Do you know any awarded scientist that is a racial realist?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
washingtonpost.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
inb4 ass
The guy who discovered DNA.
It seems like intelligence correlates with leftist positions.
Ass.
Steven Pinker is the personification of the master race.
fucking called it
The greatest of them all:
James Watson.
He's much more than just the DNA co-discoverer. Also did a lot of other stuff.
Was unawarded for his later views.
Can you debunk it Sup Forums? Can you debunk this video?
Yep. Small genetic difference can cause enormous cognitive differences.
Seriously?
The video is fine. Basically there isn't one consensual way for classifying races so we say races don't exist in reality. Races are abstract categories There's a continuum across human populations, if you look at genes alone.
But the interesting question isn't whether race exists or not. Rather, it's whether those small genetic difference determine innate behavioral proclivities. that's the question that matters and that has real relevance to us.
He was hated and ostracized for his later views, yes. Most people dismissed him as 'senile'. Of course he kept his nobel, so he wasn't *literally* unawarded.
So you're a liar.
ass
>The video is fine. Basically there isn't one consensual way for classifying races so we say races don't exist in reality. Races are abstract categories There's a continuum across human populations, if you look at genes alone.
Wrong.
en.wikipedia.org
"In the 2007 paper "Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations",[21] Witherspoon et al. attempt to answer the question, "How often is a pair of individuals from one population genetically more dissimilar than two individuals chosen from two different populations?". The answer depends on the number of polymorphisms used to define that dissimilarity, and the populations being compared. When they analysed three geographically distinct populations (European, African and East Asian) and measured genetic similarity over many thousands of loci, the answer to their question was "never"."
And how to prove it with real life experiments? That is easy. The australian aboriginals have been evolving isolated from rest of humanity for 25.000-40.000 years. You ask a bunch of 100% pureblooded aboriginals to build a modern house with everything installed without help from others. They can't do it and you can't teach them.
A border collie and a wolf can breed. One has the genetic inclination to herd sheep, the other will never learn no matter how much you teach it.
>But the interesting question isn't whether race exists or not. Rather, it's whether those small genetic difference determine innate behavioral proclivities. that's the question that matters and that has real relevance to us.
They do. It is no longer up for debate.
I was speaking metaphorically.
Watson was too old when he began to talk about race, too old to need any punishment. It's easier to just say 'the old man has lost his mind'.
This
The debate is ongoing.
There's little consensus over what genes (or set of genes) determine what behavioral proclivities. Also, DNA methylation can deactivate certain genes depending on environmental stimuli, a mechanism which don't understand well.
>Inb4: the warrior gene!
Its expression depends en methylation. And consensus hasn't whether on the issue yet. I've read some of the papers and the data isn't great.
Tes, this fuckers said that Mrs Watson have 16%African Ancestry from a study from 2008, to then continue with his "we are all one race, human race" hippie narrative.
>rigourous youtube video..
Hell, but everything is literally arbitrary. There's not even a single definition of species, biology or even life.
>The debate is ongoing.
The debate is ongoing because no one dares to ask the aboriginals to build one fucking house.
The experiments are there to be done. There is nothing left to discus.
archive.is
>I've read some of the papers and the data isn't great.
Fuck your data. Fuck your papers. The experiments are there to be done.
Also your hypothetical anecdote (lol) on aboriginals doesn't count as evidence. Is there a study about aboriginals failing to build modern houses? Have you had direct experience with aboriginals? Or are you just making stuff up?
They could potentially be less intelligent (depending on how we measure intelligence) but it's really hard to disentangle genetic from environmental factors, if you know what I mean.
Everything is arbitrary indeed and if you look at genomes we can show that all existing species share a common ancestor. There's no way we will ever find consensual criteria for splitting or lumping species in groups.
Anyway classification isn't what matters. What matters is causation: does gene x cause behavior y?
>Is there a study about aboriginals failing to build modern houses?
No of course there is not. Because actually proving the difference between men and woman and the difference between races is so wildly political incorrect that no one dares to do them.
>Have you had direct experience with aboriginals? Or are you just making stuff up?
Nigga, did the aboriginals have any kind of civilization when whites came to Australia? No. Do they have any now? No. Why is that? Because they can't.
>There's no way we will ever find consensual criteria for splitting or lumping species in groups.
Except when people need a marrow transplant, then all of the sudden people can find consensus.
washingtonpost.com
"f you become ill with a blood cancer or other disease that requires a stem cell transplant, here’s an uncomfortable fact: Your race matters."
"For a successful transplant, donor and recipient must have nearly identical genes regulating certain immune cells. These genes evolved in response to the disease threats people faced long ago. “Tell me where your ancestors lived 500 years ago, and I’ll tell you who your potential donors are,” says Jeffrey Chell, an internist who leads the National Marrow Donor Program, also known as Be The Match."
Nigga,
Yes, these questions are politically incorrect but science is advancing anyway. There have been many of studies on genetics and criminal behavior, genetics and intelligence, etc. A lot of people are rewarded for holding politically incorrect views. Jordan Peterson is an example. He might be shunned by some swjs and professors, but overall the guy is successful and is probably making a ton of money.
On the aboriginals. Presence or absence of civilization isn't determined only by intelligence. It's much more complicated than that. Your medieval ancestors weren't genetically very different from you, yet they were much poorer and less educated than you.
Now let's say you want to run an experiment to test whether aboriginals are less intelligent than you. How would you measure intelligence anyway? I've done research among indigenous populations. You can't just go to a village and ask people to answer IQ tests. Tests mean nothing for them.
Your medieval ancestors would probably have done the same if they were asked by a time traveler to answer the Raven's Matrices. They would see those tests as a waste of time.
The most important thing you can do for the white race is keep your own life in order. You must be successful, reliable, hardworking, and, above all, happy. Do people in your life trust and respect you? What does your family think of you? Racial politics doesn’t have to be the only factor of that.
If you can’t achieve these things in your real life, then you are wasting your time here. How can you think you are able to help others, when you can’t help yourself? Always remember: we live in first world countries and have opportunity that most people born on this planet don’t. Spend your time wisely and keep your real life priorities in order. Nothing on the internet should ever take away from your real life.
>You ask a bunch of 100% pureblooded aboriginals to build a modern house with everything installed without help from others. They can't do it and you can't teach them.
but what do you mean by this?
are you saying they need to be able to mine every single mineral, manufacture and assemble all tools, factories, r&d new materials etc before they can prove they're capable of building a house?
they need to set up every single bureaucratic & regulatory institution that's taken 1000s of years of western development to accomplish?
they need to do a 1:1 independent replica of western construction ?
of course that's impossible to replicate. they don't even really own the land to do it on, by law they'd have to work with white people who control the safety & regulation side of construction
if you're talking about using already made tools & materials and assembling a house, they can do it, there's 100% owned & operated indigenous construction groups that do build homes and other things
but if you're expecting a group of people who were in the stone age only a few generations ago (and some even more recent due to how long it took europeans to get to central australia) to be able to replicate western civilization then you're asking for way too much
>Presence or absence of civilization isn't determined only by intelligence.
It is an absolute prerequisite.
>How would you measure intelligence anyway?
Iq test that are cross-cultural. They exist, they been used, they show difference. Then they been used on adopted children. Say a black kid adopted by whites. They show difference. This is common knowledge. Just very political incorrect.
en.wikipedia.org
"Rushton & Jensen (2005) wrote that, in the United States, self-identified blacks and whites have been the subjects of the greatest number of studies. They stated that the black-white IQ difference is about 15 to 18 points or 1 to 1.1 standard deviations (SDs), which implies that between 11 and 16 percent of the black population have an IQ above 100 (the general population median). According to Arthur Jensen and J. Philippe Rushton the black-white IQ difference is largest on those components of IQ tests that are claimed best to represent the general intelligence factor g.[46] The 1996 APA report "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" and the 1994 editorial statement "Mainstream Science on Intelligence" gave more or less similar estimates.[47][48] Roth et al. (2001), in a review of the results of a total of 6,246,729 participants on other tests of cognitive ability or aptitude, found a difference in mean IQ scores between blacks and whites of 1.1 SD. Consistent results were found for college and university application tests such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (N = 2.4 million) and Graduate Record Examination (N = 2.3 million), as well as for tests of job applicants in corporate sections (N = 0.5 million) and in the military (N = 0.4 million).[49]"
>but what do you mean by this?
I line up the experiment in this essay, but for women.
archive.is
Also, see pic.
>if you're talking about using already made tools & materials and assembling a house, they can do it, there's 100% owned & operated indigenous construction groups that do build homes and other things
That is swell, then the experiment should be done. Just wanna point out the irony of your picture. Only one of those men has the chanceto be 100% pureblooded. The two others are mixed.
they're all full blooded
you really know nothing about aboriginals
Why don't you start calling yourself "native/indigenous Europeans" instead of white?
Why we never talk or hear about Native-Europeans but we constantly hear about other native peoples around the world? Why we talk about "white" Europeans and not Native-Europeans. There aren't any "white" Europeans because all the white people are Native-Europeans.
Hell, try even Google about native or indigenous Europeans and you find nothing...
...
...
...
?
Women still can't build a house without men.
Discovered the structure of DNA. DNA was discovered much earlier.
jews previous to this - such as (((franz boaz))) - pushed that there were no differences among the races.
(((steven pinker))) is essentially a jewish supremicist. he tries to get jews to not be afraid of racial differences , arguing that high iq is "good for the jews"
youtube.com
he is currently head professor of psychology at harvard
?
...
Women still can't build a house without men.
I was responding to what you said about aboriginals, not women
see
>(((unawarded)))
I wonder why.
Women still can't build a house without men.
what does that have to do with aboriginals?
Can you prove they are full blooded? Not just
>here is picture they are in Aussie land that means full blooded
But can you fully confirm through an unbiased means that they are 100℅ abos no white or European at all
And you wonder why scientists don't even think about coming out of the closet.
Yes, and instead of presenting me with a house build by 100% pureblooded aboriginals you give me pictures that means just as much as those pictures I show you with women. Women can't build houses without men and so far you showed nothing that proves that aboriginals can.
You must have a personal emotions involved n this if you can't understand that.
Darwin
he mentions the malafort twins, who were seperated at birth, raised seperatly and bumped into each other at the patent office with the same invention in their hands.
I can't find anything on google about this, am I just spelling the name wrong? Sounds really interesting so pls reply if u know
...
Lot of pics of abos doing basic shit like grinding and wielding or operating machinery something you can train a kid to do...but so far I've not seen any pictures of abos laying out housing plans or abos directing other abos how to follow a basic pipe laying plan? Or even any proof that they are 100% abo other than
>They are cause I said so
>no double top plate
wew lad
In the scientific community, you've got something called peer review.
If your paper challenges the accepte PC paradigm, it wont get published. Its as simple as that.
Then the leftists come out and scream "yus got no scientific proof man"
IQ tests try to be cross cultural. In theory.
However, the notion of being tested isn't universal. In societies with low schooling people simply don't understand what it means to be tested, and as a consequence they won't focus on the tests. People just don't pay any attention to stuff that doesn't matter for them.