Pro-communist beliefs are legal despite communism killing literally over one-hundred million people

>pro-communist beliefs are legal despite communism killing literally over one-hundred million people
why is this allowed?

Capitalism and Communism are both Jewish systems, so it is in their best interest that the only alternative people think of when they become dissatisfied with capitalism is the alternative they've laid out for us.

Why else would Germany ban fascist speech but allow communist speech, despite East Germany being under the boot-heel of the Soviet Union for so man years?

Because they weren't openly rayceest, duh.

Because of how attractive and sanitized (((they))) made it look.

Dumbass children who are frustrated that life is too hard because they have to get a fucking job and unfair because some people have more than others inevitably turn to the intellectual temper tantrum known as socialism. Some never grow out of it.

Because the Jews are communists who control the media and economy. Not that hard.

Capitalism is the system of nature.
Voluntary exchange of goods and services is not a Jewish system.

J E W S
E
W
S

Socialism just means government control. National Socialism made it necessary for people to work, even though it was still a form of Socialism. You are getting mixed up with Communism.

because the academia is infested with marxist sympathizers, as is most left wing parties

in nature the strong take from the weak

Capitalism itself isn't jewish, but it is often abused by turbokikes.

Communism is literally "Jewish Tricks: The Ideology" and inevitably leads to all the power in a nation being concentrated in a central government while the masses starve

...

Maybe for the Jews because they are barely natural at all, but National Socialism is the most idennatureideology to humanidennat: natural selection, fertility encouragement, work, nationalism, and a single leader similar to the alphamale.

Lmao

Nah, that's socialism, and / or crime.

1. Because it didn't.

2. Because a physical exclusion of a certain group of people from society isn't an inherent part of its' ideology.

>physical exclusion

>seize the means of production
>kill the burgeoise

pro-Nazi material is only illegal in Europe and a few other places. In those places, Nazis killed more people than Communists did. As for why pro-communist material is legal in places where communists killed a bunch of people, I don't know.

result of communist subversion.

>When every fact that paints Communism in a negative image is propaganda but your only sources to support your ideology are state-owned media from Soviet Russia.

>seize the means of production
Doesn't lead to
>kill the burgeoise

Literally the only one who did it was Pol Pot.

You can simply seize the means of production, or do it via some gradual or compromise process, while retaining the bourgeosie in society. In order to create an ethnic state, however, you have to physically expel everyone who doesn't fit your standards.

>a form of socialism
No, stop.
It was a form of Nationalism.

why dont neo-commies realize they'd all be gulaged for being beta NEETS

>nazi
Are you a kike or just retarded enough to use Kike terms?

>When you're allocated a bottom floor apartment while a party official is allocated the top floor penthouse.

>When you think everyone is a special snowflake with different needs and wants but support a communist revolution that requires an entirely homogenous society for it to even have a chance at working.

>When you kill all land and property owners only to give it all to the regime.

>simply seize
What if the owners object?

>create an ethnic state
For what purpose?

Have you misread what you are posting or my post? I already agree with your supposed contradiction.

"Socialism" without qualifiers is pretty much synonymous with Communism. "National Socialism" is very different. I would choose national socialism over socialism without hesitation.

>my brand of collectivism is totally different
>except when it comes to killing millions of people idk lol

>defending commies
race traitor

>For what purpose?
For the purpose of establishing of ethnic State.
>What if the owners object?
They are no longer legal owners but squatters and are evicted.

>Nazi sympathiser
Traitor to the Russian people.

>why is this allowed?
Because it wasn't real communism.
Not even joking. That the ACTUAL rationale they roll with.

Fuck off, commie shill.
Russian people are more than fed up with your communist bullshit.
Your retarded ideology will never succeed because it's not based in reality.

socialism and communism both rely on forcing people to do shit for you aka slavery, because you're somehow entitled to it because you're born. Capitalism doesn't care for your race, age or gender, it just speaks money. People need to realize that giving shit to others makes them lazy and corrupt, and they need to stop doing it, be it through socialism ór communism.

You don't know the first fucking thing about capitalism Dutchie but I like your attitude. Try reading Capitalism and Freedom so you can get the ideas right.

He зaбyдь пpoгoлocoвaть зa Зюгaнoвa, пeтyшoк. A тo eмy нa нoвyю виллy нe хвaтaeт.

>Russian people are more than fed up with your communist bullshit.
Do you even believe in this yourself?

>Your retarded ideology will never succeed because it's not based in reality.

It worked for 70 years best than anything else for Russia. It allowed China to overcome us in wealth in influence by staying faithful to it, despite being 10 times poorer in 1991. When the current regime falls, some sort of communist or democratic socialist government will come to power.

>For the purpose of establishing of ethnic State.

Yes, for what purpose?
On what grounds?

>OP literally compares Fascism and National-socialism.

/po/rasha tier comment.

Because we have freedom of speech. It's not there to protect the speech you love, but the speech you hate. That being said, I'd like to give every commie a final helicopter ride.

Opinions shouldn't be illegal ever, that's the sort of thinking that has "facist" speech and symbolism banned in much of Europe and has empowered ANTIFA. If we want to fix the world we need to be better than the people who broke it and not repeat their mistakes.

Can you not answer my question?

> The idea that China experienced any sort of economic success prior to Deng Xiaoping embracing capitalism

all or none my dude. if certain ideas are illegal than communism should be #1 on that list.

Because of the exceptionally strong subversion of academia in America.

Your views on Semipalatinsk? Was it necessary for the workers party to stop that?

>It worked for 70 years best than anything else for Russia.
Leading to millions killed in the name of future that never came even close, total economic collapse of the country and dissolution of USSR. Yea, such "best than anything", much wow.

Also, my dear communist faggot, please take a close look at S. And N. Korea. That's about as clear-cut of an example of what works best — communism or capitalism — that you can arrange for.
>communist china
yea, so communist they've got all their recent success from being a hired labor for US. Such communism, much wow!

...

Yes. Holocaust denial and antivax are just stupid shitposting and only a few people are hurt by these memes. Communism is the truly severe mental cancer that actually destroys societies.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Ancaps are stupid yes but anarchy doesn't seem to have the same emotional draw for people that communism does so it doesn't create powerful propaganda. Socialism is what we have to worry about.

>For what purpose?
It is irrelevant for the discussion. It was a goal of most Fascist governments in history, as well as local Natsocs.
You may think what you like, I'll agree with most Russians on that.
What episode in particular? A nuclear program? I don't think so.
Since the establishment of the PRC (a little bit later than the exact date) and until the recent slowdown, with a brief exception of cultural revolution, Chinese economic growth was never lower than 10% GDP.

> Economic growth exceeded 10% during the Great Leap Forward
Alright Lenin, go ahead and believe whatever you feel like believing

True, my statement isn't exactly correct: I don't have such data memorized.

While mine is merely imprecise, yours, is absolutely wrong.
> The idea that China experienced any sort of economic success prior to Deng Xiaoping embracing capitalism

>You may think what you like, I'll agree with most Russians on that.
I don't need to "believe" anything or "agree" with anyone, I have factual reality as a proof.
It's you, faggots, who have no other option that to BELIEVE in communist — because in reality it failed horribly and miserably times and again.
Also, where the fuck did you get the idea most russians agree with you? Less than 20% voted commies the last year.

>my sources that support communism come from state owned media

>For the purpose of establishing of ethnic State
That was nazism, not fascism.

You mean like the perfect example of how the Bolsheviks let the tsar go peacefully after taking everything he had... oh wait... how about their peaceful acquisition of what the Cossacks had... oh wait.

>when you devalue the currency to try and attack the rich but it only harms poor stupid people who keep their money in the bank instead of investing

Because it was actually the Jewish Bolsheviks that won the cold war.

I've heard that this is why smarter Chinks are constantly trying to buy Australian and New Zealand real estate and other assets. Chinese economic policy is such a clusterfuck that any savings a Chinaman has in the bank become practically worthless within a decade due to inflation

>Jewish Bolsheviks that won the cold war.
Care to explain how that is the case?
How exactly Bolsheviks — Jewish or otherwise — won the cold war? Last time I checked the legacy of Bolsheviks largely collapsed while their enemies — capitalist west — largerly became the dominant power.

They don't want to piss off the NKr and Chinese

I take that Russians hate communism now?

Mabye demsoc, not so much communism

K I'll bump this thread by accident then

>Marxism is just a way of viewing the labor system
How do you respond this?

Because you live in a third world country.

In Poland communism is actually banned and gloryfying that totalitarian system is a criminal offense

...

You don't so much hate communism per se, you just understand it can't work and any attempt to enforce it do more harm than good.

...

The predictions you draw from taking this view of the labor system alone have proven to be incorrect and the conclusions to be actively harmfull.
So what is the view good for, again?