Men today are too feminine, unlike back in the day

>Men today are too feminine, unlike back in the day.

>Arguably the most powerful man of his time, Louis XIV.

>300 years ago.

Other urls found in this thread:

world4.eu/french-fashion-reign-louis-xiv/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

wtf? I hate the monarchy now!

>using a Frenchman as an example of traditional masculinity

kek

this.

>French
>not getting fucked in the ass constantly by other men
pick one

>What are cultural norms

Nobles in Louis court would go bankrupt cause they had to keep up with the fancy fag fasion. If you wear the wrong socks, so help you god

>women ripping off fashion from 300 years ago
It's like nothing has changed. Faggots still dominate the fashion industry.

You see Jean-Paul, if you wear ze carpet comme moi, your nice clothes will not get dirty when ze Eengleesh are walking all over you.

Cultural norms change. Hell, idea of colors being masculine and feminine was invention of XX century clothing manufacturers. Up till '30 little boys were wearing the same clothes as their sisters and ran around in little dresses. Louis XIV didn't dress like that becouse he or his countrymen considered it feminine. Neither were roman legionaries feminine for wearing basicly skirts.

You gotta be pretty buck to rock tights and wigs. These guys didnt even have electricity, or hfcs. YOU are a disembodied online entity! YOU jack off to tranny porn!

...

If you could afford luxury goods that aren't tacky you would feel differently. As it stands, you prescribe to a interpretation of masculinity made popular by Jewish Hollywood media.

>YOU are a disembodied online entity!
>YOU jack off to tranny porn!

1. These two statements are contradictory.
2. The French nobility would have fucking loved tranny porn.

>ugh why are men today such cucks! The ancient greeks were so much more redpilled!

>all of greece was a homotopia that participated in boyfucking
>Spartans participated regularly in wife sharing
>10 year war of troy fought over a whore

spbp

>monarchs
>good representation of the average man.
Also "back in the day usually refers to ~1900-1960

that's a painting dumbass

Louis XIR was actually alpha as fuck - he reduced the French nobility, from being proud and independent rivals to power, to being palace servants who had to fight over who got to put on the king's jockstrap.

I looked at the picture and I can say honestly there's not much to it.

I don't understand what's supposed to be feminine about the man in the painting with the sword.

Well there are the heels...

Spartans were an ethno state. Like the majority of all cultures were before the age of colonization. Wouldn't you share a woman with your own brother? Or does that make you a cuck in your eyes?
>10 year war of troy fought over a whore
This was a long time before Spartans existed.

Heels originated as a means of keeping a horseman's boots from slipping through his stirrups. Again I'm not seeing what's supposed to be feminine here.

What's your point?

It's called decadence you degenerate ape.

>Last monarchy on France was 150 years ago.
>Hate monarchy.

Are you stupid ?

There's nothing wrong with peacocking if you carry the biggest stick (and aren't cornholing men with it, thereby fueling degeneracy). I'm not a big admirer of Louis XIV, but clearly he dressed like this to rub the competitions' face in his superiority: like, "I ruined you and your family for generations, enjoy this exquisite painting of me as a dandy lad, xo BTFO."

He's trolling after rolling castle-bred ni66as.

Led Zeppelin is my fav example to shoot down your argument. Men get a pass if they're output is genius. They're are plenty of fag jocks and politicians who clock into work sporting traditional manly attire. Look at Marv Albert or Jeremy Renner.

Led Zeppelin wearing chick jeans and flipping their curls on stage, not the same as some gay rapper pushed by (((them))) or Don Lemon wearing eyeliner and lipstick for his CNN masters.

What sensible white guy hasn't dreamt of dressing like Barry Lyndon and Aaron Burring his wife's son on a romantic, bucolic afternoon?

I never knew that.

Heels for men were common at a time of horses. It's like complaining about togas being closer to robes than to shirts.
Also Louis XIV was king of the manlets so the extra two inches were necessary.
There isn't anything particularly feminine in it either.

desu 17th century was a strange period

Apparently, Catherine of Russia would have balls where she would make everyone come in gender swapped outfits...men in dresses and women in whatever the men wore

Is that scoopy thing supposed to be a weapon?

You mean it was the goat right?
>world4.eu/french-fashion-reign-louis-xiv/

Context is everything.

As if Adolf wasn't absolutely fabulous.

>Louis XIR
shieet he even had his own gender neutral pronoun