How much in taxes are you willing to pay to employ the unemployed?
Say there are unemployed factory workers, minors, and automobile manufacturers. Would you agree to a 20% tax on your yearly income to support? If not, how much more are you willing to pay, or how little?
How much do you think you will spend personally in taxes, including sales tax?
>Is it the governments job to make sure citizens have jobs?
It is when they've taken over to the extent they already have.
>How much in taxes are you willing to pay to employ the unemployed?
Doesn't have to be like this. Although that's the only way liberals know how to create jobs it seems.
>Doesn't have to be like this. Although that's the only way liberals know how to create jobs it seems.
So you are a neo-liberal?
I want to move to her country breed a half white baby inside of her with my big white cock
I'm a nationalist. The current neoliberal policies are not nationalist.
that is a kawaii helicopter
>I'm a nationalist.
Good for you, that tells me nothing.
Do you believe people should pay taxes proportionally based on wealth?
Prime-pumping? Trickle-down? Do you cut spending and taxes, or adjust where the money goes? Does the government make subsidies?
How would you have your country pay for shit?
Pay them $1000 per dead nigger from the welfare that was previously going to said niggers.
now that's fucking pimp
>Do you believe people should pay taxes proportionally based on wealth?
Yeah, based on income though, not wealth.
>Trickle-down?
That's a made up straw man.
As for the rest, maybe.
But the country has to have nationalist policies first. Right now world order considerations have taken precedence over the well-being of our own citizenry. Most western nations have through the Washington Consensus. These things without protectionism are really bad for us. It's a world-wide race to the bottom and it's all dependent on the US government's control of the world's financial system and natural resources (and requires constant military interventions).
If you put the brakes on that, the whole game changes. All of these things won't have the same effects anymore.
Why do people in Japan work really long hours daily and then complain they have no time to fix the low population problem?
Taxation is theft.
>But the country has to have nationalist policies first.
There's that word again. What? Plenty of people voted for trump hoping he would, among other things, save their jobs, give them health insurance better than Obamacare, fix the infrastructure, build a border wall, and expand the military and police.
So if taxes are to be used to pay for those things, and Trump is the nationalistic candidate, then taxes are patriotic. So who fits the bill, you or rich people? So who pays for this patriotism? Regular people or rich people? And why do you think the way you do, and who should pay for stuff?
Some of that kind oif stuff may benefit you, therefore how much do you think the government should give you based on your lack of income paid for by rich people? OR, do you think people should not be given handouts and thus rich people shouldn't be taxed as much?
Or are you a libertarian leaning and both spending and taxes for everybody should be cut?
>There's that word again.
Yeah. I explained it to you a little bit but you don't care. You guys are pro-globalization and pro-mass immigration. For the most part you do not make sense. Your ideology is only good for the elite and multinationals and whomever the government picked to receive handouts.
>taxes
THIS AGAIN. You guys are obsessed with it. Polices can lead to job growth without having the government to pay for every single one of them. As it is being implemented, globalization does the opposite of that. Everyone knew it would happen. Even leftists opposed it (especially them) before they became downright retarded.
For the most part, the elite do not pay taxes. And you guys always confuse their wealth and their income. Their wealth is immense, but that's not being perpetually regenerated. Taxing that is a one-off thing. That's what socialist revolutions usually do but that doesn't work for long.
And here's the thing, the "middle class socialists" would often rather pay higher taxes if it means the poor do not have a shot at becoming middle class themselves. It's a better deal for them. And that's what the democrats have been doing for them (the republicans not much better though, until then). Also, they hate those richer than themselves.
So no, I don't want higher taxes. I want job growth at the expense of globalization. A lot of the current policies were set in place to hinder native job growth and encourage globalization.
>...h it. Polices can lead to job growth without ha...
And that does not explain how shit gets paid for. Are you implying that when more jobs get created, the citizenry can pay more in taxes and cover the government expenditures, or that the businesses and investors and bankers and other entities like that can pay more in taxes because they are making more money from doing business?
Answer the damn question already.
Conscript everybody who can't find work.
Only to an point. If a person is in need of training or job placement there should be some level of assistance. That being said it the government should not care for its citizen to the point it prevents their ability to develop as an individual.
The government serves the individual but its not a replacement mother that should always provide. The individual must, at some point, provide for itself.
>And that does not explain how shit gets paid for.
An economy can grow without anyone paying for it. A growing economic creates more wealth and people consume/save more and it's mostly due to the private profit motive. I hope you understand this.
Now economic growth largely depends on the government because it regulates so much already and society has become very complex. This doesn't mean the government has to pay for the growth. Just that policies will affect it greatly. And yes, paying for it can help too, but the main problem is policies right now. Globalization hinders it. But this is the will of the current political establishment and this is what can be undone.
Right now ordinary people haven't gotten a fair share of the created wealth of the economy grew. The problem is way, way before taxation. A system where the rich get all the money and then the government redistributes it isn't a healthy free market. The problem must be fixed at the source.
For the record the girl pictured isn't actually a pilot.
The event was for the 45th anniversary of the Kisarazu Air Field, and the girls pictured are cosplayers.
The character on the helicopter is one of the four mascots of the Fourth Anti-Tank Helicopter Squad, also women cannot serve as anti tank pilots.
After this event the squad got in trouble with the Ground Staff Office and were told not to do anything with the characters.
Just thought I should point that out. But to answer your question, its more yes and no.
Holy shit that reverse image search. Topkek
wtf top lol
So you are for cutting taxes and services, with tariffs? Alrighty.
So I assume you are opposed to the populist candidates like Trump who promises spending and services that thus need to be payed for?
Japanese companies haven't invested in technologies/labor techniques that cut down on manpower and labor intensity. It's gotten so bad with overworking that their government had to create a law where on every last friday of the month the workplace shuts down at noon so that their workers get more free time and are able to see the sun
>with tariffs
Not necessarily.
>that thus need to be payed for?
There are other ways to pay for it than raising taxes. Like reducing corruption (Trump is the only one which might be able to accomplish that as he already oppose much of the current establishment (pretty futile to hope for it otherwise)), increasing efficiency (mostly through more competition) and growing the economy. A LOT of our problems are due to corruption. Of course they'd rather raise the taxes that fix this. And the US has A LOT more options to finance itself being the world's sole remaining hegemon and all.
>government-created jobs
No, it's your job to make yourself employable or your family's job to help you if you aren't employable. It's called personal responsibility.
>How much in taxes?
None.
The current tax system and welfare state are a massive scam designed solely to remove money by force from wealthy income-earning men and give it to women and minorities in exchange for votes. It's entirely immoral, even evil if you believe evil exists at all.
>Trump is the only one which might be able to accomplish that as he already oppose much of the current establishment
You know, I just don't think he will. He has basically just done a bunch of run-of-the-mill republican stuff for most things except for his wall and travel ban attempts. Tax cuts for wealthy folks, deregulation, defunding programs, expanding military.
Asides from the wall. travel ban, and promise for replacing obamacare, his entire presidency has been neo-liberal all the way.
>There are other ways to pay for it than raising taxes
Well, he did make it a policy to privatize infrastructure. Though paying tolls for using roads is pretty much worse than taxes imo.
>Is it the governments job to make sure citizens have jobs?
That depends on your view of government. That said, a government "employer of last resort" program would be more beneficial to the economy than welfare payments are. Less inflation and less debasement of the human psyche.
A raise in taxes shouldn't be needed, maybe a 5% increase at most, just cut the unemployment benefits. At least here in Denmark that'd be enough.
Personally I yearn to see a revival of the working class here in Denmark. I can say for sure that the "everyone is middle class" society isn't working, or at least will crash horribly if a crisis happens.
>his entire presidency has been neo-liberal all the way.
Give him some time for fuck's sake. And you know you are being dishonest there. You know his campaign was a lot about trade deals and globalization and that he'll get on that. He's already growing the economy and jobs due to anticipation. He's already negotiating and preparing this, but these things take time.
I hope you are right because a lot is hinging on this guy actually delivering on his promises.
Heh, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Obama didn't do much of anything for 8 years and things are still going. If Trump fucks up, they'll get rid of him and put everything back in place and things will just keep on being regular shitty. He is fighting against an entrenched deep state that resists any and all changes now. That's what's so interesting about it. And they have big plans. There's a political cabal behind Trump. Bannon laid out a lot of their ideas. He's a really interesting guy.
no it's not. when you exist in a governed area you have implicitly agreed to abide by that area's laws. you don't like it? leave.
Taxes have gotten pretty damn high though, and it's mostly to subsidize corporate abuse. Wages are low and people need all sorts of assistance. But it's effectively workers paying for other workers' wages.
the fuck it's true and i'm fucking dying