I have a genuine discussion question for Sup Forums.
Had the Nazis created the bomb first and won the war, how long would it have taken them to enslave the Slavic peoples?
Same War Different Outcome
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>enslave
that wasnt the goal of the war in the east.
At least 3 years. Too many people and resistance.
Retard
a>fuck off
Sage
Maybe you shouldn't talk about things you clearly aren't well educated on.
>Nazis
>the bomb
Atom bombs are based on Jewish physics user.
germans just wanted resources, they didnt care about the people there.
Are you fucking retarded? I'll ask you again motherfucker, are you a low-IQ shiteating fuckhead?
Go smell your own farts you pseud
Still, the nazis had jets, a space program, and many capable wartime science officers.
And no oil.
>And no oil.
>germans just wanted resources,
>Are you fucking retarded?
Yet they had stakes in the Middle East and North Africa.
they wouldnt have
Croats fought for slavs they would have a nation Hungary would have a nation romania would be also an independent nation probably only poland czechia would not continue to exist.
How far do you think they would have made it into the Soviet Union?
Yes, but you mentioned jets and posted a picture of ME262 but they weren't in service until way into mid-1944 when the Germans and Italians were already hammered out of Africa and getting their oil hammered out of Romania.
The oilfields of Baku weren't the main objective of the entirety of the Operation. Land and forced labour is what the German's were after.
Read Mein Kampf.
I understand that few of those jets were in use before the Soviets destroyed the hidden air fields. It is also interesting to note Hitler's fondness of Jerusalem's Grand Mufti.
I'm pretty sure he was fond of anyone who had the potential to disrupt things in the Middle East for the Allies.
I'm sure he also loved the fact that the Mufti disliked the Jewry.
(((Allies)))
Where was that picture taken?
South-East England, not sure where specifically.
The sad truth is that even if Germany was not at war with Britain and the USSR, and they had the nuke first before the US did -- they would still lose the war. It's simply a matter of time.
Because there was no way they could wage war across the ocean against the US... and even if they had planes and missiles capable of hitting US targets -- that's irrelevant.
It's about resources. The US had more resources. Processing resources and manufacturing takes time, yes, but the US is huge - the resources themselves are unlimited... There simply is no way that Germany could inflict enough damage on the US mainland so that the US would need to give up or be unable to continue fighting.
Think of it like a Command & Conquer game -- imagine an uneven map - one side has more ore/gold/tiberium and the other side has much less. Plus, the first side already has various advantages in being able to maneuvere and project power against the enemy... there's no way the enemy can catch up and overcome that - even if they have some sort of "super weapon" advantage... they'll run out of ore/gold/tiberium and meanwhile the opposition simply continues manufacturing units... the conclusion is inevitable.
It may sound stupid, and sounds like something an American blinded by over-the-top patriotism and ignorance would say, but it's true: once the US entered the war, Germany's fate was locked.
>enslave
ehehehehe ... more like eradicate those fucking roaches
I'll add this:
So in other words, the key to who would win in a Germany vs US only WW2, would not be so much about techological superiority, but rather; what matters; is the geography and resources.