Best argument to dismantle this graph?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trifunctional_hypothesis
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

For a start it describes fascism and totalitarianism, not capitalism

If anyone posted it, you could just simply ask them to define capitalism

When they insist
>"no way my dude THIS PIC right there is what capitalism ITSELF does look like!!!"
how to respond?

yeah all the priests i know are so fucking loaded, they really only do it for the cash

Ask them to swap out the bottom title for "Communism", and replace the top title as "Taxes".

kek

Hm, not seen in any of these graphs is an indication of how much worse it is under socialism.

graduate highschool

...

>Communism
>Taxes

Pretty good argument, with much less cruelties to poor people though

>9gag
graph dismantled

There is literally no argument in the picture

Lurk more

Capitalism is a mode of production protected by the state, and labour builds the state. Without labour, the state falls.

Private property rights is realized with force.

>Picture of the feudal system
>With a random picture of fat people in it
What the fuck is the 4th row supposed to be even? Capitalism doesn't supply fat people with free food, unless those are supposed to be "Fatcat" CEO's.
Also, the whole "we work for all" thing doesn't make sense. That seems more like a Communism thing.

if a retard really offered this as an argument and you need to go on Sup Forums to find a rebuttal for this, you shouldn't be debating
if they're that dense you wont crack them

We need a new ideology.
One that takes the best from the failed ones.

Why would someone make that?

>you need to collectivist to have private property

Just point out the shitty design work.

Whoever created this is a moron because this picture portrays feudalism. In a capitalistic society, soldiers do not hold power over anyone such as portrayed here. This is clearly displaying king, religion, knights, nobles, and serfs.

The true capitalism picture would have two tiers. One of power, class, and structure. The next of heinous dirt and reality tv shows; providing a metaphor for meritocracy and demonstrating those who work and put effort into bettering themselves... Into achievement are of the upper class. The rest of people are... More concerned with Kanye West and the Kardashians.

Wow, actually, nevermind. You don't need force to protect private property. I guess you abolished my argument by using an overused molymeme haha.

>implying feudalism is bad
xD

>you need government to secure property rights
>therefore its ok for government to do whatever it wants including abolishing property rights

you have no argument

I never said you didn't need force, that would be absurd

It's irrational to claim that collectivized property can be private property

>best argument to dismantle this graph
it has a 9fag watermark

So people can think it was made 7 weeks ago, not 7 decades ago

its private insofar that anyone not within the public has no claim to it

: ^)

Remind them that collectivism only had two layers. The overwhelming majority were on the bottom and those who weren't eating thier own children were starving to death or being piled in mass Graves by their own governments.

Its not that the graph is wrong, its that idealist commie dreamers will invariably do worse, and after they get "redpilled" after millions starve, and are purged, they and their closest allies will invariably only vie for top spot on the pyramid.

You can't escape the caste system. It is upheld by centuries of sexual behavior and prehistoric.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trifunctional_hypothesis

>supports (((capitalism)))
>calls himself redpilled
NSDAP would be disappointed

*yawn*

Socialism is a mode of production protected by the state, and labour builds the state. Without labour, the state falls.

Private property rights is realized with force, much like public property """rights"""

Mods are gods and I am grateful that they made explicit the already attaining forbidding of redundant threads BUT
The biggest problem here was not redundant threads, it is one-line writing prompt one-posts. This format allows a spammer to quickly bombard us with brainless spam and drive good threads off the board before they can be archived. The brainlessness of the non-discussion offends the character of the board.
Imagine trying to have a substantive discussion while surrounded by robots who constantly demand to know your favorite color. /s/ has a minimum thread set-up requirement -- you cannot demand that everyone else write your thread for you -- and Sup Forums needs one too.

...

That's actually not what he said or implied but ok.

gud one, I really like this one

Not real cummunism!