Right wing

Why is right wing such a shit ideology?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War
washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/03/03/ayn-rand-is-dead-liberals-are-going-to-miss-her/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_System_(economic_plan)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)
heritage.org/index/ranking
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because it keeps you from sneaking into superior countries?

>implying it didn't cause it

ideologies need to be applied with humans

cause once you add 'wing' to something it becomes retarded.

>(((neoliberalism)))
>right-wing

>extensive economic liberalization policies such as privatization, fiscal austerity, deregulation, free trade, and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society

>not right wing

>wanting to keep the FREE MONEY FOR EVERYONE shit
>when it was leading us right into our demise

>wanting the cartels to be left alone
>when they're a bunch of fucking criminals who kidnapped and killed civilians for no fucking reason, not even monetary gain

I bet you're voting for AMLO.

>capitalism
>exclusively right-wing

>neoliberalism
It's right there in the name, paco. The actual historical right wing hasn't existed in most western countries since before WW2. Nowadays you have only socialists and neoliberals.

The alt-right and Nrx are the revival of the real deal.

Eww no, but PAN is cancer and so is neoliberalism.

>dude privatization lmao
>dude deregulation lmao
>dude small government lmao

>not right wing

Neoliberalism is what Trump is fighting against. And he is right-wing, to say the least.

Right and left can have different meanings in different contexts.

The drug war started in 2006?

Come on now son, you can bait better than that

So drugs are oppressing you, not the fact that you are a subhuman race of people

Also
>hurr durr the drug war has achieved ANYTHING

Yes it did?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War

It would help if certain people didn't (not gonna name who) use them.

>not right wing
These are historically liberal ideas and are called liberal in most of the world, which preserves the proper usage of the term. Neither the mercantilist British Empire, nor most of the Old Regime in Europe, nor fascism, nor any other manifestation of right wing politics has ever believed in free market fundamentalism. Even the historical US didn't have any such thing; it was protectionist as fuck.

He wants to get rid of globalism, but not all the other things in that statement. So instead of exploiting poor Mexicans for 4 dollars a day, he wants to exploit Americans instead.

Socialist policies were what fucked our country you literal shitskin retard.

>neoliberalism
>right wing (tough on crime)
>male (female)

So what are you bitching about? Wouldn't you prefer that. Also, I fail to see why any of us should give a shit about what happens to Mexico.

In the short term it will suck because of higher prices for everything. However, in the long run it will promote self sufficiency and removal from markets in which other nations have an artificial absolute advantage (looking at China). Self sufficiency is the first step towards sustainability.

>neoliberalism
>right wing

kek ok

Hmmmm Socialist policies gave you healthcare and UNAM.
Right wing PAN gave you war and neoliberalism.

>dude privatization lmao
>dude deregulation lmao
>dude small government lmao
>dude kill everyone who is a criminal with army lmao

I am complaining about right wing here, I don't care about you.
>not right wing

higher prices are better because it means more money goes to labor instead of

Republicans were anti neoliberalism (which started under Carter) until the neocons took over

Again, why should we care? Also, why did you put South Korea in that graph? Do you think their policies aren't neoliberal as well? They certainly aren't leftist.

>extensive economic liberalization policies such as privatization
>privatization
That's the complete opposite of liberalization.

>Fiscal austerity
Kek
>deregulation
Is that why business have to pay bribes for even existing, you gigantic faggot?
>free trade
Toppest kek

>reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society
You have no fucking idea what's going on in the country

Too bad this country is filled with shitheads like you.

>Mexican intellectuals

washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/03/03/ayn-rand-is-dead-liberals-are-going-to-miss-her/

neoliberalism came about from the rise of jewish economic and political ideology usurping established Anglo economic theories


America had always been pro nationalist, pro labor Republic until the mass influx of jews from Eastern Europe.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_System_(economic_plan)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)

Mexico on the other hand was (and currently still is) a feudal oligarchic state based on the enslavement of the majority of workers by the Castizo ruling class.

South Koreans are nationalists like all east Asians

you think China doesn't have tariffs?

lmao

>repeating things while ignoring the responses

This. The confused political climate of the past more than half a half century is finally clearing up.

1. I didn't make the graph
2. You made South Korea when you pump dollars in it just because fuck North Korea and fuck China

HAHAHAHA What a gigantic faggot, this is like watching people claim Nazis were not right wing.

>all these right wing ideas are not right wing because I say so
>all these right wing ideas are not happening in Mexico because corruption is also happening on of that

>all these right wing ideas are not right wing because I say so

Neoliberalism is a product of the (((Washington Consensus))) and has kept Latin America impoverished, causes stagnant wages in the US, and shipped all the jobs to Asia.

Reminder that the US industrialized with protectionism, as did Japan, South Korea, and China now.

You have to go back

It is neoliberal in the sense of having a very free market. Also, South Korea is part of AFTA.

>UNAM
Oh shit, a bunch oh shitskins selling weed. Thank you socialism!
Let me give you a protip you retarded faggot, out of all the people with direct access to UNAM, only about 10% do something worthwhile.
UNAM's true power relies on rich kids from private schools who have to take the hardest exam in Latin America to enter. "Grupo piloto" rings a bell? Stupid fucking commie.
Healthcare? Really? Are you going to argue in favor of our healthcare when just 2 months ago it was discovered that kids with cancer were given salt water instead of their chemos? Or how thousands of HIV patients were told they were negative in order to not pay their treatments?

You're fucking stupid kid.
Also,
PAN: 1USD = 12 pesos
PRI: 1USD = 20 pesos
Do the math, faggot

>You made South Korea
You mean in the 50s, and that what's created the incredibly high standard of living for the South Koreans? That must have been an excellent investment.

Neoliberalism is far more than just that. It also includes a religious obsession with free trade and a Wilsonian foreign policy/international outlook among other things.

Japan and South Korea industrialized and modernized successfully by ignoring this sort of advice and doing something closer to what the US did historically.

And how did they do this if they're part of a free trade agreement that includes most Asian countries, including China?

Privatization isn't right wing you retarded faggot. How can you be so obtuse? Which countries have their oil privatized? Which Mexican politician wanted our oil to stay privatized?
How can you say Mexico has deregularization policies when the main reason why corruption is so rampant in the country is because you have to bribe like a madman to bypass thousands of regulations?

>you made South Korea
No they didn't. The reason why South Korea boomed was because while here in Latin America we had people looking for kids who would be the best soccer players, South Korea was looking for their next best scientists, engineers, doctors, artists.

You sound like a truly sheltered faggot who has no clue about the actual world. Textbook commie.

>Right-wing politics hold that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable
>defending this position on the basis of natural law, economics or tradition.
>Hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences or the competition in market economies.

>neoliberalism
>lets cut the taxes, deregulate the economy, free market for everyone, longer working hours for the weak and poor, and if they don't make it, it is just the natural order of things, only the strong thrive

>not right wing

>UNAM's
>only about 10% do something worthwhile
>still best university of the country by miles

It seems that those people should have gone to private hospitals. Wait, they can't afford it so without the health care they would be even more fucked.

PAN: 1USD = 12 pesos
PRI: 1USD = 1 peso

You really ought to read How Asia Works by Joe Studwell. Korean industrial and financial policy post 1960 up until recently has not been free market or free trade in the slightest. There was heavy government investment and involvement to protect local industries from international competition. Also, I don't think anyone would argue that Japan's industrialization doesn't parallel the US and diverge completely from what modern economists would recommend. Why are you talking about modern trade agreements?

>Neoliberalism
Neoliberal was used by Milton Friedman because progressives hijacked the word 'liberal' and he didn't want to be associated with libertarians. Liberal, libertarian and neoliberal are the same thing but I always see leftards using neoliberal as it's some kind of insult.

I am talking about them because it has not seemed to have slowed down the growth. Even if the Asian tigers were protectionist, it was there neoliberal policies that spurred their immense growth.

Wait, are you fucking serious?
Is this your actual level of discourse or are you baiting? Or you can't keep up with the English language?

Whatever, you stupid faggots will keep voting for socialist policies, which will keep buttfucking you, forcing you to go north and the most ironic shit of all is that you will try to vote the same fucking policies in the USA!
Meanwhile, people like me who understand you retards are just mindless cattle will keep taking advantage of the system. I'm just 21 and I'm already earning a 5 figure salary (without a career and in USD mind you) How's your UNAM going faggot?

South Korea is substantially more free than Mexico and seems to be doing fine. Perhaps you have no fucking clue what economic freedom is?

heritage.org/index/ranking

>it was there neoliberal policies that spurred their immense growth.
No it wasn't. They only adopted these policies after they had built up their economies to the point where their companies couldn't be picked off by predator multi-nationals. Southeast Asia on the other hand took the advice given to them by the West and had free trade from the beginning, then fell flat on their faces. Latin America is a similar story of failure but with CIA and communist shit mixed in.

>Southeast Asia
You mean like Singapore? Also, what economies have failed in Latin America due to their companies being picked off by multi-nationals?

>you mean like the finance hub city state founded by a fascist chink that's not a nation
Yes

>what economies have failed in Latin America due to their companies being picked off by multi-nationals?
Their governments refused to make the proper changes to upend the old hacienda system. The options available to them were communism and neoliberalism (especially in Chile), the latter option resulting in the horrible inequality and inability to accomplish anything in most Latin America. The book I mentioned above discusses in depth the redistribution in land and property ownership that are needed to transition to a successful modern market economy. Neoliberalism has literally never produced a successful nation.

Right wing is not an ideology, it's a category of ideologies.