98-100% of economists think Trump's policies will HURT economy

igmchicago.org/surveys/100-day-plan

How do you respond to this, Trump supporters? Not a single economist thinks Trump's plan to reduce H-1B visas will increase tax revenues. Only 2% think doing so will help Americans find work!

Trump's economic plan is going to destroy us! How do you even support this guy?

Other urls found in this thread:

nationalreview.com/article/445844/donald-trump-economy-trumps-policies-appear-be-driving-economic-choices
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

(((Economists)))

Yeah no shit hiring cheap foreign labor helps business, but the American people are more important than some Jew's wallet

Really makes your synapses fire in a chain. I guess having illegals eating, going to school, and receiving medicare for free boosts our economy

Econfag getting his masters here.
Pretty much this, most are deluded towards (((free market))) capitalism and the fields which can easily critique this perspective like behavioral and institutional econ are overrun with leftists that realized math is too difficult for them.

>lowering taxes and regulations will hurt he econemy
>not having slave labor will hurt the econemy

100% agree? You can't even get 100% agreement within your own oppinions this is fucking shit

How many of those economists told us everything was fine before 2008?

Hillary also has a 99.99999% chance of winning. Drumpftards BTFO!!

Get a real degree faggot. I laugh at useless majors like you all day.

And still we don't care.

For the last time shills. This is not about what's best. This is entirely about fucking over liberals.

>not having slave labor will hurt the econemy

This is the truth. I've been saying this for years, but we should allow human evolution to split into two categories.

One species would be Hillary supporters and would be entirely comprised of ultra high IQ, aesthetically superior city people and another species that's basically readily disposable subhuman waste whose only purpose would be to help achieve the goals dictated by the superior species.

This would help attain maximum efficiency.

They hate true free market deregulation and competition because it fuckin works. So much easier to just regulate and merge your way into bigger and bigger pseudo monopolies than compete. Wall street bankers fucking h-a-t-e-d how successful the white working class was under Reagan and as soon as Clinton (even Bush really as he got NAFTA rolling) got into office worked to start locking the free market back up which is what's happened in the 25 years since. Anyone telling you that Trump's economic plan won't work is telling you that from the POV of a priveleged cuck who has benefitted from the rigged system in place since Reagan left office. Trump's plans essentially ENSURE rising wages, job creation, increased business and consumer spending. It's no that they're scared. They know that they'll all still do well. But to show you how distorted and perverse the jew mind is. The reason that they're not happy is that this will draw working class back away from serfdom/enslavement to big brother. Trump is undoing 25 years of globalist kike treachery to our livelihoods

(You)

Didn't Shillary have like a 99.9% chance of winning?

Fuck off

i heard this "economists think trump is stupid arguement" a billion times now don't you think you should stop trying to say the same bullshit over and over

that's almost the same number they got for global warming conensus!

It's also the voting result for most of based desert leaders

funny coincidence

Why do they all come with such high percentages?
If they had such a high amount of consensus, wouldn't that also mean anyone should be able to spot such a gross mistake?
If you ask an engineer if a load bearing column could withstand a certain load, would you see 100% of them come up with the same answer?

Just so people have some context, this is the same panel of voodoo pseudo-science "economists" who love Greenspan and Bernanke, who think NAFTA and TPP are the best thing since sliced bread, and who think that QE was a successful policy.

These ivory tower propagandists are so out of touch with reality, that they think people will keep falling for their shit over and over again.

Funny that the best they can come up with is "surveys", which are totally useless, because any time you actually study historical data honestly, their lies get immediately exposed.

With that I say, fuck off you shill faggot.

Its basic economics that protectionism hurts the economy so this is no surprise. Tax cuts for the rich dont help either.

Is this the same economists that said that the UK will be fucked after brexit, and voting to leave, and international companies will be looking for a way out?

Yet Google is building a new HQ in UK, and the economic growth forecasts went from a projected 1.2% to 2.0% just last month.

yeah shove your economists up your ass.

>Economics has nothing to do with this.

This is the exact line libtards gave Mainers when restricting fishing rights, and somehow it was beyond criticism because of 'muh environment'.

Well commies, same shit applies here. My culture is my environment.

you cant "HURT" the economy. that doesnt make any sense. you can only rearrange it and change the trade offs.

SHILL
CTR
CREW
SHARIABLUE
GUESS I SHOULD HAVE VOTED FOR HILLARY NOW!

Is this like when 99% of news agencies thought Hillary was going to win?
You people are pathetic, shills are so fucking obvious it hurts.
FPBP

98-100% of economists did not see the economic crisis coming.

98-100% of economists think immigration of low skilled third worlders is a boost to western world economy where most low skilled job have been offshored to ... the third world.

98-100% of economists thought the eurozone was a fantastic idea.

Should I go on?

>Is this like when 99% of news agencies thought Hillary was going to win?

That doesn't take into account rigging the election by denying people the right to vote you fucking faggots.

>economists intellectuals
the same ones that predicted the current crisis amirite m8

...

(((economists)))

they're idiots.

Wtf I hate trump now.

Economists are just as partisan as the science community at this point.

ahahaha such traitors

wasn't the trend up until now enough?

Didn't 99% of (((economists))) "fail" to "predict" the financial crash in 08?

Did any of these folks talk about the power of MMT? If so, do continue.

If not, GTFO. /thread

Why does having slave labour improve an economy? You can whip a slave as much as you want, they'll still manufacture nothing but shit for you.

So what you're essentially saying is that the DNC didn't do enough voter bussing and fraud for your liking?

>economics
>useless
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

You have no idea the pussy and the money he will get with that master, holy kek

Every time I see 'Economist' I think of Paul Krugman. Then I ignore everything that follows.

> quantitative evidence shows immigrants are net contributors
> hurrrr but I'm a flyover country degenerate who never studied maths because Alabama shifted funding for schools to pay for churches

Are those same economist that said Brexit will hurt UK?

Evidence also shows that you're a shitposting wog from Melbourne.

> having this much cognitive dissonance that you mentally turn off before even been shown any evidence
> wanting to be taken seriously as a thinker
> being this proud of ignorance
> being this proud of being stupid
> wanting respect

...

Oh my gosh I'm just so shocked right now that liberal professors would be against Trump's plan, I mean golly, wow you sure showed him!!

> realposting economics major from USYD who is white
Does it hurt your cognitive dissonance that there may be evidence out there that shows you're not right?

Or the election results. What happened to super techno cyber analyst Oracle's?

> infomeme as evidence
AHHHHH HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

I don't think you know what cognitive dissonance means....

why is the stock market doing so well? seems to me it would have shit the bed if his policies were going to hurt the economy

After more than a century of central banking, fiat currency, money printing, wealth redistribution, welfare state, subsidizing every degenerate hobby under the sun.

The sudden concern of leftists with government spending and economics comes across as not completely believable.

Daily reminder that The Economist magazine is run by Rothschild kikes

Stop being a retarded liberal cuck and get some actual facts and evidence.
Maybe then I'll start listening

Gee, where have I heard numbers like that before...

The economy is already on viagra thanks to Trump.

> Having ideology that immigrants r bad mkay knowhatimean muh jobs zero sum game etc cuked etc
> Quantitative data shows that immigrants are net contributors
> your ideology clashes with evidence so you ignore the evidence and dismiss an entire field
> still claim to be right
I think you don't understand what you're typing

a BS in economics is not bullshit, faggot

how else are you going to figure out the most feasible way to allocate resources? intuition?

1% of the economists predicted the financial crisis

99% are just globalist shills.

Checkmate.

>Not a single economist thinks Trump's plan to reduce H-1B visas will increase tax revenues.
that's the programm that allow immigrant to come work and tunnel money out of the country if they choose to? How's that good for the economy? money leaving the country?

you have to factor in americans living on welfare that otherwise would have a job, too

The special kids on this board don't understand why anecdote

Economists say this, but when I see the stock market, most people are betting on Trump boosting the economy.

I'm not really sure if I trust economists giving their opinion over people that put their money where their mouth is and invest in stocks. The economists actually investing in the stock market seem to not agree.

>98-100% of economists we asked think...
>saged
fuck off shill

> thinking stock market speculation is a good correlate to wage growth
> wanting to be taken seriously

The debt has been REDUCED!!! In Obama this was a failure.

Wait a second...

The question is "If all of the “Seven actions to protect American workers” in President-elect Trump’s 100-day plan are enacted, it will more likely than not improve the economic prospects of middle-class Americans over the next decade."

The response is that everybody disagrees, but they're disagreeing with the statement it will NOT improve the economic prospects of middle-class Americans. In fact, the survey seems to indicate 0% of economists agree Trumps plan will hurt the middle class.

However, when I read the individual responses from economists, they seem negative towards Trumps plan.

So what exactly is going on here? Were the people that designed this survey just retarded?

The same economists that didn't see the dimming of the 2008 depression.

Nassim Taleb pill

fake news

>(((economists)))

A large portion of these people didn't even comment, perhaps like the polls they are in silent support.

Furthermore, I looked at some of their bios, it isn't surprising that CS idealogical adherents don't agree with Trump. Duh. Economics isn't actually a science at this point in history, despite what they want to believe.


That said, Steven Kaplan's comments are pretty interesting, he scores perceived positives and negatives but concludes the net effect is unclear.

I'm pointing this out because the majority of economists in this survey seem skeptical of Trumps plan in GENERAL, whereas the majority of people actually putting their money where their mouth is are betting big on Trump succeeding.

I trust people risking their money more than I trust people risking their reputation.

98% of economists didn't see the 2008 crisis coming.

They're mostly just retards who worship the Federal Reserve at this point. A pack of morons who follow the crowd.

t. financial advisor

Always remember- America is opposite land

war is peace
freedom is slavery
single motherhood is good
illegal immigrants are good
gays are good
not having children is good
not having jobs is good
being on welfare is good
intervening in random countries is good
funding ISIS is good
graduating with 200k in debt is good
globalism is good

So when they say Trump's economic policies will do bad, you know what that means

"TO insist on the miraculous is to deny to the machine at least some of its claims on us, to assert the limited wish that living things, earthly and otherwise, may on occasion become Bad and Big enough to take part in transcendent doings."

fpbp

>kick out all the Poo in Loos
>massive vacancies in the market
>"those will definitely not be filled with Americans"

Kek, whatever they say

Haha idiot this was the plan all along

>wanting so badly to sound authoritative and enlightened
>failing so miserably

>Hillary has a 98% of winning
Kiddo, stop listening to the (((polls))) the kike media shoves down your throat, you nigger lipped abomination

>Real degree
>Is a NEET
A masters in Econ is the real redpill. If more people understood economics than we wouldn't have a problem.

>economists think

Cool meme, bro.

Same as always

Anything that disagrees with Daddy is fake news
Anyone that disagrees with Daddy got something wrong once and thus can never be trusted

It's very easy OP

We never have to be right as long as someone else might be wrong

Get ready for it because it's on deck taking warm-up rips.

As soon as the situations with H-1Bs and illegals are in hand, the leftist and globalist corporate execs are going to continue binning resumes from white males, per usual and then pretend there's a crisis.

That fat black dyke in HR is not going to suddenly turn pro-white just because the enitre employment pool is white. This might even be the hill that the internationalist left dies fighting on. They'll cling to the lie that Nationalism is destroying our economy for as long as the shareholders will permit it and in idealogically infected industries like tech and media, they will permit it until the last head rolls.

The midterms have to be another sweeping anti-globalist referendum and there will probably need to be nativist quotas installed with severe penalties for employing or housing illegals.

Well, there's two ways to look at the health and effect. Most economists use GDP and related things, which yes will boost when domestic labor can be replaced with cheaper foreign labor. Basically, more profits. However, it fails to capture the breakdown of the middle class and how money flows in the economy get so fucked that it becomes a domino effect of middle class failure. No proper wage factory jobs means less local spending, meaning the small stores are closing, meaning other stores will shut down, so on and so forth.
Anywho, im nationalist as fuck so thats why im one of the few that bothers to consider such things.
Economists, like most people in most fields, are mainly comprised of uncreative people that just take what they're told as gospel. Math fields and engineers suffer from this too even. Its just how it goes.

>Wednesday, November 16th
nationalreview.com/article/445844/donald-trump-economy-trumps-policies-appear-be-driving-economic-choices
>Today

>economist say a thing
>the entire economy go the way (((they))) didn't expect

It remind me of another peoples, you can probably guess which one.

Always do the opposite of what they say.

What is their reasoning on it not helping? I can't see how it would even hurt at all.

>Shillary has 98% of winning
Same old story

I'm a published economist and I think it will help.

Economic forecasting has a terrible record. Until they start proving that they understand how the real world works by producing more accurate predictions, I'm not going to lose too much sleep over what they say.
It's not surprising they can't do it, the world's a complicated place. This level of consensus on something with so much uncertainty, simply illustrates economists ovine lack of self-awareness.

Asians overwhelmingly support the democrats who are consistently anti-free-markets so it is necessary for the long term health of the economy to prevent them from coming in and justifies the immigration restrictions. The anti-free-trade provisions will lower real incomes and should be scrapped.

Economists said Trump winning would crash the stock market the next day

FAKE NEWS

low energy

Are these the same economists that predicted Great Britain will fall to its knees should we vote to leave the eu? I laugh in their durection.

>economists
yeah they've been doing a bangup job on the economy already

there are things more valuable than cheap labor

"Let's survey the people who will say what we want..."

((((((((((((((ECONOMISTS)))))))))))))))))