>2017 and being a republic
Why is republics so shitty?
We all know countries with ROYAL FAMILIES like KINGS, KAISERS AND EMPERORS are best
France as alot better before they became a shitty republic.
Germany was alot better before killing their own fucking kaiser
Countries like Norway, Denmark and England is best because we have royal kings/queens
Republics are soulless shithole meme countries
GOD SAVE THE KING
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>be monarchy
>still have all the negatives of a democuckcy
Parlamentarian monarchies have nothing to brag
Plus your king is a degenerate race traitor and unable to make sons
Dont talk about his majesty high king Harald like that
King Cuck of Norway; it does not matter if you're a homosexual, muslim or anything else, you're still welcome!
Harald CK?
>Sweden is a monarchy
>Most degenerate country in the world
>Destroying a beautiful people with very massive immigration
Fuck you
>tfw george washington refused the chance to be king and went with a democratic republic instead of a consitutional monarchy
>tfw the french overthrew their monarchy because frogs are retarded
>tfw the last kind of italy got rid of the monarchy because mussolini fucked everything up
>tfw prince harry is gonna bring a black girl into the british royal family
>it's only a matter of time until one of the noric countries tries to outcuck one another and bring some str8 outta africa bull into the family
at least the queen of spain is kind of hot
Republicucks get the fuck out
Their royals are even cucks.
They screwed over their Crown Prince so that Princess Victoria could be Queen, and she married her personal fucking trainer.
I mean, wtf Sweden? Why even have a monarchy?
For Queen and Country
The Italian referendum was rigged by the CIA btw. They admit that.
Washington had zero interest in propping up the Savoys.
would rather be a republic than have a king like this tbqh
And I bet that soon they will racemix
>prince harry
>royal family
uh huh
'Prince' Harry has no royal blood.
Nothing of value will be lost.
>King
You a fucking retard?
>sweden is a monarchy
Make Europe Great Again
>American are smart
117AD. When Rome was an Empire. With an Emperor. So how is OP a retard?
modern monarchs are literally welfare niggers
>proving OP's point
>The Roman Empire
>Empire
you know the thing about empires bong? They got emperors.
shouldnt you be cleaning toilets right now?
Empires =/= monarchies, retards
Sweden is as much of a monarchy as Britain.
have fun with financing ebin monarchs with zero power outside of telling people to accept refugees
name a monarchy that reached space. Monarchy are shit.
Then how did Queen Victoria preside over the largest empire the world has ever seen?
Checkmate frog.
We need an hivemindarchy.
I don't care about if their monarchs got all the power or not, they are just destroying them countries, promoting degeneracy and other shits. I don't even understand how people here say that it's a solution.
Maybe monarchies in the past were good but for now it's totally useless because they are globalists as fuck
It's not Queen Victoria who did this but her government she had almost no power
except my Monarch did not tell me to accept refugees. Quite the opposite.
>"its not given that you become Danish just by living in Denmark"
its a good quote.
also the Danish monarch holds quite essential power since we never revolted like the rest of the niggers of Europe.
Rome fell due to over extension, debasement of its currency and its vast multiculturalism, all spurred on during the imperial phase. At least during the Republic there were checks upon power and a limit to which power could be wielded (don't march on your own damn capital maybe?). The Empire grew bloated with bureaucracy and the power vacuum left in the wake of countless incompetent emperors with unlimited power did little to assure the nation's continued existence. That map is a sign of the things to come, never forget that.
>assume monarchs to be shit because no one man should have all that power
>first world powers get rid of their monarchies
>first world goes to shit in a century
My noodle is stirring
good for you then, i think swedish monarch got his stuff stolen by a refugee
>Germany was alot better before killing their own fucking kaiser
It was an authoritarian nightmare. Everyone should be equal before the law.
>willingly being a cuck
>We all know countries with ROYAL FAMILIES like KINGS, KAISERS AND EMPERORS are best
Pfffff HAHAHAHAHA
>Monarchy are shit.
>checked flag
>kek'd hard
200 years of Pax Romana under the Empire was far preferable to the constant infighting, trumped up dictators (Sulla, Marius, Pompey) incompetence, disorganisation and civil wars of the Republic.
So what actual power does the the king of say belgium or sweden have
>hivemindarchy.
gud joke cause its actually what we live in
But that's not your king Pedro
Even so.
Britain had a monarchy and an empire
pax romana was meme
>what is year of 4 emperors
>what is war of 5 emperors
and then you have stuff like time of crisis where in 50 years or so not a single emperor died of natural causes
Yeah she did nothing else that eat and drink in the back of Britain workers
What an accomplishment
You confuse strife with decay, it is better that the Republic remained in tact and the things which allowed the Empire to even come in to being be protected. It is because of all the hard work done by those who built up the Republic that the emperors could enjoy such vast wealth and "peace", as also often said: "The Romans create a wasteland and call it peace."
You're giving credit where it isn't due. The emperors destroyed Rome, of course because they had none of the mechanisms left in tact to protect is, they were dictators sitting upon a slowly unfolding national crisis of decline, what did any of them do to stop it? Rather, especially the Christian ones, hastened the divide and destruction.
>2017
>his king doesn't have a fucking chin
There are many different republics, which word on itself is meaningless these days. It's always global elites and monarchies have a high tendency to wanting to be global elites, just look at them.
>we wuz racemixing and shit
>then we became niggers Well at least they sterilized slaves at beginnings.
I actually am starting to agree. Congress/parliaments are useless.
All they do is talk. And nothing gets done ther than petty bickering by career politicians and I'm sick of it at this point.
Please answer
I feel ya
>and unable to make sons
wat?
But a monarch is a solution as they can not be controlled. A king is the ruler of all the land and no jew will be able to sway him with money as he is already the richest person in his country as well has the man who holds all power of the that country.
Bavaria still has their Duke and many Bavarians want to be independant. Could we get a campaign going to meme him to be crowned king and go independent?
>Frog saying empires aren't monarchies
>literally :CROWNED/ Napoleon emperor
I cannot deny this.
Just hope that monarch would be not a mason or other shit like this
>A king is the ruler of all the land and no jew will be able to sway him with money
>Britain does not exist
You're the dumbest person in the world
>norway
>denmark
>ENGLAND
'murica
Well ideally you would have a constitution that would allow people to over throw the government in event that he becomes really fucking stupid or acts less like the father of his country and more like the entitled toddler which is bound to happen in a 3-4 generations.
>modern Britain is what people mean when talking about monarchy
kek
>The roman empire
>imperium
>emperor
Are you actually this dense?
Monarchs who do nothing are shit. The existence of the aristocracy was contingent on their existence as an elite military core. When they stopped being that, they lost their right to rule.
well. during times of war, our king is the guy in charge.
Sweden and Belgium are so redpilled, am I right ?
Source? I'm interested in reading about this
Napoleon was a military leader who fought his way to the top. That's not how a monarchy works
Indeed
Faggot-Store and Hadia Taqiya can go to hell
if the king calls, Norwegians would fill Slottsplassen
Not to mention Princess Madeleine who married a wall street banker and is more or less a trophy wife at this point. The Bernadotte's have been garbage since the first guy died.
It's even on Wikipedia that the CIA bankrolled the Christian Democrats in 1948.
Guess who were the overwhelming Republican party on the right in 1946?
The Christian Democrats played ball with the CIA, so they guaranteed the referendum.
How come you have a French royal family ?
Why do their berets look so shitty? They all look like they have barely been formed.
...
...
Portugal invented JFK/Franz Ferdinand assassination style in 1908 because the King sucked too much Eternal Anglo cock.
You guys have French kings too
nah
he was the original
en.wikipedia.org
>Balthasar Gérard (alternative spellings Gerards or Gerardts; c. 1557 – 14 July 1584) was the assassin of the Dutch independence leader, William I of Orange (William the Silent). He killed William I in Delft on 10 July 1584, by shooting him twice with a pistol, and was afterwards tried, convicted, and gruesomely executed.
and you guys are being raped by maghreb migrants, whats the difference
Willy is based as fuck.
One of Napoleon's buddies literally cucked the entire country and was so alpha they begged him to become king
Since XVIII, House of Bourbon, originally from France. Absolute decline
Pic related is a pro multi-kulti shill
Literally has his wife's son
Good thing he has no real power
he does have real power, he never use it though.
dont think he ever will.
What would happen if the monarch would get redpilled?
Do people in your country value his opinion?
Does the average person have loyalty to the monarch beyond a cuckservative lip service?
Asking all monarchy countries
We don't have monarchies, just republics in which the president (without power) is not elected
Habsburg mismanagement caused the decline.
Didn't help that Carlos II was retarded as fuck and couldn't even comb his hair.
Thanks you mong. I didn't know that.
Anyone except this genius that can answer my questions?
Sure, but not Habsburgs of the XVI (Carlos I, Felipe II, even Felipe III), but those from the XVII (Felipe IV, obviously Carlos II)
Wouldn't know that by any Danes I've met. All the ones I've met have been like "bring one the socialism and multiculturalism! There is nothing bad happening in Sweden or Germany!"
the kings approval rating is over 80%,
the standard answer is that they like the diplomatic and representative work they do for norway.
Who knows what would happen if the king got redpilled. i mean, if he tried to take back controll, i think it would be a toss up, if he got the military behind him and could manage to insititute some viable form of government, AND not be thrown over by the people. then sure.
but i think thats higly unlikely, and not to mention difficult.
value his opinion, well, its like having a leader with no power. kind words and such, people obviously like that. he usually doesnt get too opinionated about stuff.
what a fucking great post!!!
The swedish monarchy is purely ceremonial, our king isn't even allowed to make statements about politics.
>What would happen if the monarch would get redpilled?
Nothing much would change. Our queen rarely speaks out about politics, and almost never on specific issues. She does influence the zeitgeist though, and that can be important. Mostly people just read into it what fits their narrative though.
As someone said earlier, in the queen's 2016 new year's speech, she said that just being born on Danish soil does not make you Danish.
It remains to be seen what our future king will do, but he seems pretty cool and served in the military.
>Do people in your country value his opinion?
Only in the aforementioned new year's speeches that generally draw 2/5 - 3/5 the population and 90%+ of all TV seers, but generally yes. Her new year's speech is always more popular than our minister of state's.
>Does the average person have loyalty to the monarch beyond a cuckservative lip service?
I'm not really sure. There's a lot of respect for our monarch, and it's an honour if you've served as her guard. Most would definitely prefer to keep our monarchy if asked, but would they fight for it? I don't know.
That's how monarchies start