Would reducing the male population be a great thing?

Would reducing the male population be a great thing?
>No more rape
>No more faggots
>No more global warming
>No more war

Other urls found in this thread:

ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/ozone-hole-and-gw-faq.html#.WMFH1IHytdg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Men are not humans.

Pay no attention to this slide thread, and check out these hexes instead

Sliding 101. Don't bump.

>noone to blame for everything

Women would slaughter eachother after 2 days

mmmm yeah

>No more global warming
Wot? We literally have a hole in our ozone layer because women can't help but spray chemicals into their hair so it looks slightly more puffy then other women's hair.

[citation needed]

Yes ignore the discussion

>No more civilization
>No more comfy lives
>No reason to live for most females

>"Ozone depletion occurs when chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)—formerly found in aerosol spray cans and refrigerants—are released into the atmosphere. These gases, through several chemical reactions, cause the ozone molecules to break down, reducing ozone's ultraviolet (UV) radiation-absorbing capacity."
>ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/ozone-hole-and-gw-faq.html#.WMFH1IHytdg
Literally the first link on a google when searching "what caused the hole in the ozone layer"

I gotta say

Being on Estrogen is pretty great

OP is a monstrous faggot. SAGE.

The hole in the ozone layer is because of car fumes

>No more faggots
Sure
>No more global warming
Sure
>No more war
Sure

rape and war are most often perpetuated by women.

I didn't know that cars ran on aerosol sprays and refrigerants.

Would reducing the female population be a great thing?
>no more crying
>no more complaining
>no more being useless child, that has to be take care of by their husbands for entirety of their adult lives
>no more coal burners
>no more single moms

once we perfect technology, where women are no longer needed we win.

who will carry out the killing?

Who said anything about killing anybody

yes the brown ones, we have too many

Anne may body pillows cannot reproduce

Yes, if they are muslims.

>once we perfect technology, where women are no longer needed we win.

Did you read what i wrote or are you just retarded, oh wait you are a woman. that explains it.

no more getting shit done
well at least some shit

You didint say what you meant by ''perfect technology''
That could mean
>Artificial wombs
>Genetic engineered women who have no free will

perfect technology which allows us to not rely on women

there

AI waifubot thats made of rubber isn't the same as flesh and bone women

If you want to see some test runs of all women run organizations just take a look at huffpost or watch dance moms and re evaluate if you think that's a system that could work.

yeah it has a mute function

They said reduce the male population, not wipe out men idiots. Males would still be the authority that upkeeps peace and rule of law. And yeah historically this has been the case, in ancient greece around 25% of males died in wars. In old times it was war that kept the population of males down, and it worked. It leaves the males that stay alive with less competition for women and more women and jobs (or farmland) for all the males.

>Would reducing the non-white population be a great thing?

fixed it for u

>>No more rape
>>No more faggots
>>No more global warming
>>No more war
You are wrong on every single point o_O

...

except No more war, there would be just a bunch of countries, not talking to each other
kek

FAGGOT POST DETECTED


SAGE

Im all for it, every man would get a harem

I prefer faggots over dykes, personally

>No more global warming
>No more war
proofs?

Sliding thread.
Also all that could be solved by removing niggers and other 3rd world lazy scum.

Fantastic idea! You first!

Who would women leech off of though?

Would reducing the female population be a good thing?
>no more child murders

Pretty sure the pollution follows various industrial nations over time. What America was producing during the late 1800's to late 1900's is now happening in China.

A can of hairspray isn't going to compare to a smokestack from a company that pumps unfiltered chemicals into the air 24 hours a day.

There would be more war, just on a less destructive scale.

Actually, statistics like violence from females against those who can't defend themselves with the strength of a man (children; elderly in their care; those in lesbian relationships) indicate that women are as violent or more in situations where they aren't physically outmatched.

Without men to control and stop them, women would be violent towards women. When men are there to dissuade any violence, the women use other means to cause harm.