Monarchism Thread

>2017
>Not being a Monarchist

Serious, user. Are you trying to ruin humanity or something?

Other urls found in this thread:

discord.gg/vjJcT
discord.gg/3x4Np6J
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

fuck off faggot

Meme ideology for the political illiterate.

>t. Swedecuck

Can't handle a superior being's authoritarian reign over a peasant like yourself?

This doesn't really amount to much, does it? Is Britain the best it could be without its monarchy? Also, merely saying that you approve of the British monarchy in its current state makes you a monarchist.

Nice slide thread faggot, but the jokes on you, I am one.

>tfw no cute queen to rule you

Absolute monarchy or constutinal monarchy?

>he wants to be ruled over by someone for no reason other than their birth
kys, you're more of a cuck than Jeb. typical hungarian.

Absolute Monarchism. Constitutional Monarchy is falsified.

Join our discord if you want to discuss Monarchy alongside other Sup Forumsacks discord.gg/vjJcT

im gonna b da king

DEJAD DE SER UNA REPUBLICA

"The best argument agianst democracy is a 5 minute talk to the avrige voter"
>Bad education
>mob rule =tyranny of the majority
There is a reason the founding fathers made the us a constitutional republic and the electral collige exist

>ruled by a dynasty of rulers and nobles with centuries of history and experience, exquisite upbringing, literally groomed to rule since childhood

vs

>a dynasty of clintons, rotschilds and bushes
>someone buying himself into presidency because he has the money

Disgusting and degenerate.

The "no reason" is the point.

I'm not a monarchist but it's clear you haven't been redpilled enough to appreciate what it means.

>exquisite upbringing
>groomed to rule
At least someone who's buying the presidency had to make money. Royalty is royalty for no reason other than someone's great grandpa swung his sword harder than someone else's great grandpa.

Wanting to be ruled by economicaly illiterate retards voting by mob rule and puppet politics
>reving up their breads and circuses
>averige voter is malipulated by the propaganda media

The Monarchs in Spain and Belgium actually have legitimate political power even if it is only to act as a referee for their elected parliament

>dynasty of rulers and nobles with centuries of history and experience, exquisite upbringing, literally groomed to rule since childhood
this is something that can be considered with aristocratic republics and such, Rome being the defining example

the system of government is ultimately secondary and subordinate to the health of a civilization anyway
a dying civilization won't be saved by kings, especially when many worthy kingdoms stopped existing anyway in favor of nationalism and such

I bet it's poo in loo dreaming about the good old days of being enslaved by the monarchy

>picking your ubermensch masters arbitrarily

Cuck.

its really funny seeing amerifats loving monarchism when I literally live in a monarchy and am barely less cucked than the mainland european countries that also have monarchies

The dont our monarchy is powerless ironic our country has become the eu puppet state

>direct democracy or representative democracy?

The monarch does not know what is right for the individual, also FPBP.

>had to make money.

No, they had to born into a family with money.


>Royalty is royalty for no reason other than someone's great grandpa swung his sword harder than someone else's great grandpa.

Staying in power and relevans through centuries and dozens of wars is a pretty good measure of ability.


And now we are back to multinational empires again There can be no better checks and balances aganist abuse of power by nobility, especially noveau riches than an unimpeachable authority.

Does Youre monarchy has power bong?

We need more Monarchs like you in our discord.

discord.gg/vjJcT

Would make for great political discussion.

fpbp

It's the male fat whale autist equivalent of women here shitting their panties over the royal family because the words "princess" triggers their autism

In traditional monarchies, the monarch has every incentive to care about it, because it is his property and if he fucks up he can be removed like it has happened several times, they don't drown their countries in debt in peace times, contrary to democracy where debt always goes up until the state collapses. You may get bad or good monarchs, in Democracy, the politician has to be a conman and promise free stuff if he wants to get in power, the people in charge also have a huge incentive to loot as much as possible in those 4/5 years they are in power, monarchs have every incentive to not do that as they will rule all their life and consequences will come sooner or later.

Monarchism doesn't exist.

Inplying mob democracy has any respect for peoples rights

You forget that if a mob is malipulated enough by a politcian the will believe anything
Hitler is a good example
Bernie too
I Would rather live in a constitutional monarchy than a country with a self righteous mob rule

>Francis declared antipope
>worldwide chastisement
>civilization falls apart
>all republics fall
>Catholic Monarchy picks up the pieces with restored church.
It will come to pass. Classical liberalism is death.

I would be fine with monarchy I guess if there were some eugenics involved with the royal line and the monarch could prove himself immune to the same leftist culture that all modern elites are afflicted with. The Nrx obsession with it though never made any sense to me.

How does your monarchy work exactly, OP?

a constitutional monarchy is a monarchy only in name. show me one where the "monarch" actually has any real power.

discord.gg/vjJcT

Join the discussion on Monarchy, based user!

Saudi Arabia. You schould know them, they are your greatest allies besides Israel.

>Absolute Monarchism
>Constitutional Monarchy is falsified.
Cancer
Constitutional Monarchy

>he names a shitskin country
so that's your benchmark. and you would know, too, krautcuck, their people are flooding your borders and raping your women.

I never said that I supported mob democracy. Democracy is just as godawful as monarchy in my opinion. It is clearly obvious that individuals are capable of taking care of themselves and don't need a government to do their shit for them.
>constitutional monarchy
So then who would make the constitution? The monarch or the people.

>tfw your king is a businessman
>tfw he went from 2.7B$ to 5.5B$ in 5 years and keeps getting richer while your country still gets fucked in the ass
>tfw you pay $800M per year just for the maintainance of his palaces around the country
>tfw literally fucking everyone in the country loves him

>their people are flooding your borders and raping your women.
>Saudi Arabia
>emigrating in masses
At least I'd have understood if you said Syria or Iraq or Afghanistasn (without even mentioning nig countries).

>al monarchies, the monarch has every incentive to care about it, because it is his property and if he fucks up he can be removed like it has happened several times, they don't drown

Amen

all shitskins are the same to me

800M dirham or dollars?

>the monarch has every incentive to care about it
The monarch, like every other individual, has every incentive to care about himself as well. The only difference is that he is in power and others are not.
>because it is his property
When did he or his family before him ever pay for that much land for themselves? They never did, see.
>and if he fucks up he can be removed
If he fucks up people will rise against him and all he will ever do is send his men to put down this uprising that only happened as a consequence of his decisions and policies.

Thats the exact role I'd like a monarch to be. Not a day to day leader, that role is for the prime minister or chancellor or something but a counterweight. A balance, traditional and conservative by design, an epitome of the culture, history and society of a country, a constant reminder of unity and heritage. Plus a source of constant gossip for women how the royal family is doing.

I also say that not all countries are compatible with monarchism. Countries with heavy republican history like france or no real royal history like the baltic states should not adopt it because it would go aganist the history and national character of the state. On the other hand, some countries like Poland, Hungary and Austria should be monarchies, because royal symbols, ruling houses and customs are so ingrained into their national culture.

Also, on a much wider note, having sultans would help a lot at unfucking the islamic countries.

That's an awfully simple view of the situation in that geographical area.

goddamn dollars, although it appears I was mistaken. It's "only" 250 million dollars.

Pic related in dirhams.

Also, gotta add the investment budget of the royal court (about 13 million dollars per year).

I'd prefer a constitutional meritocratic dictatorship myself.

Elective monarchy by state recognized noble families it the true top tier government.

Hello! I am also from that Doscord. We want some of you monarchists to join us here.

/pol General Discord (MONARCHIST WELCOME):
discord.gg/3x4Np6J

ally on paper that is all.

...

>electoral college prevents mob rule
It literally gives the idiot bumpkin people in the least educated states 3x voting power
>muh democracy

Lets hope so

Gott erhalte den Kaiser
>Ask for an absolute monarcy
>gets an answer
>butthurt