When will you realize that the world's doomsday clock is ticking and Trump/The Republicans will ignore the danger and doom the planet for oil shekels (Rex Tillerson) and cheap climate refugee workers? (goodbye jobs)
Oilshills and alt facts not welcome.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
dailymail.co.uk
voxeu.org
climate.nasa.gov
climatedepot.com
twitter.com
BUT BUT TRUMP SAID IT WASN'T REAL BECAUSE OF HIS EXXON MOBILE DONORS
Climate change will be good for northern (white) countries
I'm still waiting for the sea level to raise until I have a panoramic view to the Adriatic sea.
According to climate changers, this should have occurred 5~10 years ago.
Lol, especially once 100000000 Poo refugees invade your hood
Nothing is so certain, but but the Clathrate gun will shoot soon
>Implying climate change is a man-made issue
>Implying it's an issue at all
youtube.com
I'm more concerned with the next eruption of Yellowstone or Mt Vesuvio. What are you changers doing to prevent these events?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND op's narrative is ded
dailymail.co.uk
Aaaand you moved the goalpost. Try to learn how to argue before pretending to be smart.
I said no alt facts. Cite NASA instead of Republican clickbait lies.
I don't pretend to be smart, I'm not.
Just trolling, it's sunday after all.
>report is by Dr John Bates an NOAA scientist that registered democrat
It is taken out of context, or does not prove you right.
How do we know what the temperature was 500 years ago?
>no y-axis
I see oilshills have already invaded this thread
A lot of the global warming alarmists show temperature trends starting from the 1800s. What they don't tell you is that this is around the time we were coming out of a "little ice age". And before that was the medieval warm period. A lot of the temperature increase since the 1800s has simply been due to the fact that we were rebounding from the little ice age.
And then there's all the issues with how temperatures were measured historically compared to today.
Common misconception, one that makes the oil companies richer and richer...
Really? So that means that the models since 1970 that says the polar region will be iceless by 2000 was right? How about gore and 2013 predictions?remember the polar bears? Ya there pop is at an all time high, leading to cannibalizim, which is normal for polar bears. How about global epidemics? Forgot SARS? How about asteroids, the fact china has been building the worlds largest hydroelectric dam on a fault line? Since the started building the ring of fire has been more active.
How about you go back to the bill nye, David Suzuki, and al gore ( only 1 scientist, and specialist in flies) and suckle the teat some more.
So where is your proof that humans made atmospheric CO2 rise? I just see Micheal manns famous "hockey stick graph". Why during the jurrasic period atmospheric co2 was 4 times what it is now? Why does natural sequestered co2 from the ice being released a correlation with human use? Why is there no studies on how much co2 is sequestered from agricultural crops? Or woodlands? Or grasslands? Why is NOAH lying about sea temps? I can answer these but you can't.
There's nothing we can do to stop it from destroying us massively at this point. By now it's more about mitigating damage than changing habits. Going green should be a priority, but Oxygen farms and relocation should be the number 1 priority.
Make no mistake, we are past the point of no return.
Well which is it slowtard. Do they teach you to read and critically think in your cult?
>The science is settled don' t bother looking at the data
wow better pay my carbon taxes
surely the taxers would not EVER spend my money on browns immigrating here
NEVER would they do that!
Oh ya I forgot sorry to double post, if we as a civilization could reduce our atmospheric carbon down to 1/4 what it is now, most plant life on earth would starve to death. Leading to the 6th extinction level event. So there is that to. I guess just tax me for it, that will fix the problem right?
Carbonfags gtfo.
do you know what a gigaton is
...
I went and saw the first quote by "international science board" (UN) and you lost me.
Why does the in say no global warming in 18 years
climatedepot.com
And how does the "pause" work when we still are outputting co2?
And why is water vapour (clouds) not being looked at?
How many times do alarmists need to fail in their predictions before they'll shut the fuck up?
Nothing you've ever said has come true. And that makes sense because your models only include CO2, water vapour and clouds and it's not even certain whether clouds are positive or negative (most likely negative, otherwise we'd have fried hundreds of millions of years ago). They don't include wind, volcanoes, ocean oscillations, El Nino, The Sun (yes, THE SUN) and more.
Dishonest and pathetic. Fuck off.
What we call Earth is the result of terraforming by Man. This ain't the real Earth, we are a colony based on it. Climate Change (CC=33) is a joke on that fact. Everything you see is man made, including the 'stars', Sun and Moon.
Unfortunately as long as carbon taxes exist. After a few generations it will just be "normal" like income taxation, in fact I am sure the long term plan is to replace all taxation with carbon taxation cutting right to the chase. A life tax being carbon based lifeforms. Yes it's absolutely disgusting being built on the big lie but this is what we call "civilization" or more accurately, human domestication.
No it won't.
Octane turns into upto 8 CO2 molecules when it is burned in oxygen.
There are 7 billion people running engines in an atmosphere only 62 miles thick, it is just as serious as running a car in your garage.
>Why does the in say no global warming in 18 years
>take a look at your link
>intrigued, take a look at your site's homepage
>greeted with "ALERT: A Joyful Day in DC! White House declares ‘global warming’ funding is ‘a waste of your money’"
gee, I wonder why they say that
google "paleotemperature proxy"
Nationalism has a better chance of protecting the environment than anything the feel good green globalists propose.
Shifting manufacturing back to the US, keeping them energy independant, and building a mentality of high quality made in america products instead of cheap chinese shit will do more to change lifestyles to protect the environment than establiahment ideas. Fuck off shill.
CO2 makes up a few hundredths of one percent of the atmosphere, idiot.
Ozone concentration isn't even 1ppm (compared to CO2 >400ppm), but I don't thin you would say that ozone can be disregarded or its effect in the biosphere is negligible.
pointing out the relative concentration wont win you even a hint of a point with people who bothered to look at this topic even at a superficial level
Use liberal Monroe's own xcuckcd comic against him.
Oh, and comparing a smoothed rolling average that has been (((error corrected))) to the last actual decade and then saying the numbers can't wildly swing back is just graph manipulation. "best case" is in 2020 it's -1 and liberals are saying: "See! Man made climate change."
Spotted the shitlib. Look, it's gotten so politicized that there's no room for rational debate. Either you take the shitlib position on it or the right wing position on it. There's no middle ground and there's no rational thought left.
It's not really interesting to even think about.
bitch gotta label his axes. Can't tell shit with that. Is it a log scale? Is it a normed linear scale? what are the tic marks? How are they delineated? This is a poor graph.
Even if global warming is happening and mankind is causing it the coimate change will mostly affect equatorial regions so why should the United States care?
that's not actually true, the warming is most concentrated at the extreme northern latitudes
the effects on the aequatorial regions are (other than the moderate latitudes) largely unknown because tropical wind- and precipitation patterns are notoriously hard to model