Daily reminder: if you receive Communion you are committing a sin

Everytime i go to church, everyone except me recieves Communion. This is bullshit because if you have ANY sin you are committing a sin itself by participating in the Eucharist.
Jesus himself said "even the most just man commits 7 sins a day". What's your excuse for insulting Christ's sacrifice?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_Korea
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>worshipping a Jew on a stick

Lmoa

do not take the lord's supper unworthy


I was invited to a communion service at a church once.. I declined because I knew I was living outside the spirit following my flesh... I knew this because I was born again...

it's only mortal sin.

Taking the eucharist itself comes with the forgiveness of venial sins.

...

That's only for mortal sins user.
One of the things the Eucharist does is cleanse the reciever of venial sins.

After confession of mortal sin can you recieve Eucharist.. premarital sex is a mortal sin. We all commit that and i know we all do. There's no fucking way every single person except me is having premarital sex

I've seen better shitposting from a Canadian I know.

It is only sinful to receive the Eucharist when one has not first gone to confess any mortal sins one has committed. Venial sins do not make one unworthy of communion.

Get catechized.

Edit: every person except me is refraining from premarital sex

>goes to church
>complains that everybody is worshipping wrong

Really makes you think

>implying anyone on pol can even convince someone to sleep with them

Premarital sex is a mortal sin, we all commit this.. penance for this is usually 3 days long.. you usually confess on Saturday. You cannot recieve Eucharist the next day because you're not forgiven until Tuesday. You will always commit this sin before the next Sunday

The Eucharist is a bizarre practice, it has nothing to with the bible, or being a christian.

None of the early christians did, neither do any of the real current christians do it. Because it's just disturbing, you're LITERALLY you're pretending you sacrifice Christ anew and then eat him.

There is no such thing as "mortal" sin and ... any other kind.
all sins are mortal and they are innumerable. Narrow is the path that leads to life. All other paths lead to death. That is the essence of sin. If you don't partake of communion because you "broke a rule" you have a very poor understanding of Christ and salvation.

Or you're a fucking heretic. Praise kek.

>We all commit that
Speak for yourself. 36 yo virgin christian here. But I can share OP's opinion on having communion without confessing before.

Only a Protestant would think that's a crazy concept

It takes dignity to walk up there with your arms crossed.

Waiting until marriage for it. I'm engaged.

>None of the early christians did it

wew
e
w

lad.

lol
Dude, all Christians believed in a literal Eucharist up until late in the Protestant Revolution. Do you really think Christians had it wrong for over 1,500 years?

The tradition was started with Christ and the disciples themselves

You are pure, you are one of the few that deserve to recieve christ. But you are rare in modern day. I'm literally the ONLY one that won't recieve Communion because i have premarital sex, and i see many many people my age recieving it and i know they are lying. There's no way i am the only one out of 100 people unworthy of recieving christ.

This

Muh tepid Anglican church has no rituals or mysticism so they're unnatural.

>only pretending
We don't pretend, we don't do symbolism, it is His body.

Confession has totally disappeared here because of vatican II and the socialization of Christianism. The only thing that disturbs me more than having Communion without confessing is the priest holding the Mass facing the people and not the Christ.

how does this apply to people in the east? I mean Asians dont believe in this mumbo jumbo bs... does that mean only westerners are entitled?

I'm just tryina eat some food at church, shit nigger damn

This didn't even sink in 100% when I first read it, that's great.

I was raised evangelical. We still took communion, but we enjoyed and played up the shiggydiggy sacrificed anew bits.

>t.literal pizzabagel
STOP JEWING. LITERALLY STOP TURNING MY FATHER'S HOUSE INTO A MARKETPLACE.
>Catholics
Not even once.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_Korea
>The 2005 South Korean census showed 29.2 percent of the population as Christian, up from 26.3 percent ten years previously.

oh?

"DO THIS IN MEMORY OF ME"

THE LORD'S SUPPER IS MEANT TO REMIND US OF HIS SACRIFICE AND OUT MEMBERSHIP IN HIS BODY.

MAKING IT INTO SOME RE-SACRIFICE MYSTICAL EVENT IS EXTRA-BIBLICAL CATHOLIC MUMBOJUMBO AND I WAS RAISED CATHOLIC AND MY UNCLE IS A PRIEST

If it was meant to remind wouldn't he say "remember this", not "do this"?

Nigga, if you ain't Roman Catholic this shit doesn't apply.. what do you think?

>DO THIS
do it exactly, not do it but think it's just some bread. You don't eat Jesus, you allow him into you, the priest transmute the bread into the Christ. This is Christianity 101 here.

Protestants aren't Catholic.. you are protesting the first church

no because the act makes the impression...

jesus came in the flesh and died actually... he didn't just think ;"Ok I now forgive all sin"

Waiting for marriage master race here. Premarital sex is a retarded idea. Why would you cheapen the bond between man and woman to turn it into a throwaway thrill? Then if you have a baby, you're faced with either trying to force it and pretend you're making an immature dating for fun relationship into the real close loving relationship of marriage, or kill the baby because you weren't responsible enough to handle it. Never made sense to me unless you're just a dumb animal without any self control.

venial sins are remitted during the penitential rite at the start of mass.

the first church? you mean the first Roman catholic Church.


the first congregations didn't view the communion as the Catholics do ..

it is symbolic.. Jesus' death once for all paid for sin... there is no need or efficacy possible from our considering the communion elements as the literal body of Christ.. this is akin to witchcraft.

Christ is in the cup

he's facing him.

Bro, I've been with my girl 4 years now and i love her more than anything and we are not married. Our sex is sacred, feels like the first time everytime. But it is still sin (i dunno why, but it is). It is not cheapened at all. I appreciate every second and we bond everytime.

lol, KOREANS

Literally dogs basically they have no soul.

all sin was nailed to the cross and forgiven when Jesus died.

Could you explain this from an early christian,

"This food we call the Eucharist, of which no one is allowed to partake except one who believes that the things we teach are true, and has received the washing for forgiveness of sins and for rebirth, and who lives as Christ handed down to us. For we do not receive these things as common bread or common drink; but as Jesus Christ our Savior being incarnate by God's Word took flesh and blood for our salvation, so also we have been taught that the food consecrated by the Word of prayer which comes from him, from which our flesh and blood are nourished by transformation, is the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus."

"First Apology", Ch. 66, inter A.D. 148-155.

"God has therefore announced in advance that all the sacrifices offered in His name, which Jesus Christ offered, that is, in the Eucharist of the Bread and of the Chalice, which are offered by us Christians in every part of the world, are pleasing to Him."

"Dialogue with Trypho", Ch. 117, circa 130-160 A.D.

Not during Communion especially but during all the rest of the time. Priest were facing the back of the church in traditional mass, same way as the people. And I could go with a little latin too, some songs are more powerful in latin.

Only if you are under mortal sin user. Stop spreading heresy.

I don't actually believe in Jeebus, I just go because the Jeebus-crackers are tasty. I wish I could get them in bags.

>it's symbolic
>it's not real

You need to read up on things m'lad. Early christians weren't fedora tipping faggots. Symbolic is the means of transmitting very real things via visible and/or comprehensible things.

so "just" because it's symbolic, doesn't mean it's not REAL.

t. Zainichi-kun

"This food we call the Eucharist, of which no one is allowed to partake except one who believes that the things we teach are true, and has received the washing for forgiveness of sins and for rebirth, and who lives as Christ handed down to us. For we do not receive these things as common bread or common drink; but as Jesus Christ our Savior being incarnate by God's Word took flesh and blood for our salvation, so also we have been taught that the food consecrated by the Word of prayer which comes from him, from which our flesh and blood are nourished by transformation, is the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus."

"First Apology", Ch. 66, inter A.D. 148-155.

"God has therefore announced in advance that all the sacrifices offered in His name, which Jesus Christ offered, that is, in the Eucharist of the Bread and of the Chalice, which are offered by us Christians in every part of the world, are pleasing to Him."

"Dialogue with Trypho", Ch. 117, circa 130-160 A.D.

Could you explain this

"Consider how contrary to the mind of God are the heterodox in regard to the grace of God which has come to us. They have no regard for charity, none for the widow, the orphan, the oppressed, none for the man in prison, the hungry or the thirsty. They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not admit that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, the flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in His graciousness, raised from the dead."

"Letter to the Smyrnaeans", paragraph 6. circa 80-110 A.D.

"Come together in common, one and all without exception in charity, in one faith and in one Jesus Christ, who is of the race of David according to the flesh, the son of man, and the Son of God, so that with undivided mind you may obey the bishop and the priests, and break one Bread which is the medicine of immortality and the antidote against death, enabling us to live forever in Jesus Christ."

-"Letter to the Ephesians", paragraph 20, c. 80-110 A.D.

Oops

>the act of attending the mass dissolves you of your sin, therefor you can receive communion
get with the times

Idk about any heretics.
I know the Orthodox face the altar most of the time, except after the formula, for practical and theological reasons both.

Though joking aside, i wouldn't make it a doctrinal issue. I think we have a nice touch, but there's much bigger problems than facing to be deal with.

Everything but a source. Who said it?

Those wafer things they use for communion are the most godawful shit I've ever had to eat. Its literally fucking cardboard.

Would it kill these niggers to buy a couple of loaves of actual bread and just sprinkle them with holy water or whatever?

Justin Martyr who is an early christian of second century. The works cited can be viewed online for free

...

if our salvation is accomplished by the Eucharist then that says the actual death or Christ was inadequate which is blasphemy.

the commandment of Christ to do it in memory of him says to me the work is accomplished by Him and this supper is so we do not forget it. Not that the sacrifice he made will only be effective if we keep on partaking of the Eucharist ...

Making his death's effect dependent on the ongoing communion is an artifice of the carnal mind.

Yes but your view is completely missing for the first three centuries of christianity

waiting as well, only for a few more months though, don't feel like i missed much either, you're just weak

>so also we have been taught
by whom was this author taught?

there were heresies even in the days of the living apostles.

only the Bible is the word of God.

The Apostles and his teachers duh. Either way that view is practically the mainstream view. The only ones taking your view are literally the gnostics

I don't recognize Popes after Saint Pie X, although I accept the authority of the Church in it's traditional role. actual false pope is speaking about priests marriage, accepting gays in churches and things like that, plus he acts like a non believer in accepting the existence of other religions. Not a new problem but a growing cancer in the Church.

>use holy water to cleanse yourself of venial sin before mass
>go to confession before mass if you have committed a mortal sin
>don't sin during mass
>eat the Body of Christ

That easy.

Umm, no, sweetie.
Hebrews 10:11-12

Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins.
But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God

Premarital sex is mortal sin, anyone 20-30 is committing this sin in modern age. Not heresy but fact. Maybe no one knows premarital sex is mortal sin

Salvation is obviously not fucking complete because you still die you goddamn heretic. Unless you believe in a soul in which case i'd tell you to fuck off into proper Platonism and steer clear of muh christianity.

Christ's BIRTH itself was descent and (re)sanctification of all creation. Death is recapitulation and culmination.

Sanctification and anticipation remains (love, faith, hope) - that is Eucharist

God damn fucking protestant faggots. Fuck you, Roman Catholics for fucking it up.

"Consider how contrary to the mind of God are the heterodox in regard to the grace of God which has come to us. They have no regard for charity, none for the widow, the orphan, the oppressed, none for the man in prison, the hungry or the thirsty. They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not admit that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, the flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in His graciousness, raised from the dead."

"Letter to the Smyrnaeans", paragraph 6. circa 80-110 A.D.

"Come together in common, one and all without exception in charity, in one faith and in one Jesus Christ, who is of the race of David according to the flesh, the son of man, and the Son of God, so that with undivided mind you may obey the bishop and the priests, and break one Bread which is the medicine of immortality and the antidote against death, enabling us to live forever in Jesus Christ."

-"Letter to the Ephesians", paragraph 20, c. 80-110 A.D.

Too bad if you hate the early christians who do it too

my view was present at the last Supper.. what believers devised thereafter may be left up to ones own obedience to God.

Take the Lord's Supper in faith that his death was once for all the payment for your sin. I see no basis to accuse one who regards the Lord's Supper in a Christian service as a symbolic memorial as evidence of an apostate.

>Jesus himself said "even the most just man commits 7 sins a day"
I am not aware of that scripture. Could you tell me where to find it?

I tried my best to not have sex but slipped up and got a handjob from a girl in high school.

Is that the same as premarital sex?

Absolutely not, I'm in true love, and we've been together a long time so ofc we have sex, we even live together. Please refer to But look, I'm commiting a mortal sin for bonding with a woman I'm going to spend the rest of my life with

>confession and penance first
Are you even trying?

Ergo, Paul is an apostate for implying that one is participating in Christ via the Eucharist

Kek

Virgin till marriage here. This is despite women throwing themselves at me (serious)

from a strict point of view, anything that involves genitals is bad, maybe even more.
personally I'd say yes, it counts

M'lad... not only priests, but bishops themselves used to be married.
This monastic circlejerk faggotry needs to be dropped. There is literally no reason for it except "muh elitism".

And if you go "but how will he be devoted enough if he has a family"
Just stop and think about what you're implying.

>We all commit that

Where the hell do you think you're on, Normiebook?

if it's true love, then i see no problem waiting for a few years? also, if you're living together and have sex, why aren't you married yet? there's no reason against it

But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.


the fruit of the Spirit is gentleness...

the sacrifice of Jesus Christ alone pays for sin and the mental assent to a belief in the mystical identification of the elements of the Lord's Supper can add nothing to the efficacy of His Blood.

you are saved by Grace through faith not of works lest any man should boast

How about you stop LARPING dumb white racist

they cannot love anyone as in marriage love except God. Same goes for nuns, they are literally married with the Christ. And he cannot have a family because his family are the people of his church.

Believing in 'salvation' religions is satanic in itself.
I believe in God and I do not need some jesus guy who probably never existed to "save me".

The tongue of proddies are poison

The protestants condemn the early christians out of arrogance and denial

this
Paul said that if you can't restrain yourself, just get married, I have not found anything that says a priest anyone similar should not get married

no. we take the Lord's Supper in memory of Jesus as he instructed.. adding to that simple act a hocus pocus of transubstantiation and a re-sacrificing of Jesus is just beyond scripture.

saved by grace only
Literally a protestant faggot

I told you, read up on early church canons. You will see that they were married. If it was good enough then, it's good enough for me. I don't see where this obsession for monasticism is supposed to take us


except into Montanism.

>look at how special I am
>all of you are plebs compared to me

Too bad Jesus was serious especially in John 6

How? Sex means penis in vagina

If you want sex so much, go fuck a hooker dimwit

Wrong. Sex is genitals motion

Source?

>having a healthy family
>fucking a hooker
>those two being even comparable

this is what Roman Catholicism has done. Secularism didn't bring immorality. It's literally implied in the roots here.

The bible. See what God says in Matthew 6:69

again, I would say the intimacy and all that goes with it are also part of it. I'm not saying you are forever lost or anything, but I do think that anything closely related to sex belongs into marriage
There is no verse that proves that and if you don't agree with me, that's fine too, it's what I feel makes sense and is right, but that's probably about it.

Jesus: "I died for your sins BUT if you don't think in your little mind the Eucharist is literally me and the wine literally my blood then my death can not help you."

Show me that scripture.

If I were at the last Supper and heard Jesus say ; "this is my body which is broken for you." the first thing I would be thinking is he is being symbolic with an object lesson..