While all this CIA shit is happening, a quick reminder that CIA tried to frame Donald Trump as a Russian spy...

While all this CIA shit is happening, a quick reminder that CIA tried to frame Donald Trump as a Russian spy, and that's how this whole Russian hacking thing kicked off
But now that the CIA's credibility has been called into question, let's re-evaluate the evidence

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OSpsAauvEXU
youtube.com/watch?v=-OBg7r9Vgbw
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-media-news-donald-trump-jeff-sessions-russia-links-pressure-new-york-times-white-house-election-a7607376.html
youtube.com/watch?v=R4Th-SO4w78
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I feel like because everything has happened so fast it's feels like there has been so much information released regarding Trump's connections to Russia, but what do we actually know?
That a maybe a few people near him have secretly had ties to the Russian government?

Even if it turns out that all of those people - Sessions, Flynn, whatever - where Russian spies and gave Putin head, that still wouldn't quite explain why people are calling for Trumps impeachment since that's not the same as Trump being connected
This issue is that with all this came as like a 'train' of (mis)information

First, it was that Russia hacked the election polls:
That would be unacceptable, but it was untrue
Then, it was that Russia hacked the DNC:
That is less unacceptable, but since it came after the election poll revelation people still saw 'Russian hacking' as totally unacceptable, even though all it did was expose Hillarys corruption

Then, it was that Russia worked with Trump to hack the DNC:
Not believable, but it came at the same time as that Dossier (which was shown to be complete bullshit) and this CIA report (pic related) which was the FIRST REAL bit of evidence about the ENTIRE russia sitiation

This report, however, doesn't ACTUALLY say that Trump has ties to Russia, NOR does it even claim with 100% confidence that the hacker was EVEN Russian

If you take the time out to actually read it, you realise that they (in a very convoluted way) only claim to be about 70% sure

Which seems a little low when you consider that people are STILL riding the anger that came from when we thought that Russia had really hacked the election machines (which this report says they didn't) and are making it seem like it's the worse thing ever

bump for u

Pic related
That was what the media was saying about the situation at the time
They were VERY confident that Russia had ties to Trump

Here's a quick rundown:


-NSA bow to CIA
-In contact with aliens
-Possess psyop-like abilities
-Control france's election with an iron but fair fist
-Own blacksites & safehouses globally
-Direct descendants of the proto-50's-alphabet agencies.
-Will bankroll the first wars in south america (Cuba will be be the first crisis)
-Own 99% of information editing research facilities on Earth
-First MKULTRA babies will in all likelihood be CIA babies
-both the CIA and NSA said to have 215b budget, such intelligence agencies on Earth has only existed deep in Russia facilities in Moscow
-Ancient Snowden scriptures tell of two factions who will descend upon Earth and will bring an era of spy and unprecedented information control progress with them
-They own Cyberwarfare R&D labs around the world
-You likely have the CIA spying on you right now
-The CIA are in regular communication with the Illuminati and Council of 13, forwarding the nasty anime futa you jack off to the AQUILAS project mainframe AI. Who do you think set up the meeting between the director of the CIA and the NSA (First meeting between the two organisations in over 10 years) and arranged the NSA leader’s first trip to Antarctica in history literally a few days later to the CIA consulate in Germany?

-They seized control of the French in under a week
-Know where nation states entrust their gold reserves. There’s no gold in Ft. Knox, only CIA's offshore accounts.
-The organizations are about 4 decades old, from the data-time reference point of the base human currently accepted by our technology.
-In reality, they are timeless organizations existing in all points of data and information from the cold war to the fabric of the society we operate. We don’t know their ultimate plans yet. We hope they’re benevolent organizations.

youtube.com/watch?v=OSpsAauvEXU

No they didn't.
youtube.com/watch?v=-OBg7r9Vgbw

Obvious shill is obvious

Fast forward to know, the media is STILL very confident that Russia has ties to Trump
And I'm sure it feels like, since now and then, more information has been shown right? But what ACTUAL proof has there been since the bullshit dossier?

What the fuck are you saying, bot faggot.

It's mostly been evidence from 'Intelligence community sources'
Hmmmm, why is the intelligence community leaking information about the establishment it was meant to protect? And if it's going to do this, why not just come totally public?

independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-media-news-donald-trump-jeff-sessions-russia-links-pressure-new-york-times-white-house-election-a7607376.html

Of course not. The CIA's just being moneygrubbing and wanted to help the candidate that would ensure even more power and money go to them. Now, all they have left is what they've been practicing forever- destabilizing a government. How much yall wanna bet some CIA agents have gone cowboying for Soros?

ತಎತ NOTHING TO SEE HERE GOYIM MOVE ALONG ತಎತ

They've been making up bullshit this whole time. Fabricating evidence.
This means we are already in a civil war.

If they move it goes hot.

What I mean is, we have seen from the Vault 7 leaks the extent of CIA's abilities.
If Russia WAS helping Trump. they'd know
But in THEIR OWN REPORT they admit to only being 70% sure
AND YET they seem to be leaking information to make it seem like Trump DOES have connections to Russia

Why?

Also yeah, why not come out in public as a whistleblower against the CIA. Sounds like a recipe for a long, healthy life. We're making accusations given the only proof so far to surface through all this, it's up to them to dispute it

Read up on Umbrage in the docs.

Basically, they can frame any "hacking" too look like it came from Russia, or various other places. Digital false flags that can be used to justify further actions, physical or political.

Is anyone surprised?

Only 70% sure the hacker was Russia mind you, they don't say anything about ties to Trump

Soldiers need to be paying attention.
This is what they're really for.

Daily reminder that the cia is the mercenary arm for the pedophile cannibal jewish bankers and their political pets.

youtube.com/watch?v=R4Th-SO4w78

youtube.com/watch?v=R4Th-SO4w78

Brain surgeon astronaut data analyst here.
If you're a total "conspiracy theorist" who thinks that all your information is being tracked daily, you already knew all this. I read through all 8000 pages over coffee this morning. Old news, nothing to see here, that you didn't already know. Carry on, oh and your laundry will be ready for pickup at the dry cleaners around four and we already ordered a pizza for dinner for you tonight, should be there about six. Don't worry we kept the olives off, we know how you like it.

Yeahhhh
And it's funny that according to the Guccifer 2.0 wiki page there are 3 main pieces of evidence tying Russia to the DNC hacks:
Cyber security Firms saying it was Russia (which have been shown to have ties to clintion but that's long to explain)

Metadata in the files, which has just been shown that the CIA can falsify that kind of information in the UBridge thing

And '''''independent''''' cyber security experts

Do you have any copies of my ex's nudes that I accidentally deleted? I sure would like to have those back.

I'm counting on you CIA, or NSA if you're so inclined!

If you google Guccifer 2.0 and go to any website with actual real independent cyber security experts they will all say that evidence tying Guccifer to Russia is lacking
So who is this independent expert? Who is Thomas Rid?

Yep. We literally live in an age where unless you're physically sitting next to the person actually doing the nefarious deeds, you can't be sure who they are no matter who good your tech and skills are. Everything can be faked.

Hell, CIA has access to the Internet backbone and they can use Man-on-the-side attacks to get anything anywhere.

Unlimited digital power!

Not a cyber security expert I'll tell you that much.
He is an author though, and a war studies expert (not the same as cyber security)
So who is that say he is a cyber security expert?

The CIA, actually

Likewise

bump for interest

In the sense that his ONLY cyber security expertise comes from the fact he has written these books
Heres another thread on this topic

So, my point after that long tangent, is that the CIA with the help of it's MSM puppets are CLEARLY running a campaign against Trump

A sophisticated campaign, too
The fact the the MSM started rambling on about fake news wasn't a coincidence, they wanted to use the rise of 'fake news' as a justification for censorship while people are STILL riding off the fear that Russia hacked the elections or did something similarly bad

You can tell that this was their real main goal because in that CIA Russian hacking report, they REALLY REALLY try to drive home the idea that Russian MEDIA (specifically RT) is to blame

But Trump fuck that up for them
He hijacked the term fake news, just as it was starting to be used for anything anti-establishment, and twisted it to work for him
And the news media hated him for him, and I think the CIA hated him for it too

And I think the CIA knows that, whether Trump intends to or not, he is going to fuck things up for them
Hillary was their girl, and they had planned for her to win
The CIA is in deep in places like the middle east - now is not the time for a change of power that has no reason to keep the skeltons of the past administration in the closest

And so, the CIA WILL get rid of Trump.
I think they will absolutely accomplish their goal since this thread is sliding at supersonic speeds which is a metaphor for how quickly any attempt at trying to look at the facts of the past is stopped since so many new facts are coming in

Thirded. Just post them in this thread please.

They're not wanting to JFK him, because they know it'll cause backlash and it won't kill off Nationalism and Populism. Instead, they will continue to try anything and everything to get him impeached and/or to resign. Otherwise, their hold on power and their supporters' power is seriously threatened.

It is still possible that they'll JFK him if they get desperate, but if they do so it'll have to be absolutely water tight. Far better than the job they did with JFK.

Are there any intel factions that can replace the CIA?
Also, are there any factions in the U.S. that can lock them down until they solve this thing out?

This rings true. A blatant broad daylight assassination would only make a marter of an already larger-than-life man; if you want a public overthrow of your shadow government, this is how you get it. They'll have to try and kill his character in public opinion. If that is done successfully, they can save the bullet.

They could consolidate several intel agencies and dump everyone that's corrupt. These agencies compete with one another to various degrees and there's probably plenty of people that would be happy to point out the corrupt ones. We need intel but not 16/17 agencies. Too much redundancy and bureaucratic nonsense.

Also, we need to put far stronger controls and oversight over the work that they do. They have too much leeway right now and will typically do whatever they think they can get away with. Zero ethics amongst a lot of them.

>in contact with ayys
I stopped reading here

Bumperolio

...

...