Who would win in a war between Australia and North Korea?
No allies or third parties whatsoever.
Who would win in a war between Australia and North Korea?
No allies or third parties whatsoever.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
The emus.
Australia does not have nuclear weapons so that would be an easy win for NK
North Korea does not have nuclear weapons either. They also don't have missiles that could reach Australia even if they had warheads. They also do not have a navy or airforce.
Literally the only thing stopping any developed nation from glassing the norks is that they have a gun to the head of South Korea.
aussies lost a war with birds
>Can't take over some rocks
...
Depends on the meme warfare. We have no idea what kind of memes could be hiding in best korea.
sweet digits
Who would win?
North Korea
Who do I want to win?
North Korea
Fuck Australia you kangaroo fucking kikes
BTFO
I am nothing more than a Lemming clinging to the same tree my ancestors did millions of years ago. My body is human but my mind is not even the level of a monkey. Stuck somewhere back in the archetypal standards of Lemming to a Tree for safety I refuse to leave out of fear of what is out there on the ground. Sorry. The ride has been good. Although I have a human body, I am nothing more than a scared little Lemming, much less a monkey.
The North Korean military is terrible. Antiquated soviet era equipment and tanks. Their soldiers are 5 ft tall. They're only formidable now bc of all the artillery they have close to Seoul and a nuclear bomb. That's it. Complete paper tiger.
Cheer up, emokid. Go visit the water park in best korea it'll make you feel alive again
Australia wouldn't invade North Korea because too expensive
NK wouldn't invade Australia because they can't.
a war between them would probably be all the diplomats talking shit at each other until the other side surrenders and no one can beat Australia in that department
>North Korea does not have nuclear weapons either. They also don't have missiles that could reach Australia even if they had warheads.
user...
>no dong
kek
No successful tests of 4 or 5. They can barely get any missile off the ground nonetheless an intercontinental one.
...
i'll have you know we're reserved and polite people
>no dong
kekeroo
>implying even if they had them they wouldn't just blow up in their face
>implying the emus aren't completely radproof and won't wipe them out if we died anyway
>who would win in a war with white people against east asians?
Read some history you fucking tards.
The last one they tested fell into the ocean...
Also I think you're forgetting about Jindalee..
en.wikipedia.org
Do we have to care about SK in this theoretical engagement?
No: GG EZ, no losses.
Yes: We'd lose a lot of people but still win.
fpbp every time
I like this idea.
It's like making the retarded kids fight each other at school for keks.
That's England not Australia
why dont you sip some faggoty apple tea you brown cunt
Not even the USA could defeat North Korea, that's why it still exists. MacArthur had to throw a hail mary invasion at Inchon bay just to save their asses in the first place.
Does it work when subs roll up to the shoreline?
>no dong
everytime
You guys lost to Japan in ww2
this, if we could actually beat them it would have already happened. North Koreans laugh at our arrogance because of jew controlled media
Their subs are even louder than ours, so yes.
IIRC, only Astute can actually avoid detection.
...
We kicked their asses once we got our footing. We got pushed back because China got involved.
What would happen if some guy with knowledge of how to build, operate and maintain nuclear weapons moved to NK?
It's basic rocketry. Money and skilled manufacturing is their main problem.
Australia would win easily.
If they dont have any nukes, I think we will have a good chance.
If they do, I dont think they will be able to reach the bigger cities, either because of range or being shot down.
We will probably win, they only have photshoped hovercrafts, r-right?
A random Health Physicist likely has enough knowledge to build a device, but there is shitloads more than that involved.
Iran has billions of dollars of oil money, NK is flat broke...
Iran still doesn't have a viable weapon.
There won't be any winners. If North Korea is going down, they're taking anyone and everyone with them.
No other nations are involved, so no China and Historical Soviet support for NK.
We're not talking about Israel here jeez louise.
north korea
Photoshoped hovercraft, tanks, planes, artillery, missiles, subs, soldiers, civilians, buildings, food...
Sometimes I wonder if they really have more than one of anything and if it actually works.
How many emus do they have?
>Literally the only thing stopping any developed nation from glassing the norks is that China has a gun to the head of South Korea.
Fixed that for you.
Of course we'd beat them in that case, we would have complete full spectrum dominance over them in a week or two with our aegis destroyers and AWACS. The ground war would be nasty though, they're fanatics who use human wave tactics.
Depends entirely on the win conditions.
North Korea could not possibly hold Australia. It's too large, and its population too spread. It could nuke the fuck out of Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne, and cripple our economy, but it could not feasibly capture the continent.
Australia could not dent North Korea.
Well, frankly, the Koreans would immediately blow their entire nuclear budget on Australia, at which point Australia would retaliate (presumably with infantry by sea). Then, after the majority of Australia was out in the war, the kangaroos would stage a coup, prompting North Korea to enter a peace agreement. Each country would have its own terms, but I should hope that one of them would be for North Korea to be renamed 'North Kangaroo.'
NK. Not even shit posting.
According to this chart, looks like the Aussies would dominate militarily, and NK doesn't have much of an online presence, so their meme game would be weak. Australia would therefore destroy North Korea both with overwhelming firepower AND kek's will.
austrailia would get their shit handed to them
north korea is scary, even for a superpower like USA, china and the EU
huge zerg rush quantities of soldiers, lots of wepons, ICBMS and fucking nukes
australia, all they got is that sorry excuse for a "beer" fosters (better known as koala piss), that stupid faggot shit poster hat, and a few kangaroos
not to mention that lousy accent and dyke lookin females
whatever navy australia even has would be decimated by nk's subs which are diesel fuelled making them near impossible for australia to detect. in terms of land warfare, nk have been drilling tunnels and perfecting guerilla warfare for decades. australia wouldn't stand a shrimp's chance on a barbe
I don't think anyone could successfully pull off a land invasion of Australia.
The outback would claim the lives of many invaders.
I would win because I always win
>diesel fueled making them near impossible for to detect.
Are you on crack?
Every time I see this Webm I always watch it, great source for a sensible chuckle.
If it's no allies as well, then NK is fucked. They don't have China to protect them. The only reason they're still around is because of China.
Emu master race, fag.
We should make a site like 'FaceMash' zuckercucks site. Where you get two countries and choose who would win.
...
Well, frankly, shut the fuck up
>north korea is scary, even for a superpower like USA, china and the EU
Not as a direct threat. They're only scary because of what they could do to the countries close to them and their ties to China.
Like hell an emu would win in a fight, bitch.
>North Korea vs Australia
North Korean troops would probably die of starvation before they even reach Australia. Do they even have boats to carry troops that far?
...
Neither country has a big enough navy to invade. Sooooooo....
NK has a large submarine force, could be used in a hypothetical invasion. Australia cant protect all their coastline. Only problem would be north koreans fucking starving and running out of oil
...
It would take 2 years MAX for Australia to develop their own nuclear weapons if they somehow went to war with NK.
Do you really think the USA, UK, or France would give a shit if Australia developed nukes if it meant to fight against NK?
This is assuming the PRK and Russia don't do anything.
diesel submarines are quieter and harder to detect
yeah i guess that's true man
but this is like a thought experiment and shit
sorry about the beer comment bro, i didn't mean it-- i don't even drink beer
>north korea is scary, even for a superpower like USA
They're not scary per se, they just might do something rash and mess up the balance in the region.
In fact, Australia SHOULD develop some god damn nukes. That entire hemisphere is unprotected. If USA were to somehow collapse.
North Korea cause historically Australia are known stragglers and pussies
>being this retarded
Aussie obviously you git. But it would bankrupt your country and take you ~10 years of recession to recover.
They really aren't.
But if you're that deranged that you think they are, Collins Class is quieter than NK subs anyway.
As stated earlier the only subs that can creep past Jindalee are Astute class and UK isn't in this war...
For reference, we use Jindalee for oceanic sciences and climate sciences too, not just defense.
Agreed m8. You guys got our backs and most of us appreciate it (except Melbournites but they're all faggots anyway), but we need to have some self defense capabilities. Not necessarily a military rivaling the US (not that it would be possible), or even the UK, just some nukes for MAD to apply, and a navy/airforce for the triad.
...
Who needs nukes when you have boomerangs.
>implying we don't have sneeky inter-continental ICBMs spattered across central-notthern Australia
Why do you cunts think you never hear about the inner mass of our nation? We have enough firepower to destroy the world three times over and enough uranium to still sell a surplus
So if we set aside a large portion of land for the australian army and north korean army to duke it out who would win?
They aren't ours though, US isn't in the war and isn't allowed to support in the theoretical engagement.
Otherwise NK would have China support...
Only if the boomerangs can travel hundreds of miles and cause devastating explosions on impact.
I recall NK's subs are only short range diesel ones. Good to defend again SK but they will all sink if they try to cross the pacific ocean to reach Australia.
collins class are diesel too
North Korea has nuclear weapons and they have a fleet of ships and tons of missiles that reliably can deliver the nuclear load from a safe distance.
We might hear about their experimental missiles because their state propaganda channel mentions how the latest experimental missile fails (which later end up in our own media) . But their regular missiles work and their nuclear weapons work.
That's the point.
You seem to think diesel is quieter (it isn't)
But even if it was (it still isn't) we have diesel subs, so your entire argument that NK has 'quieter subs' is blown out.
Don't need to we can turn to China for nuclear protection if it ever came to it.
Not to mention developing and maintaining nuclear arms isn't cheap, better off spending that money on putting up female traffic lights.
Best Korea has the best spies. Advantage.
North korea is modernize so them
Pretty sure our aussiebros would win this even without nukes.
NK has to load their 50s era nukes into a plane and drop them on their target Hiroshima style. They might as well not have nukes if they go up against any technologically advanced military.
australia has 6 submarines
I bet very few Americans even know North Korea exists due to China pushing us back. I bet even fewer Americans know there was serious pushing from our top General for the president to pre-emptively launch nuclear strikes against the entirety of China during the Korean War, to that point that the president forced him to resign despite being regarded as one of the generals responsible for winning WWII.
>boomernukes
Typical OZ engineering, NK easy win
My land white boy
the norks have satellite launching capability. what makes you think they can't launch nukes
pretty sure their satellite launching capability is limited to the mariana trench
they're one of only 12 countries that have launched satellites on their own into space