>Asian Americans commit violent crime at the same rate as Asian countries
>White Americans commit violent crime at the same rate as European countries
>Hispanics lower but on par with South America
>Blacks same as Africa, a little lower but income is a major factor
Whats that about?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
sciencedirect.com
twitter.com
S-s-social constructs?
nice. got some new argument to use if i ever meet some liberals
Ya' don't say
Well, white police also topple black communities at the same rate as white nations topple black countries
WE
Also the Great Depression didn't increase crime rates at all.
But muh inequality
So its white peoples fault everyone seems to have certain behavior you can track world wide.
good stuff
so why didn't africans ever put themselves in the position to do the toppling.
Everybody talks about how africa has been raped and pillaged by colonial rule over the years but I would like to know why africans didn't do it first?
It's because they are literally inferior.
Well, no, it's just you would expect victims of crime to be more willing to engage in crime themselves.
If you're so tough and mighty why are you so desperate to paint nonwhites as villains? Are you feeling guilty?
good post.
No one ever talks about the ottomans oppressing blacks or the Chinese who are literally doing it today
>Well, no, it's just you would expect victims of crime to be more willing to engage in crime themselves.
You have a warped view of history. which revolves around denying all evidence
>Well, no, it's just you would expect victims of crime to be more willing to engage in crime themselves.
are you sure? you would think a victim of crime would be more likely to want to uphold the rule of law to prevent additional crime.
Holy FUCK!
What, if any, is the counter argument?
But I thought whites were superior to those backwards barbarians.
good post.
If a man sees that he is surrounded by criminals, and that the authorities' only intervention into the situation is to either help the criminals or to take advantage of the situation themselves, he is inclined to turn to criminal behavior himself, since there is hardly any other future for him.
probably an appeal to emotion.
Socio economic status only accounts for 3% of differences.
>crime rate in Africa
higher poverty level and lower education caused by "scramble of Africa" by European colonization is a major factor for increased crime rate in Africa
>Black's history of slavery and discrimination caused cycle of poverty along generations with lower opportunity for education to move up the social ladder which lead to higher crime rate.
>correlation does not equal casualty
Anyone who knows statistics should know this. There are many different factors for causality and genetic racial factor to crime could be slim to none.
>economic development of the country and opportunity for education is the largest factor in determining the crime rate, not race.
>You are cherry picking certain data to support your political agenda which is very illogical and ignorant.
...
We're all products of our evolutionary environment
Superiority doesn't mean anything in an evolutionary sense. Whats Superior today may be extinction tomarrow
good luck meeting one who will listen.
That's bullshit and you are a buffoon.
The point is; acting like a subhuman towards subhumans with the justification that they act like subhumans makes you no more than a subhuman.
>If a man sees that he is surrounded by criminals, and that the authorities' only intervention into the situation is to either help the criminals or to take advantage of the situation themselves, he is inclined to turn to criminal behavior himself, since there is hardly any other future for him.
your mind is a strange place of ifs and buts wrapped in a false narrative.
it's clear criminal behavior has a strong genetic component as does intelligence.
Okay but allowing our population to become a majority sub 90 IQ people seems really fucking stupid
Past demographics who cares, your right
Adjusted for income black crime rates are still higher.
Adjusted for IQ (IQ set to 100) black and white incomes (though not total wealth) are about the same.
Explain how the most egregious criminal action against Western society in all of recorded history, WW2, was committed by extremely white people and in the name of white supremacism, then.
The population already is majority sub 90 IQ my good sir. The time for thinking in terms of nations ended half a century ago.
D-DELETE
alternatively the high poverty and low intelligence could be caused by the genetic traits that also lead to high crime rates.
is it really just a huge coincidence that western european people have spread all over the world and created civilizations much like the ones they originated from while west africans have also spread all over the world and they too create the environment seen in their homelands every single time? even west africans in western european origin countries recreate the same west african conditions.
WE WUZ ZULU N SHEET
It isn't though we are at 95 and falling
90 is the threshold for a free democratic nation. which you can see looking around the wide
By definition IQ test is normed at 100, and our 100 is harder to get than it was 100 years ago (Flynn effect). So no, we're not sub-90 iq majority, just certain demographics are (the ones breeding)
you want me to explain the entirety of WW2 to you? here's the short, the Nazis were a reaction to the destruction of the german people caused by jewish nepotism. the jews are exceedly good at subversion and propaganda and used those traits to convince other countries to attack the germans under the guise that the germans were genocidal maniacs when in reality they simply wanted to deport the non-germans. even after the war ended the propaganda never ceased. it begs the question, if the germans really were these killer maniacs we've been told they were, why then after the war were they able to do a complete 180 and become a modern, safe, highly ranked and developed country?
the jewish parasite is the greatest threat to white civilization because they twist the good nature of white people into committing terrible acts under a false narrative.
ITT: Sup Forums still thinks Liberals give a fuck about statistics, mathematics, and objective evidence. Guys, the Globalist Left decided 50 years ago (((Civil Rights movement))) that the world's authorities will ignore racial realism in favor of a one-world multicultural government that crushes nationalists under their boot heel. They do not care about your numbers and charts. The only way that we have any hope of saving our countries and civilization is to militantly organize ourselves around White Christian identity, and confidently assert our right to determine the conditions of our existence. It is really that simple. Either wake up and learn to openly stand up for yourselves, or just shut up and watch while globalist psychopaths rape your homeland, your countrymen, and the future of your civilization.
Any responses?
slavery was already a practice in Africa, coastal tribes went inland to catch new slaves and sold them to other countries
You are a total neanderthal. The destruction of the German people did not cause nearly as much suffering to ethnic Northern Europeans as did the German chimp out.
Why is it modern and safe? Because ethnic Germans are indistinguishable from WASPs and other Aryans, who controlled the post-world order with an iron fist. Thus making them completely compatible.
How can you possibly justify WW2 when it caused millions of young Nordic males to be sent into slaughterhouses?
baka look at the entire list to some of the all black countries are below crime rate of Russia and US.
not sure what point you're trying to make.
WW2 happened because germany tried to cast off the chains of jewish oppression. that is the starting point for what eventually became WW2. no justification needed. germany would have been sucked dry if they had done nothing.
How did the Race fall prey to the Jewish menace in the first place?
just googled both places, stats are wrong beattyville is significantly higher then viewpark
That would imply whites are superior. But you're not racist, are you Tyrone?
African kings where the most rich humans at some point.
To be honest this it's just how they roll.
>Reading comprehension
One was 100 years ago you fucking retard. Look at the demographics in 2017
Of course there are average differences in different ethnic groups. Every group developed for thousands of years in different areas of the globe, with different climates and different environments.
Not superior so much as villainous.
You may as well say blacks breaking into a white man's home and stealing his possessions are superior to him. Militarily, yes. Ethically, no. And the subject of this thread is not OOGA BOOGA MUH DIKS BIGGER, but rather the ostensible ethical failings of minorities.
the western europeans good nature. you see the same thing happening in white countries today. they want to let the "other" in. oh lets save the refugees, oh we should become more multi-cultural and accepting. then eventually it turns out that not all groups are created equal and it causes a crisis in the country. now the new generation are tasked with solving the problem that blind acceptance and tolerance created. sometimes the solution necessitates violence as it was left to go on too long.
if you don't believe germany would have been destroyed by the jews had it done nothing, i'd like you to study the case of rhodesia and south africa. both are countries that were exceptional under white rule. did you know the end of white rule in those countries were initiated by jewish groups? the big difference between germany and rhodesia/south africa is that the rhodesians/south african whites did not fight back. they let it happen. now we have a zimbabwe that has committed white genocide and is starving, relying on foreign aid and south africa is following after it with the crumbling of european built infrastructure and murder capitol of the world.
Well, I really see no evidence to suggest the Jews would have genocided the German people had the Holocaust never happened. After all, Germany was integrated into the post-war, "Jewish" order, and yet its ethnic German population has increased since then.
Rhodesia and South Africa both had an already existing native underclass that significantly outnumbered the white population, which is why revolution was inevitable, there.
I really don't see why you're so paranoid.
r-racists are all the same!! it's evil racist peoples fault!!!
Well, what happened in the soviet union makes me think otherwise
no paranoia. when you understand the effects of race in society you can see clearly where certain policies will lead you. currently white countries are headed towards another crisis because their policies are ignorant of history and race. they say history repeats itself and it's very true. this century we are guaranteed to see either a resurgence of white nationalism, or we will see many once great countries crumble under a multi-cultural, multi-racial society.
i wish it didn't have to be like this, as do most other whites. the only difference is the young and naive don't know that it will happen until it's too late.
>race is determinant at 80% in everything
More news at 11
It already is too late. Ordering the world along ethnic lines just isn't politically or economically feasible.
That was the object lesson of WW2.
For the past 50 years the West has done its best to ignore the suffering of everyone unfortunate enough to be born a different color; now it is all coming crumbling down.
cis white males made the truth racist.
obviously
You're racist
thats it....This is the counter argumentIts your fault
India and parts of China too. Why is Singapore so rich after being owned my Brittiania?
>>Blacks same as Africa, a little lower but income is a major factor
Remember that American blacks have been mixing with whites for a while, which boosts their IQ. And T B F they do have better diets, less lead poisoning, rtc.
>If you're so tough and mighty why are you so desperate to paint nonwhites as villains? Are you feeling guilty?
(((Marxism)))
I don't understand, are you actually butthurt that you aren't genetically superior to 6 billion people? Why would you be butthurt about that?
>implying shitskins never suffered in their native squalor before the rise of the west
>implying Europeans never suffered or experienced squalid conditions
>implying you're not a fucking retard zombie who gets a kick out of being able to be racist against a group of people in this age who never did anything to you but build the greatest civilization ever seen in human history, that you enjoy the fruits of, while you become precisely like that aspect of white people you supposedly hate: that they supposedly went out of their way to make poor, innocent PoC's suffer.
you make me sick
>white police topple black communities
Oh so it's white people's fault that blacks rob, murder, abandon their kids, beat their kids, etc.?
Say, if black communities are "toppled" by whites, doesn't that mean blacks are dependent on whites for a better life? And doesn't that means, then, that blacks must be inferior. If they can't sort shit out themselves?
And if it's so horrible being around white people, why are all the black and brown people flooding over here? Why don't they just fuck off back home?
Do you know what % of, say, Nigeria is white? Why don't you look it up for me.
t.
>That's the counter-argument
It's not even a fucking argument.
>why are you so desperate to paint nonwhites as villains?
>bitten by dog
>never pet dogs again
>OMG DOGIST BIGOT WHY ARE PAINTING DOGS THIS WAY
Well its working for some reason..I don't know why but it is
>Ordering the world along ethnic lines just isn't politically or economically feasible.
>That was the object lesson of WW2.
well you say that, but germany, united ethnically and politically, saw an amazing economic recovery and it took nearly the entire developed world to take them down. they say diversity is our greatest strength, but with results like that i'm not so sure.
history will repeat itself.
>WAAA HES BEING RACIST
>HES OPPRESSING US ;_______;
Sound familiar?
>Say, if black communities are "toppled" by whites, doesn't that mean blacks are dependent on whites for a better life?
Well, no, actually. That isn't what that means at all.
As for white people, well... the vast majority aren't bad. Everyone loves white people. The only problem is the small minority which are aggressively, histrionically racist. They're a bit of a stick in the mud, know what I mean? They cause the social order to break down, make people feel poorly about themselves, and generally are a nuisance. Sometimes ya start to wonder if society, well, just might be a bit better off without them...
Aha ha ha ha ha. Who the hell am I kidding. I'm not really a kike, I fucking abhor niggers. Carry on, fellas.
Remember that Europeans were able to invade and conquer African territories due to superior technology. Europe was already a lot more developed than Africa.
Plus, colonial territories where the population had high iq (such as Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore) + the ones settled by Europeans mostly (Australia, USA, Canada, New Zealand) are also developed today.
>genetic racial fator for crime COULD BE slim to none
en.m.wikipedia.org
>economic development of the country and opportunity for education is the largest factor in determining the crime rate
Oh... And what determines education and economic development? :^)
Nice. Saved.
If there were no blacks, rape, assaults, robberies, would all plummet also.
>NOTE TO SELF: No blacks on Martian colony.
>slavery was already a practice in Africa,
Before the contact with the White European man, they already did that themselves...
Afterwards, the European man only traded them and transported by sea.
>sound familiar?
yeah, it sounds like faggots like you
>The only problem is the small minority which are aggressively, histrionically racist.
I wonder who (((they))) might be
This is the kind of racism that caused Dylann Roof to shot those innocent people. You are the worst kind of people in the world
>how the most egregious criminal action against Western society in all of recorded history, WW2
1. The """victims""" were almost entirely white you numbskull
2. The Holodimir
3. Why limit it to Western society? Of course the perpetrators would be white. Why not The Great Leap Forward?
The Holocaust, if it even happened, was not the worst atrocity ever committed. From your posting you seem pretty new here?
Welcome. You'll never leave and your friends and family will come to hate you.
Can you imagine how much MORE of a shithole Africa would be if it wasn't for white people teaching them about the wheel, etc.?
Look at what happened to Zimbabwe after they chased out / Holocausted the whites; look at South Africa since the end of Apartheid; look at Liberia, a black """utopia""" for freed US slaves.
Not to mention how much slavery there was in Africa. White people didn't invent slavery. But half a million white people did die ending slavery.
Really gets the noggin joggin'.
>more people would be willing to take public transportation
>people would subsequently breathe cleaner air
>average life span would increase
>wouldn't have to abandon perfectly good cities, and there would be less suburban sprawl
>decrease in farmland being to converted to sub-divisions.
>food prices drop
>people subsequently eat healthier foods
>adds more years to life span
>insurance costs decline
>people have extra money to by health club memberships
>increasing average life span even more
>Americans end up living to be 100 years, in perfect health
>work till their 80,increasig tax base
>more taxes allows government to fund brain and genitalia transplants into bio droids
>Americans now live a couple hundred more years
We could live to be a thousand, if not for the black menace!
>what's the counterargument?
RACIST, RACIST, RACIST, RACIST, RACIST, RACIST.
This is what I keep saying here.
Kuruminha meme is just that, a meme.
Most "natives" in the Amazon are absolutely horrendous.
The money dumped into Africa, to keep them alive, is in the billions. Without white input the population there would decline to a few million, in sub-Saharan Africa
I'll leave this here.
sciencedirect.com
Wow, that's fascinating.
On the sex front, blacker counties in the US watch more gay porn. (Pic related but I haven't made it memeworthy yet.)
You can take the nigger out of the jungle, but you can't take the jungle out of the nigger.
So it's true. Blacks can't into civilization, and never will be able to.
Into the garbage they go. We gave it the college try but it was never meant to be.
>people would breathe cleaner air
You mean without niggers stinking it up?
...