The leftists are right, Sup Forums. Fuck having laws n' sh*t

The leftists are right, Sup Forums. Fuck having laws n' sh*t.

Other urls found in this thread:

Cosmopolitan is always right.

The Jews are just butthurt that their kike Merrick Garland is not going to be on the supreme court.

If you thought the supreme court forced gay marriage on people... imagine if the kikes had a majority.

It's over, Trump can never win

is that a real article

>go to store
>Cosmopolitan on magazine rack
>notice degenerate things like see your sex iq and 101 sex movies

>Fuck having laws n' sh*t.

The truth about immigration, by the numbers:


Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide

The plan to eliminate the white race:


Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:


Cultural Marxism & Social Justice Explained:


Why are we in Decline - Cultural Marxism:


also see

The facts about slavery in North America:


Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:


Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)


The Holocaust:





Jesus Christ that's just blatant lying propaganda

When I need to understand politics, i turn to Cosmopolitan.

Constitution originalists are just as bad as SJWs

I disagree

That's a very leafy opinion

>10 reasons why all white women need to be impregnated by black men

>Islam: tthe true feminist religion?

>Why Hillary can still beat Trump

>talks about heller case
>is proved wrong in the first 5 lines of the case

So why can't we ban muslims again?

At least Cosmopolitan prints decent fapping material. That's all they're good for.

I lost my virgin thanks to Cosmopolitan.

I know its degenerative, worth it,

>no instructions on how to interpret

Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Literally kill leftists

So if this is what they believe, I guess banning Muslims is completely constitutional

They probably didn't offer any instruction since it was WRITTEN IN PLAIN FUCKING ENGLISH THAT SHOULDN'T NEED ANY INTERPRETATION

everybody fucking knew what they meant, and it wasn't until the power grab from John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison that this idea of constitutional interpretation became a thing.


>Nor, of course, did handguns exist in the 18th century

Holy shit, Cosmo was about how to give good blowjobs and not let your date know you're on your period when I was a kid, why the fuck are they talking about the constitution now?


Can the Left stoop even lower?

The heart of this is the thinking "the constitution is a living document" crowd. Of course there can be "original intent", the problem is that professives hate the original intention and want to "improve" it.

Because nothing says empowerment like having a vagina that also has a strong opinion about things that sound important on a surface level

OP is right, only rural and suburban retards think the constitution should be interpreted as it's written. City people know the founders wanted it to be a living document which means whatever progressives want it to mean

Cosmo is giving Constitutional advise now? They should stick to advise about vaginas and ugly women's clothes.

>12 sex tips that will make him jizz in you until it squirts out of your ears
>Also in this issue, we tell the supreme court what to think, in clickbait list style

Are they out of their element perhaps?

And lets hope the Supreme Jewess dies soon and Trump can replace her

The smug attitude and blatant lying to fit a narrative is why journalists are scum.

Trump should put obama on the court after Ginsberg dies

1. Lefties can't criticize it
2. Keeps the conservative balance
3. Removes obama from politics for the rest of his life

Then hopefully trump gets one more choice and we will have obama forever irrelevant on a 6-3 conservative court

>14 Confessions From Women Who Cheated and Don't Regret It


> Federalist papers
Literally explain every part of it and it's intent

>Reading the document isn't enough, I also need it to teach me how

you realize, obama can simply decline.

>We didn't have hand guns in the 18th century
Really gets my noggin joggin

It's where I get my political news.

>10 tricks to do on his balls with razor blades that will make his toes curl!

constitution clearly says a militia constrained by bureaucratic red tape being necessary to the existence of global government, the right of only the government and elites to keep arms shall not be infringed

Why would he? He's a constitutional scholar and a lawyer and former president

His only reason to decline is so he can keep lobbying against trump and being a political troublemaker

their actual problem is that they got BTFO and told to fuck off

they proposed their idea, it was rejected, and now they don't have the power to amend the constitution anymore. so they try to push the same shit that was already rejected by the people by "re-interpreting" the meaning of the constitution.

what the fuck

Wait, weren't the amendments added after the signing of the Constitution? So we can all acknowledge that the law can change. According to wikipedia, it was amended as recently as 1992.

>tfw reading that line sent a shiver down your spine

It can, but they don't have the influence to do so. Which is why they are impotently raging and saying we should just interpret what's already written down in a different way.

amending the constitution according to the procedures outlined in the constitution is following the original intent of the constitution

>nor did handguns exist in the 18th century

Im gonna fucking puke



Where did she go? Have you checked lost and found?

I cant believe that they actually tried to make the supreme court majority Jewish......are you Americans paying attention!!