Here's what we know >FISA request was denied in June that targeted Trump directly >FISA request was approved in October that targeted Trump broadly >FISA does not require probable criminal activity to be approved and thus is easier to get approved than a standard wiretapping warrant >whether or not Obama ordered it directly, people in his administration approved a request to wiretap then-candidate Trump Trump is not wrong in the fact that he was wiretapped. We already know that Flynn was wiretapped. Now the big question is whether or not Obama was involved in the wiretapping process. If he was, the Democrats are done for decades.
Of course Obama was involved in it. He couldn't stand to see his "legacy" be exposed for the shit stain it was. The question is how well he covered his tracks.
Josiah Green
The coordinated shilling is breathtaking in its scope and its malicious intent to deceive the American people.
Every one of these bloggers, the ones that aren't bots, should be rounded up and shot by a firing squad.
Luke Ramirez
Bump and check out those digits
Nicholas Sanchez
>Proof that Trump was targeted Why is the media not reporting about this FISA thing? Actually, I don't even know why I asked that question. It's obvious why they aren't.
Tyler Nelson
ShareBlue working OT to put this fire out. I wonder if they're being paid from Obama's DoJ slush fund?
Nicholas Jenkins
Bump, rhody needs to go.
Gabriel Green
this is already scandalous
Adrian Peterson
Of course they are. They've been targeting Sessions hard because the DoJ was a super important bureau for them. With Sessions in charge, they won't be able to get away with their shit much longer.
Justin Hill
Bumping
Camden Howard
>Now the big question is whether or not Obama was involved in the wiretapping process
No chance of this. Notice the wording when he wiretapped Merkel:
>Obama allowed US intelligence to listen to calls from the German Chancellor Merkel's mobile phone
So the way around it is to say "didn't direct it" but "alllowed" it. Therefore Drumpf is proved wrong when he said it was directed from the oval office.
It's all word game lawyer bullshit with the Democrats.
Gavin Martin
One more bump,care to give me a quick rundown about mr. Rhodes?
Cooper Russell
They are running two stories simultaneously:
1. The main story is that Trump accused Obama of wiretapping "without any evidence"
2. The second story is that "well if it's true that means Trump was doing something wrong, this will backfire on Trump". The key shill word will be "backfire".
His brother is the President of CBS News. His wife is the foreign policy advisor to Barbara Boxer. He him self was deputy NatSec advisor to Obama. He has a ton of connections to the intelligence community (Deep State). He is also one of (((them))).
Which is false since a FISA request does not require evidence of wrongdoing, just suspicion (which is completely subjective).
Josiah Wright
This is why trump is such a wrecking ball though. He cuts through the bullshit and gets to the meat of the matter. So he says something wrong, like how many Hillary emails were destroyed and the media corrects him by giving the right number of emails. Who cares that he was wrong in the number, the fact is the media was forced to address it. He knows something is worth mentioning here and he's trying to force a discussion about it. This is good stuff.
Chase Brooks
doing god's work user keep it up
Bentley Nguyen
FACT CHECK: Obama wiretapped Trump during the election.
Pants on fire, 100% false: The wiretapping was performed by Shlomo Goldbergstein after being given a direct order from Obama. So as you can see the claim that Obama wiretapped Trump is laughably false.
Michael Jackson
I saw that. A very dangerous persona hiding behind kind of regular apperance. Tough nut to crack.
William Parker
And if they've had Trump bugged since Oct, then they have nothing because they wouldn't have allowed him to be President if they had something on him.
The fallback plan is let their propaganda wing, the MSM, try to influence public opinion.
Samuel Rodriguez
Trump's an exaggerator not a liar. The details might not always be correct but the underlying message is.
Levi Nguyen
This. Does he exaggerate numbers or wins? Yes. Is the overall message wrong? Definitely not. He's a confident guy. His confidence tends to make him exaggerate a bit. Nothing wrong with that.
Aiden Thomas
Focus gents. How do we deal with this kind of the people's enemy. Memes aside.
Isaac King
Who gives a shit when the NSA is spying on all of us.
Benjamin Phillips
This. The key here is because FISA doesn't require you to do anything wrong, you can abuse it.
As long as they actually wiretapped Trump Tower (remember, manafort LIVES there) and nothing is found, Trump will be vindicated.
Jonathan Parker
Exactly, and they know it. Their deception is intentional and malicious. Look at this top story from Twitter.
Jayden Gutierrez
The purge will start soon.
James Martinez
CNN fact checker
Claim: >They wiretapped Trump
Reality: >No such devices used, they used computers
Aaron Evans
Kek, damn they don't even try to seem legit anymore.
Logan Morales
Things are about to get crazy. If Obama does face charges of any kind there will be a thumping like you've never seen.
Robert Martinez
>Now the big question is whether or not Obama was involved in the wiretapping process.
Who cares? Obama is irrelevant now.
The people responsible need to go to jail. I don't care who they are.
Connor Wright
This happens in the lugenpresse all the time, they attack you for the details as a way of removing the argument, not the general message. It was like the brexit thing getting the £350 million back to spend on UK rather than sending it the the EU. The media shilled that it was the wrong amount, rather than the principle that UK tax money should be spend in the UK and not by some unelected EU officials.
Mason Bennett
Heh, reminds me of our own deal with politicians and their talks. When those leaked media was not about what is on those tapes,but who recorded them. Damage control at its finest.
Jacob Mitchell
Yes we need a full, independent investigation into all of this shit, amirite?
Zachary Sullivan
...
Kayden Ward
>The people responsible If Obama is one of the people responsible he isn't irrelevant, and if you think the DOJ did this without his approval you're out of your mind.
Oliver Martinez
We still need to be able to prove that though, I think Trump probably knows something, as we've seen throughout the past year he almost never says something outrageous or ground breaking without being validated at a later date in some form or another. At the very least he's exposing how much power and authority the surveillance state actually have to spy on citizens at a whim.
Jordan Green
(((Roseman)))
Robert Nguyen
This. The fact that Obama's people approved it means that he was involved.
Easton Adams
yep
John Ward
Slow and Steady
Grayson Anderson
Wait so if there is an open warrant and trump goes on Twitter to complain doesn't that mean he broke the law by doing that?
Alexander Wright
>YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR GOYIM >JUST LET THE GOVERNMENT LISTEN IN WEW the left has really gone to shit
