Neanderthal Pill

Science has proven that ALL non sub Saharan have Neanderthal DNA from interbreeding and assimilation. It is therefore also proven that Blacks are not biologically human as defined by the rest of the world population. Admit it /pol Europeans have more genetic similarities with Asians than Africans.

genographic.nationalgeographic.com/neanderthal/

Other urls found in this thread:

livescience.com/46036-blond-hair-gene-identified.html
m.youtube.com/watch?v=W_oX6zZonRw
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0831_050831_chimp_genes.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Admit it /pol Europeans have more genetic similarities with Asians than Africans

NE Asians have the most Neandertal introgression actually, they had 3 major periods of introgressions, compared to 2 for other Eurasians.

There are 5 cardinal subspecies of homo sapiens on Earth:

1. Homo Sapiens Sapiens aka Subsaharan Africans (No Neandertal admixture, high ammount of archaic homonin admixture)
2. Non NE Asian Eurasians aka whites, middle easterns, south asians, and steppes peoples, who are 3-4% Neandertal
3. NE Asians who are 4-5% Neandertal and have distinctive physiology (i.e. ++ shovel-shaped incisors, cranial capacity etc)
4. Melanesians (islands between Australia and mainland China) who are 4-5% Denisovians, an extinct subspecies of hominid that was discovered in 2013.
5. Australian Aboriginals, who are distinct and basal to the rest of humanity.

t. white anthropologist

niggers should only live in a ZOO where they belong

No shit sherlock. We have more in common with chinks than niggers.

yall aint human.... just sayin

Except that what we call "white" including capacity for blondeness and Western technology arose less than 8,000 years ago

Probably the result of eugenics and alteration performed by the Altlantis global civilization (Aztec gods)

(No, really, blonde genes are only 7,200~ years old)

>Aboriginals, BASAL.
As in, base of the evolutionary tree?
They really are a throwback. Fucking cave people.

>eugenics and alteration performed by the Altlantis global civilization
I really want this to be true. Really jostles my almonds.

>(No, really, blonde genes are only 7,200~ years old)
So what did white people look like before that?

Graham Hancock and Randal Carlson, if you haven't already heard them speak. Good jumping-off point, at the very least.

livescience.com/46036-blond-hair-gene-identified.html
> The gene codes for a protein known as KIT ligand, which binds to receptors throughout the body and affects pigmentation, blood cells, nerve cells in the gut, and sex cells.

>A broken KITLG gene would be disastrous for an individual, Kingsley told Live Science.

>"You'd have white hair and be sterile, because your gonads hadn't developed properly — and actually, you'd be dead, because blood cells didn't do what they're supposed to do in the bone marrow," he said.

>Yet the mutation also seemed to be linked to normal variations in hair color. In population studies, blonds in Iceland were much more likely than brunettes to have the genetic variant.

> It turned out that this tiny tweak of just one letter in the genetic code didn't change the structure or function of the protein. Instead, it acted like a tiny thermostat, subtly ramping up or down the production of pigment in the hair follicle and nowhere else, Kingsley told Live Science.

>The study convincingly ties the gene to hair color, Hopi Hoekstra, a geneticist at Harvard University who was not involved in the study, told Live Science in an email.

>"The study is rigorous, elegant and airtight," she said.

So a mutation very recently that SHOULD have resulted in infertility from even a small genetic drift instead acts as tiny, perfect hemostat in blondes' genetic code. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

objectively a different subspecies

And I have more genetic similarities with niggers than chimps, but I'm. Not gonna start calling niggers brother.

Either way Kikes are still the number one problem. Genetaniggers should just focus on creating a virus to wipe them out.

>Graham Hancock
>Randal Carlson
Gobbled up all the free stuff. Haven't bought any books yet.

>4. Melanesians (islands between Australia and mainland China) who are 4-5% Denisovians, an extinct subspecies of hominid that was discovered in 2013.
>5. Australian Aboriginals, who are distinct and basal to the rest of humanity.

are these two groups really as distinct as you're making them out to be? your explanation of groups ignores Polynesians,

Well, actually blacks are human, residing in the genus homosexual is the qualifier, regardless of species.

Abbos and polynesians for example are also heavily interbred with homo denisova and homo erectus, all human.

You should have paid attention in middle school biology.

nothing more cucked than an anthropologist... If you want to speak to someone who is only capable of regurgitating what they hear and read, who are incapable of original thought, speak to an anthropologist.

so humans are a genus

and race exists
each race being a different species of the genus "homo"

the jews really backed themselves into a corner with this whole "race" thing

>1 post by this id
>have more genetic similarities with Asians than Africans.
more than what? fuckin slides

I'll gladly admit it

Bullshit. The trickery is unending when it has no fucking rules.

As long as they can reproduce with, and produce fertile offspring with whites and chinks, they meet the criteria for Homo sapiens. Anyone who says different, will die in their sleep tonight.

r1b whites are homo sapiens sapiens sapiens

No they won't, they'll sleep unstupidly. Denisovians would fit this category and are obviously not homo sapiens.

> zoo = welfare utopia

sounds about right

what implications are you implying?

m.youtube.com/watch?v=W_oX6zZonRw

>0% Neanderthal DNA
>4-5% Neanderthal DNA

How can you have a 5% difference in DNA and be considered the same species?

Does anyone disagree with this?

>would be seen as rigid, autistic, and xenophobic by modern humans
You know damned well why (((they))) push the conclusion so hard that the Neanderthal approach was inferior.
>read this as "the jews really blacked themselves into a corner"
That's enough Sup Forums for today.

I can still breed your women so does this even matter?

Not knowing that these definitions are based on the outdated science of analogous anatomy instead of shared heritable DNA

Advanced eugenics in forgotten antiquity. He's not crazy, either.

>Denisovians would fit this category

Very simple, post your proof. I'm willing to change my mind.

How would you describe a white person with no know asian heritage for the last 8 generations with shovel shaped incisors and a prominent occipital bun (think Patrick Stewart)?

ALL non sub Saharan also have negative birth rates.

Probably more dark-auburn chestnut color shades; redhair has been traced back to the Persia/Anatolia/Caucaus regions prior to modern humans in Europe

varg "famous intellectual" vikernes made a video about it
is it true that like 60% of our dna is neanderthal
And when you take an online dna test, what they refer to as neanderthal dna is in fact neanderthal hybrids or some shit
seems like (((they))) have some interest in hiding that information

Your extinguishing the very traits you find attractive in white women. If you like white girls what's wrong with us making more of them?

>CUZ MUH DICC CRACKA NIGGA

>genetaniggers

I had a giggle typing that out

The 4 ice ages caused seperate waves of migration of humans out of africa over many millennia. As climate got warmer at higher latitudes, people populated mountainous regions of southern and central Europe. When it got cold again, some were trapped and forced to either die or adapt. Adapt they did. The cycle repeated and interbreeding occurred. Not really anything controversial here.

>have Neanderthal DNA from interbreeding and assimilation
nah that's bullshit.

we don't 'have' neanderthal DNA. we ARE neanderthals.

The percentage of your DNA that is NOT neanderthal is actually identical to monkeys. What makes you human is neanderthal.

Can we also take into account the 'junk' DNA which we don't understand, and may be some sort of genetic memory?

Can anyone expand on this?

If you are in doubt about genetic memory, chickens which have been bred indoors for many generations will still shit themselves when they see a hawk.

There is no junk DNA, it codes for self assembly and expression frequency in response to environmental factors and other things; the junk DNA model was obsolete circa 1995

news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0831_050831_chimp_genes.html
>we also have a 4 percent divide with chimps