Why is democracy so bad?

Why is democracy so bad?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9RXZvyKAk
youtube.com/watch?v=u-wMmYSG9JQ
youtube.com/watch?v=k12teOokSqM
youtube.com/watch?v=f82mHHAt6yI
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf
mises.org/library/aristocracy-monarchy-democracy
youtube.com/watch?v=78juY_OcxrI
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Mob rule.

How is this a bad thing?

Bill of rights / constitution enshrining it; good.

Mob rule by easily manipulated morons; not good.

How do you fix the problems? I don't know.

it's bad because when radical progress is needed it takes too long (see France)

it's good because of the relative stability

kind of a double edged sword

You can convince the average person to do things against their best interests through the use of advertising and marketing (aka legalized propaganda).

This removes the agency of individuals within democracy and makes it no longer a democracy.

Because it allows even the dumbest of the dumbest to vote. The result you can see for yourself. 8 years of Obongo to name just one example.

This is an issue that comes up in wildlife; herds (which are democratic by nature) have evolved strategies to deal with tough but immediately required decisions. I'll have to look up the papers I read on it to recall what they were though.

Because people are naturally weak and stupid. That's why they need to be ruled by a wise and strong king/dictator.

You live in State A with 500 other people and are hard-working farmers. You take a small tax for the goods that you sell to State B.

You live next to State B that has a population of 50,000 people. A guy running for office in State B says that State A is keeping too much for themselves and they should be punished.

The population of State B is whipped up into a frenzy, elects the guy (the vote of State A being meaningless) and State A and it's inhabitants are massacred for their crops.

Mob rule is bad.

Good things for people in (51% of country) at the expense of (other 49%) becomes an unbeatable strategy.

democracy makes every country the same: a shitty compromise between capitalism and communism, which pisses everyone off.

instead we should have different countries with different policies, similar like companies each have their own style, none of them being democracies either.

Majority of people are ill-equipped to make an educated decision about political candidates.

Democracy is tyranny of the majority over the minority.

Niggers

Can't speak for every country but the majority of Americans are FUCKNG retarded. My wife and I have a long running joke with each other where basically every time we encounter an especially stupid member of the human race we say to each other, "see? That asshole can vote."

People are stupid and shouldn't be in charge of important decisions

That is why i think we should change the definition of citizen because not all peopĺe sould be granted rights to vote. A citizen must be someone responsable, a land owner or a tax payer.

Democracy is a stupid gimick/experiment that has lasted to long

The average pleb does not understand how his society is sustainable. The average pleb doesn't think about how and why, they think "I want x", and the motivation for getting that x is either hedonistic self pleasure or winning approval points from the social group.

>All of these people hating on mob rule
>Not realizing that the alternative is to be controlled by a small elite
>A small elite none of us would be a part of
>AKA the rich Jews
Yes goy, the right to vote should be kept for you, the smart one! Keep falling for our divide and conqu- I mean, our terrible analogies! Good goy!

To believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy

Genuine democracy i.e direct democracy is good because it forces people to get involved in running their own society and they can't blame politicians when they fuck up a decision. Switzerland is a semi-direct democracy and overall the quality of the debates on political issues at citizen-level is impressive (it's not perfect though there are still blatant cases of demagoguery by the people and electoral turnout could be much better).

You might improve the democratic process by screening voters for education/age/sex but there is a risk of disenfranchisement.

Representative democracy is not democracy at all and is the regime suffering from most of the faults wrongly attributed to democracy proper.

Don't school us on voting, Jose. Fix your own fucking country first.

For homogeneous cultures it's fine.

For countries which are eroding tradition and letting in boatloads of immigrants, it's eventually the whip which'll be used to mark your back.

For America, which is a collection of states (not a country), each state has their own people and their own interests. If Some fly-over state has no say in who governs them just because California and New York are overpopulated with faggots, and worse yet have to listen to those fagstates, then those fly-over states aren't having their problems addressed and will likely vote to secede while they still have that option open to them.

that's why i say only tax payers/land owners should be considered citizens and allowed to vote.

youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9RXZvyKAk

REDPILL Sup Forums

Who does not listen is a black faggot jew cuck

Democracy is great, alas only Switzerland has it.

>Mexico
>Fixing
lmao.
Only nukes could fix us, Straya
If theres anything this country has taught me is about voting and what happens when a minority controls its results: A compete shitshow

Something like tax payers only seems fair. I would add one more requirement though, to be able to vote your IQ must be 95 or above.

Mob rule decides on minor issues, all the important decisions are made by a small elite AKA the rich Jews

Because women can vote.

It's fine if you're of like minded people with little differing morals and ideals.

When you open your borders to taconiggers or sandniggers with completely different ideals and morals it's bad because it fucks the native population over.

Modern democracy is a dumb majority voting for whatever they think the majority wants.
Basically they are voting om behalf og people they have never met because the television said so.
The television is ofcourse the one who decides whatever the minority wants.
So idiots feel morally superior voting for whatever the television tells them.
These are the same people that whish nothing but harm upon themselves as a result og the television's anti-white campaign.

tyranny of the majority
51% of the people may take away the rights of the other 49%
it wastes, exhausts and murders itself
media rules

>implying we can't eradicate the jews before switching to autocracy

"Everyone" is a globalist commie concept. Some people are better than others. Some people are murderers, others are not. The non-murders are indeed better people than the murderers. Equality be damned.

Is there alternative to democracy that works better?

Yeah, survival of the fittest.

>tax payer.
Tax payer should be enough
>IQ
As much as I hate to say it, IQ is a meme.
The greatest problem about democracy is explained by Oz Media gains a massive power over people. Media is, of course, controlled by a small elite.
We've tried that for thousands of years. They're like roaches.

anarchomonarchism

Voting blocs, easy manipulation of gullible people with little to no education or critical thinking skills. Most Americans are fucking retarded and once a certain party is in power (like dems) they begin opening their borders to acquire a new support base that will essentially be their slaves. All the stupid fucking Arabs and niggers of the USA say cliche shit like "WHITES ACTUALLY THINK REPUBLICANS CARE ABOUT THEM", as if democrats are somehow an honest branch of government. That country has been swinging left to right year after year and as long as an establishment candidate is elected it is ALWAYS the same story, always the same foreign policy, always the same exploitation of the working and middle classes no matter how "left" or "right" or whatever promises are made, but of course dumb fucking sandniggers and spics freshly introduced into the country have no grasp or concept of American politics outside of what all their PoC friends parrot back to one another so they believe the lie that democrats are the virtuous party.

Modern feudal microstates

I'd be fine with democracy if it were
a) unanonymous
b) direct
c) responsible
If you vote for shitskins you're going to get them dumped on you, you have to pay for them, you're going to go to prison as accomplice if they commit a crime.
It should also be inversely proportional. For example, like with the referendum we had a few years back, if women vote for a continuation of the draft they naturally should be drafted as well.

This shit would pretty much kill leftism.

...

Monarchy, or a minarchy.

Was pre-revolution Europe completely controlled by the Jews?

Only tax payer married men over 18 with kids should be allowed to vote.
Only tax payer married women over 25 with kids should be allowed to vote.

Democracy means the majority, if you're lucky. Even 12 year olds understand that

noice

because, by definition, 50% of your voters are below average

It is now. Only anuda shoah will right the world.

A new aristocracy must rise from the plebeian masses and revolt against the Jewish hegemony.

Do I really have to explain it to you?

youtube.com/watch?v=u-wMmYSG9JQ

youtube.com/watch?v=k12teOokSqM

youtube.com/watch?v=f82mHHAt6yI

thank you portubro

Democracy in Athens had very simple rules.
Only sons of Athenians could be Athenians
Only Athenians males who had gone through military training could vote
If there was a war all free man had to go and fight to defend democracy, no excuses.
Any free man could propose a law
Any free man could propose to cancel a law
You only had to convince your peers and all decisions had to be taken on the same day the question had been proposed
What we've got now is not democracy really, even less when you add immigration to the mix.

A confederacy (through free trade and a non-aggression pact) between privately-owned (either by kings or companies) feudal micro-states.

Its bad in 3world counrty's because the have very little education just look at American education

Controlled by a mob of retarded plebs who know little to nothing of economics tuss are easly fooled by legalized propaganda and personal insults

Im at work. Will watch later. Thanks.

Is Europe ready though? Mexico is. The USA is hopeless. Northern Africa and the Middle East are already starting to clense their lands. All we need is for Europe to do their part.

No prob. It's an amazing red pill.

Because the majority wins.
And the minority will be raped.

If the majority is nazi and decides it is ok to destroy jews, then they will vote to make it legal.

Democracy = SHIT!

We need ANCAP system where everybody private property needs to be respected.

A constitutional monarchy citizens will have a bill of rights and the monarch has to follow the constitution

A constitutional monarchy institutionalizes aggression against the king's subjects by writing down the powers the king has. On the other hand, an absolute monarchy rests on mutual respect between the king and its subjects.

Absolute monarchy > Constitutional monarchy

But this guy is correct.

It's not.

Gang-rape benefits the majority.

Democracy is socialism.

You're a complete fool if you think ancap society would actually 'respect' private property.

That entire ideology is jew bait. It's there to trick morons into letting jews fuck them over.

Have you read any books about it to say that? Or are books jew bait as well?

An absolute monarchy the monarch can do anything he wants in a constitutional monarchy the monarch has rules he has to follow and the citizens have a bill of rights

Who creates those rules?

It's not bad on a small scale where the people involved understand the situation and are invested in the consequences of the vote. It gets worse as the situation gets more complex and the average voter knows less about what's going on. For a national election where voters know little about the issues and can easily be influenced by propaganda, it's terrible.

When the french revolution happened france went from a absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy if the monarch abuses his power the people can revolt

iirc a Parlament is created to rule, or at least regulate the kings actions. Like the bongs did when their monarchs were relevant.

AA good alternative would be a direct democracy
>where the people are well educated about economics and the policy's there voting derectly for

Because it was invented thousands of years ago by Greeks. how can you expect such an old model to function properly? If you use a cellphone that is 15 years old you are considered crazy, because we live in a dynamic and fast changig world, and that world cannot funcion on old and obsolete models. Everything is old: our political system, educational system, monetary system... We still live in the middle ages.

However counter-intuitive it sounds, it's the other way around.

>riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf
11. On the Errors of Classical Liberalism
and the Future of Liberty

Can Post citations that prove that a absolute monarchy is more respecting to its people than a constitutional monarchy?

"you"

Fine, let me dig them up.

Democracy evolved but it did not take in account how economcly illiterate and retarded modern people are

Democracy is an ideal form of government for a city state of around 50000 people, in which only non slave men older than 30 and that have been in military have the right to vote.

Democracy is not mathematically consistent. It is an ideology for primitive mud-people.

it allows to take over a country by immigration. absolutely perverse if you think about it.

It's fine in small groups, until one person wants to get lazy.

didn't you learn the horrors of group projects in school?

same shit

So in the end the monarch is pointless because the ones ruling are the ones that get elected the same way it is right now.

Because you can import voters for a monopoly on politics. The founding fathers of America knew this which is why we live in a republic.

"In schoolbooks and the official, orthodox historiography this transition from absolute to constitutional monarchy is typically presented as a great step forward in human history, as progress. In fact, however, it represented another folly and initiated still further decay. For whereas the position of the absolute king was at best a tenuous one, as the memory of his actual rise to absolute power through an act of usurpation still lingered on and thus effectively limited his “absolute” power, the introduction of a constitution actually formalized and codified his power to tax and to legislate. The constitution was not something that protected the people from the king, but it protected the king from the people. It was a State-constitution, which presupposed what was formerly still considered with greatest suspicion, namely the right to tax without consent and to make laws. The constitutional king, in subjecting himself to a few formalities and procedural routines, was thus enabled to expand his powers and enrich himself far beyond anything possible for him as an absolute monarch. Ironically, the very forces that elevated the feudal king first to the position of absolute and then of constitutional king: the appeal to egalitarian sentiments and the envy of
the common man against his betters and the enlistment of the intellectuals, also helped bring about the king’s own downfall and paved the way to another, even greater folly: the transition from monarchy to democracy."

There's more, but you read for yourself if you want to. The book is here:

mises.org/library/aristocracy-monarchy-democracy

Will read thanks

Here was my first redpill on Democracy.
youtube.com/watch?v=78juY_OcxrI

Read Plato's Republic if you want to know more.

>Wanting mob rule

No.