What did Stanley Kubrick know, and why did (((they))) kill him?

>WARNING: MANY REDPILLS

Ok, so its pretty obvious that the CIA killed him while he was making "Eyes Wide Shut", so he never really "finished" it, even though it was released.

Kubrick left 5D puzzle pieces in all his films, especially,

- 2001 A Space Odyssey
- Eyes Wide Shut
- The Shining
- Lolita

Room 237 is a documentary that explains the hundreds of puzzle pieces of "The Shining", which is probably his most complex movie, including the deep subtext of the film PEDOPHILIA/ABUSE, THE HOLOCAUST, THE APOLLO 11 MOON LANDING and much more.

His wife also said he had a deep depression regarding the "holocaust".

>The explanation of how Kubrick faked the moon landing from the Room 237 documentary:
youtube.com/watch?v=_u4A5tJ2j3o

>The Full Documentary (poorer quality since youtube)
youtube.com/watch?v=6S_n8CQBpRs


WHAT DID KUBRICK KNOW AND WHY DID THEY KILL HIM?!?

Other urls found in this thread:

collativelearning.com/the shining - chap 16.html
youtube.com/watch?v=0sUIxXCCFWw
collativelearning.com/the shining.html
youtube.com/watch?v=vc2cPuwpqTg
youtube.com/watch?v=hhkRQUtD_Jo
youtube.com/watch?v=FR8ihFose8Y
aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2480271/The-Shining-really-scariest-horror-film-Heart-rate-monitors-reveal-terrifying-movie-moments-time.html
vimeo.com/78314194
aulis.com/mythbusters.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Pedophilia subcontext of The Shining explained
collativelearning.com/the shining - chap 16.html

Film psychology in the movie regarding the entire design:
youtube.com/watch?v=0sUIxXCCFWw

I feel like theres a lot of hidden answers we can find in his movies even though people have already looked for many years, theres much to find

They killed him because they knew what he was doing.

>exposing them in a very subtle and complex way

Dumb shit. If you want to expose someone, you do it and bang.

Or: Was he helping expose them or help craft a subtle form of subconscious programming for the things the elite do in order to "tell" the public, but only to make these things seem like fiction, thus hiding the truth behind a smokescreen?

In the documentary, they mention that Kubrick studied books regarding subconscious programming in the same way commercials do.

Kubrick apparently spent a very long time studying it before he made The Shining.

wouldnt even surprise me, such a shame he has been killed
he was a genius

His IQ was estimated at 200. You can find info on it online.

moar ?

Go through this whole thing, starting from part 3, they're short and include screenshots. Shows you how complex everything really is.

collativelearning.com/the shining.html

However, if you want a variety of different things watch Room 237 (the full documentary) in the original post.

Watch any movie of his that you haven't watched already...

Dude I've solved 5d puzzles before. This Stanley Kubrick stuff is either 10D or autistic gibberish.

He had an extreme case of OCD, he was known for it and apparently later became depressed. Everything in his films from set design to props, all carefully picked and placed.

He had Jack Nicholson repeat the scene where hes threatening to bash his wife's brains in over a hundred times to drive Jack insane in real life so that the take would be perfect.

And apparently he psychologically abused Shelley Duvall during film so he could put her into the state he wanted and she needed psychiatric treatment after the filming was done. She said working with Kubrick was the worst experience of her life. She is totally insane nowadays too, a total nutjob.

He probably went to a few parties for that kind of shit
He was largely famous and held as one of the best on the planet do the upper echelon definitely invited him to lots of stuff
He wasn't killed by anyone though, there was easily plausible deniability for every secret club cult shit he put in movies simply because you could call it just movie shit for interesting bad guys and anyone seeing it would say that makes sense and ignore it.
Fuck, the only reason why I even remotely believe in any of this shit existing is because of the weird ass things Skull and Bones does
Otherwise I would chick it all up to outright tinfoil garbage
The only benefit for knowing these culture groups exist would be so we had a comprehensive list of who to kill first

...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=vc2cPuwpqTg

This very scene has stuck in my head since I was 13.

Kubrick died on my birthday :(

>He had an extreme case of OCD
Or just dedicated to his work

A Clockwork Orange is extremely redpilled.

Its about liberal brainwashing of society.

>This thread

he was the husband of the daughter of the film director that made "der ewige Jude"
so you know whats up

lol
along with Die Hard, and Falling down this is favourite movie of my dad, so I had to watch this also alot when I was a kid
this movies message is pretty obvious, but its such a good "time-caps" that documents to alot of people what has been

also his movie of WW1 is just as good

It shows the unbelievable useless thing that this war was

Supposed to be a comedy, but if you take it seriously, through red-pilled eyes, it becomes very frightening.

>he had and xtrem case of ocd's :-(
>pushed to get the performances he wanted from actors instead of accepting mediocre ones

it's like he wanted to make good movies or something...

yup. Did something like 200+ takes for the scene where Scatman Cruthers explains the shinning to Danny alone.

>red-pilled eyes
Kikemeister Dustin Hoffman
Nigger-lover Robert De Niro
You can't pay me enough to watch that shit.

Ok leaf, you just keep rolling down that tunnel, telling yourself you're redpilled.

Why are people so autistic about the moon landing? How can you say that the shining is a movie Kubrick did to hide clues in it about how he faked the moonlanding without starting to feel silly.

IDK. How can you gather at a train station and applaud the arrival of your invaders without feeling silly?

The only thing that was faked about the moon landing was the 'landing footage' - we actually landed on the moon.

Other footage from the same mission is genuine and real.

The reason they faked the video feed was to conceal the existence of aliens on the moon - which greeted the astronauts.

They didn't want a live stream of the moon landing capturing ET's and scaring the sheeple.. so they hired Kubrick to fake it.

Separate from the redpilling it was also predictive. Alex's living arrangement -- brutalist apartment blocks inside a major city, semi-supervised tolerated delinquency, special educational program for stupid violent people which might some day learn a trade, obsession with music and lifestyle tchotchkes, gangs, under-motivated hostility to religion, and easy sex -- became the norm for black youth and presumably for many white lower-class British youth.
It is very subtle though when the minister very quickly adds that they need the anti-crime brainwashing to make room for political prisoners.

Because I don't do that and the people who do hate this country.

Pizza gate is real goy

youtube.com/watch?v=hhkRQUtD_Jo

Eyes Wide Shut was just a book written by some Jew which was ultimately banned by Hitler.

It's difficult to say that it's a deliberate attempt by Kubrick to spread a message about the elites because it very closely just follows the story.

If it was a totally original story out of nowhere then it'd be more plausible but people are looking too deeply into something that was made a long time ago.

That said maybe the original story was written about the very same secret societies and Kubrick was just subtly trying to get people's attention about the subject.

Hard to tell either way but I'm glad he made the film.

...

what would aliens do on the moon

you can see the jew in him.

Maybe his autism allowed him to surrmount is jewism and become the revealer of jews. Thats why they killed him. he knew too much.

>mfw the stargate sequence in brand sparkly new 70mm print

at last I truly see

behold, and despair

Serum 114

CRM-114

Behold what?

And what am I supposed to see here?

We are online you fuck. You find it.

dolly shot?

>blind as bats

look closer

Still no idea. The perspective changed a little. What is the significance o Rainman?

youtube.com/watch?v=FR8ihFose8Y

Holy shitballs, checked

the ground, green dots, has the expected parallax
the mountains, red dots, does not

the background is flat, and there is a hard break between the two elements

i see it now. very clear on the right side.

based on aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

I decided to try it myself, and grabbed a random set of side-by-side pictures off of nasa's flickr to see if it was also visible there

>5D
?

once you see it, you'll learn to pick out "the line" even in static images pretty easily

>tfw too intelligent to bow down to the Rothschild's

What is that small dot by the hill to the right? Look hella odd

I'm inclined to believe the guy who made this is either retarded or didn't think very hard. Went to the first image he created in reference to the moon landing stuff. He claims the camera was only moving centimeters, yet we can see the person taking the picture has actually moved quite a bit SINCE THE FUCKING LANDER ITSELF MOVED INTO THE FRAME SEVERAL FEET.

Still interesting way to tackle the issue. I'll keep reading and check back.

>that get

Painfully underrated prophetic post.

what was Kubrick's view on the jews?

...

Would anyone explain why her daughter became a scientologist?

Him, Philip K Dick, and David Bowie were literal prophets of the True God. There were probably others but I can't think of any at the moment.

Kubrick revealed the corrupt nature of society.

PKD revealed the false nature of reality.

Bowie revealed the hope of the coming savior.

He got a hold of Georgie's snuff porn collection and was gonna make that a theme in eyes wide shut.

its fake

>Room 237 is a documentary that explains the hundreds of puzzle pieces of "The Shining

Room 237 is a not very subtle mockery of those conspiracy theorists who think they see all kinds of Easter eggs in Kubrick's film.

If you're so stupid that you don't even recognize the "documentary" as a mockumentary, then your delusions are exactly what you deserve.

You're just setting the dots in the back to move less than the ones in the front, but the stuff under them is moving more than the dots.

>(((Kubrick)))

Although his parents had been married in a Jewish ceremony, Kubrick did not have a religious upbringing, and would later profess an atheistic viewpoint

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick

Kek confirms that this autist is falsifying the evidence by mucking about with his dots

Rob Ager with a US proxy pls go you tinfoil scouse tit.

>still blind as a bat

I'm not setting the dots to do anything, each dot is carefully matched to an easily identifiable feature on the landscape, the dots just highlight the landscape

the un-dotted version should speak for itself, stare at it for a few minutes

I guess if you don't have the visual acuity to identify small rocks between the frames there's nothing I can say to help you

exhibit B, part 1, rules of perspective

I haven't watched the movie yet but it even listed on imdb and wiki that is a documentry

exhibit B, part 2
chest mounted camera rig used on the moon

>I'm not setting the dots to do anything, each dot is carefully matched to an easily identifiable feature on the landscape, the dots just highlight the landscape

You are placing them deceptively and inaccurately. You are accurately placing the dots in the foreground but in the background you are sloppy and place the dots to get the result you want. If you accurately mapped the dots in the background to the terrain features, you wouldn't get the result you want.

Kill yourself newfag. I bet you only found this place what, in 2013? 2014? Go back.

The Shining is an incredible film. I think it's the best movie of all time.

he's probably talking about the other one, dark side of the moon, which is a mockumentary, and also high level disinfo featuring high ranking military men engaging with some french art student film project for no ulterior motive whatsoever

exhibit B proper

Except you can see the perspective has changed. Literally the camera has been picked up, moved several feet to the side and turned. Go outside and try it yourself and see why you're a retard

He said this

JFK praised Hitler too

I think it is definitely up there.

It certainly is the greatest horror film of all time.

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2480271/The-Shining-really-scariest-horror-film-Heart-rate-monitors-reveal-terrifying-movie-moments-time.html

it's chest mounted, they couldn't pick up shit in those ridiculous gloves

it wouldn't work if the perspective hadn't been moved
>american education

Who cares he's a jew

>332233
>3+2+3=8
>3+2+3=8
>88

Look him up he's not just an average jew you fucking reatrd

He taught people to realize that their are no coincidences and everything is done on purpose with a goal

Like I said, go outside and try for yourself. This whole premise is retarded. If it was a projection, why does the perspective change on distant objects?

>morons who think they're intelligent but fail to use simple logic in examining evidence

Way to be rused by a hohol Ukrainian brainlet lmao

>Jew exposes globalists that he was close to for a while

>Who cares he's a jew

Are you dumb?

you guys are idiots.

Well I mean there are very few movies anymore with that much attention to detail.

This

jesus went the same way

>why does the perspective change on distant objects?

it doesn't, all the red dots are basically static relative to each other, where the green dots move more closer to the camera, as you'd expect

I can't help you if you're too blind to track features with your own eyes without my dots, or too stupid to understand how parallax actually works

The Shining was written by liberal Stephen King, yet look at all the levels and interpretations given to the film made by Kubrick that go beyond the novel. Kng never appreciated the movie anyway.

Wow seems like Kek is mildly passionate about this

wtf I love jesus now

Detail
see here
vimeo.com/78314194

My image shows the perspective changed though since you can see the shape of the objects doesn't line up. I love your attempts at disparaging my intelligence because your pet belief is nonsense which is contradicted by evidence you supplied.

I still have the PSD open with the images overlaid. I've tried making the background parts line up as best as I could but they won't because the perspective on them changed. Do it yourself and you'll see.

10/10 roach

uhh ... guys?

Sup Forums is collective of anti-semitic jews

Friendly reminder that Full Metal Jacket was his last completed film and apart from EWS it's the one he spent the longest amount of time working on. It's often overlooked as a source of puzzle pieces because it's not as trippy as most of his other films.

get out

exhibit C
mythbusters and nvidia aren't so trustworthy now
aulis.com/mythbusters.htm

yes, the perspective changed, that's the whole point, if the perspective didn't change you can't get parallax, you can only do this analysis on pictures taken of the same scene twice some distance apart

I'm disparaging your intellect because you can't even understand such a simple fact