What do all the R's mean?

what do all the R's mean?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entryism
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAP

it means all the republicans are a bunch of sellouts

does it just mean "representative" or something? seems redundant because every one has it.

oh okay. that's trump's party right? wow. seems like shilling then? I thought you guys didn't like that.

follow up question: is this part of the "winning"?

>buy senators history
>release it
>?????
>profit

>Republicans
>Trumps party
How new are you?

Gosh, if only there were a way to influence the behavior of private companies that engage in voluntary transactions with consumers that didn't involve legislation.

drumpf is finished

very new. don't follow politics. humor me.

did Trump run as a democrat, republican, or independent?

and if the republican party is full of shills who would almost all vote for this, why would Trump choose to run as one of them? was he just deceiving people then if he isn't a true republican? I guess that kinda makes him a shill either way. huh.

can anyone explain?

>Manipulate what you see
>Monitor you

Rolling in the dough.

he ran for republican but wasn't really accepted by most republicans. He didn't run for democrats because they are the vilest creatures on Earth.

yes.

Trump and Ron Paul ran as republicans because we really do only have a two party system in the US. The problem is that both those parties are essentially the same fucking party anyway. HOWEVER Trump and Ron Paul are obviously not strictly republicans as we all know Ron Paul is a libertarian and Trump is probably more of a mix of a few different things as he isn't a traditional republican retard or a libertarian or a leftist. Its something competently different that we've been trying to put into the white house. The media has been shilling that Trump is a republican and the republicans actually listen to trump but guess what. Trump doesn't run the republicans at all they are all for the most part running against him (i'd say 70/30) behind closed doors if not right out in the open. I'm not sure why you don't understand this it seems you just now started coming Sup Forums

Because there is a virtually 0% chance of winning in the US as an independent. His views do tend to lean more republican than democratic, however i wouldn't call him a republican at all.

this only shows how flawed the US is with their two party system. On one hand you have a bunch of globalists who want to important as many third world migrants to their country in order to secure votes in the future, and on the other hand you have neo cons which are working exclusively for the 1% and wall street.

Don't hate the player, hate the game

>Republican
>Trump's party

This board is Trump's party.

Trump originally ran as a Libertarian but that didn't work out well so he tried again as a Republican in 2016.

i better post about this on facebook

which monitors me, manipulates what i see, and sells it for profit

>The problem is that both those parties are essentially the same fucking party anyway.

I feel like the pic proves otherwise and that "both parties are the same" is a huuuuge meme. parties are split on a ton of issues.

I feel like facebook just wants to sell highly targeted ads though. they don't really give a fuck what you look at.

Shareblue is getting subtle.

Don't reply. Sage.

>no Paul
based

>parties are split on a ton of hot-button topics that have little real-world import but are handy for distracting the masses with useless debate while the important bills get quietly passed with bipartisan support

FTFY

>not a single democrat
Sup Forums will defend this

They didn't vote to pass a new law, this is currently how things are now. They just shut down a law proposed by Obama that would not allow ISPs to monitor you. The logic behind this is that no company should be denied privileges that other internet companies receive. Fuck off shill.

wtf i love billionaire globalists now!

>the parties both being controlled opposition is a huge meme

Sweetie...

so you're agreeing with how they voted? and I'm the shill? lmao. defend repubs in the face of logic and call me a shill. hahahaahahahahha.

Democrats didn't vote on healthcare either despite the majority of blue states premiums about to implode on itself just to be anti trump.

It's all a sham.

>in the face of logic
???

not really the end game is usually the same anyway outside of your shitty meme single voter issues like abortion

>Democrats didn't vote on healthcare either

When was the vote?

but Dems weren't even a factor. I mean think of this way. Dems aren't even needed for it to pass, yet Trump couldn't get enough Repubs to vote for it... Repubs who have been waiting years to repeal and replace. if the plan is that shitty how can you say Dems were just opposing Repubs (a large number of whom agree w Dems about the plan being shit)

Oh wow, I didn't realize that. but sure enough:

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services”.

>Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services” (81 Fed. Reg. 87274 (December 2, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

OH DEAR GOD THINGS ARE GOING TO BE THE SAME AS THEY WERE LAST THANKSGIVING THE WORLD IS OVER DRUMPF DESTROYED EVERYTHING THE RUSSIANS HAVE SEIZED CONTROL OF THE WORLD

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entryism

Grow up...

you have an American flag so I assume you're familiar with English idioms. what's the problem?

Just the other day.

Politics isn't about politics anymore, it's about principles.
The democrat party has just become the Anti-Trump party, mostly because they think it's the only way to keep the collective of people it has under its belt together by focusing only on what they unanimously agree on.

The republicans did the same with obama and hillary to try and unite the neo con, libertarians and conservatives.
It doesn't work when you actually have to discuss poltics to make boogeymen out of common enemies, decades ago, you'd pick up a few democrats for a bill like this.

he was pointing out that it was pulled, never voted on. which means Trump knew Republicans weren't interested in voting for it either. which means Dems and Republicans agreed - it was shit.

That is liberal programming.

Going across the aisle was always how politics was done, granted corruption always reared it's ugly head that way as well, Obama didn't pass ACA and the Stimulis package with only democrat support, but there were democrats that did not support it.

The reality is, if hillary was elected and the democrats had a super majority, they wouldn't get the votes to change obamacare either even though a lot of them desperately want to.

The republican freedom caucus didn't vote to repeal and replace because all they wanted was a removal back to the old ways and they knew that letting obamacare implode is the easiest way to do that.

Both parties cause us to suffer, the ones who put the plan in, and the ones who don't remove it.

This is reality and you have to accept it.

exactly this

What was the final vote total on this "vote" you're referring to

What logic was presented ???

You are factitiously asking questions you believe you already know the answers.

Are you stating there is logic to your answers?

They can be boiled down to;
>everything I disagree with is bad because I don't agree with bad people

Your initial question, provide the logic behind why you think your OP is bad.

do you think having a pres that isn't a complete cunt of a person who constantly spews hate in every direction would help to get the left and right to agree on legislation?

About Nay 9 niggers and Yay 11 faggots.

Hillary would've been the exact same situation, the political overton window is done. We are entering into an age where policy doesn't matter, it's political commercialism.

You like Wendy's over Mcdonalds'? Well fuck you faggot, I hate you and there is nothing we can agree on.

And those "partisan" issues you posted above that make them appear superficiously different, you are eating the same processed shit whether you like it or not, but actually defending one side over what shit you get to swallow is brain dead tier.

It's an illusion of an opinion.

>Monitor you
they already do that
>Manipulate what you see
Just like google, youtube, facebook, cnn, nbc, etc all do already
>Sell it all
As long as it's done without giving away your identity there's no issue here (ie name, address, etc).

Other private companies already do this.

OP most likely watched some retarded youtuber like h3h3 who didn't realize this was already something we had and made a video that has advertisments enabled that unduly scares people with the prospect of change while not actually changing anything and making money off of it.

Really makes you think.