Why do people hate nazis ?

Why do people hate nazis ?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_gun_control_theory
youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yszp3SmxE&
youtube.com/watch?v=F0vwOvVuQe4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Because it is a disgusting violent ideology?

Being a nazi is about love. Love and passion for your country.

It's also about the violent hatred of other nations/ethnicities/races.

Love your nation fine, but when you think your nation needs to destroy other nations then you have a problem.

annndddd ..... downloaded

thx for the pepe

because nazis suck. next

because they chose a side

That's the full cuck attitude right there desu. Although I respect your opinion.

Nazis Aka National Socialists are peaceful. People only believe the lies about WWII and Hitler but it is actually backwards. We are quite obviously in the hands of the true enemy and are blind to it because we believe their lies. National Socialism is the cure to this slavery. Only we are not willing to acknowledge it.

de nada

NatSoc

>t. Melbourne numale

Red pills for everbody

It's the cuck attitude to point out the historical fact that a violent expansionist nation once existed which desired to take over a continent and destroy people who were deemed racially inferior?

...

Brainwashing mostly, the full truth is never disclosed, you have to seek out and dig for the truth. Which is beyond most people, so they watch the History Channel and take everything they say as the real truth.

Seems to me like the sun is hitting al the wrong spots. Please die already boomerang bro. Extinct yourselves.

Why?

The fact the you immediately see a connection between nationalism and hitler's party is really fucking saddening. Nationalism is healthy. Period.

>The fact the you immediately see a connection between nationalism and hitler's party

When did this happen?

>no personal liberty
>no free press
>no way to recall a bad leader
>no gun rights
>mass murder

>my country is better than everybody else's because I live in it!

>Nazism is about the destruction of other countries
Remember when millions of Germans voted NSDAP so they can destroy Poland just cause they could? Me neither

you have to go back then hypocrite

^ Here is one of the people I mentioned in

The real question is:

"WHY DO PEOPLE HATE NAZIS MORE THAN ANY OTHER (((INTOLERANT)))) IDEOLOGY"

Because Anglos > krautcucks

Stop worshipping some faggot painter to be edgy and read up on real role models like Andrew Jackson or Richard Seddon or Cecil Rhodes

But he's talking about Nazism, which is NATIONAL SOCIALSIM powered by racism since they believed in inferior/superior identity politics.

you're an idiot
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_gun_control_theory

The six bajillion

Sauce?

This

Hitler explicitly stated a desire to destroy the Polish ethnicity. This was before 1939.

Please show me the hypocrisy before you state that it exists.

>I'm against Hitler because I'm more reasonable and smart

And all those thousands held at gun point at the Nurnenberg rallies, don't forget that as well :^)

NAME ONE REDPILLED ANGLO WHO HELD POWER. PROTIP: YOU CAN'T

because Indiana Jones said so

Are you kidding me?

>Hitler explicitly stated a desire to destroy the Polish ethnicity. This was before 1939.
He didn't. Poland was the aggressor

Because they're not German and are jealous.

Obviously the thread is about questioning the general hate towards nazism and because of that you blatantly started to mumble about it Or what did you try to imply?

They are bigoted, subhuman uneducated faggots

>but when you think your nation needs to destroy other nations then you have a problem.

did your convict anglo ass destroy "other nations" bitch

your ignorance is boring me

Can we agree that current academia and the History Channel are cancer Germanbro?

Maybe one day they will wake up

because they lost the war

This is actually the only reason. TAKE NOTE, HISTORICALLY UNAWARE STOOPIDS:

>t. University of California

People have a natural disgust for cowards, weaklings and deviants. Nazis sort of fit into all of that. They're an easy target.

If being a Nazi means hating a nation or groups of peoples for destroying, killing, raping, or generally maiming my country.
Then call me fucking Adolf Hitler.

Because they are told to do so by the (((media))).

Nazis are disliked because they lost

And they lost because Anglos are gods own people and germans are a bunch of horse eating savages

you dont actually know what nazi mean do you ?
you're so fucking delusional holy shit

>He didn't.
So Lebensraum wasn't a concept before the war?

Read the post again dude.
Nazism =/= Nationalism

Nationalism is a constituent of Nazism but that does not mean Nazism is a constituent of Nationalism. Nor does it mean they are fundamentally linked.

>did your convict anglo ass destroy "other nations" bitch

Well the convicts certainly didn't orchestrate it but yes; the British Empire destroyed many nations in the colonial process.

all these jew posters

Just because they're not edgy Nazi virgins doesn't mean they're Jewish.
>Everyone who doesn't support my belief is Racist.
You're pretty much a right wing SJW, just swap racist with Jewish.

Sure but it does equal to it to some extent. National Socialism doesn't really exist today but the majority of people still use the nazi word reffering to people with nationalistic believes.

Hitler was not affiliated with Friedrich Ratzel or Hans Ehlich.
Germany had enough Room to settle within eastern Germany that was already owned by Germany. The war started to reclaim Danzig and potentially other lost territories.

OP stop samefagging

Lmao. Western education is fucked beyond the point of repair.

Thats not me dude

Because they attempt to disrupt content creation by spamming meaningless, contextless, incoherent one-post writing prompts.

>people still use the nazi word reffering to people with nationalistic believes.

And those people are mistaken. They misunderstand nationalism. That misunderstanding was not expressed in this thread either so why are you applying this false definition to the conversation?

>Hitler was not affiliated with Friedrich Ratzel or Hans Ehlich.

No I'm talking about Hitler's idea of Lebensraum which was to expand into Eastern Europe. This desire is expressed within Mein Kampf.

don't bother with these idiots. They believe nazism is infallible

Invaded countries.

Racist.

Enslaved and exterminated minorities.

Were anti-fun things like race mixing, LGBT, abortion, drugs (with exceptions to themselves)

Hated the mentally ill and didn't want to support them.

Anti-freedom of speech (burned books), anti-freedom of press (lugenpresse) and anti-freedom of expression in art (entartete kunst).

Girls were treated as inferior sex, were taught to look good and be stay at home mums.

Believed that tall blonde, blue eyed people of Germanic origin (Aryans) were the master race, everything else is either impure, honorary or subhuman.

Rejected democracy and accepted of totalitarianism and dictatorship.

Gee i dont know maybe because of the hall of cost!?...

I know, I'm just seeing if "new Sup Forums" exists and I'm using this thread as a reference point.

>Mein Kampf
Don't expect these inbred edgy teenagers to have read Mein Kampf, let alone have passed history class.

Exactly. And you can't really prove me otherwise, tho I share some liberal views too.

>Germanic origins
>Aryan

try again

"Lebensraum in Osten" in Mein Kampf refers to the barely populated areas of eastern Germany or the ones that were taken by Poland. There is no desire of conquest expressed in it. Hitler was not affiliated with those I mentioned that desired it in the "Generalplan Ost".
Tell me why it is infallible then, and I argue it. Argueing is not a symptom of delusion.
I have read it in original German. I was always best in history class. You just say that because you want to believe that. But I should better not bother with those idiots that believe democracy is infallible :^)

I have a copy. Kind of a hard read to be honest.

Make nazism great again!!

>There is no desire of conquest expressed in it
That's debatable for part one of Mein Kampf, but not debatable for part two. And by all means illuminate for me any translation issues.

>The Folkish State, conversely, must under no conditions annex Poles with the intention of wanting to make Germans out of them some day. On the contrary, it must muster the determination either to seal off these alien racial elements, so that the blood of its own Folk will not be corrupted again, or it must, without further ado, remove them and hand over the vacated territory to its own National Comrades.

I want r/politics to leave and stay gone

I mean if you've read it and still support Nazism or whatever then that's fine. Just that all of the guys I've met that support Nazism perfectly fit my previous description.

Also in what way would you suggest a dictator be chosen, since democracy isn't infallible.

Those black nipples are fucking disgusting.

Holy fucking shit. Yuck.

Because they're brain dead globalist cucks

Idk desu I think they look amazing.

...

Because they're taught to hate them without proper context.

>Because it is a disgusting violent ideology?

Like Islam, Judaism etc.?

The world is filled with violent ideologies, and good people doing nothing & letting other violent ideologies destroy your nation will not help.

An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. Since when does the fox not kill the goose simply because the goose is not violent by nature?

Open your fucking eyes, the world is not a place of peace. It's a place where the strong prey on the weak. The white race is being attacked on all fronts by different races who would love to see us go away to have a better chance of furthering their own genes.

You won't get any respect if you beg, you must demand respect.

youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yszp3SmxE&

Yes. That applies to Polish territory that was once German.
There is no point in making complex guidelines for choosing a leader. When a leader is vacant there will appear someone that will take his place.

I don't know.

So You're telling me that anyone can step up and take the place?

Meaning that special interests like Hillary Clinton and racebaiters can step up too?

A dictatorial system with no guidelines is literally the opposite of Hitler's dictatorship.

At no point did I say that Nazism was the sole violent ideology in world history.

>Yes. That applies to Polish territory that was once German.

Where does Hitler make this distinction?

Then my question is what is your response to other violent ideologies? To stand on top of your moral high ground of pacifism and comfortably take a piss on the graves of your ancestors as you watch hostiles destroy the future of you, your nation, family & everything good mankind has ever created? You are a weak person. Mentally & physically. You are too weak to see the world for what it is, so you go live in your fantasy land where everything will be okay as long as you are peaceful & nice.

Hitler appointed Dönitz as a successor in his last will. There were no policies that the NSDAP made to select a leader. If Hillary would ever succeed convincing other contestants of the elite of the Nazi party to step back or support her she would become leader. No policies are needed as incapable leaders are sorted out and it is better to let the leaders select their successors like Hitler.
It's either territories that were settled by Germanics (Wartheland) by some time of history or German territory directly lost as result lf Versailles.

One look at the world should tell you all about how pacifistic nature is. We live on a mudball in outer space, with deceases, animals, poison & millions of things that don't give a single fuck about you and will kill you. It's a world where for pretty much every organism it's kill or be killed. It's not a fantasy land in the clouds with rainbow water fountains.

Because They're Socialists

Nice edgy diatribe chief.

>It's either territories that were settled by Germanics (Wartheland) by some time of history or German territory directly lost as result lf Versailles.

And it is the territory that was not lost as a result of Versailles which becomes the issue because Hitler starts drawing his net back many centuries in order to justify his reclamation of "Germanic" clay. The contentious history between Germans and Poles goes back to these earlier periods (not that I need to tell you this) and it is Hitler who chose to reignite the fire by seeing Poland as an illegitimate nation which occupies the land which is rightfully German. He wanted to re-colonize Poland, but he didn't want to make the same "mistake" which his historical forebearers made. He wanted his empire to comprised of racially German folk, whereas the preceding empires believed in assimilating other nations.

That is literally the defining characteristic of Hitler's foreign policy. Why is it so difficult to see the obvious instrument of ethnic cleansing in this plan?

You need to sort yourself out dude.

Glorious png

It's not marxist socialism you dip

You care about your race. You don't want white people to disappear. I don't think this is a racist thing to wish for, that you want white people to always be around.

But why do you always come to conclusion that the only solution to have more white people around is by getting rid of non-whites?

Why not focus on raising fertility, libido and white childbirths in general? Why not promote the concept of nuclear family?

Why not create artificial white embryos and grow your kids in labs?

youtube.com/watch?v=F0vwOvVuQe4

Did I say I wanted to exterminate non-whites or something? My point was, the world is not a very nice place, grow some balls if you think national socialism deserves a mention as a "Violent ideology". It's just not being complete ethno-masochistic cuck.

No just common sense sorry bud ):