HEY YOU FUCKING PLEB.
YES YOU. YES. THE ASSHOLE INSIDE A SKULL READING THIS IN A LOUD VOICE.
AND THE OTHER ASSHOLE TO THE RIGHT THAT NEVER TALKS AND ONLY SHOWS YOU WEIRD IMAGES.
GREETINGS FROM /r/C_S_T
WE HATE YOU AND YOU HATE US
WE LOVE YOU AND YOU LOVE US
GO DO SOME FUCKING LEARNING YOU FUCKING DEGENERATES:
philome.la
philome.la
HAVE A NICE EVENING YOU BRILLIANT SHITHAWKS.
Other urls found in this thread:
docs.google.com
psychologytoday.com
opensynthesis.org
arxiv.org
twitter.com
HERE HAVE SOME MORE LEARNING YOU SHITS:
docs.google.com
ARE YOU LEARNING YET?
GO DO YOUR FUCKING LEARNING Sup Forums
COME ON.
>not politics
sage in all astral dimensions
>intelligence analyst training better than the CIA teaches you
>not politics
ヽ( >∀
ARE YOU LEARNING YET, Sup Forums? ARE YOU?
OR DO YOU JUST THINK YOU ARE BUT AREN'T?
russian uses wit
american uses pejorative
unsurprised
>he seriously considered that i clicked that shit
nah nigga
WE HAVE A LEARNER OVER HERE.
HERE, HAVE A SHITTY WALLPAPER FROM 2014 AS A REWARD.
>pejorative
thats kinda sad, since you can actually make pretty witty puns in english
AND YOU FEEL LIKE YOU SET A MEANING FOR YOUR LIFE?
>talks about witty puns and fails to comprehend the double-meaning of wit
ヽ( >∀
fuck meaning
im not in a life crisis, neither am i in shizophrenic psychosis like you seem to be
take your meds
>no meaning
AUTIST DETECTED.
YOUR AUTISTIC SOLIPSISM HOLDS NO POWER IN THIS DOMAIN.
YOUR ACCUSATION OF SCHIZOPHRENIC IDEALISM HOLDS NO POWER IN THIS DOMAIN.
YIELD TO THE CONSTRUCTIVIST POWER OF INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS.
OR DO YOU WANT /hwndu/ TO BEAT YOU IN A RACE AGAIN?
>AUTIST DETECTED.
WHICH ONE IS IT NOW, IMBECILE. DECIDE YOUR ACCUSATION.
both in your case, some degenerates are unknown to science
BY NOW ENGAGING IN THE ACT OF ANALYSIS OF COMPETING HYPOTHESIS, YOU HAVE APPLIED ONE OF THE OLDEST CIA INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS METHODS AVAILABLE.
CONGRATULATIONS, YOU HAVE INVOLUNTARILY BEGUN LEARNING BY DOING.
NOW REFLECT UPON YOUR OWN MIND AND YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE NORMAL AS THE DEGENERATE.
>YOU HAVE APPLIED ONE OF THE OLDEST CIA INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS METHODS AVAILABLE.
shit. pic related
>YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE NORMAL AS THE DEGENERATE.
No.
>shit
SHALL WE NOW DISCUSS THOSE OLD CIA SECRET PRISONS IN POLAND OR WOULD YOU PREFER GIVING A GLOMAR RESPONSE, OR SILENCE, OR ANOTHER EASILY DECONSTRUCTED ACCUSATION SUCH AS THE ONE IMPLICIT IN THE VERY TEXT YOU CURRENTLY PARSE.
>No.
>implying you didn't already based on your response
ヽ( >∀
honest question at this point, what the fuck are taking right now?
it must be a stimulant of some sorts.
I just think Sup Forums would benefit from applying hardcore proper rational analysis of current events instead of the disorganized, unmethodical bullshit currently going on.
I mean, look at this:
opensynthesis.org
and tell me it's not way fucking better than the current, disorganized bullshit going on in here.
And the thing I linked actually *is* a way to teach intelligence analysis very well, developed by an academic studying intelligence analysis.
However:
Catching the attention of the hive mind?
Without outrageous bullshit?
And a rationally justified idea?
Come the fuck on, that slips right through the cracks.
*Acting* like a maniac?
Seems to have about equal chances of working/not working.
(and the Poland thing was a reference to 500k (that's right, *k*) GET on Sup Forums, and me being an idiot for a moment and mixing up the Russian flag with the Polish flag.
Although that kind of made it even better because it makes accusing you of being a CIA shill even more baseless and easily deconstructed.
praise kek and his prophet pepe (memes be upon him)
>I just think Sup Forums would benefit from applying hardcore proper rational analysis of current events
It would, if were talking about proper rational analysis and not overrational analysis which ends up in relativism.
>and tell me it's not way fucking better than the current
pol is part of an imageboard related to politics.
its not supposed to be something else.
watched the link, seems interetsing btw.
i havent even got what that was about.
>being a CIA shill
>talking about shills
her you go alpanon.
thats an example.
>Trump has sexually assaulted at least one woman
>Very consistent
These guys sound like fags.
PRAISE KEK.
But heed the all-knowing:
Literally just going to read because that russkie got btfo harder than hillary clintons last child slave
Indeed, and we are talking about that. In fact, I can prove that Analysis of Competing Hypothesis (ACH) leads to the most rational analysis HUMANLY POSSIBLE, *if* done correctly. You'll be in for a very long read, however:
arxiv.org
And you'll have to read the follow up literature. All of it. There's a fucking lot and a lot of it is hidden.
tl;dr: You *always* need:
1. two competing hypothesis
2. Bayes factors based reasoning capable of agnosticism, something inherent in ACH if you use the Kesselman list of estimative words
3. Frequentist p values
4. A self-validative cycle (Think oroborous)
to come to a statistically *truly meaningful* conclusion.
Where we can define 'meaningful' using the following 4 attributes:
* discreteness (sharpness)
* stability
* separability (decoupling)
* composability
Given that, a cybernetic control model with the following properties can get constructed from the outcomes of this:
1. The outputs can be measured;
2. The objectives can be defined;
3. It is possible to identify the true reasons for any deviation from plan;
4. It is possible in determining corrective action which, when implemented, will have the appropriate and desired effect.
>pol is part of an imageboard related to politics.
>its not supposed to be something else.
"[...] the purpose of a system is what it does. This is a basic dictum. It stands for bald fact, which makes a better starting point in seeking understanding than the familiar attributions of good intention, prejudices about expectations, moral judgment, or sheer ignorance of circumstances.", to quote Stafford Beer.
>i havent even got what that was about.
I did estimate that it as unlikely that you would
>116063660
Do you think about fags a lot?
No, but I find them everywhere I go.
Anyway, it sounds like you want Sup Forums to be some "intellectual" circlejerk shithole.
FUCKING TYPO FUCK. Let me repeat that question:
Do you think about fags a lot?
Come on Argentina-user. You can admit it. You're amongst people(such as yourself) who fucking hate you. Where else could you admit it but here?
In fact, here, have a recipe so you can learn how to change your current habit of daily cum gargling to your hourly cum gargling.
What did I do to make you so angry? Might want to calm down. Remember what happened the last time an austrian got angry.
Are you fucking stupid?
Sup Forums has already become an "intellectual" circlejerk shithole. Where the fuck do you think all these successful predictions of world events come from? IDIOTS? THIN AIR?
The only reason it gets masked behind a facade of shitposting and 'edgy' humor is due to the fact that that way, you can feel less bad about wasting your potential on the internet instead of actually doing something in live. Like you do. So:
>but I find them everywhere I go.
Well, seems like you have a pretty finely tuned gaydar then. Which only gay people have. Go suck some cocks instead of rotting in front of your computer feeling bad about it, and about wasting your potential.
>implying my anger has anything to do with you and not the fact that a network of pedophiles controls the deep state and the only two places in the world in any way taking it serious are a left-leaning subreddit(a medium of text, which schizophrenics handle better) full of schizophrenics and a right-leaning imageboard(a medium of images, which autists handle better) full of autists
lol.
>/r/C_S_T
Hey australian, shouldn't you be raping your basement family?
right back to plebbit you go, sage goes in all fields