Nazis saved the German economy

>Nazis saved the German economy
when will this meme end?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy
youtube.com/watch?v=_r9Z-hTn1r4
nber.org/chapters/c9480.pdf
historylearningsite.co.uk/nazi-germany/nazi-germany-military-expenditure/
aryanism.net/politics/economics/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>muh Red Cross reports

>Greatest Story Never Told

(you)

I'll save your thread from the archives

>anything that is contradictory to my nazi circlejerk is BAIT
you stormfags really cannot see through anything but what is fed to you on a daily basis by your stormfag superiors, you are not redpilled, you are simply brainwashed.

prove what I have posted wrong Hans, you stormfag.

>if I meme arrow and say stormfag I win

...

can you prove the pics I posted wrong? I really can't understand the stormfag process of thought.

Nazis made some healthy people. Just a guess

that's not provable and irrelevant.

>yfw you realize that the devil kikes funded both sides in both world wars
>yfw germans killed american troops while riding in american trucks
>yfw everyone was played like a fiddle
>yfw they are still using the same tricks

Ok do you understand how currency worked in nazi germany? Cause I don't think you do

>>not provable
>healthy people irrelevant

What kind of twisted belief makes you say that? Healthy people and environment are a direct consequence of a functioning economy. Monetary values won't get you anywhere.
Also, you don't "prove" evidence, you try to disprove it!

No, they geared it for war, did a good job at doing that, and sadly lost the war. Their entire economic model was set up around war and the annexation of other countries. Had they just successfully invaded their neighbours, we'd be telling a different story.

They put a huge emphasis on short term goals because their end game was war. Had they not planned for war, their economic model would have been different.

So, I'd quantify your charge, and instead say, "The economic recovery of Nazi Germany would not have been feasible without the contingency of war"

and they did go to war, like they planned to from the beginning. What the fuck is your point.

>anglo education
Good goy always believe the war economy propoganda even though he offered peace to Britain

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic

"By November 1923, the US dollar was worth 4,210,500,000,000 German marks."

This was 10 years before Hitler, btw.

1. Peace Treaties are not any kind of law and have never been. When a nation finds it in their disinterest to follow them, they will break them.
2. Nobody claims the leaders of the Räterrepublic were Russian. Nobody claims the main instigators of the Novemberrevoultion were Communists.
3.
4. I'll add something to this later
5. Yes he said he was going to exterminate the Jewish race from the face of Europe. It is a metaphor. Also Hitler didn't genocide any jews.
6. So you're admitting that Poland did commit atrocities to the German people, not only that, but before Germans did so to the Poles?
7. Explain the civilians that died as part of it. Also, Poland did have say over what happens in Danzig, otherwise it wouldn't have been independent.
8. Nothing to say about this.
9. If it was a (as claimed) shitty retarded, then why wouldn't they have any interest in renegoitating it? Why would Poland not event look at it?
10. Considering the other European powers were acting against Germany there was no interest in holding up any agreements made with them.
11. There were no jews killed in a genocidal manner.
12. [Citation needed] also why does it matter that the allies had supply lines in this case when it is about the German supply lines?
pic down right:
most jewish soldiers were spared by hitlers government

National Socialist economy wasn't gold backed, hence there is no debt which was basically the fucking point considering Germany was dead broke, the whole point of National Socialism is to reduce the slavish evaluation of human effort via capital and replace material backing with labour backing. There can be no debt if there are no banks, and there is no central interest-based printing bank, or any kikes to loan you considering they've all been kicked out.

So much for the "I'm an economist guise trust me". Appeal to authority fallacy, faggot.

op, comment?

Well he offered peace to Britain for sure, he really liked Anglos

Poland tho deserved to go up in flames. Just reading Mein Kampf you can tell he was predisposed to war and annexation from the beginning.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy

Kraft durch Freude was a part of the German Labour Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF), the national German labour organization at that time. Set up as a tool to promote the advantages of National Socialism to the people, it soon became the world's largest tourism operator of the 1930s

It was quite successful up until the outbreak of World War II. By 1934, over two million Germans had participated on a KdF trip; by 1939 the reported numbers lay around 25 million people.

25 MILLION PEOPLE ON FREE HOLIDAYS TO MADAGASCAR BOY MUST BE A FAILING ECONOMY THERE

>National Socialist economy wasn't gold backed

No, it was silver backed you negroid.

Lebensraum in Osten refers to eastern Germany

>There can be no debt if there are no banks
wrong

seems like you are blaming the intermediary. Banks just bring debtors and lenders together. They just increase the efficiency that you can borrow or lend at

Silver from where, jackass? Your ass? How was 1933 Germany going to revise its economy with material?

>inb4 they stole all the Jew gold

Redundant considering they didn't allow conversion for currency in stead of mercantilism, which was an immediate effect to stop American kikes from buying up German industry with the massive conversion rates

There's a reason why they hid all the gold in fucking lakes, nobody wanted them!

You do realize the Nazis were mercantile traders right? They completely stopped speculation of any kind in currency which is the whole point of removing material backing, snownigger.

>what is national debt
Germany had one bank, the Reichsbank, the Economic Ministry HQ, printed money without INTEREST with no material backing

>what is international debt
To stop speculation they traded internationally in mercantile terms, exchange german machinery for raw material etc.

Nigga go read how debt works before making abhorrent leafposts, start with the federal reserve

Oh yeah banks are totally awesome that's why JP Morgan and cronies engineered the Great Depression with their phony loans

Pro tip: Read about margin loans and when they were made

just got here, anything habbening?

srry wrong thread

The predisposition to war was a thing for the whole world at the time. Mein Kampf is not a reliable source for this.

Are you saying they wouldn't have stopped annexiation?

>The economic recovery of Nazi Germany would not have been feasible without the contingency of war
Today I see atleast 2 economies that don't seem to be able to sustain themselve without continuous war.

I urge you faux economists to watch this without drinking the government koolaid

youtube.com/watch?v=_r9Z-hTn1r4

There's a reason why 55 countries attacked Germany, kiddies

Pro tip: It wasn't to save poor old Poland! Ask yourself, what happened to Poland after the war began on the pretext of protecting her sovereignty? Annexed by Soviets! Remember kids, this Russian is your friend, he fights for FREEDUMB

Mein Kampf isn't a reliable source for the political inclinations of Hitler and the National Socialist party?? I'm saying the annexation would have stopped eventually once the rampant overheating was satiated.

What's your point

>by 1937 Germany had to reduce military spending

TOP FUCKING KEK THIS IS WHAT BRAZILIAN INTELLECTUALS LOOK LIKE

nber.org/chapters/c9480.pdf
historylearningsite.co.uk/nazi-germany/nazi-germany-military-expenditure/

CHART 9

1935: 8%
1936: 13%
1937: 13%
1938: 17%
1939: 23%
1940: 38%
1941: 47%
1942: 55%
1943: 61%

Turns out they didn't change military spending in 1936-37. Wew lad.

And after that they increased military spending. Hmmm...

Also your bureaucratic babbling is pointless in an economic debate if you don't back it up with facts on HOW EXACTLY it led to economic deterioration, and pretty fucking rich to assume a state that was in power for 2 years to have a perfect hierarchical system, countries don't work that way faggot

>the timeframe is from 1938 to 1939

Oh boy, did you think people won't read this drivel? Nazis set up shop in 1933 bucko, 1928 was Weimar.

Care to explain why you are discussing national socialist economy while including 5 years of Weimar Germany with fuckall degrees of hyperinflation?

*1928-1939

aryanism.net/politics/economics/

Read this you newfags, you all make me fucking sick that you don't do required reading and decide to enlighten us with your communist brouhaha, LURK MOAR RETARDS

My point? I simply criticize you method of evaluating historic events. "Mein kampf" is just another bible and hardly suffices to properly reflect on history. Nothing more