So does he believe in God or not?
So does he believe in God or not?
Other urls found in this thread:
yes
Got a vid that is
Watch his talk called Strengthen the Individual: A counterpoint to Post Modern Political Correctness. Also watch the follow up Q&A. He is asked about how we can know that the Logos exists and works the way he says it does. This doesn't answer your question directly, but I think it's related to your question.
...
He believes in God in that believing in God is evolutionarily advantageous.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
In a video of him recently he said, verbatim, "I'm not an atheist anymore."
Nonetheless, he does like to be elusive about his exact beliefs.
Don't think so.
he changed the normal definition of God to convince himself that he believes in God
He believes in things he doesn't speak about openly, too. He took psilocybin.
>normal definition of God
Enlighten me on what this is.
>nobody has ever believed in fedora straw god
Color me surprised
...
I alone can answer your question...
If mankind dies out, then everything he believes is not true.
God exists, and that's that, bucko.
It's not lupus, OP.
He IS god.
Yes, neurologically speaking, everyone believes in god.
If he does, it's clearly not in the conventional God of the Bible. In his interview with Joe Rogan he literally said "like the stories in the Genesis, they are obviously not scientific theories". In my opinion, he's just an atheist at heart who draws morality lessons from Christian myths.
Your mind is flawed in this case then
No substance to this post
Plenty of greek philosophers also asserted tht the logos exists and then said plainly that they were atheists
BASICALLY YOU ARE BEING JEWED
The Logos just literaly means the rational guiding law or principle, or person of the world
It can be the meaning of life
a bunch a rules
a machine
a person with infinite power
ect
It doesnt matter it just makes the world tick in an orderly fashion
AAAnd the idea that the Logos is a person was a new idea
the stoics had a hindue thing going on with the logos so that doesnt count
Christians and Jews were the ones that really pushed the idea that it was an actually fucking Deity
>It doesnt matter
Well, the Christian faith starts and ends with the belief that Jesus died for your sins. For Christians at least, this is very important.
No it doesnt start there it starts at genesis you moron
What the hell you think is on the first page of the bible anyways
And IT DOESNT MATTER
the LOGOS DOESNT HAVE TO BE GOD
IT CAN BE A FUCKING CAT SHAPED COMPUTER COMPUTING EVERYTHING
PETERSON IS NOT A CHRISTIAN OR EVEN A THEIST
Can we get him to run for office?
Any leaf bros actually in contact with him?
I know it starts with Genesis... I didn't literally mean it starts and ends with the aforementioned, how did you miss that?
And I said FOR CHRISTIANS the belief that Jesus died for your sins, the belief in God, is FUNDAMENTAL.
Do you disagree with that?
Who cares?
Peterson should sort himself out before he starts lecturing others.
Practice what you preach Mr Peterson.
YOU FUCKING DUMBASS
MY faith begins with God making the earth
How the fuck do I justify Jesus dying for anyone if you dont state first that God created the earth?
This is first order logic you fuckign "rationalist"
I am being very technical here
YOU MUST START WITH GENESIS
NO ITS NOT FUNDAMENTAL
ITS SECONDARY
1. GOD MADE EVERYTHING
2. GOD ...
3. ....
4....
....
Nth. Jesus Died for your sins
Is that the set of RedLetterMedia's Half in the Bag? It sure looks like it
It's Dogmatic but not a fundamental
Fundamentals you start with the most basic truths and then work down from there
Oh and Peterson is an atheist
You can believe in the existence of the logos and be an atheist
In fact most Greeks were
he believes in himself, duh
If you watched his videos and you might be less of a fucking autist
Do you feel the chronology of the Bible determines what is fundamental vs. what is secondary?
Give an example of fundamental vs. secondary beliefs in the Christian belief, in your opinion.
Nice trips but this is not about Chronology at all Doctor Peterson
I just told you I am ordering things from first order logic
So this is order of X Causing Y Causing Z ect
so
1. God made everything
2. God gave Adam and Eve the choice
3. Adam and Eve choose death and degeneracy
4. ..
5...
... Moses, Israel, old covenant and so on ect
Nth Jesus Died for everyone's sins
Fundamental I mean the first things
so
1. X or Y
2. Not Y
Therefore
3. Y
3. is secondary from order of logic
It is still important
But you can't have 3 without 1 or 2
I and 2 are needed or you are a heretic
Sorry I mean
Therefore
3. X
Interesting points.
I still don't feel comfortable saying some are fundamental vs. secondary. I mean, could you believe everything up until (Nth-1), not believe Jesus died for your sins, and still be a Christian? I guess is what I'm getting at.
Yes, he understands that "God" is a pronoun for the underlying order of the universe.
>inb4 autistic Christians sperging out
If you are not comfortable then you should not be in the field of theology
Since thats all it is.
No you are no longer a christian if you deny the prior assumptions and what follows from that
Denying any of that while asserting the final conclusion means you are no longer a christian
This is a very legal definition of what a heresy is but it allows me to stake who ever I want on fire by proving it ina court of law and no one can deny it
ITS GREAT
Do you interpret everything in the Bible literally?
>heh it says here you deny statement 18?
>yes rabbi
>INTO THE FIREYOU GO YOU FILTHY GOY
KEK
>literally
>allegorically
Plainly little goy
I read it plainly
I chose option #3
People have NO RESPECT for the Roman Catholic Church
You think we just threw any shlomo in to the pit
NO
We had beauracracy
We had paper work
We had lawyers
You had to get it stamped
You got interrogated by HANS
What are you even trying to say, you spastic?
>denying knowledge of foresaid statement
>conclusion follows that you have plausible deniability of crime of heresy
Nah I don't buy it