Thread for bringing together all right wing political ideologies together to form an alliance against our common enemy; leftists. Libertarians, Republicans, Conservatives, National Socialists, Fascists, & Anarcho-Capitalists are welcome here to share their fight against the left!
> REPORT IN FOR YOUR IDEOLOGY! > TAKE BACK OUR BOARD! > DRIVE OUT THE LEFTISTS!
We need people to keep the RWA Generals active! Those with the ability to keep videos & news updates possible, and always keep it updated with a new pastebin link!
Please stop shilling this meme that Hoppe libertarianism is Fascism or that monarchism and Fascism are compatible. You'll only hurt the cause.
Nathaniel Anderson
You're shilling for a division of the right in a time where AnComs, Commies, Socialists, DemSocs, Dems, and Libs are uniting together against the right. We can't fight this battle on our own for long, friend.
Jason Garcia
Bump for the preservation of western society.
Jonathan Rodriguez
Threads going to die if no based /RWA/ bros keep it updated with me.
Oliver Stewart
We can infight when we aren't in dire straits.
Nathan Parker
Exactly. A good example of RWA is Murdoch Murdoch, 3 different people with 3 different right wing ideologies who get along and produce content on YouTube.
There's no reason why we can't settle our differences to destroy Marxism.
Leo Nguyen
Thread is going to die
Nicholas Lee
It is utterly useless for us to debate what form of government we *would* take, if we could, while everyone else is busy ensuring their own government is the one in power. We're squabbling about what color to paint the walls or what decor to buy while the house burns down.
We can argue and fight each other once there's something to argue and fight over! We NEED to work together right now, in this moment, because the other side is (even if unintentionally), and if we can't get our heads out of our asses we're going to burn alive.
Jaxon Sanders
Then talk more, fag
Luis Edwards
Couldn't of said it any better myself, user!
Easton Ward
They arent even doing so intentionally. It just so happens that almost everything on the """left""" side furthers eventual destruction
The "green" area is simply impossible, and filled with retards, so they are the useful idiots of the red.
They dont even have to try to help each other.
Chase James
bump for hoping thread doesn't die, it's dis-heartening how few are in here
Cooper Evans
For the most part, they're uniting in solidarity because their main focus is the Trump administration, or Farage, or Le Pen, or Wilders. The new anti-left counter culture is underway, and the left doesn't want their status quo to fade away.
>AnComs, Commies, Socialists, DemSocs, Dems, and Libs are uniting together against the right
they aren't very successful at doing so actual commies and socialists absolutely despice the neoliberal "free markets and open trade are just great!" approach that dems and libs are currently pushing. hell, just look at how much the bernouts despise the mainstream democrat leaders. wouldn't surprise me if significant numbers of people leave the democrats within the next few years and form their own party, or just defect to jill (((stein))) and her green party.
Austin Jenkins
>Commies >Dems >Libs >uniting >implying
Asher Roberts
New thread theme. Good find! Jill stein is a meme.
Cooper Perry
daily reminder that the jews dont want exactly what you are doing op.
Well let me tell you something as a natsoc guy. I will respect the NAP and the libertarian lore of the whites.
I also think that the religious christians are a good force of morality if they choose to do ethno christianity a bit more.
Lucas Ross
death to reds
long live Rome
Dominic Bailey
>the plane is crashing >there will be no survivors
Andrew Ortiz
Can anyone make a picture of Allende blowing his brains out with the words "Follow your leader"
Aaron Hall
Exactly. They're scared of NatSocs teaming up with other honest hard working men and women,
Thomas Butler
also to add to that: the reason why christianity and freedom worked in the past was because of whites.
Its the one unifying thing that guarantees a manner of civilization to enact whatever ideology you want to have.
The guiding force perhaps should be racial realism within all of these groups. Well it kinda has to be.
White European Christianity flourishes because of its ethno stateness. American liberitarianism did the same because mostly high IQ individuals who were not hostile to it.
To some extent, even asians can mingle successfully with us.
Chase Peterson
Not a right-winger but I hate bolshevism and sjw with a burning heart. Can I join?
Alexander Ross
and to add to that once more, this picture by you libertarian tards really encompasses one of the most core issues extremely well.
>no hostile parties in your nation who wont honor your rights >no parties/races in your nation who are too dumb to understand them
is what makes right work, its what makes civilization work.
Bentley Hill
The funny part is that their desperation to prevent that scenario is causing them to do things that encourages people to make it happen
>not a right-winger >hate bolshevism and sjws so what are you, then?
Brayden Rogers
National Socialists are just Democrats who are honest about how they feel towards minorities they are not right by any means
Tyler Clark
>DR3 idiocy it's the gallows for you
Levi Harris
>so what are you, then? A normal person?
Let's just say I believe in the free grouping of individuals… So if you want a certain type of community (let's say whites only) you should be allowed to have it.
Jacob Roberts
Are you fucking kidding me?
NatSoc/Facism = third position and is still not right wing. What do they teach you in school? Why do americans in particular have such a hard with understanding this?
>Let's just say I believe in the free grouping of individuals… So if you want a certain type of community (let's say whites only) you should be allowed to have it. Sounds pretty right-wing to me, or at the very least it's the sort of thing I'd associate explicitly with the right.
>Why do americans in particular have such a hard with understanding this? It was a legitimate question; he said he wanted to join a right-wing alliance after stating that he isn't right-wing.
>NatSoc/Facism = third position and is still not right wing. This is just meaningless semantics and the only purpose it serves is to divide us further, which is antithetical to the point of this thread. Nothing good will ever come from it.
Chase Flores
>Let's just say I believe in the free grouping of individuals… So if you want a certain type of community (let's say whites only) you should be allowed to have it. sounds like a libertarian then too right wing for a commie at least
Hunter Kelly
It is really sad, come to think of it desu.
Owen Bell
Bumping for the Right Wing Alliance!
Thomas Watson
...
David Stewart
As an individual I consider myself an anarchist, but that will just pointlessly trigger people around here and derail the thread.
But I want a Terran Empire as a society. And the Third Reich was the closest we got to that.
Well then most likely you are a left libertarian, not a right libertarian.
Although, it is not so much that that is outlawed or something in right libertarianism, that can of course exist.
The main point is it would most likely not be accepted and that the freedom to discriminate as such on that issue or any issue at all should be allowed. This is something not allowed in present society and is assumed by left libertarians that in a libertarian society no discrimination of any kind will happen because its going to be one big happy world peace world.
Indeed in this case, a gay community could make a community of their own and deny entry of non-gay individuals. This can occur. Right libertarians just take a more harder realistic view, that not its not going to be a hippy fest and that there would be no "cultural rules" on ones own property or community.
William Thompson
...
Isaac Adams
...
Christopher Ortiz
Topkek
Aaron Stewart
Hoppean libertarian here, good friend of a NatSoc guy, we talk a lot and in a world where we respect eachother's borders and markets we can very easily cohabit this world
Jeremiah Nguyen
Exactly. Libertarians and NatSoc could get along if we could just settle our social view differences.
Dylan Watson
This assumption is stupid, while welfare may play a part it is not the root of degeneracy. Having a weak state like lolberts want, will remove the ability to fight degeneracy completely. Also this wouldn't do anything about the jews.
Well at least you are helping us go against the liberals ... oh wait, well at least you are against sjws.
Andrew Cruz
Libertarians want a weak "state", a weak centralized government. There's still a strong government. The easiest way to understand this is to imagine in a libertarian society, each person is their own government. That's why it's completely acceptable to sanction individuals for improper conduct.
Wyatt Phillips
you may fudge with the definitions and words as much as you like, but you are praying to capitalsim at the core. In the society you people want a lot of the problems we have today will worsen: >environment >economy producing garbage intentionally (shortlived products) >faggotry >jewry >organized crime
How do you plan on fighting any of those, if you destroy the nation state?
Jayden Moore
The person who started this thread is probably a nat-soc/storm fag. It doesn't matter how often we repeat the words "never punch right", overt nazism is and always will be, for all practical purposes - cancer. Fave reality, Lose the swastika, get a new name or fuck off out of the way. You dont help. Period.
Colton Clark
The individual city-states would still exist. See pre-United Germany, an example Hoppe himself uses.
Jonathan Kelly
Also to add to this jewry and degeneracy basically all started in the 20th century, made possible by the centralization of power of which can be and was easily subverted.
Dominic Carter
>you may fudge with the definitions and words as much as you like, but you are praying to capitalsim at the core.
Oh no definitely, I am 100% a capitalist. I was just explaining how the actual governance occurs in a libertarian society (these things are not exclusive).
For the first couple bullet points, these are issues that economists argue a free market solves, and for the last three, that's a matter of the company you keep. You'll have to have your argument with the economists, but addressing the later three points:
Imagine a purely libertarian town, maybe 200 residents total. There are morally upright peoples and morally degraded peoples to start. Morally upright, working citizens spend their time being successful and due to the nature of their success, tend to congregate with the other morally upright citizens. They help one another through trade deals and gather in their lodge. The immoral citizens spend their time wheedling for welfare and doing drugs and being just successful enough to get by. They tend to consolidate by nature of being everywhere where the capitalists are not. This is the pivotal point where we see physical removal - in an extreme, this would be where the capitalists raid and execute the degenerates, but in most realities, this is where the excluded degenerates die out from a lack of support from the successful capitalists. This could be higher prices for people not part of the capitalist's lodge, or an inability to own enough land due to the capitalists withholding it in favor of moral citizens. Organized crime might be removed with force due to the threat to the capitalists, and the faggotry and jews are excluded and despair under the weight of their poor economic and social policies in such a society.
Henry Wilson
are you retarded? the creator is obviously a lolbert, all the other ideologys already naturally converge and work together to build a strong government.
ah I guess I mixed you up with the ancap fags a little then. so lolberts just want to be fully decentralized, but don't actually mind authority that much? Still tough some issues arise, as a splintered nation of city states is very weak toward the outside. How do you plan on fighting wars?
Also while some competition is good, too much will create lots of redundancy. For example instead of everyone trying to cure cancer by themselves, you could have a strong government effort to do it much more effectively.
Samuel Scott
Christian anarchist reporting In.
Amish uprising when?
Wyatt Perez
Yes valid points. Right libertarianism is the only non cucked and realistic form.
Jaxon Allen
Minarchists report in.
Adam Cox
Ethno-Nationalist Libertarian reporting in.
Nathan Powell
Interesting, I cannot really imagine how a totally free market would solve garbage products being advertised and sold, but if you say so whatever.
While you may be right in that moral people are going to be more succesful, obviously a free market wants to sell a bunch of degenrate garbage to the degenerates. What keeps companies from advertising degenrate garbage?
What keeps companies from putting poison (for example lead) in kids toys?
To me it seems like this ideology contains a lot of wishful thinking.
Gabriel Roberts
I don't want anything to do with authoritarianism and fascism or libertarianism
>"Better call everyone I don't like a cuck because I don't have any arguments and I'm 14" Fuck off, true conservatism values democracy and is thus inherently opposed to fascism. I never bought into the whole "The enemy of my enemy..." thing because I'm not retarded.
David Richardson
>False flag or >talking about classical liberals.
Pick one.
Matthew Nelson
Excellent ability you have at aligning the right wing against common enemies
Landon Williams
>true conservatism values democracy
No, you don't. True conservatism values the constitution, and the republic. Democracy is mob rule, a constitutional republic stands up for the rights of the minority. And it's a good thing that conservatives value the constitution, because if America was a democracy - Hillary would've won.
Carson Martinez
Ancapy Pinochet enthusiast reporting in.
hail Hoppe, death to leftists and we must secure the existence of our people and a future for rightwing helicopters.
Dylan Clark
I'm so fucking tired of people equating Nazism with right wing ideaology. Nazism was, if anything, more left but quite centrist honestly, but super high on the authoritarian scale.
Charles Barnes
There's pros and cons. The city states would be like "gated communities"of today. They set their own rules and no one is forced to do anything, it's just if you refuse you can leave or are kicked out.
Asher Collins
call it what you like, to me it's still democracy. If the people vote, I'd call that democratic.
Isaac Cooper
Democracy !== Republic
Learn the difference, you're not a real Conservative.
Kevin Lewis
Democracy is a failure and is leading to the slow collapse of western nations youtu.be/s6StVNfcttc
Ryan White
>democracy You still haven't swallowed the red pill i see
Evan James
As well it should.
OP is a shill, trying to associate Naziism with the Right.
Nazis can fuck right off.
Jackson Williams
>t. Cuck who wants his wife fucked National socialism is the ultimate governmental form
Camden Gutierrez
Why would you value this form of government?
>Is inherently bad at getting the right people in power >why should everyone have an equal vote? seriously why? >decisions are made very slow >people in power change too often, making long term policies hard. >people in power will do stupid shit just to get reelected. I could go on, but that seems good for now.
Ethan White
Whatever, call it what you want for the sake of nitpicking. The point stands that it's important that people should be able to vote. Besides, it doesn't scare the normies as much if you call it democracy.
Yeah, the only system that allows for the people to hold the government accountable for their actions and treatment of working man is a complete failure.
Elijah Ortiz
>call it what you like, to me it's still democracy You don't even know what the words you are using even mean.
Lincoln Butler
I'm not the one begging big daddy government to fuck me in the ass
>oh, der furhrer, tell me what to do und I do it!
Nathaniel Foster
>nitpicking
It's not nitpicking. You're saying Democracy and a Republic are the same thing... they're complete opposites.
Brody Gomez
>working man Socialist detected
Christian Johnson
I find one of the problems with fascists is similar to a problem with communists. They both seem to assume they will be the elites deciding how society Is formed.
Personally I think canad would be better served assumes a republic with a small libertarian like leader.
I know Americans have tried this and in many ways it has failed. It also has been successful In other ways.
Anyway Bernier for PM.
Ayden Lopez
>nazis >right wing
Stop this shit you fucking idiots. Even if those socialists faggots were right wing you morons only make yourselves look bad by associating them with you. Nazism is dead, get over it.
Jack Bell
>having discipline is bad >having an organized effective structure is bad Cucc
Andrew Ortiz
T. Spic
Gabriel Sanchez
How on earth is it inherently bad at getting the right people in power and how would any other system improve this. The people know when life is good for them so they vote for the people who cause it to be so. People shouldn't get an equal vote, this is why I like the HoC system where each area's vote is worth the same. I don't think every 5 years is too often, honestly. And people will vote for the party who makes life best for them so if the "stupid shit" benefits them then they will get reelected.
Jaxson Edwards
Let's make an international right-wing alliance, Sup Forums. Which countries/groups are our best bets? These are some ideas.
>Russia Memes aside, still our best hope for a right-wing superpower capable of defeating liberal hegemony. Pro-Christian, anti-faggot, and anti-NATO. Dugin is a must read for all rightists. >Belarus 100% white and proudly Christian. God-Emperor Lukashenko hates faggots and Zionist NWO. >Iran Anti-communist and anti-Zionist. Follows Shiite Islam, a hierarchical, esoteric brand of Islam that opposes Wahhabist shitstains and protects Christians. >Syria Home of based Assad and even more based SSNP. Anti-Zionist, anti-Wahhabist, and pro-Christian and Shiite. >Hezbollah Anti-Zionist and Shiite. Kills Wahhabists and protects Christians. >Houthis Same as above. BTFOs Al Qaeda and Saudi beheaders on a daily basis. >Biafra A homeland in southern Nigeria for Igbos, a Christian ethnicity with the highest IQ of any sub-Saharan African people. Unsuccessfully tried to secede in the '60s with military aid from apartheid South Africa. Biafran independence movement has since recovered and seeks alliance with Russia. >Best Korea Ex-communist, now racial national socialist. Ideologically superior to their ultrafeminist, pro-immigration cousins to the south.
Gabriel Peterson
Not really, in fact they are far from complete opposites. >Each eligible citizen goes to the polling station on election day, votes on a few issues and their candidate gains there vote to represent them and their interests. Could be either a Democracy or a Republic.
Oh no! How dare I think that the purpose of government should be to keep the country afloat while making things as good as possible for the most people in the country.
Thomas Cooper
>hold the government accountable for their actions Quite the positive man you are but not the brightest
Democracy is the ultimate tool to give people an illusion of power and prevent you from actually doing jack shit. Hillary has commited many crimes and Trump refused to release his tax returns and Hillary is still free and Trump is president Democracy is a show, a circus to keep people entertained
Connor Allen
you have my helicopter
Gabriel Ortiz
Like national socialism does?
Aiden Carter
NatSoc Reporting in, Hail Victory!
Gabriel Scott
Yeah, having government enforced discipline is bad.
Seriously, take your socialist, government uber alles bullshit off to /leftypol/, they're more your speed.
>if you haven't noticed, the left hates der juden too... they just cloak it in pro-palestinianism.
Lucas Flores
National "socialism" is socialist as much as "communist" Russia/China is communist
