Can we all agree that women was a lot better in the past?

Can we all agree that women was a lot better in the past?

Remember when Sweden wasn't filled with cucks

no

Viking women never wore horn helmets. That cliche came from a 19th century play.

Yes

Plx, let me know her name. I beg you.

Looks like my mom when she was younger

>asians

The "vikings never wore horned helmets" is a jewish meme to sterilize and disconnect the earlier germanic heroic age prior to the viking age.

We have tons of historical evidence of horned helmets, actual horned helmets, figurines with horned helmets, tapestry woth horned helmets, helmet embossings of horned helmets dating from 1000BC Nordic Bronze Age Vikso helmets to the tapestries of the viking age.

I doubt the average britbong even knows that anglosaxons migrated from Scandinavia and Northern Germany only 100 years before vikings, about things like the Sutton Hoo helmet which is basically a Swedish vendel helmet(it has images of horned helmets on it by the way), about the hundreds of other anglo artifacts like the finglesham belt buckle which is a man with a horned helmet.

You should start a thread about this.

>Yet you chose that picture
Wowzer

That's obviously supposed to be a valkyrie
I thought everyone knew this, but what does it matter?

Yes, please do. Wasshail
because it sounds like yet another Jewish plot to disconnect the Caucasian from his roots.

The digits demand it.

Anglosaxons didn't exist before meeting up in the british isles you idiot.
They're a mix of the two tribes of Engles (Aengles) and Saxons

Those were most likely ceremonial right?
Because having horns on a helmet you wear in battle is a terrible idea.

and THICCer

you were there? how do you know? that's right, you don't. faggot.

>Vikings
>Bronze age ceremonial helmets

...

No shit sherlock

...

There is literally zero evidence that VIKANGS wore horned helmets even for ceremonial purposes.

People often say that but I'm not so sure, having horns would mean that blows directed straight down onto the top of the head would not glance off the helmet but get "trapped" between the horns, in that one would need to draw ones weapon right back to perform another strike. The points often made about why horns are shit don't seem so compelling to me; yes you would take more of a bash from any overhand strike down on top of your head, but not much more and for the position it leaves you in it seems lik e it could be worth it.
You could grab the horns! yeah I guess if you were bare handed fighting a guy with a shield and a sword or axe grabbing his helmet sounds like the most sensible plan of attack.

Yes purely ceremonial

Read the first sentence again doofus

We Were Druidz

let me give you a quick rundown

What is the top left person on this viking age ship burial tapestry wearing?

NAME

>because da jooz are bad

That's the first sentence.

Also
>Bronze age
>Vikings

Pick one.

People DID wear horned helmets and even sometimes wore them in actual battles. The cons outweigh and pros though (which is why there wasn't any serious mass production). You make it sound like getting hit squarely on the top of the head without the blow being able to glance off is a good thing, it isn't.

>da jooz
Fuck off JIDF shill

>depictions in art must mean they were used

Wrong. They were used by other cultures and commonly portrayed. They were used by Roman Auxillary which is part of the reason they have their association with barbarism as Auxillary were not Roman citizens. They were NOT WORN BY FUCKING VIKINGS, VARG.

ayo girl!

But women are better than ever.

2D women that is.

UNNNFFF
Funny how barbarians become heroes when they're your ancestors. If your father started raping and pillaging villages you'd be ashamed but if your great great grandfather did its heritage.

That's what your argument has been reduced to. I'm glad some basic logic and historical evidence could get rid of your 19th century romanticism. Now ples, go find some actual culture.

Sure in the terms that your head will absorb more energy from the blow but it might be worth it for the position it leaves you and your opponent in. I think the horns could have provided a sort of false weakness but one that would only really be effective against people that hadn't thought about or seen it, making it unviable for mass use. Humans have a strong tendency to throw blows downward at the top of the head and this is in a time when most people can't read and communication between settlements is poor.

Kill yourself you filthy kike, they are undeniably part of 6000 years of continued nordic history from the ancient stone carvings to and including imagery in the viking age.

nope, they all leftie sluts.

Spreading there legs for every one.

Its the nature of the women. They dont know better.

Heroic poetry is a real thing. Look it up.

They were used by some cultures but again your overlooking the gigantic first part of your post: your making your armor less protective. That's fine if your a gaudy faggot (in a tournament) but when you're trying to stop some retard from raping your kids then you would probably want less horns to survive the day.

>I think the horns could have provided a false weakness

How would it be false? It is an actual weakness. This is like making boobs on breastplates. No one did it (for long) because it gave another place to connect with a spear thrust.

>yfw you never get to bang a stone age European tribal woman with hips that go on forever.

Fucking stick insects all over the place these days...

The enemy would just have to pull his sword back, it's not worth it.
The horns would also get in the way of your own movement or that of your buddy behind you.

>Nordic history

You mean a history of starvation that was only mitigated by living off the fat of superior cultures that could actually sustain a civilization? The Vikings were shit and you're a naive twat for buying into them. Again you will find depictions of horned helmets in artwork. You'll also find dragons. Now find me some dragon bones with your Viking horned helmets. You should spot them at the same time.

Well melees could be chaotic right? So whats to stop some guy pulling one of your horns from behind, pulling your head back and just slittling your throat? Or even from the front?

>pull his sword back
>after the horns on your helmet ensured a square blow on the top of your skull

How is this fucking tea drinker not understanding this? This is the literal reason why helmets were made with rounded tops for the majority of history.

Can we all agree that women was a lot better in the 2D?

Fuck you you little bitch. They discovered America and were known for having huge cocks.

Men were a lot better in the past. Before the Jews were genociding our race.

Fuck off you filthy mongrels, you're riddled with parasites and steppe niggers. those previous people were corrupted by the invasions from the east.

In all seriousness, user, I have no problems with people loving their history. Especially the history from where they're from. Nordic history is great but buying into the horned helmet myth is silly and it bothers me when people won't look at actual archeological evidence.

Sup Forums is too infested with plebitors to accept the true redpill.

They were probably better than refugees who are living in your country right now.

That skirt is defying gravity.

I think his idea is that a sword would actually be stuck giving you a window to attack.
In reality you'd probably be unconscious or at least dizzy giving the enemy a window.
OR he has a Dane axe instead that goes straight through your helmet were it could have been deflected to the side without the horns.

BBC is a hoax. Masturbation makes your penis stop growing.

I just don't think that a single blow to the head (which would be unlikely to land squarely, since horned helmets are usually domed as well) to a metal helmet with padding underneath would knock me out and that it would be an easy position to respond from
yeah would have to pull their arm back, my experience with fencing and HEMA is that there aren't really any "free" moves. Set the position up with a buddy, start from the position of having your sword in between the horns at close range (my theory being that Mr Horns would advance at any downward blow to the head). Try it, I have this is the reason I think this.

yes.

Hnngggg

Not if it is taught on the bottom because the material is gathered on the top and held between the legs.

IBBC is a hoax. Masturbation makes your penis stop growing. That's why the Jews make porn. To sterilize white men.

False

Nah either all the energy goes into your skull and neck or your head gets thrown to the side.

>a fucking leaf
why is every single canadian so retarded?

...

Yes. Feminine women were better.

Much better.

Why would I trust a 4 inch dick Indian. I saw 2 black guys dicks. One was the same size as mine and he jerked off every day. The other had a huge dick and jerked off every 2 weeks. The reason blacks are bigger on average is because whites are addicted to masturbation. Which is why Jews make porn.

The average Nord was taller, healthier and had more freedom than the average kike at any point in history.
As said previously the continuity of hard evidence with imagery is well established for the helmets, comparisons to mythology is inane.
Now get in my oven Schlomo, your kike "arguments" read like something Hitler described in Mein Kampf.

At least i am not a retarded burger

Yet your iq is vastly inferior.

poo in the loo, pajeet.

And your penis is probably smaller as well. And you're probably shorter.

>I just don't think

We'll go fucking do it then. I don't care but historical evidence and common sense says they weren't something that helped. I just want you to know I hate you for how dumb you are. You do realize the horns are stopping the force of the blow from glancing off? This makes the rounding of the helm either pointless or less efficient. In no way does it help reduce the force of the blow which would be the case WITHOUT the horns.

I understand the idea but this is like grilling inside. Sure it's warmer but you're gonna be fucking dead.

Pretty much.

Pic related is what the average movie star looked like in the 60s.

Now they're all jewesses with boy bodies.

Only relationship with little girls can save us now.

>Nords
>kikes

>and Vikings

Oh my.

What are we even comparing here now? There are no archeological finds for Viking horned helmets. I'm sorry you're too dense to understand that. Maybe someday you'll be less retarded, Varg.

With today's results it is clear that modiji will remain the PM of India and the supreme leader of UP for many years to come. Soon we will build the grand temple at ayodhya and take supreme blessings of lord Ram. With these powers we will take over the world and each one of you will have two options:- either do ghar wapsi or die. JAI SHREE RAM

Vikings did not exist before the Viking Age, and in battle would not be wearing horned helmets as is commonly depicted

See

Hey, Varg, I literally already responded to that post. You know we have IDs on this board, right? I know it's hard but you really should try reading before posting.

Gawd dammit, now I'm diamonds.

obviously not because they led us to the present.

I already demolished your shit-tier argument of "no archaeological evidence for horned helmets in viking age, even though actual helmets, figurines with helmets and general imagery is consistent with the same folk group for 6000 years and even in the viking age"

I'm off to go do something more productive than repeat ad naseum to a lying kike in denial.

Yep, she truly was something special.

Now we have 4/10s like Jennifer Lawrence and Emma Stone who they try to tell us are flawless and beautiful, but I'm not fooled like normies are.

Show me a horned Viking helmet then. We'll all wait. We've been waiting for centuries. We have many Viking helmets without horns. There should be some lying around with them if they were used as you say.

Can we all agree that men were a lot better in the past?

>tfw no betty compson wife

>A majority of men in Scandinavia have the I1 haplogroup
>The I haplogroup is one of the oldest in Europe, having been here for over 30,000 years
The R1b haplogroup (which you almost certainly belong to) came to Europe 10,000 years later
>Genetic tests regularly show both the average Scandinavian and the aristocrats today and a thousand years ago belonging to the I1 group
>"herp derp vikings were central asian"
Yeah...

>shitty teeth
>plump
>wild hair
>too long hair
>less makeup

Current is better as it gives a larger spectrum. Like sluts? You got them. Like Japanese women in school dresses? You got them. Like art deco era cosplayers? You got them. Like classic girls? You got them. Etc

Crying about the past is something bitches do.

The buckle and the helmet depict naked horned figures, there is no evidence of it being helmets and if so if they were meant for ceremony or what.
Also bronze age = vikings ????

Pic unrelated
We wuz lokis

No.

I don't need to, the imagery + continuity is enough evidence. We have more pre-viking age helmets found in Norway than viking age helmets, in fact only 1 Norwegian viking age helmet has ever been found. Similar story with chainmail. Yet, texts and imagery from the period is rife with mentions. We have no hard evidence for the Grand Temple of Uppsala, yet no one desputes its existence.

Are you seriously suggesting that this is a naked horned figure and not a helmet

>penis
>horns sprouting straight from brow
Are you not?
And even if they are supposed to represent headwear, it's part of a dance/ceremony/symbolizing the horned god or odin, even more so bronze/early iron age helmet crests were very different from the bull horns on helmets in pop culture.