Molyneux

youtube.com/watch?v=9AOXvdweTu4

Can any Stefbots defend this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/r3rZ3EzQLaA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Wow!

It's a pretty solid argument that needs no defense.

Shapiro figured out a long time ago that if someone is being unreasonable to you you shouldn't be reasonable back. So if someone calls you a Nazi kkk rayciss for a example you don't just revert to facts you tell them they're being cunts and to produce evidence for their claim. Yea Moly looks like a douche here but you can't just criticize someone that has more experience without any evidence.

WOW
O
W

what do we do against shills then?

>Can any Stefbots defend this?
Not an argument.

That's not at all what the point is. It is also a fact that people respond better to you when you are pleasant and not demeaning them. If you seriously think you will win more arguments by being uprupt and rude, when this goes against basic human emotional response, then you are a braindead faggot. The caller was absolutely right and instead of Stef thinking critically about what he said, he turned it into (literally) "so you think your better than me?"

This is because Stefan has a demonstrated history of narcissism and self grandeur and his ego simply could not handle being corrected by someone he sees as inferior to himself

tl;dr Stefan has a legitimate mental disorder

What do you mean? That's exactly the point. Shills often act like cunts. You provide evidence for your claim and if they don't refute it and they still attack your side and your character you should call them out. It's why they're called shills in the first place.

Stop attacking Moly shill it'll never hold....SAGED