HOLD UP!

HOLD UP!

How can you call yourself a National Socialist and forget entirely about the Socialism?


Here is the Nazi Platform 1925

users.stlcc.edu/rkalfus/PDFs/026.pdf

13: We demand the nationalization of all
enterprises (already) converted into
corporations (trusts).

14: We demand profit-sharing
in large enterprises.

15: We demand the large-scale developm
ent of old-age pension schemes.

19: We demand the replacement of Roman La
w, which serves a materialistic World
Order, by German Law.

20: ........"We
demand the education at the public expens
e of specially gifted children of poor
parents, without regard to the
latter’s position or occupation."

This is all about wealth distribution. NOT Capitalist intent.


Here is an excerpt from a Goebbels pamplet

"What does anti-Semitism have to do with socialism?
I would put the question this way: What does the Jew have to do with socialism?
Socialism has to do with labor. When did one ever see him working instead of plundering, stealing and living from the sweat of others?
As socialists we are opponents of the Jews because we see in the Hebrews the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation’s goods."


Heres another

"The sin of liberal thinking was to overlook socialism’s nation-building strengths, thereby allowing its energies to go in anti-national directions.
The sin of Marxism was to degrade socialism into a question of wages and the stomach, putting it in conflict with the state and its national existence.
An understanding of both these facts leads us to a new sense of socialism, which sees its nature as nationalistic, state-building, liberating and constructive.

research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/haken32.htm
HITLER WOULD HAVE A UBI BUT ONLY FOR WHITE PEOPLE!!!!!

Bump please. this just does not make sense why nobody talks about this.

This is how we know Sup Forums is full of hot air.

You don't even want to consider the fiscal policies that made Germany great.

Sup Forums knows nothing of what it talks about, and will simply refuse to even hear it.

...

I need someone to talk to please.

I was recently released from prison after a 2 year + stint inside and I'm feeling hopeless and unironically considering suicide.

I don't think anyone calling themselves NatSoc (myself included) is against the socialist part of national socialism user...

In a homogeneous white society, I might support limited socialism.
I'm not paying for worthless niggers.
(Yes, I'm aware I already am)

I agree. I'm all for property rights.
Socialism MUST be tempered with love for ones nation and people in order for it to work.
This still leaves room in there for tuition free collage and tradeschool. Welfare for WHITE PEOPLE when it is needed.

ya that doesn't sound anything like socialism/marxism/communism

was always curious what the economics of natsoc was

Nothing wrong with socialism in a nationalist society. A community of a racial homogeneous population should look after each other and treat each other as family. Problem with marxist socialism is that its goal is to subvert the white world order by ethnic dilution and hedonistic materialism through the process of virtue signaling.
BIG DIFFERENCE

I'm unironically telling you to do it. Day of the rake.

Nat. Socialism is a center authoritarian ideology you fucking debt slave moron.

Yes, socialism is part of it. Do you think the founding fathers were 100% pro an-cap Fed Reserve dick suckers such as yourself? No. Because there's this thing called Common Sense you fucking trans-nigger spic.

>>> Thinking I wasn't trying to PROMOTE NatSoc

Kek.

>Flag = Fed debt slave in denial of his own slavery
*consumes depletable products*

Sorry it's an old habit. Most of you Americans are happy good goy consumers.

Im a fascist not nazi you faggot go back to sucking sweden off

Understanding that some degree of socialism can work in an ethnically homogeneous, united society is one of the hardest redpills for your average American right-winger to take, especially given that this image tends to hold true (at least up until stage 3). It also doesn't help that your average American tends to conflate any form of socialism with Communism/Marxism.

I believe in consumerism to an extent. Property rights, personal finance and responsibility are crucial to having a stable home and community. For 90% of white people things should stay the same or get better financially.

but epidemic obesity; owning 5+ cars just for yourself and accumulating billions of dollars that they could never possibly spend in 200 years is just obscene. There are far more important things than accumulating wealth.


And if it was only white people there would be plenty to go around.

Hitler studied a lot about the communist theory and karl marx. He despised communists. He new before anyone the destructiveness of marxism.

Yes OK. But consumerism is built upon continuity, it is a loop that cannot be closed so it needs depletable goods that need to "re-consumed" which eventually needs all goods to be produced for cheaper materials and need said goods to be quickly depleted to suit the monthly inflow of consumer money into the system.

Consumerism automatically leads to accumulation of wealth for future consuming. In all cases most people will not break the chain of consumption if it makes them happy. And corporations know that the flow of new shiny overpriced goods make consumers very happy and that it is a scheme they gladly participate in.

Most problems will be solved by becoming a monoethnic state. But consumerism is a chain of corruption that eventually becomes a norm and later a cultural trait. The poor man must literally become a schemer to accumulate wealth for consumption and the rich will become apathetic because he reaches a point where consumption no longer fulfills his greater realization, and even then he continues to consume because he can.

This is why it's dangerous. It is an addiction based around the will.

That's why I call myself a fascist.

Don't see how I disagree really. except maybe in how the law should be allowed to interpose.

Not for a permanent, Authoritarian state. That kind of power (if it truly must be created, I would desperately hope it does not come to it) has to transmit eventually into a republic, but preferably a democracy.

Political power should start in the home, then pass thru the local community on its way to any kind of centralization. assuming we even need any in a monoethnic state other than for a standard fiat, a symbol of unity and ensuring the 14 words apply to each man thru socialist policies.

I think that part might surprise us. negroids and sand people are a pretty heavy burden and we don't honestly know how good it will be without them.

Like if we didn't have a middle man for all of that oil.

Or if they at least were all given their own country away from ours and stayed there. They would kill themselves off if left to their own devices and we would be spared the trouble.

Having all of the worlds resources for ourselves would be ensuring a future for White Children pretty far down the line tho.