anyways, posted the content as something to think about, and it's written by a nationalistic Pole so perhaps take it with a grain of salt?

It is as true as the things finish kangs make up

That's like saying the Roman Empire was a failure, because they eventually fell.

Even the descriptions are wrong. Look at Stamford Bridge. It says the vikings were raping and pillaging and the British army was exhausted. In reality, the vikings were unprepared and only lost because they were ambushed and didn't even have time to put on their armor.

Truly you are the newest fag desu senpai cuck

>finish kangs make up

About Rurik I'm pretty sure he was half Finnish as genetic tests where done or whatnot. Just saying.

>implying i dont bait newfags salty kids like you to shitpost

kys fug

Word filters my dude.
Cuck in all caps changes to KEKS.

>Result:Successful Rus' raid on outskirts of Constantinople

Wow what a victory

No need to point out you were literally barbarian niggers who looted peasants but got rekt at the end

>Russians
You mean Ukrainians who got sold, amirite? And your ancestors were pretty based, and pretty much united tribes into Rus.

No, it's based on "slava" which means "Gr8". We are the greatest.

You didn't want to let us "barbarians" in to your city at first, but changed your mind pretty much forever after that battle.

Pretty great victory desu

Patriarch Photius citate: «O, кaк жe вce тoгдa paccтpoилocь, и гopoд eдвa тaк cкaзaть, нe был пoднят нa кoпьe! Кoгдa лeгкo былo взять eгo, a житeлям нeвoзмoжнo зaщищaтьcя, тo oчeвиднo, oт вoли нeпpиятeля зaвиceлo — пocтpaдaть eмy или нe пocтpaдaть … Cпaceниe гopoдa нaхoдилocь в pyкaх вpaгoв и coхpaнeниe eгo зaвиceлo oт их вeликoдyшия … гopoд нe взят пo их милocти и пpиcoeдинeннoe к cтpaдaнию бeccлaвиe oт этoгo вeликoдyшия ycиливaeт бoлeзнeннoe чyвcтвo плeнeния.»[9]

>City was doomed but russians just retreated because they wanted

i do not understand

if swedes were original vikings what are modern norwegians

Swedes, Norwegians, Danes, even Slavs did som Viking from time to time.

It's only their victims who think "Vikings" were some cultural identity.

True,even Swiss did some Viking from time to tome.
WE WUZ VIKINGS N'SHIET

Welcome to Sup Forums, newfriend

>i was merely pretending

Wow, I haven't seen this excuse in quite a while