Brainstorming thread

What do we do about this?

AP is a factchecking site now?

delete your profile and continue to live your life

click continue

Snopes is literally a cat-lady and her husband...


Sup Forums really needs to do something about Snopes.

I don't even have a Facebook and haven't for over 2 years. But tons of normies do and we need to be evangelizing them.

>disputued its accuracy

translation
it is controversial, and we don't like their opinion

facebook, the CNN of social media

I think her husband cheated on her with the intern they had working for them and now they're divorced. But yeah, it's just 3 liberals who literally make stuff up.

Fuck these kikes. Post that message on every fucking libtard site. Maybe we can turn this against (((them))) like "fake news"

Delete social media accounts and make fake ones to troll and redpill

That's a good idea. We obviously have to push back against this shit until they give up

(((Kikebook)))

Shit like this makes people only double check. Since the left is a lying sack of shit right now, it's not a good thing for them.

>how do we stop a private corporation from informing its users

Let the invisible hand of the free market do its stuff.

Bust report everything, call those factcheckers reporting everything, report it to angela merkel too

Anyone have a list of shit Snopes gets wrong?

anything dealing with politics

They honestly never get anything wrong...

What's the problem here? Fact checking news before it gets shared keeps everyone correctly informed

>Let me check your facts for you, no need to check goyim.

What free hand? facebook and google are monopolies.

Start shopping it onto people posting CNN and MSNBC articles

How would one go about breaking up their monopoly?

So it's true that Trump has a cuck shed?

>Anyone have a list of shit Snopes gets wrong?

Not just that, Snopes "fact check" equals googling around. Meaning they're feeding off the same fucking thing AP is printing. How in the arseholes of the gods is that "independent" in any way.

This is the same "air of authority" game newspapers play on when they start quoting each other and you can go full circle in their citations, confirming their source was nobody at all and they pulled it out of their ass.

"Sources say"
"Unconfirmed reports"
"People on twitter are saying"
"Some people think"

100% fucking bullshit.

Always put a face to the name. Meme pic related into the collective consciousness so that the name can never be uttered anywhere without that pic manifested in the mind of the reader.

(((fact checkers)))

We need to repeal the section in the 2017 NDAA labeled Global Engagement Center (Section 1287). It's a global anti foreign propaganda initiative aimed at protecting USA national security interests. "Fact-based" American narratives will replace and/or slide local news, alternative facts, or actual truth. Conspiracy theories harmful to the USA, unveiling of American pedoticians, war, and bad business practices will be protected to preserve the American way. We need to bring this to the main stream, educate people, this is the meme police at the local level in dozens of countries abroad. Will begin operations June 23, 2017. #memepolice

Making more popular services

Exactly. This is why section 1287 Global Engagement Center needs to be defended. American "facts" will rule the day abroad. This is a bad step towards dumbing down billions of people who are unwise to the information they consume, thinking they are getting local news in their country, in fact will be fed American propaganda to make them think pro USA. Not good. #MemePolice

>how do we stop a private corporation from informing its users

Let the invisible hand of the free market do its stuff.

What free hand? facebook and google are monopolies.

>How would one go about breaking up their monopoly?

>Making more popular services

What services in particular?

They won't break up the monopolies because they're technically all in the same sector. The idea is that Facebook Google etc all compete even though they work hand in hand to push agendas. You'd have to get Social Media, Searcy Engines, etc deemed their own sector instead of just Tech

We can't count on the government to break them up, rather, market forces in the right direction.

Google does the search engine thing too well to get outcompeted, but Facebook and social media are a different story. They compete for people's time because they are repositories for people to fill with content.

My question is; Facebook centralizes social media in one place with no competition, would the market benefit if social media decentralized into a hundred different websites.

report the warning as fake news for calling snopes a fact checking site

>AP is a factchecking site now?

Print them out and put them on holocaust shit

Yeah, I honestly think it'll backfire hard. Not only are people generally much smarter than (((they))) give them credit for, but treating them like children who don't know any better? No one likes that.

Arrogant, condescending schmucks will get what's coming to them.

We dispute ALL