Have these people no shame? These were the guys that during the Bush administration cried out against the CIA and other secret operative groups that were committing literal war crimes against sovereign nations and going into war with them for made up reasons. These were the people that lauded Assange and Manning as heroes when they leaked the Afghan war logs and the cables. But look at them now, bringing in the fucking CIA director to tell us: “Oy vey you stupid goys we are not spying on you keep buying American phones and know that your president is a paranoid fuck”.
It makes me a bit mad when you guys call them leftists because they are not, and being one myself it makes me want to fucking throw up when someone mixes me in the same bag as these identity politics motherfucking power hungry ultra feminist cunts cause that has nothing to do with the core essence of real left politics the only thing they are after is power and nothing else. Now I ain’t blaming you, they disguise themselves in these “liberal principles” the same as neocons disguise themselves in “conservative principles”. For once Sup Forums i’m gonna have to agree with you, the day of the rope cannot come soon enough.
It's outrageous. I suspect most people see right through it though. The MSM wants you to believe that the resistance is popular but I suspect far less people support it than what the MSM presents.
Hunter Torres
They are most certainly leftists. Left ideologies, such as socialism and communism advocate for stronger collective powers which always translate to more power to the state and it's institutions such as the media or secret services.
What you are correct in pointing out though is that they are disguising themselves as "liberals" for two reasons, firstly because Communism and Socialism is so hated in America it would be career suicide to label one as such and secondly to turn Americans against the ideology that their country and the west in general was founded on by equating liberalism to marxist/communist positions.
Jaxson Butler
>They are most certainly leftists. Left ideologies, such as socialism and communism advocate for stronger collective powers which always translate to more power to the state and it's institutions such as the media or secret services.
Wrong. It is true that in Communism and Socialism the state has a much bigger role but that does not represent the whole "left" spectrum like for instance anarchism. What is really the core of left policies is class struggle and a more socially economically balanced society. You claim they represent these values but if you look at Obama's anf Hillary's viewpoints venture capitalism and neoliberal policies were one of the main viewpoints they defended. How in the world is that left politics my man? They disguise themselves as leftist using identity politics and bringing up gay and race a lot but that is just bullshit. If they cared about black communities they would try to stop gun violence and drug distribution which are rampant instead of blaming "whitey" for muh priviledge
William Roberts
Honestly I'm not even sure if Colbert is telling any actual jokes anymore. Even when it comes to normie humor, it's really stale. Removing the laugh track would probably make the interview more dull and creepier than when it was done to that scene from the big bang theory. It just becomes more and more obvious by the day that he's about shaping public opinion rather than being a comedian.
Andrew Green
Colbert is nothing but a narative-of-the-day propaganda puppet
>monologue is completely devoted to shitting on what trump he did yesterday >alex jones getting too popular? gotta shit on him in a segment >pizzagate? better shit on that >obama wiretapping? better interview some boring CIA nobody, the normies will really find this entertaining >new shitty movie coming out, better interview this b-lister in the movie. >insert some product placement cause my ratings cant keep up to fallon.
AT LEAST Fallon and Kimmel TRY to insert SOME comedy segments that have nothing to do with politics Colbert is strictly pushing an agenda
Evan Wilson
Im assuming the CIA payed NBC or whatever channel hes on 600,000,000$.
Levi Watson
Does that fat British guy beat Colbert in the ratings? Going by normie conversations I hear at work, they watch that guy but not Colbert. He's never mentioned.
Jayden Anderson
On the same day the Wikileaks makes the data dump they bring a the ex CIA director to talk about "how they don't spy on you silly goyim, only on the bad people". If that ain't damage control then I don't know what is desu.
Noah Baker
Look don't get me started on how stupid and moronic anarcho-communists are. You only have to look at what happened to Brazil recently when the police went on strike to see how the whole ideology falls apart the second there is no state influence.
The thing you may have missed though, when I mean labelling yourself a commie or socialist in America is career suicide, it's accurate. There are no "left" parties in America that have any sort of credibility. While it is true, that Obama and Clinton still fall on the right side of the political spectrum on a global scale they are much further left than America's "centre" position and are seen as stepping stones to socialist/communist positions rather than actually representing those positions outright.
Jeremiah Campbell
>The thing you may have missed though, when I mean labelling yourself a commie or socialist in America is career suicide, it's accurate. There are no "left" parties in America that have any sort of credibility. While it is true, that Obama and Clinton still fall on the right side of the political spectrum on a global scale they are much further left than America's "centre" position and are seen as stepping stones to socialist/communist positions rather than actually representing those positions outright.
I completely agree on that, it was kind of misconstrued from my part to compare them to leftist since they clearly are not but these are the people claiming to be progressive leftist.
The comparison you made in your previous post, I would consider that a false equivalence. Since you argue that left ideologies, such as socialism and communism advocate for stronger collective powers which always translate to more power to the state and it's institutions such as the media or secret services, the same could be argued with the right if we draw a comparison with fascism or authoritarian right wing dictatorships. The problem os that you cannot go to some ends of the spectrum to define a whole political ideology.
Tyler Rodriguez
hey, lay off colbert! He's a legit comedian with totally unbiased political opinions.
Xavier Miller
No, Colbert is still way above him in the ratings. The fat brit's ratings have been slowly rising though. Jimmy Fallon still currently sits at the top when it comes to ratings.
Jaxson Murphy
I thought for the past two months Colbert had already surpassed Fallon?
Oliver Lee
Trump derangement syndrome
Joseph Cooper
Oye que te parece a tí todo lo de los States compa?
Daniel Richardson
Maybe you are a truly a misinformed conservative. Republicans are the anti-slavery party with Democrats being the party of tyrannical rule.
Brayden James
>still in the "I am a classical leftist who hates establishment liberals" - phase >hopefully hoppeian ancap by the end of the month
>Implying I care in anyway about fucking democrats or conservatives
I am above that shit nigga, I ain't touching american political ideology even with a ten foot pole that shit is as toxic as it can get.
>2017 >Being an ancap
Yes sure why I would love a modern day feudal system in which I had to sell my kids as sex slaves to have something to eat. Capitalism was a mistake.
Aiden Phillips
Sorry I meant democrats or republicans
Jason James
Total embargo on that dude. His behaviour during the US election firmly established his place in the grand scheme of things for me. Peaking when I accidentally started a video of his without sound, and saw his snarling proselytizing face screeching back from the monitor. I had seen into his soul, and it sucked.
Hunter Bailey
I'm surprised the CIA aren't trying to spin the Cold War rhetoric into saying we have to invade Russia because the Russians have access to the 100 billion dollars worth of computer viruses, programming exploits, hardware backdoors, and everything else Vault 7 confirming what everyone already suspected the CIA has but is now confirmed
The CIA are globalists who work for themselves and the globalist cartel--not any individual nation. They SELL ACCESS to their malware toolki, they didn't "accidentally" leak it.
Trump apparently was tapped by nationalist forces; Snowden indicated there's a civil war going on inside the Intelligence community, most likely the real battle is globalists against nationalists.
Austin Morris
It's weird, isn't it? Back during the Bush Administration Colbert seemed anti-Authoritarian, and even during the Obama years he didn't seem like a FULL shill, but now he's literally joining hands with the CIA and shilling relentlessly for them, even though that strategy didn't do shit to stop Donald Trump from being elected
Is it gonna take a Republican Super Majority in 2018 for these guys to learn they need to take a step back and look inward to why their influence is diminished?
Isaiah Hughes
>tfw Colbert keeps doubling down after "you're not going to be president!" >tfw Colbert devotes his entire show to being an anti-Trump bullhorn >tfw no matter how many times you click "not interested" in jewtube it always suggests you watch last night's episode
Bentley Lopez
Colbert the shill's ratings bump is shortlived, he'll be replaced within next 2 years
We call them left because they are not right. The origin of right meaning just comes from to strike with the right fist, which is the normal way of doing things. What they aren't are liberal. They are authoritarian.
Robert Phillips
What?
Josiah Walker
That link says Colbert gets more viewers
Jayden Gray
>Capitalism was a mistake.
I am sorry but your condition seems to be more serious than I thought. You might have to get physically removed if you don't join the fight against de-civilization.
Zachary Hall
colbert shilling hard about pizzagate and now cia
what do they have on him?
Ryder Myers
probably pedo stuff
Logan Taylor
I don't like Fallon, but at least he's doing what he's supposed to do and be entertaining. I don't know if his show is preachy and political, but I get the impression it isn't. Are libs still mad at Fallon for having Trump on and petting his hair?
Sebastian Fisher
Holy shit this is rally uncomfortable and pathetic.
considering the CIA was one of the major players behind Watergate there's no reason to even question the idea that the CIA isn't listening in on people all the time. They have a proven history of doing it.
Aaron Hill
>capitalism was a mistake
no shit you fucking faggot trash idiot nigger kike, but what else better system is there? obviously order following and systems like socialism filled with faggots with mommy and daddy issues don't even work. the best kind of system that i can think of (that of course you didn't mention because you are here to bitch and not provide solutions to our core underlying fundamental problems) is enthno-contributionism and mass re-education of natural law.
Brandon Baker
>go on TV >tell people that the CIA cannot spy on you using a TV >"but leaked documents sho-" >no goy, your TV isn't bugged, keep watching TV
Jackson Green
Sad!
James Myers
It was a beautiful psy ops. Spend 8 years shitting on Bush, then shill for a guy who is Bush with a tan. Now that they've been exposed they said "fuck it" and went full shill. No shame.
Landon Russell
Well just because they CAN do so doesn't mean they HAVE they still need actual humans to listen to your conversations as far as I know.
I haven't watched the clip but am assuming its just that old damage control, calm people down BS "well, we can hack into everything but its okay we only hack into terrorists and Trump ;)" stuff as usual.
Matthew Reyes
Colbert is controlled obviously
Jacob Torres
The people funding and organizing the NGOs and lobby groups that shill for refugees aren't working class proles. They're elite Capitalists who want to saturate your labor market and displace your people to make a few quick bucks.
Ian Watson
>colbert shilling hard about pizzagate and now cia >what do they have on him?
You know its funny cause this absolutist argument reminds me of something Marx said in "the Misery of philosophy".
"Capitalists have a singular way of proceeding. For them there is only two kinds of institutions, the artificial and the natural ones. The institutions of feudalism are artificial and the Bourgeoisie institutions are natural. In this they are alike theologians, who stablished two kinds of religions. Every religion which is not theirs is an invention of man while theirs emanates from God himself. When capitalist say that the current relations (bourgeois means of production) are natural the give an understanding that they are relations that generate riches and develop themselves as arrangement of the forces of nature. It is because of this that this relations are, in it of themselves, natural laws independent of the influence of time. They are external laws which must always reign on society. Thus, the history has existed but it does no more. There has been history since feudal institutions have existed and in these we find that completely different relations of production have existed to those of the bourgeois society which capitalists seem to consider as natural and eternal."
If we replace "feudalism" with "socialism" or "comunism" we find the same argument that parrot ancap and neoliberals make all the time.
Nathan Walker
Fallon now has less viewers than Colbert, as pointed out, and a couple of MSM news articles have said that it is due to being "too soft on Trump." I dunno about public opinion though, nobody I know watches TV talk shows.
Camden Phillips
lefty=CIA=feminist=globalist
Jace Wright
I'm a data analyst for a Fortune 500 company. I live on zero hedge and browse here when I'm not busy with work.
Over the past 24 hours I have gone through the entirety of the data. I haven't slept. I took 150mg of adderall in intervals in order to ensure attention to detail.
I can unequivocally say that the data released by Wikileaks is insubstantial.
Daniel Moore
Thanks goy I can now watch CP at ease
Joseph Martin
Look, it's simple: Either you understand economics, or you don't. If you think that marxism is anything but a retarded and deeply evil illusion of a theory, then you are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past.
Gommunism has been BTFO both as theory and as politcal system for the last 150 years, accept defeat.
Nolan Cook
whew thanks, saved me alot of wasted effort
Benjamin Kelly
I am not a communist but to shit on Marx is beyond ridiculous. He has made a lot of economic and philosophic contributions that still hold up until today. I know you like to suck capitalist cock and thats fine by me but you are the one that is choking on ideology by aligning anything Marxist as false and getting triggered the fact that you attached a picture of Von Mises a guy that used to refer to Freidman as a socialist says that much.
Luis Hall
>It makes me a bit mad when you guys call them leftists because they are not They are, I'm sorry. The left replaces the aristocracy with celebrity, stories with narratives, and virtue with virtue signaling.
Having someone on his show that he considered a political opponent signals the virtue of moderation while supporting the hysterical anti-Trump narrative. Of course this came from a celebrity, the new aristocracy, raking in millions of dollars by commoditizing gullible leftists eager to please the landed class colonizing their brains—the metaphorical landed class being the ones with the "correct" opinions, which you know because they invite "experts" to agree with them.
This is leftism in its purest form.
Isaiah Reyes
>data analyst for a Fortune 500 >live on zero hedge lol pick one faggot
Blake Rivera
>They are, I'm sorry. The left replaces the aristocracy with celebrity, stories with narratives, and virtue with virtue signaling. Having someone on his show that he considered a political opponent signals the virtue of moderation while supporting the hysterical anti-Trump narrative. Of course this came from a celebrity, the new aristocracy, raking in millions of dollars by commoditizing gullible leftists eager to please the landed class colonizing their brains—the metaphorical landed class being the ones with the "correct" opinions, which you know because they invite "experts" to agree with them.
No my man, those are McLeftists. I'm sorry to say that your country has the unique ability to import foreign ideology and warp it into some kind of amorphous disgusting ideological blob that adjusts itself in order to fit in the american consumerist decaying society.
Jeremiah Gray
>it can only be done for reasons of foreign intelligence YOU MEAN LIKE WHEN YOU SAID THEY WERE IN DEALS WITH RUSSIA?? fuck these guys.had to quit it was to rage inducing in it's irrationality
Daniel Reed
That Alex Jones bit actually made a lot of my normie friends completely disregard anything he had to say.
Anthony King
I've never been more convinced Colbert is actually a pedo.
Nolan Foster
Marx was wrong on absolutely everything because his basic premises about value and labour are entirely mistaken. He was also a hypocritical leech who never actually saw a real factory or business in rl.
Sure, Marx's bs theories had tremendous contributions, bigly. 100 million people slaughtered by state terrorism or mass starvation. Absolute genius.
Parker Butler
> He has made a lot of economic and philosophic contributions that still hold up until today. Like invention of doublespeak?
Henry Wilson
>I've never been more convinced Colbert is actually a pedo.
Look up Renaissance weekend, the Location, who goes, who runs it, and how many Human Trafficking centers are located in the area...
Jonathan Green
...
Isaac Hernandez
The only thing Marx was right about had already been done before him. That is his observations about the misery of the working class and the social issues that they faced (and to some extent still face within the community).
His solutions and theories beyond that are completely retarded and disconnected from reality.
Sebastian Cook
What the fuck happened to late night television? Leno was a Republican.
Elijah King
>Renaissance weekend >Dat list >Dem pics
PEDOS ALL! REEEEEEEE!
Chase Campbell
...
Gavin Powell
>It's a guy falls for the cultural marxism meme
Cultural marxism does not exist, it is a snarl word used to attack anyone with progressive tendencies. The term alludes to a conspiracy theory in which sinister left-wingers have infiltrated media, academia, and science and are engaged in a decades- or centuries-long plot to undermine western culture. The first usage of the phrase "cultural Marxism" in the conspiracist sense was by William Lind of the Free Congress Foundation in a July 1998 speech, "The Origins of Political Correctness", to right-wing group Accuracy in Academia, in which he described "political correctness" and "cultural Marxism" as "totalitarian ideologies" that were turning American campuses into "small ivy-covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted 'victims' groups that revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble."
Marxists in the USSR in 1960 regarded the movement known as cultural Marxism with the same degree of skepticism that Bible-believing Christians regarded theological modernism. In other words, they denied that it was Marxism at all.
When you abandon the fundamental tenets of a particular ideology, and yet you attempt to retain that ideology's name, because there are lots of adherents to that ideology, you will be regarded as an invader by the defenders of the original ideology.
Cultural Marxism is to Marxism what modernism is to Christianity. Anyone who regards cultural Marxism as Marxism has not understood Marxism. Yet it is common in conservative circles to do this. This is a strategic mistake because it is a conceptual mistake.
(1)
Justin Walker
They are pretty much centrists on each of the topics, and Trump is sure left.
Gabriel Brown
The heart, mind, and soul of orthodox Marxian socialism is this: the concept of economic determinism. Marx argued that socialism is historically inevitable because of the inevitable transformation of the mode of production. He argued that the mode of production is the substructure of society, and culture in general is the superstructure. He argued that people hold a particular view of society's laws, ethics, and politics because of their commitment to a particular mode of production. The dominant mode of production in 1850 was capitalism. Marx named this mode of production. The name has stuck, even though original Marxism is culturally dead.
Marx gained support for his position precisely because it was purely economic/materialist. It abandoned all traces of historical explanation that were based on the idea that ideas are fundamental to the transformation of society. Marx believed that the deciding arena of class warfare is the mode of production, not the arena of ideas. He saw ideas as secondary outgrowths of the mode of production. His view was this: ideas do not have significant consequences. Take this idea out of Marxism, and it is no longer Marxism.
This is why it never ceases to amaze me that conservative analysts accept the idea of cultural Marxism. They go to the writings of the Frankfurt School to get footnotes to support this idea. The sharper analysts take it back to Antonio Gramsci's prison writings in the 1930's. He was officially a Communist. He was an Italian. He had spent time in the Soviet Union in the 1920's, and he believed that the Leninist tradition was incorrect. The West had not proven to be a fertile ground for Communism, precisely because the West was Christian. He recognized clearly that until Christianity was broken as a primary commitment of the West, there would be no proletarian revolution there. History certainly has borne him out. It never came.
(2)
Gavin Taylor
>Colbert is no John Stewart but he is still a good goy.
Jayden Morris
Are bluepilled shills swallowing this garbage? CIA can fuck off and die
Anthony Rogers
If the CIA and other alphabet agencies don't have the manpower to deal with actual overseas threats against the USA, then how do they put together teams for these domestic capers?
Josiah King
Wow.... first time I've seen this one.
Isaiah Nguyen
Congratulations, you know how to use Wikipedia.
Now rope yourself, cultural marxist.
Dylan Ramirez
>cultural marxism denier >2017
Go to any german university and look at the "Studierendenparlament", the professors etc. and tell me there is no cultural marxism.
I never said that cultural marxism and traditional marxism were identical. The former is the logical response to the failure of the latter.
It's also no mystery that the USSR used naive western leftists as useful idiot tools of subversion of western societies. The problem is that subversion of the neo-marxists in academia and media is still going on despite communism's supposed demise in 1989. Marxist-progressive scum needs to be purged once and for all if western civilization is to survive.
Nolan Hughes
Gramsci argued, and the Frankfurt School followed his lead, that the way for Marxists to transform the West was through cultural revolution: the idea of cultural relativism. The argument was correct, but the argument was not Marxist. The argument was Hegelian. It meant turning Marxism on its head, just as Marx had turned Hegel on his head. The idea of Marxism in the earliest days was based on a rejection of the spiritual side of Hegelianism. It placed the mode of production at the heart of the analysis of capitalist culture.
Gary North wrote a book on Marx back in 1968, when the counter-culture was growing rapidly. It was titled Marx's Religion of Revolution. It was clear to him in 1968 that Marxism was a religion of revolution, a view that went back to the Cronos festivals of ancient Greece. Marxism was not a scientific analysis of society, including its economy. He spent no time on cultural Marxism. It would have been much easier to show the religious side of Marxism by spending time on the cultural Marxists. They clearly saw that these cultural issues involved religion in Western culture, which is an outgrowth of Christianity. But that would have defeated the purpose of his book. He was showing that original Marxism was a religion. To invoke cultural Marxism would have distracted the readers. Cultural Marxists would have made easier targets, but to discuss them would have weakened the argument in his book.
The cultural Marxists divided the Marxist camp. Their attack on culture may have been presented as a tactic, but it was more than a tactic; it was a strategy. It was a strategy based on the abandonment of original Marxism.
(3) End
Robert Collins
Russian operatives hacked the DNC and you guys said "maybe dnc should have better security". lmao? it makes more sense for the left to include the CIA than the right be apologists for russian operatives.
Ryan Gomez
Anyone get the impression Michael Hayden fucks kids at the CIA?
Oliver Perez
It's not cultural marxism you idiots in any case it should be called cultural Hegelianism.
Xavier Collins
Oppressor/oppressed dialectics is literally marxism. Marxism is left-hegelianism. Marxism and Hegel can both fuck off.
Leo Ramirez
>Marxist-progressive scum needs to be purged once and for all if western civilization is to survive. >Pinochet meme
You sure showed me man, nice of you to make an argument with the figure of a literal CIA shill in South America in a thread against globalist operations and mass surveillance being perpetrated by you know, the CIA.
Mason Wood
tl;dr; Marx was a dumb godless hedonist cumbeard faggot who rejected memes as real life, saying stupid shit such as:
>ideas do not have significant consequences.
This from the very man who's ideas were responsible for the greatest injustices of the 20th century.
Later, smarter people came along and recognized the west was protected from this scourge of stupidity by the Christian God meme, and thus created Cultural Marxism to degenerate whole societies into memeless narcissistic secondary psychopaths.
Jordan Green
>>still in the "I am a classical leftist who hates establishment corporate democrates" - phase ftfy
im still in this stage and ive been here for four or five years
Jayden Stewart
>Hegel can fuck off.
Now I know you are an idiot
Zachary Peterson
>t. Hans
Your denial won't make it go away. You're just going to have to deal with it.
Matthew Hill
this title is retarded >CIA says they are not spying on americans! Of FUCKING course they say that, what the fuck do they expect them to say?
Noah Lopez
>Marx was a dumb godless hedonist cumbeard faggot
That is a nice criticism of Marxist theory please do go on.
Luke Anderson
>Is it gonna take a Republican Super Majority in 2018 for these guys to learn they need to take a step back and look inward to why their influence is diminished?
No, user, it will literally take their deaths for them to stop what they are doing.
Aaron Hall
Pinomeme is just for fun. Also, the operations in South America were anti-communist, not globalist. What a coincidence, that the country that is doing best is the one that was purged from commies btw.
I don't have a problem with CIA destroying commie countries and enemies of the free world. Problem is when CIA becomes an agent of big government control of US-citizens and surveillance of european citizens as part of a progressive-globalist agenda tied to Obongo's shadow government.
Eli Walker
Colb**t. His shitiness alone is enough to provide one of the main pillars to an entire thread.
digits
Austin Phillips
Hegel was a shill for the prussian government. Read Aristotle, Kant, Locke etc., not proto-marxist drivel.
Daniel Morales
>the operations in South America were anti-communist, not globalist globalism is anti-communist I don't have a problem with CIA destroying commie countries and enemies of the free world. free world? you mean world bank
Christopher Harris
How about you provide criticism of Ludwig von Mises' theory of economic cycles without resorting to "gabidalism is ebil XDDD"
Jacob Young
>I don't have a problem with CIA destroying commie countries and enemies of the free world. Problem is when CIA becomes an agent of big government control of US-citizens and surveillance of european citizens as part of a progressive-globalist agenda tied to Obongo's shadow government.
Basically you don't care when they do it against people and governments you don't like not that you see a problem of mass surveillance in it of itself. Nice to show your hypocresy you are no different from Colbert desu. Btw CIA operations in SA were not against commie governments but to make SA basically Americas backyard in their imperialist policies. Look up Project FU belt.
Ayden White
>Leftoids >actually believing in what they preach pick one.
The Left is a moral vacuum. They say whatever they think will work best in the moment to disarm a population, so they can gain power. They reinvent themselves at the drop of a hat. Their followers are too emotional, uncritical, or psychologically damaged to notice.
Maybe we agree that the west is not really free until FED and ECB have been abolished and everything privatized?
Rollback against commie nations is not to be confused with globalism, in the sense of Soros style subversive attempts at throwing over sovereign states and replace their power with supra-national entities.
Carson Fisher
>They say whatever they think will work best in the moment to disarm a population, dude,were you in middle school or something during bush?
Jordan Carter
>were you in middle school or something during bush? I was in Afghanistan. What's your point?
Kayden Nelson
Communist governments are not for the people, they are against the people. People don't like being starved to death and killed in millions by state terrorism. Liberating people from communists is almost an ethical obligation of the civilized world.
Adam Bennett
The criticism is right there in your own tl;dr BS.
Modes of production are the result of ideas, not the product. Someone had the idea to fashion two sticks of wood together with a cord, later a nail, later glue.
This is so plainly obvious as to preclude any discussion among intellectuals. And yet here we after a century of discussing that very fact facing a world on the precipice of post-scarcity where elites are suppressing technologies, truth and education in order to keep the class struggle going.
Marxism is a memetic fever for turning envy into bloodshed, and you are a damn fool for imagining it has anything more to offer than that.
