What did Molymeme mean by this?

What did Molymeme mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/845291728626241536
youtube.com/watch?v=mbEfzuCLoAQ
youtube.com/watch?v=vOodPSfCDa0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Monogamy
>Monopoly

Someone got cucked

Molymeme is a cuck confirmed

that he is a disgusting cuck

He's an Atheist and a Canadian. Did you actually expect him to not be a cuck?

For those two to be comparable you would need to be talking about all women in the world. Monopoly means one-many, monogamy means one-marriage, as in, one love partner. Stefan just talks shit out of his ass these days.

>"if you oppose business monopolies you should let other people compete for your partner too"

That's an apples to oranges comparison. wtf is he thinking?

He means that people who oppose monopolies aren't cucks.

I dont agree with the bastard I was just explaining his idiotic point.

wtf i love monopolies now

>Tryhard meme philosopher man attempts to get witty

Call me when he has more than an MA in History. Fucking imbecile talking head.

A relationship isn't a monopoly it's a contract

You break the contract, and the other person has a right to be pissed

How can a monopoly be in existence when there are approximately 3.75 billion other people who serve as competition?

How fucking dumb can you be?

>a consensual contract between two parties is a monopoly hurr durr
Cuck logic

Has he been exposed as controlled opposition finally?

Molymeme is a long winded faggot anyway. I have never made it through a single one of his videos.

Who are you quoting?

>doesnt understand meme text

Who are you quoting?

they are meme arrows

we are quoting memes

MOLYNEUX PROUD KEK!!!!! Sup Forums ETERNALLY BTFO ONCE AGAIN!!!!!! DESTINY ALWAYS WINS!!!!

Those who fiercely oppose interracial sex get angry when a dog fucks their wife. Think about it

Molyneux has fucking lost it. Something happened to him around mid january and he started unravelling. It's quite sad to see.

Ah got it. People oppose monopolies on business, but not monopolies on sex because apparently, those are equivalent somehow.

CUT HIM OFF MIKE

JUST

>businesses generate profit
>wives generate a loss
If anything, women are the exact opposite of revenue. We spend money on them.
Now that I really think about...we are their businesses...

I literally listen to his videos when I want to go to sleep. He knows a lot of people do this too, he makes subtle jokes about it sometimes.

...

He's pro open relationships like every other beta numale Sup Forums has ever made fun of.

You have a monopoly over your partner, you don't share them with anyone else.

MARRIAGE IS A LITERAL CONTRACT YOU FRENCH FUCK

BUSINESSES CAN'T BREAK CONTRACTS EITHER YOU SHIT

>that kid who replies to every post on the thread

And those who support government monopolies enjoy sharing their wives with every Tom, Dick and Harry they can find.

MAGAIC

The more I read this and think about it the less it makes sense. I dunno if I'm just being dumb but it seems like he has no point at all, and if there is a point it is contradictory

>stefan Molymeme attempting to make a cuck joke

>Molymeme is got cucked by a woman
>He shittalks single mothers every episode
It all makes sense now.

link?

This. So many Stef haters and they can't even make a good argument against him. Fucking shills

twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/845291728626241536

Polyneux

What does that even mean?
Did he make a typo?

people will squash a mosquito but get upset when their entire family is murdered. Sad!

Monopoly = control over all means by 1 company.
Affair = control over all mens by 1 woman.
Naturally if you oppose one, you oppose the other.

>wants one business to own all the means of production
>doesn't want one man to own all women
Huh. Really made me think.

He thinks that monopolies are fine as long as they are voluntary.

>individual ownership/partnership/love combo
VS
>complete control of a trade or industry to point of megalomania
I'm gen y and even I know this is fucking retarded. Holy fuck boomers are the problem. It's not even funny, just a sick joke

This is what happens when liberals take control. They confuse rule of law with their feelings under the guise of "ethics"

Not an arguement.

Apples and oranges.

Expected no better from a wannabe celebrity.

>monopolies are inherently wrong and bad and I don't like them

reminder that absolute monopolies cannot form in an unregulated free market.

because partnerships and marriages are fucking contracts of exclusivity, fucking retard.

>think about it
>people unironically believe he's a philosopher

fucking this

Ok I'm not THAT principled Stef

at the same time there doesn't need to be 100 companies making a wrench. what's the point of that? why not just have 10 companies making the best wrench?

well that's besides the point, because there are certain industries where monopolies are bad, and others where it's good. With transportation, having the "private sector" has been bad for trains for example versus state owned transportation, just watch this:

youtube.com/watch?v=mbEfzuCLoAQ

That's it Mike, get Stefan off my show!

Mollygamy

he's a fucking retarded pseudo-intellectual which people take seriously even though his inner cuck and nu-male pathetic self peeks it's ugly head out constantly.

at least he's more intelligent than his horde of mindless drone fans that think he is a genius

Wait What? Is he saying being upset at a cheating spouse is wrong?

Oh come on Stefan that's a retarded comparison.

lurk more pls

I'm not the one abusing the quote function, newfriend.

Is he saying his fans should think of him as their one true source of love?

Its true though, why kind of statist pig wouldn't have an affair?

...

Who's to say what the "best wrench" is? Maybe you only need a cheapo wrench because you'll use it twice a year. Maybe you need one with a funky handle to fit into a machine you're fixing up. Maybe someone else comes up with a process to make the same wrench more efficiently. Etc.

>molyneux is a cuck
damn that's eye opening.

damn, beat me to it.

>Cucklyneux

WEW

>cheating

The other way around. He'd be rationalizing cheating.

also literally not an argument. just an unsourced false equivalence where he steps back and let's you "think about it"

is this guy having a breakdown? this is shades of utter cuckery

That proves you need to lurk more.

>If you're a true libertarian let other men fuck your wife
t. Molycuck

Which video was that from? I remember seeing it but I don't feel like sifting through all of his videos to find it.

no, the way he compares sex to business and trade suggests he's in a cuckold mindset where he's getting outleveraged and his relationships are volatile. IE: he's cucked.

What did Ben mean by this?

>oppose monopoly
>oppose breech of contract
Problem Molycuck?

Not bad.

Libertarians are cucks though.

>Muh free market means you have to let Mexicans come in and break the laws!

his tweet wasn't an argument.

unsourced cuck fantasy

Why does the middle horse have a piece of the triforce?

Marriage is a disgusting monopoly that ends in affairs and divorce anyways.

only if one of the partners stops satisfying the other sexually and emotionally

unfortunately since humans are lazy and selfish this is almost always the case

Stef has some bad analogies. Doesn't mean he is bad a philosopy though. He has some very good videos and I can overlook some of the little stupid things he does.

Everyone but cucks?

Molyneux is dropping redpills so hard and he is /LIT/ as well
youtube.com/watch?v=vOodPSfCDa0
>check Japan terrorism
>last attack was domestic terrorist back in 1995
Japan is the true nation

If I'm against monopolies I should let another man fuck my wife?

Is this a statement on why corporations arent people or is he a cuck or both?

Isn't his argument that it's ok to have a monopoly if you're the best option? Idk

yes it can.

>unregulated market
>people organize them with weapons and decide they're the new law in town
>suddenly they've got an absolute monopoly

reminder that there's never and will never be such a thing as an unregulated market

Hes defending monopolies/ authoritarian rule.
Thought more people would see this.

I find the principles he sells are just the ancap-libertarian-NAP rebranded. It's ultimately deceptive since ancap libertarian counter-arguments have been distilled on Sup Forums to the point that it's impossible to seriously defend.

I don't mind him, but when he tweets out cuck shit like this, he's trespassing on my territory.

N.a.a. is getting very tiresome

He doesn't oppose monopolies. He's making fun of liberals who are hypocritical

Keksandra weeps

Wow... that really made me think about it... damn...

he means that if you expect everyone you meet to have the exact same views as you, and if they don't you consider them retarded assholes, you're not going to have a good time.

Ben should cut the tinfoil content for a little bit

>What did Molymeme mean by this?
He wants to fuck his cult subordinates wives obviously

that's a shit argument